Argument 1: Hedge against dollar inflation
Thorsten Konig, Ivory Tower’s visionary CEO, considers Bitcoin as a powerful hedge against dollar inflation. Ivory Tower uses Bitcoin’s immutability and principles to strengthen its financial resilience in a world where governments carefully regulate fiat currencies, and inflation is a risk. Thorsten Konig understands the risks of central banks’ unpredictable policies like quantitative easing, which injects extra money into the economy (Wang, 2021). Inflation slowly erodes a currency’s value, affecting firms’ profit and reserves. Bitcoin’s revolutionary design offers to solve this economic problem forever. Its blockchain-based decentralized architecture limits supply to 21 million coins. Bitcoin’s preset scarcity makes it independent of monetary authority (Ravikiran, 2023). As central banks create more dollars, Bitcoin becomes a deflationary asset that protects against inflation. Thorsten Konig’s suggestion to invest some of Ivory Tower’s wealth in Bitcoin is calculated. Ivory Tower protects its wealth from inflation by adding Bitcoin to its financial portfolio. Bitcoin’s durability and growth in a volatile economy make this proposition more appealing. Ivory Tower’s use of Bitcoin acknowledges the worldwide drive toward decentralization and financial sovereignty (Wang, 2021). Ivory Tower is at the forefront of adopting digital currency and blockchain technology, solidifying its position as a forward-thinking company in an ever-changing corporate sector.
Argument 2: High returns on investment
Ivory Tower proponent Thorsten urges the company to consider investing in Bitcoin. He thinks investing some of Ivory Tower’s excess cash in Bitcoin might generate high returns. He argues that Bitcoin’s value would exceed significant fiat currencies in 10 years, possibly yielding ten times the corporation’s profits from traditional investments. Ivory Tower might reap significant gains by adopting an alternate investing method. Thorsten’s idea deserves serious examination (Wang, 2021). First, Bitcoin’s recent rise has been extraordinary. Its value has surged, drawing institutional and private investors. As Bitcoin becomes popular, this pattern implies continuing appreciation. Second, Bitcoin may outperform conventional investing. Bonds and savings accounts have minimal yields due to low-interest rates in several major economies. Thus, cryptocurrency may be an excellent way to diversify the company’s portfolio and boost profits. Ivory Tower can lead a financial revolution by investing in Bitcoin (Wang, 2021). Innovative technology and financial mechanisms show flexibility and forward-thinking, which may impress stakeholders and investors. The company’s readiness to seek unexpected alternatives shows resilience and adaptability, boosting its market image.
Explanation
Ivory Tower should weigh the pros and cons of using Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation, securing the company’s financial assets, and investing in it for high returns and increased profitability. Bitcoin supporters argue that it may hedge against inflation, an increasing problem. Bitcoin is decentralized. Therefore, central banks and government policies cannot devalue it. It is a good choice for keeping the company’s financial reserves and preventing inflation (Rehman et a., 2023). Since Bitcoin’s value has been very stable, adopting it may provide further protection against economic downturns and financial crises. Bitcoin skeptics emphasize cryptocurrency volatility. Bitcoin values have significantly fluctuated, reaching new heights and plummeting almost as quickly. Extreme price fluctuations threaten Ivory Tower’s financial stability (Wang, 2021). If they spend a lot in Bitcoin without hedging, the company might lose a lot. The second argument for Bitcoin investments based on high returns and profitability complicates the decision-making process. Some firms and individuals have profited from Bitcoin investments, but the market’s speculative nature indicates bubbles and collapses. Thus, relying on Bitcoin to make huge profits might put Ivory Tower at risk.
The impact of “fiat currencies” and their inflationary nature compared to Bitcoin
Inflation from money printing
Fiat currencies, like the USD, operate under Governments and central banks. Since they control these currencies, they may use “money printing” to react to economic and financial crises. The mechanism supplies money and injects it into the economy. Economic development, employment, and financial stability are the main goals. If not executed with caution, this strategy can have consequences. The economy’s money supply and goods and services supply become unbalanced when the money supply increases without a corresponding growth in production (Islam et al., 2018). The surplus of money can increase demand for goods and services without increasing supply, causing inflation. Price inflation reduces currency value. Thus, when inflation rises, money buys less. It makes it challenging to satisfy their basic requirements and sustain their lifestyle. Business and consumer uncertainty about future pricing may make financial planning and investment choices difficult.
Moderate inflation boosts consumption and investment, while hyperinflation can have severe consequences. High inflation can destabilize the economy, lower savings, and disrupt business. As buying power declines, it might affect most fixed-income people, like retired ones. Central banks raise interest rates or reduce money supply through open market operations to address inflation (Islam et al., 2018). These measures reduce demand and slow the economy. Central banks can lower interest rates or increase the money supply to boost economic activity during economic slowdowns or recessions. Policymakers must constantly monitor and regulate money printing-induced inflation. Maintaining economic stability requires balancing economic growth and inflation. Loss of faith in the currency and the central bank’s capacity to preserve it may increase inflationary pressures. A sensible monetary policy is necessary to maintain the currency’s value and economic growth.
Relative weakness to de-dollarization
De-dollarization is a move by governments and companies to reduce dependence on the US dollar as the global reserve currency, which has become a phenomenon with far-reaching effects. The US’s role as the world’s reserve currency has given it economic and geopolitical power. However, the uncontrolled expansion of the money supply and rising worries about fiat currencies have raised doubts about the US dollar’s long-term worth, causing a significant loss of trust in its future (Islam et al., 2018). De-dollarization has started as governments and investors seek alternate value repositories. The complex de-dollarization movement reflects growing concerns about a monetary system based on a single dominating currency. The US has had several advantages, including the “exorbitant privilege” of issuing the world’s reserve currency. Because numerous countries retain sizeable foreign currency reserves in US dollars, the US can fund its deficits at lower interest rates. US dollars dominate worldwide commerce, highlighting the currency’s global importance. However, the global financial environment has changed, revealing the risks of over-reliance on the US dollar. During the 2008 financial crisis, the US Federal Reserve printed money. Money printing at such a scale has raised concerns about growing inflation and the viability of fiat currencies (Rehman et a., 2023). Geopolitics have also influenced de-dollarization. As tensions between the US and other major economies increased, multiple nations reduced their dollar exposure to offset financial penalties and gain more economic power. These states have aggressively sought bilateral and multilateral trade agreements in their domestic or reserve currencies. Central banks are diversifying their foreign currency reserves into other currencies and precious commodities like gold. Private investors have also considered cryptocurrencies as hedges against currency devaluation and global financial instability.
How These Impacts Make Bitcoin More Attractive
Inflation Hedge
Bitcoin’s unique properties make it an inflation hedge. Bitcoin has a 21-million-coin supply limit, making it more scarce than fiat currencies, which governments may print forever. Bitcoin’s fixed supply separates it from conventional currencies and has drawn interest as a possible inflation hedge. Fiat currencies lose value in times of economic instability or excessive money printing. The slow loss of buying power may impact long-term wealth preservation for people and corporations. With its scarcity and invulnerability to manipulation, Bitcoin is a viable option for value storage (Islam et al., 2018). Mining generates Bitcoins at a decreasing and predictable pace. Thus, its supply expansion is not vulnerable to abrupt surges or arbitrary power. Investors are confident because the fixed supply protects their investment from fiat currency inflation. Bitcoin’s decentralized structure prevents any business or government from manipulating its value or supply. A transparent and immutable blockchain network makes the coin more trustworthy.
Store of Value
Investors and institutions are de-dollarizing amid inflation and geopolitical concerns. Due to its decentralization, worldwide acceptability, and limited quantity, Bitcoin is an attractive alternative. Bitcoin’s diversification potential appeals as conventional fiat currencies face uncertainty. Bitcoin’s decentralization, free from political control, gives it an edge in a world of uncertainty. This characteristic reassures investors and institutions. Bitcoin’s international acceptability provides an appealing escape from national constraints or currency devaluation. Bitcoin’s 21 million-coin supply makes it an attractive store of value. As central banks print more money, fiat currencies may inflate. Bitcoin’s restricted supply protects it against fiat currency devaluation (Rehman et a., 2023). Long-term investors see Bitcoin as a hedge against the risks of depending on a single fiat currency, regardless of its short-term volatility (Islam et al., 2018). Geopolitical conflicts and economic uncertainty may significantly affect national currencies, making Bitcoin more appealing.
Potential for High Returns
Thorsten’s case study highlights Bitcoin’s potential as a high-yield investment. He believes the cryptocurrency’s value will rise, making it a good investment. Considering this, transferring some of Ivory Tower’s excess cash reserves to Bitcoin might provide high returns. Such a high return potential is expected to attract Bitcoin investors seeking growth (Rehman et a., 2023). Bitcoin’s appeal is an attractive investment asset. Thorsten believes Bitcoin’s value will rise because of its limited supply and growing institutional investor and mainstream financial institution acceptance. He believes these forces might support the cryptocurrency’s worth. Ivory Tower may capitalize on Bitcoin’s exponential growth by wisely deploying surplus cash reserves. Bitcoin’s appeal increases since conventional investments may provide different returns. Cryptocurrencies are risky, given their volatility, regulatory changes, and market sentiment.
The volatility and speculative characteristics of the cryptocurrency market make adopting and investing in Bitcoin risky. When reporting Bitcoin on financial records, the need for transparent accounting standards makes things much more difficult. Therefore, businesses must use caution and wisdom, carefully weighing the benefits and drawbacks of using Bitcoin or any other digital currency. Making educated decisions about incorporating cryptocurrencies into their financial strategies necessitates a thorough awareness of the dangers and a willingness to work through challenging accounting issues. Enterprises must carefully balance the potential benefits against uncertainties and volatility to ensure a well-informed and responsible approach to Bitcoin adoption.
References
Islam, M. R., Nor, R. M., Al-Shaikhli, I. F., & Mohammad, K. S. (2018, July). Cryptocurrency vs. fiat currency: architecture, algorithm, cashflow & ledger technology on the emerging economy: the influential facts of cryptocurrency and fiat currency. In 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M) (pp. 69–73). IEEE.
Ravikiran A S. (2023). What is Blockchain Technology? How Does Blockchain Work? [Updated]. Simplilearn.com. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/blockchain-tutorial/blockchain-technology#:~:text=It%20exists%20on%20a%20decentralized
Rehman, M. U., Katsiampa, P., Zeitun, R., & Vo, X. V. (2023). Conditional dependence structure and risk spillovers between bitcoin and fiat currencies. Emerging Markets Review, 55, 100966.
Wang, C. C. Y. (2021). Should We Embrace Crypto? (HBR Case Study) ^ R2106X. HBR Store. https://store.hbr.org/product/should-we-embrace-crypto-hbr-case-study/r2106x?sku=R2106X-PDF-ENG
write