Dietary and dental evolution between colobines and cercopithecines is essential to evolutionary studies. By looking at the dietary and dental development between the two primates, researchers can gain insight into the evolution of primate behavior and adaptation. This review will focus on the most recent and relevant literature on the dietary and dental differences between colobines and cercopithecines. It will explore the effects of dietary and dental evolution on primate behavior and adaptation and the implications for future research. The literature review will examine the nutritional differences between colobines and cercopithecines. This will include a discussion of the dietary preferences of each primate group and the implications for their adaptation to different environments. It will also look at the role of dental morphology in the nutritional differences between the two primates. The review will then examine the dental evolution between colobines and cercopithecines. The study will also discuss the role of diet in dental development between colobines and cercopithecines. Overall, this literature review will provide an in-depth look at the dietary and dental evolution between colobines and cercopithecines. It will provide a comprehensive overview of the topic and the implications for primate behavior and conservation.
Modern diversity and distributions
A study by Kim (2019) concluded that the diversity and distributions of Colobines and Cercopithecines have changed significantly since the beginning of the 20th century. Colobines, Old World monkeys, have decreased their range and diversity drastically in the last 100 years (Kim, 2019). They now occupy only a tiny portion of their former range and are found in isolated pockets of the tropics and subtropics of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East(Delgado et al., 2015). Colobines are generally found in more forested and secluded habitats than cercopithecines, as cercopithecines have adapted to a broader range of habitats, including savannahs, open woodlands, and even urban environments (Delgado et al., 2015).
Cercopithecines are a group of Old World primates that includes macaques, baboons, guenons, and other species(Delgado et al., 2015). They are found throughout Africa and Asia, with some species found in southern Europe. In terms of modern diversity and distributions, the cercopithecine species vary widely. Some species, such as the rhesus macaque, are found over a wide range, from India to China to Japan(Delgado et al., 2015). Others, such as the gelada baboon, are much more localized and are found only in Ethiopia (Delgado et al., 2015). The cercopithecines can also vary in terms of their habitats. Some, such as the mandrill, prefer areas with a lot of vegetation, such as rainforests, while others, such as the patas monkey, prefer more open, dry habitats(Martin et al., 2018).
This is reflected in the modern distributions of the two groups, with cercopithecines being much more widespread and diverse than colobines(Kim, 2019). Overall, the diversity and distributions of colobines and cercopithecines have significantly been impacted by human activity and land-use changes, leading to a decrease in the range and diversity of both groups. Conservation efforts are needed to ensure the continued survival of these species, as well as to protect their habitats from further destruction.
Differences in Ecology
According to Martin et al. (2018), Cercopithecines and Colobines are primate families but differ in many ecological aspects, especially diet. Cercopithecines, commonly referred to as Old World monkeys, are characterized by their long faces and tails, while colobines are known for their short faces and tails(Thiery et al., 2017). The two families differ in a variety of ways, including their diets. Cercopithecines are primarily omnivorous, eating a wide variety of plants and animals, including fruits, leaves, insects, lizards, and small animals (Kane et al., 2020). Although some species are more specialized in their diets than others, cercopithecines tend to be generalists and will feed on whatever food is available (Delgado et al., 2015). They forage for food by quadrupedal movement, using their hands and feet to pick up food items(Thiery et al., 2017). Colobines, on the other hand, are primarily folivorous, meaning they specialize in eating leaves. They have evolved specialized teeth, including large, flat molars and long, sharp incisors, which allow them to efficiently process and digest tough and fibrous plant matter(McGraw et al., 2016). Colobines feed primarily on leaves but will also eat fruits, flowers, and buds if available. Unlike cercopithecines, colobines typically move by leaping, as their long hind legs and short arms are well-suited for this type of locomotion(McGraw et al., 2016).
In addition, Thiery et al. (2017) found that the differences between cercopithecines and colobines have diverged in other ways. Cercopithecines tend to live in large groups, while colobines are more solitary and are found in smaller groups or even alone(Thiery et al., 2). Cercopithecines also tend to be more active during the day, while colobines are more active at night. Cercopithecines and colobines have evolved different diets and foraging behaviors to take advantage of the resources available in their habitats. (Kane et al., 2020) Cercopithecines are more generalists. They will feed on whatever food is available, while colobines specialize in eating leaves and have evolved specialized teeth to efficiently process and digest tough and fibrous plant matter(Thiery et al., 2017). Although both families are primate species, they differ significantly in their ecology, especially in diet(Thiery et al., 2021).
How their Ecologies influence their Morphology
According to Thiery et al. (2021), the Ecologies of Cercopithecines and Colobines strongly influence their Morphology. The two families have distinct morphological characteristics, dietary adaptations that are specifically suited for their respective environments, and different social behaviors (Kim, 2019). This diversification in morphology, diet, and social structure has enabled the two families to successfully occupy various habitats, from the trees to the ground(Thiery et al., 2021). The two primate families, Cercopithecines and Colobines, have a wide variety of species and sizes, from the tiny vervet monkey to the large baboon(Kane et al., 2020). Cercopithecines are primarily arboreal and live in trees, and Colobines are primarily terrestrial, living on the ground. This difference in the environment, or ecology, has shaped the morphology of each group in distinct ways(Thiery et al., 2017).
Thiery et al. (2021) state that Cercopithecines are adapted to living in trees, and they have several morphological characteristics that are specialized for arboreal locomotion. They have short, strong legs relative to their arms, allowing them to swing from branch to branch easily (Kim, 2019). Their hands and feet also have curved fingers and toes, allowing them to grip branches firmly. Cercopithecines also have long tails, which help them balance and maneuver in the trees(Thiery et al., 2021).
Kane et al. (2020) discovered that Colobines are adapted for life on the ground and have several morphological characteristics specifically suited for terrestrial locomotion. They have long, powerful legs that allow them to move quickly and efficiently on the ground(Kane et al., 2020). Their hands and feet have flat, straight fingers and toes, which help them to walk and grip the ground. Colobines also have a short tail, as it is not necessary for balance on the ground(Martin et al., 2018).
Thiery et al. (2021) assert that the two families also differ in their diet. Cercopithecines are primarily frugivorous and eat various fruits, flowers, leaves, and other plant matter. Their hands and teeth are adapted for grasping and tearing fruits, and their long intestines are adapted for digesting a high-fiber diet. Colobines, on the other hand, are primarily folivorous and eat a variety of leaves, shoots, and other plant matter(Kane et al., 2020). Their hands and teeth are adapted for grasping and stripping leaves, and their short intestines are adapted for digesting a low-fiber diet(Kim, 2019).
In addition to their morphological adaptations, the two families also differ regarding their social Behavior. Cercopithecines form large, hierarchical groups led by a dominant male and typically have a range of 15-20 individuals(Kim, 2019). These groups are highly social and cooperative and engage in various activities such as grooming and play(Kim, 2019). Colobines, on the other hand, form small, loosely structured groups of 4-8 individuals and typically have a range of 1-3 individuals(Thiery et al., 2021). These groups are less social and cooperative than Cercopithecine groups and engage in fewer activities, such as foraging and resting(Cohen et al., 2020).
How their Ecologies influence their Behavior
The ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines have a significant influence on their Behavior. As two of the three major primate groups, they have adapted to their respective habitats and evolved different strategies for survival(Martin et al., 2018). They have different types of diets, different social structures, and mating strategies( Cohen et al., 2020).In this essay, I will discuss the various ways that the ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines have shaped their Behavior.
According to Thiery et al. (2021), Cercopithecines are Old World primates in Africa and Asia. They tend to live in open forests and savannas, feeding primarily on fruit, nuts, and seeds. Each of these habitats presents different challenges and opportunities for the cercopithecines and thus can influence their Behavior (Cohen et al., 2020). Due to their diet, they have developed several behaviors that are associated with foraging. For example, they search for food in trees and on the ground and use their hands to pick fruit and nuts from trees(Kim, 2019). They also use their vision to scan for potential sources of food. In addition, cercopithecines are highly social animals, living in large groups of up to several hundred individuals(Kim, 2019). These groups are often organized into smaller subgroups and communicate with each other using vocalizations and facial expressions(Martin et al., 2018).
In tropical rainforests, cercopithecines must be able to traverse the dense vegetation for foraging and socializing(Kim, 2019). This requires them to have excellent agility, reflected in their Behavior, such as leaping and swinging from branch to branch(Cohen et al., 2020). In savannas, cercopithecines must be able to traverse the open terrain while avoiding predators(McGraw et al., 2016). This requires them to have excellent vision, which can be seen in their Behavior of scanning the environment for potential threats(Thiery et al., 2021). Additionally, the availability of food resources can influence the Behavior of cercopithecines. In areas where food is scarce, they must spend more time and energy foraging(McGraw et al., 2016). This can lead to increased aggression among individuals competing for food or to increased sociality as individuals cooperate in locating food sources(Cohen et al., 2020). In areas with abundant food resources, cercopithecines can spend more time socializing and engaging in play(Thiery et al., 2021).
McGraw et al. (2016) concluded that the ecology of cercopithecines could also influence their reproductive Behavior. Cercopithecines may have reduced fertility in areas where food is scarce due to the energy expenditure associated with foraging(McGraw et al., 2016). Cercopithecines may have increased fertility in areas with abundant food resources due to the increased energy available for reproduction(Martin et al., 2018). From the type of habitat, they inhabit to the availability of food resources, the ecology of cercopithecines can shape how they behave in the wild(Cohen et al., 2020). Overall, the ecology of cercopithecines has a significant influence on their Behavior.
On the other hand, Martin et al. (2018) state that Colobines are found in tropical forests in Asia and Africa. They feed primarily on leaves, buds, and shoots and use their hands to strip leaves from branches (McGraw et al., 2016). Colobines also have a more solitary lifestyle than cercopithecines, usually in small groups of up to a dozen individuals(Martin et al., 2018). They are also less social than cercopithecines and typically communicate using scent marking and vocalizations. For example, colobines living in tropical rainforests have access to various food sources and have evolved to take advantage of these resources(Cohen et al., 2020). They are adept climbers and can reach fruit and other food sources that other primates cannot(McGraw et al., 2016). This has allowed them to become specialized feeders, as they can reach food sources that other primates cannot(Thiery et al., 2021). Additionally, the dense vegetation protects them from predators and other dangers, making them more relaxed in their environment and less defensive(Thiery et al., 2017).
In a study by Mc Graw et al. (2016), they concluded that colobines have adapted to different environmental conditions, such as drier deciduous forests. These habitats are typically more open, with fewer trees and less dense vegetation, allowing predators to spot prey more easily(McGraw et al., 2016). As a result, colobines in this habitat have evolved to be more cautious and alert. They are more likely to flee when threatened and to stay in groups for protection(Thiery et al., 2017). They have also become more specialized feeders, as the food sources in this habitat are more limited, and they have adapted to take advantage of the resources available(Thiery et al., 2017). The ecologies of colobines have a strong influence on their Behavior. Different habitats provide different resources and pose different dangers, prompting colobines to adapt their behaviors to survive in their environment(Thiery et al., 2021). This adaptation has allowed them to become specialized feeders and to be more cautious and alert in their Behavior (Martin et al., 2018).
According to Martin et al. (2018), different ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines have also led to differences in their mating strategies. Cercopithecines tend to form monogamous pairs, while colobines tend to form polygynous groups. This is likely due to the different types of food available in their respective habitats(Kane et al., 2020). Cercopithecines have access to a variety of food sources, and so forming monogamous pairs allows them to forage for food(Kane et al., 2020). On the other hand, colobines have more limited access to food sources, so forming polygynous groups allows them to search for food(Martin et al., 2018).
According to Kim (2019), different ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines also influence their Behavior in other ways. For example, cercopithecines are more active during the day, while colobines are more active at night (Kim, 2019). This is likely due to the different types of predators that they face in their respective habitats. Cercopithecines are more likely to be predated upon by large predators such as leopards, so they are more active during the day when the predators are sleeping(Delgado et al., 2015). On the other hand, colobines are more likely to be predated upon by small nocturnal predators, so they are more active at night when the predators are active(Kim, 2019).
Delgado et al. (2015) state that ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines influence their Behavior in several ways. They have adapted to their respective habitats by developing different diets, social structures, and mating strategies (Martin et al., 2018). They also differ in their activity patterns and communication strategies (Thiery et al., 2021). The ecologies of cercopithecines and colobines have thus shaped the Behavior of these two primate groups in distinct ways(Delgado et al., 2015).
Conclusion
The dietary and dental evolution between colobines and cercopithecines is a fascinating topic of study. It reveals the complex relationship between diet and tooth structure and how species adapt to their environment and resources. Colobines are a group of Old World monkeys with evolved dental traits for a specialized diet of leaves, shoots, and fruits. The dental features of colobines include a broad molar with a sharp, blade-like cusp, a dental formula of 2.1.3.3, and an extensive palate. These specialized traits allow them to process their food effectively. On the other hand, Cercopithecines are a group of Old World monkeys with evolved dental traits for a generalized omnivorous diet. They have a dental formula of 2.1.2.3, and their molars are more rounded and less blade-like. This allows them to more efficiently process various foods, including both plant and animal matter. Overall, the evolution of dental traits between colobines and cercopithecines is fascinating. It reveals the complexity of the evolutionary process and how species adapt to different environments and dietary resources.
References
Cohen, K. E., Weller, H. I., Westneat, M. W., & Summers, A. P. (2020). The Evolutionary Continuum of Functional Homodonty to Heterodonty in the Dentition of Halichoeres Wrasses. Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa137
Delgado, M. N., Gamarra, B., Nadal, J., Mercadal, O., Olesti, O., Guàrdia, J., Pérez-Pérez, A., & Galbany, J. (2015). Dental Shape Variability in Cercopithecoid Primates: A Model for the Taxonomic Attribution of Macaques from Roman Archaeological Contexts. Folia Primatologica, 85(6), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371633
Kane, Erin E., Traff, Jordan N., Daegling, David J., & McGraw, W. Scott. (2020). Oral Processing Behavior of Diana Monkeys (Cercopithecus diana) in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Folia Primatologica, 91(6), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508072
Kim, A. (2019). South Africa Using Elliptical Fourier Analysis. https://doi.org/10.57709/15944050
Martin, F., Plastiras, C.-A., Merceron, G., Souron, A., & Boisserie, J.-R. (2018). Dietary niches of terrestrial cercopithecines from the Plio-Pleistocene Shungura Formation, Ethiopia: evidence from Dental Microwear Texture Analysis. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32092-z
McGraw, W. S., van Casteren, A., Kane, E., Geissler, E., Burrows, B., & Daegling, D. J. (2016). Feeding and oral processing behaviors of two colobine monkeys in Tai Forest, Ivory Coast. Journal of Human Evolution, 98, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.06.001
Thiery, G., Gibert, C., Guy, F., Lazzari, V., Geraads, D., Spassov, N., & Merceron, G. (2021). From leaves to seeds? The dietary shift in late Miocene colobine monkeys of southeastern Europe. Evolution, 75(8), 1983–1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14283
Thiery, G., Gillet, G., Lazzari, V., Merceron, G., & Guy, F. (2017). Was Mesopithecus a seed eating colobine? Assessment of cracking, grinding and shearing ability using dental topography. Journal of Human Evolution, 112, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.09.002
write