Introduction
Cognitive moral development is fundamental to human growth, encompassing the acquisition and refinement of ethical beliefs and values. It is a crucial framework for understanding how people explore moral problems and make ethical judgments. At the center of this improvement is the course of moral thinking, which includes assessing good and bad and the support of one’s choices (Tadjuddina et al., 2019). Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development provides a comprehensive understanding of the different levels individuals progress through as they mature cognitively and morally. The theory has three distinct levels: conventional, post-conventional, and pre-conventional morality. Each level comprises stages that address changing moral thinking refinement and intricacy levels.
Kohlberg’s Levels of Moral Development
Lawrence Kohlberg proposed a comprehensive theory of moral development that outlines six distinct stages grouped into three levels. These stages represent different levels of moral reasoning and reflect individuals’ progression as they mature cognitively and morally (Pajuelo et al., 2021).
Level 1: Pre-conventional morality
At this stage, individuals’ moral reasoning primarily focuses on self-interest and external consequences rather than internalized ethical principles. Obedience and Punishment Orientation is the first stage of level I. In this stage, individuals make moral judgments based on the fear of punishment or the desire to avoid negative consequences. They view rules as absolute and obedience as necessary for personal safety and security. For example, a child might refrain from stealing a toy because they fear their parents’ punishment. Individualism and Exchange is the second stage of level I. At stage 2, individuals recognize that different people have different perspectives, and their moral decisions are guided by self-interest and the expectation of reciprocity (Pajuelo et al., 2021). They view moral actions as instrumental in serving their personal needs. For instance, a person might engage in helpful behavior to gain future favors from others.
Level 2: Conventional Morality
Conventional morality is characterized by moral reasoning based on social norms and societal expectations. Stage 3 of level II is Interpersonal Relationships and Conformity. At this stage, individuals seek to please others and gain their approval. Moral judgments are based on maintaining positive relationships and conforming to social norms. Decisions are often guided by empathy and the desire to be seen as good (Pajuelo et al., 2021). Maintaining Social Order is the fourth stage. In this stage, individuals value the maintenance of social order and respect for authority. Moral reasoning is focused on upholding rules, laws, and social institutions to benefit society.
Level 3: Post-conventional Morality
Post-conventional morality involves higher moral reasoning that transcends societal norms and focuses on ethical principles. Social Contract and Individual Rights is the fifth stage. At this stage, individuals recognize the importance of a social contract and uphold individual rights. Moral decisions are guided by the belief that rules and laws should be mutually agreed upon and serve the community’s best interests (Pajuelo et al., 2021). Universal Principles are the sixth stage. In the final stage of moral development, individuals base their moral judgments on abstract, universally applicable ethical principles. They prioritize justice, equality, and respect for human dignity over societal norms or laws (Pajuelo et al., 2021).
Reasoning Process in Ethical Decision-Making
The reasoning process is fundamental to ethical decision-making, shaping how individuals evaluate moral dilemmas and justify their choices. It involves a series of interconnected steps that contribute to forming ethical judgments (Small & Lew, 2021). Moral awareness is at the core of the reasoning process, which entails recognizing the presence of a moral issue or dilemma. This involves an individual’s ability to identify a particular situation’s potential consequences and ethical implications. With this awareness, individuals may recognize the ethical dimension of their decisions.
Once individuals become aware of the moral dimension, they engage in the critical task of gathering information. This step involves seeking relevant facts, considering different perspectives, and examining the potential impacts on various stakeholders. A comprehensive understanding of the situation is essential to make informed ethical judgments. Following the information-gathering stage, individuals embark on the process of moral reasoning. Moral reasoning refers to the cognitive process of evaluating available options and making ethical judgments (Small & Lew, 2021). It involves applying moral principles, values, and ethical frameworks. Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development highlights the progressive nature of moral reasoning, with individuals moving from self-interest to societal norms and eventually to abstract ethical principles (Small & Lew, 2021).
A crucial aspect of the reasoning process is considering the consequences of one’s actions. Ethical decision-making requires individuals to assess the potential outcomes and impacts on themselves and others (Small & Lew, 2021). This involves weighing the benefits and harms associated with each option and considering the overall well-being and fairness of the outcome. Individuals must navigate the complexities of balancing conflicting interests and determining the most ethical action.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the reasoning process is a vital aspect of ethical decision-making. It encompasses moral awareness, information gathering, moral reasoning, considering consequences, reflective deliberation, and justification. Individuals can navigate complex moral dilemmas and make informed and ethically sound choices by understanding and engaging in this process.
References
Tadjuddina, N., Elfiahb, R., Meriyatic, M., Suardi, I., & Wekked, A. S. (2019). The interaction of children’s early moral development process through a holistic approach. Interaction, 8(9).
Pajuelo, M. D. S., Mejía, L. R. J. B., Bardalez, F. D. J. S., Marqués, K. F. C., & Maceda, M. C. P. (2021). Level of moral development in students at the Law School of San Ignacio de Loyola University (Lima-Peru) in the face of political corruption 2021. Economic Research Guardian, 11(2), 270-283.
Small, C., & Lew, C. (2021). Mindfulness, moral reasoning and responsibility: Towards virtue in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 169, 103–117.
write