Introduction
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is a pivotal legislation that is seen as the cornerstone in the complex landscape of drug regulation in the United States. The ACT, which was enacted in 1970, came into effect against the backdrop of shifts in society and scientific developments that surrounded the critical issue of drug abuse in the country. The ACT was created to orchestrate a regulatory framework to control and classify the manufacture, distribution, and dispensing of substances prone to abuse. The paper will provide insight into the drug abuse issue in the United States and the impact of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in limiting drug abuse.
The History of Drug Abuse in the United States
The drug abuse history in the United States is a complex tapestry interwoven with societal, cultural, economic, and legislative threads. Having a good understanding of this multifaceted narrative is essential and can contextualize drug-related challenges and crafting effective drug control policies from the opium dens of the 19th century to the opioid epidemic of the 21st century, drug abuse evolution does not only change patterns of substance use but also the dynamic responses from the government and society at large. In the 19th century, there was a widespread use of opium and its derivatives. However, there was minimal control on the usage, which resulted in increased addiction of a significant population. Patterson (2023) states that there was a proliferation of opium dens, especially in urban areas where opium was readily available. However, the increased use of opium led to widespread concerns within society, leading to the introduction of the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914. Patterson (2023) states that the Act was meant to regulate drug usage even though it was a revenue collection measure.
The mid-20th century saw a rise in the usage of recreational drugs such as marijuana and psychedelics due to a fueling need to experiment with the drugs and challenge societal norms. Patterson (2023) states that the move to challenge societal norms pushed the government to scrutinize societal behaviours, leading to the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, which later birthed the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The 1980s and 1990s marked an increased war on drugs where the United States government engaged in a multifaceted campaign that involved law enforcement, prevention approaches, and international cooperation to combat the free movement of drugs and ensure there was minimal drug abuse in the country—the 21st century brought in a new wave of drug abuse referred to as the opioid epidemic. There was an increase in the overprescription of opioid painkillers and the proliferation of opioids such as heroin, leading to a surge in overdose deaths. The events brought about by the opioid epidemic led to a paradigm shift where society changed its approach based on how it addressed drug abuse. Furthermore, policymakers and other stakeholders within the organisation began to prioritize harm reduction, prevention, and control as opposed to implementing punitive measures that did not have the desired effect.
Reasons Behind the Policy’s Creation
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA), enacted in 1970, stands as a legislative milestone that changed the approach to drug control in the United States. The country had been thrown into disarray after an increase in substance use over the decades, which led to increased concerns across society. Beletsky (2020) states that the CSA has a legacy based on the impact the PolicyPolicy had in changing the approaches to addressing drug abuse, leading to better outcomes for the country’s population. The Act was enacted to deal with irresponsible drug use because there were societal and public health concerns within the population. The 1960s-70s saw an increase in drug abuse, where individuals were more interested in using opioids as a way to experiment and challenge societal norms. The behaviour change led to a perceived threat to public health and a distortion of society, prompting policymakers to come up with an approach that would curb the increased use of drugs in the country. The Act was also introduced as a consolidation of already existing legislation since there was complexity and disorganization in trying to mitigate drug use in the country. Enacting the CSA was a move that would streamline disparate efforts and provide a framework for managing substance use.
Purpose of the Policy
The PolicyPolicy aims to develop international and local cooperation to ensure that there is a coordinated approach to addressing drug abuse by limiting the movement of drugs across borders. The United States, through the CSA, employs a multifaceted approach that involves law enforcement and other stakeholders to help manage substance use in the country and take legal action on individuals found distributing drugs in the country. The Act also helps prevent drug abuse and dependence by categorizing substances based on their potential for abuse. The classification ensures that law enforcement agencies and other stakeholders can minimize the movement of these drugs, hence limiting access that can lead to increased usage. The CSA is also fundamental in facilitating research and medical use of specific medications within the United States. Though the Act recognizes the effect of drug use in the community, it also acknowledges that banned substances have medicinal value. The Act ensures that certain drugs remain available for medical and scientific purposes. Additionally, the Act helps strike a balance between facilitating essential research and treatment of needy patients and preventing the misuse of drugs. The Act also plays a fundamental role in ensuring public health and safety through controlling access to drugs that may have potential harm to the population.
How the PolicyPolicy has Changed
Over the years, the CSA has undergone several amendments to reflect changing demands within the public and societal attitudes. Additionally, advancements in science have also led to changes in the PolicyPolicy as policymakers look to have drugs with medical benefits used for treatment. Scheduling adjustments have taken place where the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) periodically reviews and adjusts the schedules of controlled substances based on new scientific evidence and considerations. The Act has been changed to meet the plans so that new laws of usage are reflected in the law. The CSA has also been adapted to address the challenges present in the use of synthetic drugs, such as synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinones. The emergence of these drugs led to the adjustment of the CSA to ensure it covers their control so that they are not misused by the public. The medical marijuana legislation also led to changes in the CSA, where there had to be an incorporation of the amendment that provided legal protections to patients and caregivers who needed the substance for medical use. However, the approach led to a disagreement between the state and federal governments over implementing the law. Overall, the CSA has experienced several amendments that have seen the Act accommodate changes in an attempt to address societal changes and ensure there is better control of emerging substances.
How the Policy Has Addressed Issues to Date
Over the years, the PolicyPolicy has tried to manage drug usage to protect the interests of society and ensure there is the management of drugs with the potential for abuse. Policymakers have enacted several amendments to ensure that the PolicyPolicy covers a wide range of emerging drugs but with minimal control. Since its enactment, the government has raged its war on drugs, which has been gaining prominence over the years as policymakers strive to make the United States a drug-free country.
Changes to Make the Policy More Effective
Public-private partnership policies can play a fundamental role in making the CSA more effective in managing substance use. The United Nations (2023) states that public-private partnerships can be essential in increasing response to substance use and ensuring effectiveness. The federal government should consider incorporating the private sector in the war on substance use to provide a multifaceted and multiagency approach to the issue.
Conclusion
The CSA, enacted in 1970, has played a fundamental role over the years by fueling the fight against substance use to ensure public health safety. The PolicyPolicy has changed over the years through the incorporation of amendments that have aimed to address emerging issues. A general and private partnership would help make the PolicyPolicy better and ensure there is a coordinated approach to fighting substance use.
References
Beletsky, L. (2020). Controlled Substances Act at 50: A blueprint for reform. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544384
Patterson, E. (2023, March 1). History of drug abuse and addiction rehabilitation programs. DrugAbuse.com. https://drugabuse.com/addiction/history-drug-abuse/
United Nations. (2023). The path forward – for effective public-private partnerships in drug control. United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/es/donors/the-path-forward.html
write