Social Media Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
Social media has become an increasingly popular platform. Individuals express themselves and interact with others through online networks. Gay men, in particular, have been known to use social media to connect with others within their communities. They also explore their identities. Gay men in society experience certain stressors and challenges that might lower their self-esteem. These challenges have been studied using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory (MMST).
Boot-Haury (2023) examined the relationship between social media use and self-esteem in 146 gay men. The study found that social media use was positively correlated with self-esteem, suggesting that social media may provide a supportive environment for gay men to connect with others and enhance their self-worth. However, the study did not explore the specific mechanisms by which social media may impact self-esteem. Another study by Holthaus (2020) investigated the effects of social media use on body image and self-esteem among gay men. The study found that social media use was associated with higher levels of body dissatisfaction but did not significantly impact self-esteem. The author suggests that social media may be a platform for comparing physical appearance, leading to adverse effects on body image.
In a recent study, Meyer et al. (2021) looked at the connection between 463 gay men’s usage of social media, minority stress, and self-esteem. The study’s findings show that social media use may be a coping strategy for homosexual men experiencing minority stress because it was found to be adversely linked with minority stress and favorably associated with self-esteem. According to the authors, social media may give gay men a platform to connect with people who have experienced and faced comparable difficulties.
Despite these studies’ valuable contributions, the literature has several gaps. Firstly, there is a lack of research exploring the specific mechanisms by which social media impacts gay men’s self-esteem. Future studies could investigate whether social media provides a platform for favorable social comparison, validation, and support from other gay men. Second, the available literature focuses too little on social media use and self-esteem. Additional influences on gay men’s self-esteem should be studied. They include such as prejudice, stigma, and internalized homophobia.
Moreover, Boot-Haury’s (2023) study did not look into the particular social media platforms or activities that might have distinct effects on self-esteem, even though it discovered a favorable association between homosexual men’s use of social media and their self-esteem. Future studies could examine how certain social media platforms and activities affect homosexual men’s self-esteem. Then, it ought to offer suggestions for responsible social media usage. Finally, the majority of researchers have used small sample sizes. They restrict the generalizability of results. Finding more subtle patterns and connections could be possible by conducting more thorough investigations with varied populations of gay men.
Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory has provided a useful framework for comprehending the particular stresses and difficulties that gay men encounter in society. According to studies, social media may offer a welcoming environment for homosexual men to interact with others. Therefore, it improves their sense of self-worth. However, knowledge gaps in the literature must be filled. It will aid in properly comprehending the connection between this population’s social media usage and self-esteem.
Affective Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
Much research has been done using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory (MMST) to study the particular stresses and difficulties homosexual men face, such as those relating to affective involvement and self-esteem. According to research, affective engagement—a person’s emotional response to various stimuli and experiences—is critical in determining homosexual men’s sense of self-worth.
The MMST was utilized as a framework in a study by Convertino et al. (2021) to examine the connection between minority stress, affective involvement, and self-esteem in a sample of 204 gay men. According to the study, affective involvement and self-esteem were adversely correlated with minority stressors such as persecution and discrimination. Additionally, it was discovered that affective engagement mediates the link between minority stressors and self-esteem, which raises the possibility that unfavorable emotional reactions to stress may impact homosexual men’s self-esteem.
Another study by Holthaus (2020) looked into how homosexual men’s resilience and self-esteem are promoted by positive affective interaction. The study discovered that even under minority stressors, positive affective involvement was positively correlated with resilience and self-esteem. According to the author, encouraging positive emotional involvement may be a fruitful way to help gay men build resilience and self-worth. Similarly, Mijas et al. (2020) study on a sample of 200 gay men looked at the connection between minority stress, positive emotional engagement, and self-esteem. The study discovered that even in minority stress, pleasant affective involvement was positively connected with self-esteem. The authors contend that one effective tactic for reducing the damaging effects of minority stress on self-esteem is to encourage positive emotional involvement.
There still needs to be more in the literature despite the important contributions made by these investigations. First, most research has used self-report measures of affective engagement, which may be biased and may not fully reflect people’s emotional experiences. Future research could provide more accurate measurements of affective engagement using physiological indicators like heart rate variability. Second, rather than emphasizing positive affective involvement, most studies have concentrated on negative affective engagement, such as worry and depression. More investigation could focus on how positive emotional interaction might boost homosexual men’s self-esteem.
Furthermore, the current study has concentrated on individual-level factors, such as minority stress and affective involvement. Still, it has not examined how broader societal and cultural elements, including heteronormativity and homophobia, affect gay men’s affective engagement and sense of self-worth. Finally, while Convertino et al.’s (2021) study identified persecution and discrimination as predictors of decreased affective involvement and poorer self-esteem among gay men, it did not examine other minority stressors, such as internalized homophobia and concealment. Future research could expand the scope of minority stressors to understand better how different stressors affect affective involvement and self-esteem among gay men.
Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory offers a helpful framework for comprehending the intricate connections between gay men’s self-esteem, affective engagement, and minority stress. According to studies, encouraging positive emotional engagement may boost homosexual men’s resilience and sense of self-worth. More research is required to completely comprehend the complex and numerous aspects influencing this population’s affective involvement and self-esteem.
Behavioral Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
Gay men’s behavioral involvement and self-esteem have been examined concerning minority stressors using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory (MMST). According to a study, self-esteem among gay men is significantly shaped by behavioral engagement, defined as a person’s active participation in activities and social interactions.
In one study, Weeks et al. (2023) examined how gay men’s behavioral involvement was affected by minority stressors. According to the study, incidents of victimization and discrimination were linked to decreased behavioral engagement. They include social disengagement and avoidance of social interactions. Additionally, it was discovered that a strong predictor of poorer self-esteem among gay males was less behavioral involvement.
Similarly, a study by Ouellette et al. (2023) looked into how 246 gay and bisexual men’s self-esteem, behavioral involvement, and minority stress interacted. The study discovered that discrimination and victimization experiences were linked to decreased behavioral engagement, such as decreased social support and participation in social activities. Additionally, a lower level of behavioral involvement mediated the link between minority stress and lower self-esteem. Binion & Gray’s (2020) research also examined how minority pressures affected young gay and bisexual men’s behavioral engagement and self-esteem. The study discovered that discrimination and victimization experiences were linked to decreased behavioral engagement, such as decreased social support and participation in social activities. In addition, poorer behavioral involvement among young gay and bisexual males substantially predicted lower self-esteem.
There are still gaps in the literature despite these worthwhile contributions. First of all, most research has relied on self-report behavioral engagement metrics, which may be biased and may not correctly reflect people’s real behavior. Future research could employ objective metrics, like short ecological evaluation, to evaluate behavioral involvement more precisely. Moreover, the literature currently in circulation focuses exclusively on the detrimental impacts of minority stresses on behavioral engagement and self-esteem but does not examine potential protective factors that may mitigate these negative effects. Future studies should examine how coping mechanisms and social support affect homosexual men’s behavioral involvement and sense of self-worth. Last, the current literature mainly concentrates on individual-level factors, such as minority stress and behavioral engagement. It has not examined broader social and cultural factors, such as heteronormativity and homophobia, influencing behavioral engagement and self-esteem among gay men.
Finally, while Weeks et al.’s (2023) study identified victimization and discrimination as predictors of decreased behavioral involvement and poorer self-esteem among gay men, it did not investigate the mechanisms that underlie these relationships. Future research could examine the underlying processes and factors explaining how minority stressors lead to reduced behavioral involvement and self-esteem among gay men. It would provide a more nuanced understanding of the experiences of this population.
A useful framework for comprehending the intricate connections between minority stress, behavioral engagement, and self-esteem among gay men is provided by Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. According to studies, gay men are more likely to participate in less behavior and have poorer self-esteem when they have experienced discrimination and victimization. More research is required to completely comprehend the complex and numerous aspects influencing this population’s behavioral engagement and self-esteem.
Cognitive Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
Cognitive engagement describes a person’s active participation in cognitive functions like memory, concentration, and attention. According to research, gay men’s self-esteem is mostly shaped by their cognitive involvement (Wang et al., 2021). The effect of minority stresses on cognitive engagement and self-esteem in this demographic has been investigated using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory (MMST).
In one study, Wang et al. (2021) looked at how 256 gay men’s cognitive engagement and self-esteem were affected by internalized homophobia, a type of minority stress. The research discovered that lower levels of cognitive involvement were linked to internalized homophobia. It also predicted poorer levels of gay men’s self-esteem and included lower levels of attention and concentration. The study also discovered that the association between internalized homophobia and self-esteem was mediated by cognitive engagement. It demonstrates how critical thinking skills are while evaluating the worth of gay men.
In a research published in 2020, Correro & Nielson discovered comparable outcomes. The authors looked at how minority pressures affected the cognitive engagement and self-esteem of 238 gay and bisexual males. Victimization and discrimination are two of them. The study found cognitive involvement was lower in gay guys who had endured victimization and discrimination. They require focus and attention. An indicator of lower self-esteem was this. The study also discovered that the connection between minority stress and self-esteem was significantly mediated by cognitive engagement.
Binion & Gray (2020) carried out a related investigation. In a sample of 246 gay and bisexual guys, they looked at the effects of heterosexist discrimination, a kind of minority stress, on cognitive engagement and self-esteem. The study found a link between heterosexist discrimination and poorer levels of cognitive engagement. They include focus and attention, both associated with poorer gay male self-esteem. The study also discovered that the association between self-esteem and heterosexist prejudice was partially mediated by cognitive engagement.
The literature still needs to be filled despite these important additions. First, the current work has mostly concentrated on the detrimental impacts of minority stresses on cognitive engagement and self-esteem. Still, it has not examined potential protective characteristics that may buffer against these negative effects. Future studies should examine how coping mechanisms and social support affect LGBT men’s cognitive engagement and self-esteem. Second, the current literature has mainly concentrated on individual-level factors, such as minority stress and cognitive engagement, but has not examined the role of broader social and cultural factors, like heteronormativity and homophobia, in determining cognitive engagement and self-esteem among gay men.
Additionally, the study by Wang et al. (2021) lacked a diverse sample population comprising only gay men. Therefore, it is uncertain whether the study’s findings would apply to other LGBTQ+ members. The research only examined how internalized homophobia affected cognitive engagement and self-esteem. It did not examine factors contributing to internalized homophobia, like societal discrimination and prejudice. Future research could investigate these factors to understand better how internalized homophobia affects individuals from the LGBTQ+ community.
Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory offers a helpful framework for comprehending the intricate connections between gay men’s self-esteem, cognitive involvement, and minority stress. According to studies, discrimination and victimization experiences are linked to lower cognitive engagement, which predicts worse self-esteem in gay males. More research is necessary to completely comprehend the intricate and numerous influences determining this population’s cognitive engagement and self-esteem.
Justification of How the Research Question would address Literature Gaps and Potential Ethical Research Concerns
The research question “Does social media use, affective engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement predict Gay’s men self-esteem?” would address several literature gaps related to the impact of various factors on self-esteem among gay men. The distinctive effects of social media use, affective involvement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement on self-esteem can be specifically examined using this research issue, which still needs to be thoroughly addressed in the literature.
This research question could also address the ethical issues surrounding researching homosexual men’s experiences, as it is crucial to ensure that research is handled responsibly and sensitively. Instead of concentrating simply on negative experiences like discrimination and victimization, researchers can take a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to studying the experiences of this demographic by looking at numerous aspects that affect gay men’s self-esteem (Boot-Haury, 2023). Avoiding stigmatizing or pathologizing homosexual men and advocating for a more upbeat and supportive approach to understanding their experiences can be helpful.
However, researchers should be mindful of potential ethical issues while using social media. They must know the moral challenges of maintaining participant confidentiality and privacy. Participants should be aware of the techniques employed to get their data. They should also know how to collect and analyze their data and the precautions to preserve their confidentiality and privacy (Wang et al., 2021). Researchers should also consider the potential consequences of social media use on participants’ mental health and well-being and take precautions to avoid negative outcomes.
The study question “Does social media use, affective engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement predict Gay’s men’s self-esteem?” would generally close significant gaps in the body of knowledge. It will also offer insightful information about the intricate connections between social media use, engagement, and self-esteem among gay men, all while considering ethical considerations related to the study population.
Implications of the Study for Scholar-practitioners
According to the research review’s summary, gay men’s self-esteem is negatively impacted by minority stresses such as victimization and discrimination. Engagement in affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes also influences the link between minority stressors and self-esteem (Binion & Gray, 2020). Particularly, cognitive involvement is important in determining homosexual men’s sense of self-worth. Consequently, a study examining the connection between homosexual men’s social media usage, affective involvement, behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, and self-esteem may have important ramifications for scholar-practitioners. Such a study could specifically shed light on how these different variables affect gay men’s self-esteem (Holthaus, 2020). For instance, the study might show whether social media increases cognitive engagement, indicating greater self-esteem in gay males. The study might also examine whether behavioral engagement predicted greater self-esteem levels in gay men and whether affective engagement, such as pleasant emotions and mood, is related to higher levels of behavioral engagement.
For scholar-practitioners, such a study has important consequences. First, the study may contribute to therapies and programs to boost LGBT men’s self-esteem and general well-being (Binion & Gray, 2020). In particular, if the study identifies social media use, affective involvement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement as predictors of self-esteem among gay men, interventions that concentrate on these elements could be implemented (Holthaus, 2020). For instance, interventions could be planned to encourage social media use favorably, increase involvement in neighborhood events, and boost happy feelings and moods.
Second, the study might guide the creation of more sophisticated therapies that specifically target the needs and experiences of gay males. Practitioners can build therapies better suited to this population’s unique needs and experiences by looking at the distinctive contributions that various aspects make to homosexual men’s self-esteem. Finally, the findings might help eradicate stigma (Holthaus, 2020). The findings might also help others develop a more positive and accepting perspective of homosexual men’s experiences. The study can support a more upbeat and uplifting approach to comprehending this demographic’s experiences (Binion & Gray, 2020). In the long run, it can lessen stigma and advance mental health and well-being. It is accomplished by highlighting the advantages that gay men enjoy. Instead of merely the negative factors like victimization and prejudice, these favorable features also contribute to their well-being and sense of self-worth.
A study on how social media use, affective involvement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement affect gay men’s self-esteem would greatly impact scholars and practitioners in the field. These ramifications include creating personalized support systems and interventions to raise LGBT men’s self-esteem. Additionally, the study’s results might encourage gay men to use social media constructively. Finally, the study may promote ethical research methodologies in homosexual men’s self-esteem and social media use (Binion & Gray, 2020).
References
Binion, K., & Gray, M. J. (2020). Minority stress theory and internalized homophobia among LGB sexual assault survivors: Implications for posttraumatic adjustment. Journal of loss and trauma, 25(5), 454-471. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15325024.2019.1707987?casa_token=P9MFhWthT5YAAAAA:aPjsDkRwaP9etvWfRZZQSpDejq42Ocos_qNZe5IPV18Gbolq2MBYTqjIr8I1VccmKqPUhQ0jE_Ck0ybz
Boot-Haury, J. W. (2023). Understanding How Minority Stress, Gender Identity, and Resilience Predict Psychological Distress among Asexual Transgender and Gender Non-conforming Individuals (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan School of Psychology). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/6d654f3ccdd5be8dac81b9b713db2895/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Convertino, A. D., Helm, J. L., Pennesi, J. L., Gonzales IV, M., & Blashill, A. J. (2021). Integrating minority stress theory and the tripartite influence model: A model of eating disordered behavior in sexual minority young adults. Appetite, 163, 105204. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666321001112
Correro, A. N., & Nielson, K. A. (2020). A review of minority stress as a risk factor for cognitive decline in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) elders. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 24(1), 2-19. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19359705.2019.1644570?casa_token=-BDkiPmc4wQAAAAA:shJth3Bg05uL5GtwDYPVZRAdyWZKy32lVt6mMjJndMQYunTm9ihPCID6mH78ZprebwfffnhkAODFoEGi
Holthaus, L. (2020). Who Practises Practice Theory (and How)? (Meta-) theorists, Scholar-practitioners,(Bourdieusian) Researchers, and Social Prestige in Academia. Millennium, 48(3), 323-333. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0305829820935177
Meyer, I. H., Russell, S. T., Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., & Wilson, B. D. (2021). Minority stress, distress, and suicide attempts in three cohorts of sexual minority adults: A US probability sample. PLoS one, 16(3), e0246827. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246827
Mijas, M., Koziara, K., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2020). Chubby, hairy and fearless. Subcultural identities and predictors of self-esteem in a sample of Polish members of bear community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4439. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4439
Ouellette, M. J., Mutschler, C., Roth, S. L., McCabe, R. E., Tissera, T., Patel, H., & Hatchard, T. (2023). The Transcending Protocol: A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach for Addressing the Psychosocial Impact of Minority Stress in Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals. Journal of LGBTQ Issues in Counseling, 17(1), 57-76. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/26924951.2022.2096168?casa_token=CakZn7TjxZ0AAAAA:2r5tx5RAwugauA2qOLHI7g4CsEo6KFyZK-OJdWtYHZeXxFw0nmF4zDqeXmWjq1gyFKv2e8NvE2FdCKA0
Wang, Y. C., Miao, N. F., & Chang, S. R. (2021). Internalized homophobia, self‐esteem, social support and depressive symptoms among sexual and gender minority women in Taiwan: An online survey. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 28(4), 601-610. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpm.12705?casa_token=8CnB-5dYBCQAAAAA:W6wWtbSWqGe3wfH3Dhu1rtWFZUqelqIkkGQScaYzJZDT6XXStYtcJ0yrT-O0Ns7-pYSJV8Qfx6qQzS_r
Weeks, S. N., Renshaw, T. L., & Vinal, S. A. (2023). Minority stress as a multidimensional predictor of LGB+ adolescents’ mental health outcomes. Journal of Homosexuality, 70(5), 938-962. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2021.2006000?casa_token=LT1lLcFjW6UAAAAA:Tn5DWacvRadLyZIMMjpQlx3nJ2hPs9YQ2ZstjybCJg26-3KswtbEs-YbISk256WQDrmWjCHQ496sdcYm
write