Introduction
This paper critically discusses an overview of H.H. Holmes, the redoubtable serial killer in American history. It provides a perspective into life, crimes, and its association with ideals for that era. Holmes was born Herman Webster Mudgett and later gained fame as one of the first documented American serial killers during the late 1800s. He built a maleficent castle made to commit murder that he used to perpetrate different atrocious offences against his numerous victims. This paper will look into the criminal behavior perpetrated by Holmes using several criminological theories; it includes choice theory, social learning theory, psychological theories, and biological theories. Factors linked to his criminal behavior as associated with each theory are elaborated within the paper.
Criminological Theories and Application to H.H. Holmes
Choice Theory
According to the choice theory, individuals decide to commit a crime after measuring the benefits and likely risks of such an action (Thomas, et al., 2020). This explanation provides an argument that criminals have no biological reasons for their actions. This theory explains that criminals make independent choices and hence they are the direct causes of their ill decisions and choices. Applied to H.H. If, under choice theory, one considers Holmes’ criminal acts, the deliberateness of his design and premeditation, prima facie calculations of his murders, would have to be committed. Building a murder castle containing secret passageways with concealed chambers and traps within reveals forethought in providing the means to facilitate certain crimes and avoid detection. For example, his clearly ability to lead or portray a normal public figure in full light and participate in some kindjson358 of wickedness is a clear choice to be able to break society’s rules just to have gain. Choice theory, thus, gives an illustration of rational processes that Holmes would always go through, providing an awareness of deliberate choices as the cornerstone of criminal behavior.
Social Learning Theory
Social learning theory claims that various behavior patterns are learned through observation, imitation, and the reinforcement obtained from the immediate environment (Akers & Jennings, 2019). Essentially, social learning theory supports this hypothesis: with or without prompting, people will always learn new skills and behaviors based on observing certain presumed role models, or they will obtain positive reinforcement for some forms of behavior. Take any of H.H.’s situations: So, social learning suggests that if Holmes’ behavior was criminal, it may have been learned from the environment and the people he has been in contact with through his life. For example, Holmes could take others’ criminal behaviors and wrongdoings around his environment or the house as a model. Furthermore, the criminal behaviour may have been positively reinforced or validated in such a manner that Holmes got admiration or praise or financial gain which may all have served to reinforce his tendencies towards violence and deceit. The social learning theory provides an explanation on how Holmes’ interactions and experiences contributed towards his development of criminal tendencies.
Psychological Theories
Psychological theories suggest that mental illnesses have great potential to lead people to commit crimes based on the impact on cognitive thought processing, emotional content, and impulse control. More like in the case of Holmes, it is assumed that his traits as a psychopath and probable mental illness greatly played a major part in doing evil (Frost, 2019). It would surely explain his inability to experience empathy, a disregard for social rules, and manipulative tendency with a penchant to lie if Holmes was suffering from one of these mental diseases such as antisocial personality disorder. Psychopathy might enable Holmes, having no remorse, superficial charm, and grandiose ideas about oneself, to take advantage of other people in situations when he understands for sure he can only benefit without experiencing any guilt. Thus, his criminal activities expose an incipient psychological mechanism for amoral conduct to Holmes, further elaborating the significance of understanding issues of mental health in the analysis of criminal conduct.
Biological Theories
Biological theories emphasize that the root of human aggression and violence most likely derives from genetics, neurology, and physiology. Most probably, biological factors to a greater extent contributed to H.H. Holmes’ predisposition to crime (Griffiths et al., 2023). For example, researchers found that high levels of aggression and impulsive control are related to genetic vulnerabilities that occur in conjunction with some anatomical or physiological abnormality of the brain. An environmental influence may have been in operation from Holmes’ biological constitution, such as his neurobiological status, genetically determined endowment, which could affect his behavior. This may also be due to the lower-level malfunctions in serotonin or testosterone, which influences mood and raises impulsivity, thus worsening violent tendencies. There were a great number of researchers relating impetuous and aggressive natures with pathological changes to the amygdala, the part of the brain responsible for emotional reactions and processing fear. In general, biological theories provide the basis for an all-round and holistic understanding of physiological mechanisms that underline aggression and violence by Holmes, emphasizing a rather complex interplay between genetical, neurobiological, and environmental influences with priority with regard to the criminal shaping.
Analysis of H.H. Holmes’ Crimes
H.H. Holmes, referred to as America’s first serial killer, committed a number of horrific crimes during the late 1800s (Travaglione, 2021). However, his most famous deed was his creation of a hotel building in Chicago City, famously termed the “Murder Castle.” The building was constructed with secret passages, trapdoors, and soundproof rooms, facilitating Holmes’ ability to kill and hide the evidence. Holmes would trap imprudent guests, usually young women, in his hotel, then he would later torture and kill them. His acts ranged from suffocation to poisoning and dismemberment. Insurance fraud also is part of what Holmes committed besides dissecting bodies, showing the man’s insensitivity towards human life. It is expected that the checkout of Holmes’ crimes goes with a pattern full of premeditation and manipulation as he laid plans carefully to murder one by one without being caught so he could fully fulfill his sadistic desires. His crime seems to be motivated by a combination of financial gain, sexual gratification, power, and control. In general, the criminal activities of Holmes depict chilling details about the profile of a psychopath who coolly preys upon the weak for his own sinister enjoyment.
Mental Illnesses and Psychopathy
Though there is no medical diagnosis of mental illness for H.H. Holmes, his behaviors still suggest traits that would likely be seen in cases of psychopathy. He was non-sympathetic and had no remorse for his victims and he used manipulative methods against the victims because he needs to profit himself from them. And this kind of act establishes that when he was performing the acts of real sadism he maintained a high level of social desirability and manipulativeness. Besides, Holmes had superficial charm and a sense of grandiosity, which is typical for psychopaths. Indeed, his huge ambitious plans, one of which was constructing the Murder Castle, prove a reasonable degree of slyness and manipulation. Though without a professionally established diagnosis, the lack of such complicates our understanding of the psychological state of Holmes. Deeds and behavior vividly specify the traits of being a psychopath which enhance the capacity for excessive violence and criminal activity.
Human Aggression and Violence
Human aggression and violence arise from multiple causative factors, such as environmental influences, socialization, and individual predispositions. In the case of H. H. Holmes, he probably had an array of factors combined. Coming from a disturbed or disastrous background or having undergone some tragic experience during childhood could have been motivating reasons for Holmes to develop aggressive tendencies. Individualism factors could be several things to look at in this paper. For example, one’s exposure to violence or a lack of good role models might have encouraged him to develop aggressive behavior. Moreover, some personality traits or characteristics and their moods associated with psychopathy may only aggravate the inclination to the commission of violence in a person like Holmes. These factors most openly revealed themselves in Holmes’ acts through his very calculating and sadistic treatment of his victims, which can be seen in the way that he carefully planned his murders and designed the Murder Castle to get away with them. Holmes’ acts are a bizarre mixture of environmental, social, and individual factors working in concert to produce his extreme aggression and violence.
Conclusion
The criminological theories utilized in the discussion elucidate various factors that surrounded H.H. Holmes’ motive for his criminal behavior. Choice theory highlights that Holmes’ actions were premeditated, whereas social learning theory points to the fact they had been motivated by the surroundings and by all manners of social interactions that people engage in. Conversely, psychological theories describe how mental health problems and psychopathy played a role in shaping Holmes, whereas biological theories underscored genetic and neurobiological factors. Key findings will ensure a multidimensional interaction between the individual, social, and biological factors that perpetuate Holmes’s violence. This knowledge will refer to the general populace basically in their identification and prevention process of crime. More involvement into in-depth research is necessary to see how these factors interact with each other and contribute to criminal behavior so that more effective interventions to rectify violent crime can be put in place.
References
Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. G. (2019). The social learning theory of crime and deviance. Handbook on crime and deviance, 113-129.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_6
Frieze, I. H., Newhill, C. E., Fusco, R., Frieze, I. H., Newhill, C. E., & Fusco, R. (2020). Causal factors in aggression and violence: examining social and biological theories. Dynamics of Family and Intimate Partner Violence, 17-62.
Frost, R. (2019). Words of a Monster: Analyzing the Writings of HH Holmes, America’s First Serial Killer. McFarland.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=PgmcDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=In+the+case+of+H.H.+Holmes,+his+alleged+psychopathy+and+potential+mental+health+issues+may+have+played+a+significant+role+in+his+criminal+actions&ots=x14Fkw9R0H&sig=2r0bTP0dy81gU5afBjv7F2FisMU
Griffiths, S., Jalava, J., & Colaguori, C. (2023). Crime, Psychopathology, and the Idea of the Natural-Born Criminal. Crime, Deviance, and Social Control in the 21st Century: A Justice and Rights Perspective, 235.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6BmyEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA235&dq=In+the+case+of+H.H.+Holmes,+biological+factors+may+have+played+a+role+in+shaping+his+propensity+for+criminal+behavior&ots=HQgsjhN5dC&sig=us_5sVN0qKzqdHaS8yX1eBuowmY
Thomas, K. J., Baumer, E. P., & Loughran, T. A. (2022). Structural predictors of choice: Testing a multilevel rational choice theory of crime. Criminology, 60(4), 606-636.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1745-9125.12314
Travaglione, A. (2021). A Golden Age Turned Red: America’s Obsession with Serial Murder in the 1950s and 1960s (Doctoral dissertation, College of Charleston).https://search.proquest.com/openview/0d3bafccd737bc08b7ac7bc423a07121/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
write