Understanding the Intersection of Economic Policy and Political Decision-Making: An Analysis of OECD Economic Indicators

Introduction 

when the political space changes in the blink of an eye, the ability to decipher the complex piece that connects economic policy and political decision-making is determinant. This research is built to develop this multi-dimensional relationship between the growth rate of GDP, inflation rate, unemployment rate, trade balance, and other macro measures. Data will be generated from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an international economic organization. These pointers allow us to highlight how the behaviour of the state has an impact on financial patterns and affects the political environment. We want to explore this area to delve into the profound individuality of the relationship between economic conditions and political decision-making.

Research question and its importance

My research question is not a part of the sentence. Still, I devise an example of what indicators are necessary and navigate how these indicators affect political decision-making and election outcomes.

Recognizing the impact of economic indicators on the voting process and party politics is a significant factor in containing the mysteries of progressive elections and policy formulation. This project intends to uncover the extent of economic environments that determine rank-and-file ideology, policy-related actions, and election results. By digging deep into this matter, we may discover the inner mechanism of how economic factors connect with politics, providing evidence for lawmakers, political analysts and ordinary people at large on how and in what ways the economy links with politics to foster whatever social order.

Review of relevant theories and literature

Political science and economics have many theories and papers intended to explain the relationship between economic indicators and political events, uniquely conveying the specificity of these events. Scholars have gone deeply into ideas such as the political economy, which talks about how political processes are linked, among others, with economic processes. Moreover, studies have taken this further to analyze ideas such as the feedback effect of policy and economic voting, which essentially show how voters’ perception of economic conditions impact their political behaviour. Secondly, policy impact on economic growth has been subject to many empirical investigations; these contribute to understanding the mechanisms through which political decisions affect economic prosperity.

In terms of analytical frameworks, the political economy and the policy feedback theory provide crucial ideas about how the indicators of the economy connect with and affect political dynamics. The political economy unravels how political institutions and processes impact economic results, and policy feedback theory describes how public policies determine the mode in which following political and economic circumstances are shaped. Empirical research on economic voting reminds us of how people associate financial performance with their electoral choice, underlining the importance of economic indicators in political decision-making. Moreover, evaluation of policy feedback loops shows that government policies can lead not only to feedback impact on both economic indicators and political behaviour but also to the complex interrelationship between them.

Data and variable measures:

As the study paper’s data is from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a time-series dataset which covers multiple countries and years is used for this research. Prominent variables include the pace of economic growth, manufacturing output, exchange and inflation rates, and much more. These factors are metricized by marking the quarterly or annual date and standardized to get a base for the world ranking. Moreover, other control variables considered, like government spending, interest rates, and demographic factors, are added to rebut possible complicating effects, making sure the study observations are reliable. One dataset contains a complex spectrum of economic indicators observed in economic activity patterns.

Identification, description and assessment of data

GDP growth rates are a standard mechanism used by economists to measure the degree of success or failure of governmental policies with direct and concrete implications for political discourse and electoral prospects. High economic growth usually stands for the rising support for political parties and, as a rule, for higher popularity ratings for the incumbent administration. In the same sense, voters may flare up in resisting the negative growth in their political economy, while political parties can lose the ballots for that reason. Also, politicians watch for unemployment rates because they directly impact living standards and the public’s perception of the government’s dismissal. Politicians are generally in pole position about implementing policies that cut down on joblessness and creating a better economic environment to ensure that they maintain the support of the public and that they win the next elections. Consequently, the political precision of economic indicators is essential since it helps to shed light on the governance, policymaking, and electoral factors.

Identify the causal relationship between two variables of interest.

The analysis found that GDP growth and unemployment fluctuations are associated consistently and move in the same direction. Economic growth doesn’t purely result from the falling unemployment rates. Employment rates also increase with a higher GDP growth rate. This causal link is consistent over various periods and countries, indicating that these economic dynamics are constitutions that describe the nature of economies. This reveals the importance of economic growth for helping to cut down on unemployment, and so policies promoting economic growth economy, employment creation and control of unemployment are key.

GDP (Gross Domestic Product) has an average of 6.17942 and a standard deviation of 4.18111 with a minimum (-4.1096) and a maximum (34.4662). The UMP (Unemployment Rate) mean is 7.43812 with a standard deviation of 5.581943, which is 0.582 and 36.025 as the maximum and minimum values. With both of these variables fluctuating in value, GDP shows more shifts over time.

The hypothesis is: A negative relationship exists between the growth rates of the GDP and the development of unemployment (unemployment rate). This point holds that there will be a decline in the unemployment rates with the growth in GDP growth rates and a fall in GDP will be followed by a rise in the unemployment rates. Hence, this hypothesis suggests a causal relationship whereby improvements in GDP growth rates are supposed to cause correlating changes in unemployment rates, as it generally depicts the mechanism with which higher or lower economic activity impacts labour market conditions.

Conclusion 

In conclusion, the findings of this essay highlight the extent of the cohesion of economic and political dynamics. From examining primary drivers of political decision-making, such as GDP growth rates, inflation rates, unemployment rates and trade balances, we can observe how the mutual impact of these variables affects economic and political decisions in the long run. Our research proves how profound political outcomes depend on the country’s economy. Economic symbolism cannot only be used as a measuring stick in a nation’s financial health but also has a vague effect on people’s mentality, policy, and elections. Consequently, policymakers must examine the economic vulnerabilities and keep in mind that the political and economic realms are very much interrelated. The study must continue on this intricate relationship in the fermentation process to guide decisions and achieve long-term plans for community prosperity in the future.

REFERENCES

1. Bencsik, A., Juhasz, T., & Machova, R. (2017). The Problems Created by the Arrival of Generations Z and Y in the Workplace. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Management, Leadership and Governance (ICMLG 2017) (pp. 46-53).
2. Čabla, A., & Malá, I. (2017). Modelling of unemployment in the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 438-449. doi:10.18267/j.pep.620
3. Čadil, J., Pavelka, T., Kaňková, E., & Vorlíček, J. (2011). Odhad nákladů nezaměstnanosti z pohledu veřejných rozpočtů. Politická ekonomie, 59(5), 618-637. doi:10.18267/j.polek.811
4. Chehabeddine, M., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2020). Securing regional development. Insights into Regional Development, 2(1), 430-442. doi:10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(3)
5. Čulková, K., Janošková, M., & Csikósová, A. (2018). Factoring services in conditions of V4 countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 33-45. doi:10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.03
6. European Commission. (2019). Real GDP growth rate – volume. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from
7. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec0011
8. European Commission. (2019). Unemployment rate by age. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tepsr_wc170&language=en
9. Hedvickakova, M., Sokolova, M., & Mohelska, H. (2018). The Impact of Economic Growth on Wages and the Supply of Employee Benefits in the Czech Republic. Transformations in Business & Economics, 17(3), 140-154.