Over time, the US Army has achieved tremendous military breakthroughs. From the 1980s to the present, education and training structures have transitioned from analog to digital. More breakthroughs in military education and training are expected in the next years. At the start of a soldier’s career, schools and courses often focus on training to prepare them for uncertainty. As their service period grows, their courses become more educational, preparing them for the unknown. Soldiers’ leadership abilities are improved through leadership training to lead others effectively. Training, coursework, and experience all play a part in development. Education guides on how to think, whereas training teaches skills. They interlink through experience. Army officers must balance being educated and prepared to be operationally flexible and institutionally transformative in today’s war and the future.
Soldiers in the military who want to climb to higher ranks need leadership training. Sergeants are one of the positions that should depend on Soldiers’ training (Callina, 2017). The average number of trainees and students who engage in official training and education courses to gain expertise and knowledge to work in military professions is called military loads (Lawrence, 2016). Leadership training is essential for developing talented and brave leaders who can assume decisive action while leading others (Petrick, 2020). Soldiers will benefit from training that focuses on assessing their flaws and strengths in the line of duty, then making appropriate modifications to the deficiencies and making maximum improvements to the strengths. Training junior soldiers boost the confidence of those who will be leading them once again. The training is an origin of authority for the command, which younger officers will follow.
Leaders with experience will benefit from leadership training to help junior soldiers progress their careers. Constant contact between leaders and soldiers beneath them would provide a conducive atmosphere for career growth advice. This frequent contact exposes any weaknesses on the part of junior soldiers who require guidance and emotional support (Roberts, 2016). Those with specific abilities will be recognized for leadership responsibilities in areas where they may best assist. Training is appropriately significant in terms of commanding advocates and financing, but its importance in concerns of command is valid when contrasted to just providing instruction to military personnel.
Many military leaders discover that their service personnel lacks the intellectual qualifications needed to execute military professions and advance in their careers upwardly. The issue is that high school graduation does not ensure that a person would be able to acquire higher-level abilities. Furthermore, several diploma holders lack the necessary reading and writing skills to succeed in higher training and job specialization in the military. The military must guarantee that fundamental abilities are strengthened to provide fundamental commands (Roberts, 2016). So that practical plans may be implemented, the prerequisites for educational growth should be clearly understood, and difficulties related to it must be addressed at policy-making levels.
An association between the defense department and higher education is required. The partnership is critical in ensuring that service members’ requirements are recognized and met. In addition, the needs and quality of the educational procedure in the nation should be considered. Collaboration is required at important institutions to enhance the military via training and education. The troops must be educated once they have been trained.
In the confusion and uncertainty of tactical battle, improving thinking abilities allows commanders and soldiers to beat their opponents. Improving thinking skills enable leaders to become operational artists capable of planning, preparing, and executing large-scale campaigns and extensive operations regardless of situation or mission. Individuals will grasp the needs of compound problem resolution and critical systems, and strategic thinking rather than focusing on specific issue areas. Leader development, in the end, necessitates the right blend of training, education, and experience throughout a career. To be operationally ready, leaders should pursue their civilian and military education.
References
Callina, S., Ryan, D., Murray, D., Colby, A., Damon, W., Matthews, M., & Lerner, M. (2017). Developing leaders of character at the United States Military Academy: A relational developmental systems analysis. Journal of College and Character, 18(1), 9-27.
Lawrence, J. (2016). Leadership roles: Train versus Educate. Retrieved August 18, 2016, from https://deliberatedevelopment.org/2016/08/18/leadership-roles-train-versuseducate/
Petrick, J. (2020). The Importance of Leadership Training in the Army. Retrieved from https://work.chron.com/importance-leadership-training-army-23722.html
Roberts, K., Herrington, V., Jones, W., White, J., & Day, D. (2016). Police leadership in 2045: The value of education in developing leadership. Policing. A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10(1), 26-33.
write