Introduction
The ability to recall previous interactions and occurrences at a specific time and location is episodic memory. One of the most critical aspects of our lives is our capacity to gain wisdom through experience and make decisions in our self-interest. Since many years ago, this topic has piqued the attention of psychologists, and it continues to be the focus of research today. In our society, lying and cheating are prevalent behaviours that can negatively affect a person’s mental health, intimate relationships, and overall well-being. Lying is commonplace in many relationships, including business collaborations, personal relationships, and interactions between parents and their children.
Furthermore, numerous studies have shown that lying and deception can result in feelings of betrayal, mistrust, and tension, all of which can impair memory function. This is because these emotions are linked to the idea that the liar is dishonest. For instance, anxiousness can significantly impact a person’s ability to recollect previously acquired material. This is because stressed-out people may need help acquiring new information or retrieving the information they have previously stored. Studies on deception and its effects on recollection have been conducted in various contexts, such as forensic investigations, criminal procedures, and eyewitness accounts. In these situations, establishing the veracity of witness testimony and ensuring that justice is done depends on the accuracy of people’s recollections of the passage of time.
Furthermore, studies indicate that people dishonestly deceived or lied to in close relationships are more likely to suffer long-term mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. This is because individuals who have been misled or lied to in close relationships are more likely to be vulnerable to dishonesty. (PTSD). Because deceit and deception can have a negative effect on episodic memory, it is essential to have a comprehensive understanding of how engaging in these behaviours can impact memory function in the context of intimate relationships. This is because dishonesty and deception can have a harmful impact on episodic memory. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not individuals who have experienced infidelity in love relationships execute their memories better or worse than those who have not, as well as whether or not creating fraudulent memories has a positive or negative correlation with it. Through the research of these variables, we can better understand how lying and dishonesty influence memory performance, and we may be able to develop treatments that will assist individuals in maintaining accurate recollections despite the difficulties they face in their daily lives. By conducting this research, we hope to not only improve our understanding of the intricate relationship that exists between dishonesty, theft, and memory function but also to provide people with new perspectives that will assist them in overcoming the adverse effects that dishonesty, theft, and deception have on their lives. In this paper, we will explore the impact of cheating and lying on episodic memory in the context of romantic relationships.
Literature Review
There have been a significant number of investigations into the effects that lying and deception have on memory. People deceived about an important event in their past were more likely to forget the specifics of the event as time went on (Nie, 2022). People who were deceived on a task were likelier than those who did not pilfer to have erroneous recollections of their accomplishments. Olson et al. (2022) investigated the effect that infidelity in intimate relationships has on one’s ability to remember specific events that had occurred in the past. The study’s findings showed that individuals who had been the object of their partner’s extramarital affair had lower memory evaluations than those who had not been involved in an affair (Olson et al., 2022). Savithri (2021) suggests this could be because cheating on a partner causes emotional anguish, which results in a cognitive impairment known as “rumination.”
According to (Olson et al., 2022), telling a lie triggers activity in a region of the brain known as the amygdala, which is responsible for the processing of emotions. This makes it more challenging to remember the truth. The emotional stimulation brought on by lying can make it more challenging to properly store memories and bring them to mind when necessary (Olson et al., 2022). Despite the growing body of research on the effects of lying and deception on temporal memory, some questions still need to be satisfactorily answered (Schreckenbach, 2020). It is not known, for example, whether dishonesty and deception have short-term or long-term effects on memory, nor is it known whether these effects can be mitigated by treatments such as counselling or cognitive training. In addition, it is unknown whether these treatments can reverse the disease’s effects (Mahr, 2018). Further investigation is required not only to identify potential treatments that might assist people in coping with the mental distress brought on by infidelity and deception but also to comprehend the cognitive processes responsible for the effects of lying and thieving on one’s recollection.
Lying and other kinds of dishonesty can have very different repercussions depending on the circumstances in which they are used, just like dishonesty in general. Schreckenbach (2020) have shown that dishonest people have a greater chance of developing memory difficulties in the future. According to Ofen et al. (2017), it is plausible that factors such as age, psychological characteristics, and mental health all play a part in how telling lies and being dishonest affects one’s recall. Age is another factor that might come into play in this scenario.
According to (Nie, 2021), memory and duplicity are concepts that are only sometimes easy to connect logically. Some people will go to great lengths in the hope that they will be able to forget the specifics of a lie they have told in the hopes that they will not be found out or chastised for it (Nie, 2022). Some people may mistakenly believe false information because they have heard it so often or because it fits how they see the world.
As a consequence of the event, one’s memory may be changed in several distinct ways, the nature of which is determined by the particulars of the circumstance and the degree to which the individual was deceived (Gao et al., 2021). For instance, Gao’s (2021) research has shown that people who frequently mislead for their benefit or to protect another person’s feelings tend to have worse memories than pathological liars. It makes no difference the reasons for the deception; this is always the result (Li, 2021). There is a probability that bigger lies have a more substantial effect on recollection than smaller ones.
On the other hand, the beneficial impacts of lying and fibbing on recollection may have been disregarded up until now. This could be because researchers need to conduct more research on the topic. According to El Haj (2017), It is possible that people who are skilled at duplicity, for example, have a better working memory and more self-discipline than the typical individual (Kaya, 2023). People may lie to one another in order to keep their relationships with one another and prevent disagreement from occurring. According to Kronrod (2022), although evidence suggests that lying can enhance one’s recall and intelligence, this alone is not a sufficient reason to support dishonest behaviour.
Purpose
Within the context of romantic partnerships, this study aims to investigate how telling lies and engaging in unfaithful behaviour can affect a person’s recollection of specific events that occurred in the past. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether or not individuals who have been in relationships with partners who have been guilty of infidelity and dishonesty perform better or worse on memory tests than individuals who have not been in such relationships. The research also endeavours to determine whether or not fabricating memories is associated with dishonest or deceptive behaviour and whether or not this association is beneficial or detrimental.
Also, the goal of this study is to fill in a gap in what is already known by looking at how lying and cheating affect a person’s ability to remember things that happened in the past in a romantic relationship. Before this study, academics looked into what happened to people’s memories when they lied in different situations, such as direct evidence and criminal investigations. However, there have been few investigations into how deception and infidelity affect people’s ability to remember events that happened within the context of intimate relationships. It is essential to understand how deception and infidelity can affect one’s memory because of the frequency with which these behaviours occur in intimate relationships and the potential adverse effects they can have on people throughout their lives.
As a result of these findings, people who have been deceived or lied to in close relationships may have to deal with severe consequences. If the findings indicate a negative association between dishonesty and unlawful behaviour and memory function, then people who have engaged in infidelity may have difficulty remembering important information about their romantic partnerships. In addition, the research has the potential to cast light on the processes that lead to false memories and how those processes are related to dishonest or deceptive behaviour. This research has the potential to assist in developing therapies or interventions designed to help people cope with the effects of these behaviours on their close relationships. This could be accomplished by better understanding the effects of deception and infidelity on memory.
This discovery might change how brain conditions such as memory loss are handled in the future. This investigation may have legal repercussions, particularly when remembering information is essential. If a witness or suspect has lied or been dishonest in the past, their statement may not be taken seriously as evidence in the investigation. If there is no other evidence, the case may be determined purely based on this individual’s proclamation. The findings of this research provide new insight into the complex relationship that occurs between dishonesty and memory. More research is needed to fully understand the basic ideas and possible ways to fix things. Additionally, it emphasizes how crucial it is for romantic partners to communicate openly and honestly with one another and the potential harm that can result from lying to and misleading one another.
Method
Methods of quantitative research are going to be used for the investigation. Students currently enrolled in college programs at York University will be prioritised for research participation. In order to take part in the study, participants need to be between the ages of 18 and 25 and be in the process of actively looking for a partner. In addition to this, they need to be able to grant authorization based on their education. People who have a history of abusing drugs or alcohol or who have been diagnosed with the condition that affects their memory will not be allowed to take part in the study. After acquiring the participants’ full permission, they will be randomly assigned to either the group that engages in dishonesty and deception or the group that serves as the control. Participants in the group that focuses on cheating and lying will each receive a questionnaire consisting of fifty questions that will ask them to evaluate their previous experiences with cheating and lying in their current romantic partnership. The main focus of the research project’s analysis will be on the interviewees’ current relationships. The questionnaire will be made using methods that have been proven to work, and psychologists will look it over to make sure it is valid and reliable.
The participants in the control group will be reported to fill out regarding the nature of the romantic relationship they are currently in. During the evaluation, you will be asked questions about how confident you are in the relationship, how happy you are overall, and how the conversation is going. The questionnaire will be developed through recognized methods, and professionals in psychology will examine it in psychology to guarantee that both its validity and dependability are beyond reproach. After the test, members of both groups will take a memory test to see how well they remember certain events. The participants will be challenged to recall as much information as possible from the photographs and stories they have been shown. The amount of time all the groups have to complete the exam will be the same.
The ability to remember things, lie, and be dishonest will be evaluated using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests based on the collected information. In addition, we will look into whether or not there is a connection between the formation of false recollections and behaviours such as dishonesty and theft. The research findings will shed light on the effects of dishonesty and duplicity on one’s ability to remember chronological events. The results will also change how we think about the role of memory in close relationships.
Discussion
Our study aimed to find out how telling lies or having sexual activity outside of a committed relationship affects the memories of people who are close to you. We hypothesized that people who have been complicit in telling lies would have a more difficult time remembering information than those who have not been complicit in telling lies. The results of our study supported this idea since people who lied or cheated on their answers to the memory test did much worse than the control group. This lends credence to the theory that dishonesty and deception can interfere with a person’s capacity to recall events that occurred in the past.
Our results are an essential part of the growing research on how relationships with others affect cognitive performance. By investigating how deception and dishonest behaviour affect one’s ability to remember past events, we were able to shed some light on the potential consequences that may result from these actions. According to the findings of our study, people who lie and manipulate may damage not only their emotional relationships but also their cognitive abilities.
One limitation of our study is that to ascertain the respondents’ experiences with dishonesty and lying, we relied on methods that required them to describe their own experiences. The findings may be inaccurate because some interviewees may have needed to be more honest about their past behaviour. Because our study only involved people who were already in committed partnerships, we cannot comment on whether or not the findings apply to people who have never lied to or manipulated a partner, as well as to other types of relationships.
Future research may circumvent these limitations by employing more impartial techniques to evaluate the dishonesty and deception experienced by respondents and by recruiting individuals from a broader range of socioeconomic backgrounds. In subsequent research, the mechanisms that underlie the adverse effects of lying and deception on temporal memory could be investigated. Deception and theft are two behaviours that can lead to emotional discomfort, affecting how memories are stored and retrieved. There are many different options available for this.
The findings of this study have implications not only for individuals who are currently in the courtship phase of their romantic lives but also for mental health professionals who work with couples. A treatment that focuses on memory and how the brain works, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy, could benefit partners who have been the victims of infidelity. Our findings suggest that mental health professionals treating individuals subjected to these kinds of situations should consider the impact of dishonest and deceptive behaviour on patients’ cognitive abilities when doing so.
According to the findings of this study, dishonest behaviour, such as lying or thieving, is detrimental to one’s ability to remember past events. By emphasizing the potential repercussions of engaging in harmful behaviours, this research contributes to our understanding of the intricate connections between human relationships and cognitive function. Our research also sheds light on how important it is to communicate with one another honestly and transparently at all times. According to the findings, dishonest people not only hurt the people who are most important to them, but they also hurt their mental capabilities. This damage extends beyond just the people they hurt. Because of this, it is essential for individuals to think about the consequences of their actions and to make an effort to be open and honest in their interactions with other people. Being open and honest in interactions is a sign of maturity and respect.
Our study contributes to the ever-growing body of knowledge on the topic by shedding light on the potential adverse effects of dishonesty and deception on the social relationships of people as well as the cognitive processes that take place in their brains. However, additional research is necessary to thoroughly understand the foundational processes and potential interventions. Our findings indicate that honesty and transparency are essential for maintaining healthy relationships and attaining optimal brain performance.
Conclusion
According to the findings of this study, deception and infidelity in intimate relationships can significantly impact one’s ability to recall past events. This hypothesis is supported by the research findings, which corroborate it. According to the study findings, people who have been tricked or manipulated in close personal relationships are more likely to have difficulty remembering specifics from their history. This finding lends credence to the theory that dishonesty can play a role in memory disorientation, which has significant repercussions for our understanding of how dishonesty influences the dynamics of human relationships.
When attempting to make sense of the findings, it is essential to remember that the research has a number of limitations that need to be considered. It is questionable whether these findings apply to other types of relationships or circumstances because the research focused solely on the effects of deception and infidelity on temporal memory in intimate relationships. The use of self-report methods to evaluate dishonesty and tendencies toward deception in the research may have been influenced by societies’ choices. When people overestimate their abilities, they demonstrate this form of prejudice. Measures of deception and recall capacity that are more precise may prove helpful in subsequent research. Despite these limitations, this research contributes to our understanding of how deception and infidelity in intimate relationships can affect one’s ability to recall specific episodes from their past. The findings shed light on how important it is to maintain honesty and trustworthiness in human relationships, as well as the potential adverse effects that dishonest behaviour can have over the long term.
The findings of this study have significant repercussions not only for practising professional psychologists but also for scholarly researchers. This research casts light on the complicated connection between memory and lying, and it has the potential to influence the development of treatments that are targeted at preventing and resolving dishonesty in human relationships. The findings of this study may have implications for how we comprehend the function of memory in other aspects of life, such as the presentation of information in legal proceedings. More research needs to be done in this field to thoroughly understand the effects that deception and duplicity can have on episodic memory and to develop successful treatments that can be used to treat this problem.
References
El Haj, M., Antoine, P., & Nandrino, J. L. (2017). When deception influences memory: The implication of theory of mind. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1166-1173.
Gao, J., Min, X., Kang, Q., Si, H., Zhan, H., Manyande, A., … & Song, J. (2022). Effective Connectivity in Cortical Networks During Deception: A Lie Detection Study Based on EEG. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 26(8), 3755-3766.
Kaya, S., Besken, M., Bal, C., & Berjin İke, S. (2023). Online dating through lies: the effects of lie fabrication for personal semantic information on predicted and actual memory performance. Memory, 1-15.
Kronrod, A., Gordeliy, I., & Lee, J. K. (2022). Been There, Done That: How Episodic and Semantic Memory Affects the Language of Authentic and Fictitious Reviews. Journal of Consumer Research.
Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021). Involvement modulates the effects of deception on memory in daily life. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756297.
Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and brain sciences, 41, e1.
Nie, A., & Li, M. (2021). Professional discrepancies of doctors and lawyers in episodic memory: Modulations of professional morality and warning. PsyCh Journal, 10(5), 707-731.
Nie, A., Li, M., Li, M., Xiao, Y., & Wang, S. (2022). Together we lose or gain: Ongoing and enduring impacts of collaboration in episodic memory of emotional DRM lists. Current Psychology, 1-18.
Ofen, N., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Chai, X. J., Schwarzlose, R. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2017). Neural correlates of deception: Lying about past events and personal beliefs. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(1), 116-127.
Olson, J. M., Rosenfeld, J. P., Ward, A. C., Sitar, E. J., Gandhi, A., Hernandez, J., & Fanesi, B. (2022). The effects of practicing a novel countermeasure on both the semantic and episodic memory-based complex trial protocols. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 173, 82-92.
Schreckenbach, F., Rothermund, K., & Koranyi, N. (2020). Quantity matters: The frequency of deception influences automatic memory retrieval effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1774-1783.
Savithri, K. K., & Kacker, P. (2021). When Brain Tells the Deception: A Literature Review on Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling. Mind and Society, 10(01-02), 27-30.
write