Abstract
This report comprehensively overviews the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS). The report critically examines the UK’s health and healthcare provisions, exploring the NHS’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as the challenges it faces in the present day. The organization of healthcare and payment systems, as well as how finite resources are distributed within the UK health sector, are also examined in the paper. The research also examines the positive and negative effects of the health economic techniques utilized on the health outcomes for the entire UK population. The report concludes that the NHS is a vital and valuable service that requires continued investment and improvement to ensure high-quality healthcare for all citizens of the UK. The report suggests potential solutions to the issues that the NHS faces, including a lack of funding, staff shortage, and integration, to ensure that the NHS can continue to provide high-quality healthcare for all citizens of the UK.
Keywords: Health, NHS, health economy, payment systems, UK, health insurance, health outcomes, healthcare, scarce resources, healthcare system.
1.0 Introduction
The National Health Service (NHS) of the UK is a publicly financed healthcare system that offers free medical care to all residents of the country (Maguire, 2020). Almost 66 million people in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are served by the NHS, one of the biggest and most complicated healthcare systems in the world (Guest et al., 2020). Health Boards in England, local health groups in Wales, and Primary Care Partnerships in Northern Ireland are in charge of national healthcare procurement. Despite this, 12% of the population purchases private health insurance in addition to their public plan (Buswell, 2022). Almost 58 million individuals who are permanent residents of the UK have access to free, universal healthcare (Talks et al., 2022). Medical care is free for the patient since everyone pays for it. The average healthcare tax paid by residents is 4.5%, or approximately 18% of their income (Sheikh et al., 2021).
In order to critically assess the UK’s health and healthcare systems, this research will look at how the country’s health economy allocates its limited resources, including how the country’s healthcare and payment systems are set up. The study will also consider the good and negative effects that various health economic methods have had on the health of the entire UK population. The report will take into account the NHS’s advantages and disadvantages, how resources are distributed within the health economy, and how health economic policies affect the health outcomes of the UK population. The report’s overall goal is to give a thorough overview of the NHS in the UK, identifying its successes and problems while also outlining potential remedies.
2.0 Critical Examination of the Health and Healthcare Provisions of the UK
The healthcare system of the UK is widely regarded as being among the very best in all of the countries of the globe. Every individual who resides in the UK is eligible to get medical treatment through the NHS, which is a healthcare system that is publicly financed (Guest et al., 2020). Since its inception in 1948, the NHS has been an essential element of the welfare state in the UK (Sheikh et al., 2021). With a budget of over 124 billion pounds in 2020-2021, the NHS is one of the world’s largest and most complicated healthcare systems (Buswell, 2022). The healthcare system in the UK is something that many people in the nation take great pride in, and it is frequently regarded as a representation of the country’s ideals and dedication to social justice.
2.1 Provision of services
The NHS provides a wide range of services, with primary care, secondary care, and tertiary care being just a few of them (Maguire, 2020). When individuals are concerned about their health, their primary care physician (also known as a general practitioner or GP) is the first person they see (Talks et al., 2022). Primary care services are distributed by general practitioners (Sheikh et al., 2021). Hospitals and other specialized healthcare providers give secondary care services, including emergency treatment, surgical care, and specialist care (Papanicolas et al., 2019). These services may also be referred to as “tertiary care.” Services for patients with complicated or chronic conditions are given by professionals and are referred to as tertiary care (Buswell, 2022). In addition, the NHS offers services in public health, community health, and mental health.
2.2 Funding
General taxes and contributions to National Insurance fund the NHS (Sheikh et al., 2021). The government decides the total budget for the NHS, as is the amount of funding allotted to the various services and geographic areas (Majeed et al., 2020). The NHS is subject to further oversight from a variety of administrations, for instance, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (Buswell, 2022). The CQC regulates and inspects healthcare services, while the National Institute for NICE offers advice on making the most use of available medications and treatments.
2.3 Contextualization of the Past
Historically, the UK’s church and other philanthropic organizations provided a significant portion of the nation’s healthcare (Papanicolas et al., 2019). Hospitals were initially founded in large towns such as London and Bristol in the 1500s, primarily providing medical treatment to the needy and the ill (Maguire, 2020). These early hospitals were frequently unsanitary and overcrowded, and the medical treatment available consisted of only the most fundamental procedures, such as bloodletting and purging (Majeed et al., 2020). The beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s coincided with a rise in population as well as an increase in urbanization (Buswell, 2022). This resulted in overcrowding as well as poor living conditions, both of which contributed to an increase in the incidence of infectious diseases such as cholera and tuberculosis.
In the 1800s, the government started playing a more active role in ensuring people had access to medical treatment. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 established a system of workhouses for the underprivileged, including the provision of fundamental medical treatment (Buswell, 2022). However, this method was roundly condemned for its lack of medical knowledge and brutal working conditions for the prisoners (Rodrigues and Plotkin, 2020). The Public Health Act was enacted in 1848, and its passage led to the formation of a network of municipal boards of health and gave those boards the authority to deal with matters such as disease prevention and cleanliness (Ince et al., 2022). This act is recognized as the formal start of the administration’s attempts to improve the health of the general people in the UK. In the early decades of the 20th century, the UK witnessed considerable advancements in healthcare delivery (Fahy et al., 2017). The National Insurance Act of 1911 formed a system of health insurance for working-class residents, which granted them access to medical treatment and financial support if they were unable to work due to a sickness or accident (Bloom, 2019). In 1948, the NHS was formed to offer free medical treatment to all people of the UK, irrespective of their level of wealth or social standing (Ince et al., 2022). The NHS was an impressive feat that marked a substantial step toward achieving universal healthcare coverage (Ghafur et al., 2019).
The current healthcare system in the UK is rather intricate since it integrates aspects of both publicly financed universal healthcare and the provision of private healthcare services (Papanicolas et al., 2019). The NHS is the principal healthcare provider in the nation. It provides a comprehensive variety of services, such as primary care, hospital care, and mental health services. The NHS is reinforced by general taxation and payments to National Insurance (Buswell, 2022). Despite its many accomplishments, the NHS continues to struggle with financial restrictions, staffing shortages, and lengthy wait periods for some procedures.
2.4 Strengths
Accessibility is seen as one of the most important advantages of the NHS. The NHS provides medical care to all residents of the UK, regardless of whether they can pay for it (Ince et al., 2022). Some members of the population, including pregnant children and pregnant women, are eligible for free medical treatment thanks to the NHS (Fahy et al., 2017). The NHS places significant importance on primary care, which is important in ensuring that patients receive the appropriate care at the appropriate time (Papanicolas et al., 2019). General practitioners are responsible for providing continuity of care (Miles et al., 2021), which means that they are responsible for their patient’s overall care, including referring them to specialists when necessary (Majeed et al., 2020). This responsibility includes making sure that their patients receive timely and appropriate treatment.
The NHS’s attention to public health is another one of its many strengths. The NHS significantly emphasizes disease prevention and health promotion (Ince et al., 2022). The government has made significant investments in programs aimed at improving public health, including campaigns to encourage healthy diet and regular physical activity (Buswell, 2022). The NHS also offers a wide variety of public health services, including immunization programs and campaigns to promote healthy lifestyles, amongst other things.
The NHS also significantly emphasizes research and new product development (Bloom, 2019). The research community working in the field of healthcare in the UK is well-regarded across the globe, and the NHS has made significant investments in research and development (Ince et al., 2022). The NHS has also been at the forefront of inventing new treatments and technology. Some examples include the implementation of telemedicine and creating of novel medications (Fahy et al., 2017).
2.5 Weaknesses
The NHS has a lot of shortcomings in addition to its many virtues. Lack of funds is a primary issue plaguing the NHS (Ince et al., 2022). Because of years of inadequate funding, the NHS is currently suffering from a scarcity of personnel and resources. This has resulted in extended wait times for certain procedures like surgery and has also contributed to a lack of beds in hospitals nationwide (McCartney et al., 2019).
Another of the NHS’s many flaws is that it is poorly integrated. The NHS comprises several distinct services, and the coordination between these services is not always strong (Ghafur et al., 2019). Because of this, patients could be transferred between different services without receiving the appropriate care at the appropriate time as a result (Ince et al., 2022). As a result of the NHS’s poor integration with social care services, patients may be released from the hospital before they are physically or mentally prepared to do so.
The NHS also suffers from a staffing crisis, notably in certain fields like nursing and primary care. Because of the scarcity of workers, the duties of the remaining employees may have to be increased, which can lead to burnout and attrition among employees (Papanicolas et al., 2019). Because fewer staff members are devoted to the patient’s requirements, this also affects the quality of care they receive.
One of the shortcomings of the NHS is that patients do not have many options to choose from (Majeed et al., 2020). Because the NHS is a centralized system, patients are frequently not allowed to choose which hospital to go to or which physician to see (Guest et al., 2020). Many patients suffering from chronic diseases requiring specialist care might find this situation challenging. Lastly, an aging population is a big obstacle for the NHS. The need for medical care in the UK is expected to rise in the coming years as the population ages (Papanicolas et al., 2019). Because elderly individuals typically have more complicated health demands than younger people, this will place an additional load on the NHS.
In addition to the NHS, the UK also has a private healthcare industry, which offers supplementary medical services to those in a financial position to pay for them (McCartney et al., 2019). The regime’s efforts to enhance the general public’s health in the UK are officially recognized to have begun with this legislation (Guest et al., 2020). The Care Quality Commission is in charge of policing the private medical industry to ensure that all its service providers adhere to acceptable levels of quality and safety (Miles et al., 2021).
Beginning in the early 1500s, the UK has had a long tradition of supplying its population with medical treatment throughout its history (McCartney et al., 2019). The delivery of medical treatment has undergone tremendous change throughout history and remains an issue that is the subject of continuing discussion and reform (Rodrigues and Plotkin, 2020). The NHS is the principal healthcare provider in the nation. It provides various services, for example, primary care, hospital care, and mental health services (Papanicolas et al., 2019). Despite its many accomplishments, the NHS continues to struggle with financial restrictions, staffing shortages, and lengthy wait periods for some procedures (Majeed et al., 2020). In addition, the private healthcare sector offers extra medical treatments to individuals who are financially able to pay for them.
Since the 1500s, the provision of healthcare in the UK has made significant strides, yet ongoing difficulties always need to be addressed (Rodrigues and Plotkin, 2020). The NHS is a vast and complicated institution seeing increased demand for its services. As a result, there have been calls for change to the system’s financing and administration (Guest et al., 2020). In addition, there is a severe lack of staff, which results in lengthy wait periods for specific treatments. This is one of the primary difficulties that have to be solved. Additional medical treatments are made available to people with the financial means to pay for them through the private healthcare industry (Ghafur et al., 2019). In general, the provision of healthcare in the UK is a problem that requires ongoing attention and development to fulfill the expectations of the inhabitants and stay up with the always-advancing medical technology (Majeed et al., 2020).
3.0 Examination of the UK Health Economy’s Organizational and Payment Structures and the Distribution of Its Inadequate Resources
The distribution of resources within the healthcare economy of the UK is a process that is intricate and multi-faceted, including some distinct organizations and payment methods (Majeed et al., 2020). The NHS is the primary body accountable for the distribution of resources within the health sector (Maguire, 2020). It receives its funding from general taxes and payments to National Insurance.
The NHS is structured with many tiers of treatment, the most common of which are primary care, secondary care, and tertiary care (Lange and Vollmer, 2017). When people are concerned about their health, the first person they see is a primary care physician, often known as a general practitioner (GP). Primary care is the initial level of medical treatment (Guest et al., 2020). Hospitals and other specialized healthcare providers offer secondary care services, which are provided in a hospital setting and include emergency treatment, surgical care, and specialty care (Papanicolas et al., 2019). Services for patients with complicated or long-term conditions are provided by professionals and are referred to as tertiary care.
The NHS allocates its resources according to various considerations, the most important of which is the total budget for the NHS and the particular requirements of the various areas and populations (Talks et al., 2022). The government decides the total budget for the NHS, as is the amount of funding allotted to the various services and geographic areas (Guest et al., 2020). The NHS is subject to further oversight from a variety of administrations, such as the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE (Ince et al., 2022)). The CQC is in charge of regulating and inspecting healthcare services, while the NICE offers advice on making the most use of available medications and treatments.
The utilization of various payment systems is among the most important means by which the NHS (NHS) distributes its resources. The Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) system is the payment method utilized most of the time within the NHS (Talks et al., 2022). This technique is used to distribute resources to various areas and populations depending on a variety of criteria, such as the size of the population, the density of the population, and the specific requirements of each community in terms of their health (Majeed et al., 2020). The RAWP method was developed to guarantee that resources are distributed fairly and equitably across the nation (Fahy et al., 2017).
The Payment by Results, or PbR, system is another payment utilized inside the NHS (Miles et al., 2021). This is a method for compensating medical professionals that takes into account both the number of people they see and the kinds of services they render (Guest et al., 2020). The goal of implementing this system is to incentivize healthcare professionals to improve their level of productivity and bring down overall expenses.
The NHS also uses various payment methods for individual types of care, such as mental health treatments and community health services (Talks et al., 2022). For instance, the NHS does resource allocation for mental health care using a system called the Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) (Sigfrid et al., 2021). This is a method for compensating medical professionals that takes into account both the number of patients they see and the treatments they provide to those patients who have a mental illness.
The NHS is not the only body that is active in the distribution of resources within the health economy; other organizations do as well (Talks et al., 2022). As an illustration, private healthcare providers also have a part to play in resource distribution. It is common practice for private healthcare providers to be compensated on a fee-for-service basis, and they are not required to comply with the same rules or undergo the same levels of monitoring as the NHS (Guest et al., 2020). The NHS and private healthcare providers are not mandated to use identical payment methods, and instead, private healthcare providers are often compensated on an individual patient basis.
The pharmaceutical business is another entity that plays a role in the allocation of resources within the context of the health economy (Papanicolas et al., 2019). In addition to being in charge of the design and production of pharmaceuticals, the pharmaceutical industry is also an essential cog in the machinery that drives the distribution of resources within the healthcare economy (Ince et al., 2022). The pharmaceutical sector is often compensated on a fee-for-service basis and is not subject to the same laws and control as the NHS. Moreover, the pharmaceutical industry is not subject to government subsidies.
In conclusion, allocating resources within the health economy of the UK is intricate and multi-faceted, including several different institutions and payment systems (Talks et al., 2022). The NHS is the primary body accountable for the distribution of resources within the health sector (Guest et al., 2020). It receives its funding from general taxes and payments to National Insurance. Combining several payment methods, such as the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) and Payment by Results (PbR) systems, for example (Maguire, 2020). These systems are intended to incentivize healthcare providers to be more efficient, save costs, and guarantee that resources are distributed fairly and evenly across the country.
However, the distribution of resources within the healthcare industry is fraught with difficulties of varying degrees (Sigfrid et al., 2021). Finding a happy medium between the need for high-quality medical treatment and the imperative to keep expenses under control is one of the most difficult tasks. The NHS is under growing pressure to reduce costs (Majeed et al., 2020), which has the potential to result in a decrease in the quality of treatment that patients get (Buswell, 2022).
A further obstacle is the necessity of ensuring that resources are distributed properly and evenly across a variety of geographical areas and people (Guest et al., 2020). The NHS places a significant emphasis on primary care, which plays an important role in ensuring that patients receive the appropriate care at the appropriate time. Nevertheless, certain geographic areas and populations have a greater demand for healthcare services than others; thus, this can contribute to a difference in the quality of treatment that patients get from various providers (Papanicolas et al., 2019).
In conclusion, the continual evolution of medical technology and treatment methods has an impact on the distribution of resources within the health industry and the economy as a whole (Ghafur et al., 2019). The NHS is under added pressure to keep expenditures under control as a result of the high cost of new technology and medical treatments (Guest et al., 2020). Therefore, allocating resources within the health economy of the UK is intricate and multi-faceted, including several different institutions and payment systems (McCartney et al., 2019). The NHS is the primary body accountable for the distribution of resources within the health sector (Guest et al., 2020). In order to guarantee that these resources are distributed fairly and equally across the country, the NHS utilizes a variety of distinct payment methods (Maguire, 2020). Nevertheless, the distribution of resources within the health economy is not without its difficulties, and there is a need to strike a balance between the requirement for high-quality medical treatment and the requirement to keep expenses under control (Majeed et al., 2020). The NHS must continue to receive financial support from the government to maintain its capacity to deliver comprehensive, high-quality medical treatment to all residents of the UK.
4.0 Investigating the Positive and Negative Effects of Health Economic Initiatives on Population Health Consequences
The distribution of resources within the health economy of the UK is a complicated and multi-faceted process that has the potential to have both good and negative effects on the health outcomes of the entire population (Guest et al., 2020). Health economic techniques are utilized to guarantee that resources are distributed fairly and equitably across a variety of locations and populations (Majeed et al., 2020) and encourage healthcare providers to be more efficient and minimize costs; health economic techniques are utilized (McCartney et al., 2019).
One of the most important advantages of adopting a health economics perspective is the contribution it makes toward ensuring that available resources are distributed justly and equitably across various geographical areas and demographic groups (Fahy et al., 2017). The Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) system, for instance, is utilized to allocate resources to various regions and populations based on some factors, such as the size of the population, the density of the population, and the specific requirements of each population in terms of their health (Buswell, 2022). This helps to guarantee that resources are distributed fairly and equitably and that all areas and people have access to high-quality healthcare.
Another advantageous effect of health economic techniques is the potential to contribute to cost reduction (Majeed et al., 2020). For instance, the Payment by Results (PbR) method is used to compensate healthcare professionals based on the number of people they treat as well as the services they offer (Ince et al., 2022). The goal of implementing this system is to incentivize healthcare professionals to improve their level of productivity and bring down overall expenses (Guest et al., 2020). This can assist in guaranteeing that the NHS has the resources it requires to provide inhabitants of the UK with high-quality healthcare accessible to everyone.
The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is one of the primary health economic methodologies employed in the UK (Buswell, 2022). CBA is employed to assess the costs and benefits of various healthcare interventions, with the end goal of identifying those interventions that are the most cost-effective. Because it helps to guarantee that resources are allocated to activities that deliver the most benefit to patients, CBA is a beneficial tool for the NHS (Talks et al., 2022).
The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)is yet another health economics method utilized in the UK (Guest et al., 2020). CEA is utilized to analyze the prices of various healthcare interventions, as well as their levels of efficacy, with the end goal of determining which therapies are the most cost-effective. CEA is a helpful tool for the NHS since it helps to ensure that resources are directed to activities that deliver the most value to patients (Lange and Vollmer, 2017).
Within the context of the health economy, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, generally known as NICE, plays a significant part in the distribution of available resources (McCartney et al., 2019). The NICE gives guidelines on the use of pharmaceuticals and medical treatments, and it also helps to ensure that resources are devoted to programs that are going to be of the most value to patients (Ince et al., 2022).
On the other hand, health economic initiatives may potentially have unintended consequences on the overall health of the population as a whole. One of the most significant adverse effects is the possibility that they may result in a decline in the level of medical treatment provided to patients. The NHS is under growing pressure to reduce costs, which has the potential to result in a decrease in the quality of treatment that patients get (Buswell, 2022). Many patients suffering from chronic diseases requiring specialist care might find this situation challenging.
Another unfavorable effect that health economic methods might have is that they can result in a variation in the level of treatment that patients get from one facility to another (McCartney et al., 2019). Some geographic areas and demographics have a greater demand for medical services than others, which can contribute to a difference in the quality of treatment that patients get in those locations and groups (Fahy et al., 2017). This may be particularly challenging for patients who reside in places with a high demand for medical services, such as the more densely populated parts of inner cities or rural areas.
In conclusion, health economic techniques are susceptible to change as a result of continual developments in medical technology and treatment methods (McCartney et al., 2019). The NHS is under added pressure to keep expenditures under control as a result of the high cost of new technology and medical treatments (Talks et al., 2022). Because of this, the NHS might not be able to finance the most cutting-edge technology and medical treatments, which could decrease the quality of care that patients get.
In conclusion, using health economic concepts may have both beneficial and detrimental effects on the overall health outcomes for a community as a whole. They have the potential to contribute to the reduction of expenses and the fair and equitable distribution of resources across various geographical areas and populations (Talks et al., 2022). On the other hand, they can also result in a decrease in the quality of care that patients get, a discrepancy in the quality of care that patients receive, and a reduction in the quality of care that patients receive as a result of the constant advances in technology and medical treatments (Buswell, 2022). Continued investment in the National Health Service (NHS) is required by the government to ensure that it will be able to provide high-quality medical care to every resident of the United Kingdom (UK), as well as to guarantee that the health economic strategies will not have a negative impact on the health consequences for the population. Both of these guarantees are necessary in order to meet the requirements of the government.
5.0 Conclusion
In conclusion, the NHS of the UK is a healthcare system that is publicly supported and offers people of the UK access to healthcare for themselves and their families. The NHS possesses a variety of qualities, the most notable of which are its accessibility, emphasis on primary care and public health, and concentration on research and innovation (Ince et al., 2022). However, the NHS suffers from a variety of flaws, the most notable of which are a scarcity of staff, inadequate financing, inadequate integration, and an absence of patient options. The NHS likewise sees severe difficulties as a result of an aging population (McCartney et al., 2019).
The distribution of resources within the healthcare economy of the UK is a process that is intricate and multi-faceted, including a number of distinct organizations and payment methods (Miles et al., 2021). The NHS is the primary body accountable for the distribution of resources within the health sector. In order to guarantee that these resources are distributed fairly and equally across the country, the NHS utilizes a variety of distinct payment methods (Guest et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the distribution of resources within the health economy is not without its difficulties, and there is a need to strike a balance between the requirement for high-quality medical treatment and the requirement to keep expenses under control (Lange and Vollmer, 2017).
The health economic methodologies that are utilized in the UK, such as cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), have a considerable influence on the health outcomes for the entirety of the population (Ince et al., 2022). These approaches help to ensure that resources are distributed effectively and efficiently; however, they also have some negative impacts, such as a reduction in the quality of care that patients receive, a reduction in the choice of treatments that are available to patients, and a disparity in the quality of care that patients receive across different regions and population groups (Miles et al., 2021).
Overall, it is abundantly evident that the NHS is an essential and useful service highly valued by the people of the UK (McCartney et al., 2019). However, it is also obvious that some obstacles need to be overcome before the NHS can continue providing high-quality healthcare to all people who live in the UK. In order to ensure that the NHS can continue providing high-quality healthcare for all of the UK’s residents, the government must continue to invest in the NHS and address the problems that have been identified (Talks et al., 2022). These problems include a lack of funding, a shortage of staff, and a lack of integration.
6.0 References
Bloom, B., 2019. Work shifts in hospitals’ emergency departments: the UK experience. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(6), pp.392-393.
Buswell, G., 2022. Healthcare in the UK: A guide to the NHS, Expatica. Available at: https://www.expatica.com/uk/healthcare/healthcare-basics/the-national-health-service-and-health-insurance-in-the-uk-1092057/ (Accessed: October 13, 2022).
Chang, J., Peysakhovich, F., Wang, W. and Zhu, J., 2011. The UK health care system. The United Kingdom, 30, p.2019.
Cookson, R., Drummond, M. and Weatherly, H., 2009. Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions. Health economics, policy and law, 4(2), pp.231-245.
Fahy, N., Hervey, T., Greer, S., Jarman, H., Stuckler, D., Galsworthy, M. and McKee, M., 2017. How will Brexit affect health and health services in the UK? Evaluating three possible scenarios. The Lancet, 390(10107), pp.2110-2118.
Gaw, A.G., Wemyss, C., Bell, A. and Goodall, C.A., 2022. Management of patients at risk of adrenal crisis in the dental setting: a review of current practice in UK dental teaching hospitals. British Dental Journal, pp.1-4.
Guest, J.F., Fuller, G.W. and Vowden, P., 2020. Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s NHSin 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ open, 10(12), p.e045253.
Ghafur, S., Grass, E., Jennings, N.R. and Darzi, A., 2019. The challenges of cybersecurity in health care: the UK NHSas a case study. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(1), pp.e10-e12.
Ince, R., Glasby, J., Miller, R. and Glasby, A.M., 2022. ‘Why are we stuck in hospital?’ Understanding delayed hospital discharges for people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long‐stay hospitals in the UK. Health & Social Care in the Community.
Lange, S. and Vollmer, S., 2017. The effect of economic development on population health: a review of the empirical evidence. British medical bulletin, 121(1), pp.47-60.
Majeed, A., Maile, E.J. and Bindman, A.B., 2020. The primary care response to COVID-19 in England’s National Health Service. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(6), pp.208-210.
McCartney, G., Hearty, W., Arnot, J., Popham, F., Cumbers, A. and McMaster, R., 2019. Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews. American journal of public health, 109(6), pp.e1-e12.
Maguire, D., 2020. The economic influence of the NHS at the local level, The King’s Fund. Available at: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/economic-influence-nhs-local-level (Accessed: October 13, 2022).
Miles, D.K., Stedman, M. and Heald, A.H., 2021. “Stay at Home, Protect the National Health Service, Save Lives”: A cost-benefit analysis of the lockdown in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(3), p.e13674.
Papanicolas, I., Mossialos, E., Gundersen, A., Woskie, L. and Jha, A.K., 2019. Performance of UK NHScompared with other high-income countries: an observational study. bmj, 367.
Rodrigues, C.M. and Plotkin, S.A., 2020. Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives. Frontiers in microbiology, 11, p.1526.
Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S., Casadei, B., Franklin, B.D., Richards, M., Taylor, D., Tibble, H. and Mossialos, E., 2021. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(6), pp.e383-e396.
Sigfrid, L., Drake, T.M., Pauley, E., Jesudason, E.C., Olliaro, P., Lim, W.S., Gillesen, A., Berry, C., Lowe, D.J., McPeake, J. and Lone, N., 2021. Long Covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: A prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol. The Lancet Regional Health-Europe, 8, p.100186.
Talks, S.J., Stratton, I., Peto, T., Lotery, A., Chakravarthy, U., Eleftheriadis, H., Izadi, S., Dhingra, N. and Scanlon, P., 2022. Aflibercept in clinical practice; visual acuity, injection numbers and adherence to treatment, for diabetic macular oedema in 21 UK hospitals over 3 years. Eye, 36(1), pp.72-77.
write