Ethical philosophy has existed for years now, and it was influenced by a number of philosophers, including Aristotle, Epicurus, Descartes and Hume, in regard to their concept of moral agency, which is at the heart of ethics philosophy. The Greek philosophies on morality and moral agency started with the idea of rationality and virtue as defining qualities of moral agents. They ended with an understanding of what goes into individual identity that explains human moral responsibility. The essay further incorporates modern views, including Nodding’s feminist ethics and Stone-Smith-Kolbber’s environmental perspective. This essay investigates moral agency, personhood and the rights of nature, especially water ethics, as it attempts to explain how these classical concepts interrelate with current discourses about natural bodies and waters today.
Moral Agency in Ancient and Modern Philosophy
As an important concept in ethics philosophy, moral agency covers rational choices making and moral actions. Ancient philosophers uncovered important parts on which basis moral responsibilities are founded to discover what constitutes moral agency. Rationally conceived as being animal, rationality is based on logic as a prerequisite for an immoral personality. The understanding is broadened in a number of ways: the Self, the Person, the Relative Self, and the Relational Autonomous Being. Moral agency and ancient philosophy with a particular focus on the contribution made by Aristotle. In his virtue ethics framework, he argued that developing virtuous character was the key to eudaimonia, i.e., leading a flourishing life. The practice of virtue in Aristotle can be described as an ethic of the person since it is a cultivation of courage, justice, and wisdom as moral virtues. He argued that we do develop our virtues through habits and practice so as to become the virtuous agents we need in us for the purpose of deciding morally on what is right or wrong.
Another philosopher in antiquity, Epicurus, had his view of moral agency. The pursuit of pleasure as the highest good was key in his philosophy. According to Epicurus, virtuous actions promote pleasure and avoid pain, which is essential for living well. Morality revolves around the Self in the Epicurean philosophical outlook of pursuing virtue and pleasure. In modern philosophy, Rene Descartes questioned the Self and self-identity in his Meditations I-II. Using “Cogito, ergo sum (I think, therefore I am),” Descartes argued that thinking Self is the basis of certainty (Watson 150). Such a consideration of self-consciousness and self-awareness underpins today’s discourse around personality and personal responsibility. The cognitive dimensions of moral agency are clarified through Descartes’ explorations of the nature of the Self in relation to thought and existence.
However, David Hume provided complex insights concerning personal identity in his Treatise of Human Nature. Moving away from Descartes’ one and permanent self-concept, Hume proffered a ‘bundle theory of self,’ in which he contended that personal identity is made up of a bundle of perceptions. As per Hume, the mind is just like a series of perceptions, and it is through continuity and connection that man has a feeling of himself (Hume 210). Hume explores the ‘Relative Self,’ which goes against the conventional understanding of identity as being built on a fixed foundation and instead based on ongoing experience. The moral agency comprises the rational animals, Self, person, relative Self, and the relational autonomous being; it cuts across both ancient and modern philosophies. The nature of moral agency is discussed in several philosophical works. Aristotle’s virtue ethics, Epicurus’ focus on pleasure and virtue, Descartes’ study of the thinking Self, and Hume’s insights into personal identity constitute an intricate fabric that offers This search opens up room for current perspectives, especially those of feminist ethicists such as Noddings to inform a comprehensive conceptualization of morality in co-existing with nature.
Contemporary Perspectives on Moral Agency
Feminist ethics, including Care Ethics as advanced by Noddings, have contributed significantly to contemporary perspectives of moral agency; this perspective underscores relational and empathic aspects in ethical choice-making. Women epistemologists have been instrumental in expanding our conceptions of who can have what kind of actions counted as morally significant. This is exemplified by the Care Ethic paradigm introduced by Nel Noddings. The moral agency in this framework is not just about individual actions but also involves relations and interdependence among people. Traditional notions about women’s moral agency have been challenged by modern epistemologists who argue that the notion should be considered holistically in order to understand a woman as an interlinked being. Nodding points out that caring and ethical virtue ought to go together with morality. In addition, this method is contrary to the personal perception that enlarges social ethical perspective.
In the present day considerations, the idea of the Relative Self develops into one of the main topics. The relative Self acknowledges that a relational world is part and parcel of the natural lifeworld as our identity, as well as moral agency, comes out of this framework. It corresponds with environmental philosophy, whereby ethical caring in existence with nature is entailed. This is explained in the Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, whereby understanding the Self and how it relates to the environment promotes an individual’s responsibility to ensure the general wellness of all organisms within the ecological system. The Relative Self comes at the center stage in the water ethics. This point of view emphasizes the link between human activities and the health of bodies of water by going beyond anthropocentrism. Some environmental scholars, such as Michael Rosenburg, in “Christian Ethics of Creation,” argue for eco-conversion, which is a consciousness change showing respect for nature’s inherent value. Contemporary moral agency perspectives, based on feminist ethics and the relative Self, develop a more comprehensive conception (Thompson 89). Noddings is one of the female epistemologists who has greatly expanded the discussion of moral agency, considering the role of caring, feeling, and relational. When applied to water ethics, the relative Self promotes an understanding of nature’s rights and care for water bodies as a means of sustainable living together peacefully.
Rights of Nature and Water Ethics
Kolberg makes an argument for the “rights of nature” through its exploration of “Lake Mary Jane Sues to protect itself.” This story presents a scenario in which Lake Mary Jane is allowed the symbolic personality to be shielded. The rights of nature and the notion of non-human rights pose an alternative argument that nature is more than just a property, thereby giving another perspective on the rights aspect of nature. A second case for “Rights of Nature” can be found in a major publication by Christopher Stone, Should Trees Have Standing? Stone goes even beyond recognizing bodies of water as having rights and extends legal personhood to natural objects and animals (Arnold 45). Stone asserts that such entities should be accorded the status of legal persons to secure their welfare and importance as ecological sites. This viewpoint ties in with a changing conceptualization of moral agency, which moves away from a human-centered standpoint.
Water ethics include several important components, one of them being the role played by natural elements like bodies of water for their legal status. The idea of granting water bodies personhood stems from realizing how vital they are for our environment, hence creating a sustainable relationship between the two. The paradigm views natural bodies of water as entities with rights that should be enforced by law because such water is endowed with inherent value. This recognition is especially important in environmental philosophy, which includes ethics concerning non-anthropocentric elements. This extension would be justified because it provides the necessary bases that support life, ecological balance and, ultimately, human health. The notion of legal personhood for water bodies is consistent with the modern environmentalist outlook that promotes connectivity and due diligence toward our environment. Accordingly, the “Argument for the Rights of Nature” case and granting bodies of water status as a person demonstrates a new perspective on ethics based on achieving peace between man and Mother Earth.
Smith’s investigation of Māori understandings of taniwho, the sacred spirit of a river, illuminates and makes accessible native beliefs about nature. In his “Nature is Becoming a Person,” Smith discusses Māori’s ideas about river spirits and their personification. An indigenous perspective defies the notion of nature being considered only as a source of resources by the West (Smith 225). To the Māori, the river is more than a physical property in that it has its consciousness and vitality. These views play a major role in the debate concerning nature as a person, highlighting an overall relationship between people and their environment. The native worldview reinforces the understanding that nature has innate worth and should be appreciated; consequently, it supports environmental stewardship.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it has been possible to see how thinking on moral agency, personhood, and natural entities in ancient and modern philosophy, as well as present-day views, has shed light on changing conceptions in terms of ethical accountability. The discourse on moral agency has become relational and is expanding beyond traditional concepts about Aristotles’ virtue ethics, feminist ethics, and Nodding’s Care Ethics. The argument for the “Rights of Nature” as applied with respect to Stone and Kolbert, who influenced the approach towards acknowledging the inherent worth of natural entities, becomes an alternative paradigm of transition into environmental philosophy. Additionally, Smith articulates the indigenous view of Aotearoa Maori that sees water spirits and the personified nature of the earth (p. 9). When reviewing multiple philosophical perspectives concerning personhood, it is evident that giving the status of persons to nature corresponds to an ethical approach that seeks to facilitate an equitable and integrated linkage between humanity and the environment, leading to a greener and moral partnership.
Work Cited
Arnold, Craig Anthony. “Working out an environmental ethic: anniversary lessons from Mono Lake.” Wyo. L. Rev. 4 2004: p. 1.
Crisp, Roger, ed. Aristotle: nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-fhkBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=Aristotle%E2%80%99s+Ethics&ots=8nIJfp4FZl&sig=bKO_iCmGonLYQZms4_tKyndNA8U
De Sanctis, Dino. “epIcurus and hIs meteoroLogIcaL LexIcon In the letter tO potholes: some remarks.” Epicureanism and Scientific Debates. Antiquity and Late Reception: Volume I. Language, Medicine, Meteorology 1 2023: 65.
Hume, David. A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Jenkins, Willis, Mary Evelyn Tucker, and John Grim, eds. Routledge handbook of religion and ecology. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Khoma, Oleg. “The Role of Skeptical Evidence in the First and Second “Meditations.” Article 1. The Doubt according to Descartes and Sextus Empiricus.” 2016.
Noddings, Nel. “Care ethics and virtue ethics.” The Routledge companion to virtue ethics. Routledge, 2015. 401-414.
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian. “The Presentation of the Epicurean Virtues.” Apeiron 53.4 (2020): 419-435. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2019-0042/html
Rosenberger, Michael. Christian Ethics of Creation: On the Path of Ecological Conversion. Nomos Verlag, 2022.
Schildknecht, Christiane. “Descartes: Meditationen.” Handbuch Literatur & Philosophie 11 (2021): 474.
Simpson, Peter LP. The Eudemian Ethics of Aristotle. Routledge, 2017.
Smith, Mick. “On ‘being moved by nature: Geography, emotion and environmental ethics.” Emotional geographies. Routledge, 2016. 219–230.
Thompson, Paul B. The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. Taylor & Francis, 2017.
Vorobei, Elizaveta. “David Hume: Justice and Property in A Treatise of Human Nature.” 2022. https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/177272/130341669.pdf?sequence=1
Qu, Hsueh M. Hume’s epistemological evolution. Oxford University Press, USA, 2020. Noddings, Nel. “Care ethics and “caring” organizations.” Care ethics and political theory (2015): 72–84. https://uwethicsofcare.gws.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Engster-and-Hamington-Care-Ethics-and-Politcal-Theory.pdf#page=87
Watson, Richard. Cogito, ergo sum: The life of Rene Descartes. David R. Godine Publisher, 2007.
write