The extent to which Plato’s and Augustine’s political theories impacted Western politics cannot be quantified due to their immense significance. Plato, a 4th century BC Greek philosopher, and Augustine, a Christian theologian who lived in the 4th to 5th centuries AD, presented distinct ideologies concerning individual roles and institutional significance within society. This essay scrutinizes their respective philosophical stances by presenting their similarities and differences. It also explains how they view individuals’ roles along with that of political institutions.
The political philosophy of Plato is an intricate and multifaceted topic. It encompasses many ideas, ranging from governance to justice and beyond. The exposition of his theories includes a tough webbing of suppositions about the nature and purpose of society and human beings. To fully comprehend this philosophy requires an understanding and an appreciation for its nuanced complexities. These complexities have been explored by countless scholars over centuries past until now in our modern age, where it still holds relevance today.
In “The Republic,” Plato espouses his political theory centered on the ideal society. Within this structure are three distinct classes of individuals: governors, warriors, and laypeople, with each group having its place in a hierarchical order (Kiarie & Kinoti, 2022). The governor class is comprised entirely of philosopher-kings who possess exceptional wisdom to implement just governance for all people under them, while the warrior class diligently guards against any threat or danger that may befall the state itself; finally, artisans and farmers belong to a shared pool of citizenry performing crucial roles which contribute towards development without directly ruling over it themselves.
Per Plato, people’s place in society should be determined by their inherent abilities. He contended that one must receive roles based on innate talents rather than social standing or affluence (Kiarie & Kinoti, 2022). e. His ideal community is built around this concept following the principle of justice, which he felt could only be attained through seamless synchronization between all individuals and societal strata.
The significance attributed to political institutions is unparalleled within Plato’s political philosophy. As per his view, philosopher-kings must rule over all affairs state-wise, having adequately furnished themselves with immense knowledge for fair governance. He also posited that laws should be what governs rather than subjective impulses generated by individuals; they ought to originate and persist grounded on reasonableness and uprightness while being impartially enforced wherever applicable (Klein & Schillinger, 2021).
According to Plato’s philosophy, political structures must prioritize the greater good rather than furthering the desires of those in power. The perspective holds that governmental entities ought to attend to the fundamental requirements of their populace, including sustenance, accommodation, and apparel. In addition, he believed that governments should take responsibility for educating individuals so they have sufficient comprehension and awareness needed to lead themselves toward just governance.
The political philosophy of Augustine warrants great consideration. It possesses a complexity and depth that must be noticed. Upon scrutinizing his labor, he harbored an extraordinary aptitude for discerning the intricate nuances of politics and their interplay with society. The works he produces are not only illuminating but also stimulate curiosity through their examination of the impact that governing bodies hold in shaping our perceptions. Through his words, we come to appreciate just how vital philosophical inquiry can be when engaging with issues concerning power dynamics within societies across periods throughout history – concepts that continue holding relevance today even amidst changing times.
The political ideology of Augustine is unveiled in “The City of God,” where he thoroughly explores the interconnectedness between Earthly cities (governments) and heavenly ones (religious institutions). Inherent to Augustine’s viewpoint is that human society embodies flaws, rendering it impossible to generate an unblemished community on Earth (Kabala, 2020). He postulates that societal objectives should center on readying individuals for eternity rather than establishing and promoting individuals’ well-being while on Earth.
Augustine, a prominent figure in Christian philosophy, argued that the ethical conduct of individuals within society should be governed by moral maxims founded on religion. He urged people to strive to live following divine instructions while embodying love and empathy as guiding principles. In Augustine’s philosophical construct, human societies’ primary objective is not to promote earthly prosperity. Instead, it is aimed at aiding individual souls to attain salvation from an inherently sinful existence.
Within Augustine’s political philosophy, the church holds a more crucial position than political institutions. According to his beliefs, the state must be subservient while being directed by ecclesiastical governance in its policies (Kabala, 2020). The exemplar of the Christian maxim ought to govern State actions, and laws should align with church doctrines, as argued by Augustine.
Augustine posited that political systems ought to prioritize the promotion of Christian morality over enhancing the well-being of its citizens. He maintained that safeguarding citizens from external dangers was an indispensable government responsibility, although the core responsibility is embedded in enhancing moral welfare. In Augustine’s view, the state’s duty entailed backing up religious organizations while allowing them to cater to their followers’ spiritual needs.
Plato and Augustine had divergent concepts concerning the position of an individual in society as well as political establishments. While Plato held that a person’s societal function should be defined by their inherent capabilities, Augustine contended that Christian principles were to guide individuals on this front instead (Chmelík & Petrovčić, 2018). According to Plato, nothing was more crucial than political systems with philosopher-kings at the helm; conversely, according to Augustine, the church supersedes politics’ significance, given that it governs statecraft through its precepts based upon Christianity.
When considering the significance of governmental organizations, Plato asserted that society needed to cater to the material requirements of its citizens. Conversely, Augustine posited that prioritizing ethical prosperity should be a primary focus. According to Plato’s beliefs, schooling ought to fall under state responsibility, while according to Augustine’s perspective, religious institutions were responsible for catering toward spiritual welfare.
The ideologies of Plato and Augustine exhibit unanimity concerning the significance of political arrangements and an individual’s contribution. Both Plato and Augustine were proponents of the significance encapsulated within political institutions. In line with his philosophy, Plato regarded the state as paramount among other institutions and concluded that it should operate on principles enhancing justice and equality (Rohmann, 2020). He proposed for wise individuals who possess virtue in abundance to govern over said states; these persons would only merit selection after they undergo a rigorous program starting with educational means through training procedures. Augustine believed that political groups or institutions, such as the government, were responsible for protecting their citizens from the harms of threats while supporting their spiritual affairs (Rohmann, 2020).
Both Plato and Augustine shared a common belief in the significance of individuality. While Plato argued that the state should care for its citizens, he also promoted an idea where individuals accept serving their country by prioritizing national needs over personal agendas. Augustine amplified the role of individuals as giving service to God.
Both philosophers held perspectives that aimed at improving the responsibility of the church institutions and the governance while vesting roles to them. The perception held by Augustine notably expresses the need for governance in the society engraved on the Christian principles to foster a just and equitable society.
In conclusion, Plato and Augustine held conflicting political doctrines which were reflective of their respective cultural upbringings and the periods in which they lived. While advancing his philosophy, Plato emphasized political institutions significantly, whereas Augustine centered his teachings around religion, particularly Christianity. Regarding governance structures, Plato advocated for philosopher-kings while advocating Christian principles was central to how Augustine believed leaders should govern states. Ultimately both philosophers played critical roles in shaping Western thoughts about politics and society – ideas that endure even presently today. Despite disparate political leanings between Plato and Augustine, both individuals shared a common preoccupation with improving society and individual constituents. While establishing an ideal state ruled by philosopher-kings was Plato’s pursuit of justice in society, on the contrary, Christian morality and church guidance were what Augustine believed would lead to achieving social equity. Nevertheless, these distinctions notwithstanding, each great thinker recognized that political institutions were essential in influencing societal living standards – moral/ethical inclinations included. Nowadays, their legacies still influence ongoing discussions regarding the government’s place vis-a-vis religious involvement within politics’ ambit.
References
Chmelík, J., & Petrovčić, M. (2018). The Interplay between Plato’s and Augustine’s Conceptions of the State. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Ethics and Aesthetics in Political Theory: The New Paradigm of Responsible Citizenship” (pp. 72-85). Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade.
Kabala, B. Z. (2020). Augustine and Contemporary Republicanism: On Speech as Domination. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 15-26.
Kiarie, J. M., & Kinoti, P. K. (2022). The Political Thought of Plato and Augustine: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 11(1), 36-45.
Klein, L., & Schillinger, D. (2021). Entangling Plato: A Guide through the Political Theory Archive. Political Theory, 0090591721998073.
Rohmann, C. (2020). Plato and Augustine on the Soul: A Comparison of the Phaedo and Confessions. In Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages (pp. 203-220). Springer.
write