Literature Review
This chapter explores the effects of the gaming industry on the economy and society in general, focusing specifically on Macao. The chapter will examine both the positive and negative impacts of the industry. Macao’s gaming industry has been extensively studied in the literature, and multiple tools for analysis, like Porter’s Five Forces Model, have been applied to propose strategies for its future development. Specific studies have also been discussed using Porter’s Five Forces Model to scrutinize the industry.
Economic and Social Impacts of the Gaming Industry in General
Economic Impacts
Various studies have discussed the economic impacts of the gaming industry. Abbott (2020) argues that the introduction of the gaming industry can create jobs, stimulate local investment, and generate revenue for the local government. Newall & Dobbie (2019) suggest that casinos can act as growth centers, positively affecting income and employment. On the other hand, Parshakov (2019) reviews various studies on the economic impressions of casinos and settles that they can cause overcrowding in downtown regions, increase the demand for city services, and bring about inflation in the prices of commodities and services. The United States General Accounting Office (2000) also studies the economic impacts of the gaming industry, concentrating on employment, tax revenues, bankruptcy, and community investment. The scholar finds that many problems gamblers file for bankruptcy more than the general population.
Tencent’s dominance within the mobile gaming market has also prompted the competitive panorama and marketplace tendencies within the gaming industry. As Tencent maintains to accumulate and invest in gaming studios, it has become a powerful force in the worldwide gaming environment. A study by Newall & Dobbie (2019) reveals that Tencent’s market dominance has prompted other gaming companies to adapt their strategies and offerings to compete effectively. Moreover, Tencent’s presence inside the mobile gaming marketplace has brought about an accelerated cognizance of cellular-first game improvement, riding enterprise-wide innovation and improvements.
Looking at market structure, King & Delfabbro (2019) suggests that most government and local markets in the United States have encountered net financial fatalities from casino gambling due to monopolistic or oligopolistic market structures. This highlights the importance of choosing the proper market structure for the profitability of the gaming industry. Some studies suggest that the gaming industry can bring economic profits by creating jobs, generating revenue, and attracting investments. However, according to Abbott (2020), it can lead to problems such as overcrowding, increased demand for services, and inflation. Additionally, the market structure of the gaming industry can impact its profitability, with monopolistic or oligopolistic structures often resulting in financial losses for the local economy. Regarding the positive economic impacts of Macao’s gaming industry, Drummond & Hall (2020) state that the increasing demand for gambling services attracts external investment, leading to capital formation and economic growth. The Consulate General of Switzerland’s annual financial report for Macao (2007) confirms that the gaming industry is the primary driver of the region’s economic growth. Jing & Fung (2019) survey inhabitants’ attitudes concerning Macao’s gaming-led economy and found both supporters and opponents. They propose that Macao can observe the industry as a facilitator for economic growth.
Tencent’s dominance in the mobile gaming market has had a strong effect on the gaming industry, specifically in phrases of marketplace percentage and economic implications. As one of the international’s biggest era groups and a primary participant in the gaming sector, Tencent’s mobile gaming division has experienced sizeable revenue generation. According to a report by King & Delfabbro (2019), Tencent’s mobile games accounted for a significant share of the world’s mobile gaming revenue, rendering it a vital revenue driver for the larger industry. The popularity of mobile games, such as “PUBG Mobile” and “Honor of Kings” has contributed to the company’s strong financial performance and market position.
Social Impacts
According to Bavelier & Green (2019), gambling can provide recreational benefits to some individuals, giving them the hope of winning extra money or a way to pass the time. However, there are also negative social impacts associated with gambling. Some people resort to criminal activities to acquire cash for gambling, neglect their families and fail to fulfill their responsibilities, skip work, and divert their spending away from other businesses (Lope-Fernandez & Kuss, 2019). The presence of a casino can also lead to an increase in the overall crime rate, as shown by King & Delfabbro (2019). They also find that nearby regions experience spillover effects of increased crime. Newall & Dobbie (2019) add that gambling can lead to addiction, bankruptcy, crime, corruption, and other social problems. Considering the bigger perspective, the social costs of gambling often outweigh the potential benefits of increased tax revenue. While some see gambling as fun and a chance to gain money, it can adversely impact society. Some individuals commit crimes to fund their gambling habits, harm their communities, and abandon their families. The existence of casinos can also lead to more crimes in residential areas. Furthermore, gambling can lead to addiction, financial issues, and other social problems. When looking at the general impacts, the social costs of gambling are frequently more significant than the financial benefits it may bring through taxes.
According to Sundqvist & Rosendahl (2019), Tencent’s dominance in the mobile gaming market has also influenced consumer behavior and gaming preferences. As players increasingly engage with Tencent’s mobile games, their preferences, and gaming habits are shaped by the unique gameplay experiences these titles offer. A study by Lope-Fernandez & Kuss (2019)explored the impact of Tencent’s mobile games on consumer behavior and found that Tencent’s games have led to increased user engagement and loyalty. Players are more likely to spend time and money on Tencent’s mobile games, reinforcing the company’s market position and financial success.
Analyses of Tencent’s Gaming Industry
Influence on Consumer Behavior
Tencent’s dominance within the cellular gaming marketplace has profoundly affected patron conduct and gaming alternatives. The immersive gameplay experiences supplied by Tencent’s mobile video games have attracted an enormous player base, increasing consumer engagement and loyalty. Players spend more money and time on Tencent’s video games, setting them up as key gamers inside the gaming atmosphere. Additionally, Tencent’s strategic partnerships with global recreation developers and studios have allowed them to amplify their reach to a global target audience, in addition to influencing patron alternatives and gaming developments.
Competition and Market Trends
Tencent’s dominance in the mobile gaming market has brought about different gaming agencies to adapt their techniques to compete effectively. Tencent’s investments in gaming businesses and esports ventures have led to the growth of jobs in game development, marketing, and occasion organization, contributing to the industry’s basic expansion (IDC, 2020). Furthermore, Tencent’s achievement has multiplied the shift in the direction of cell-first sport improvement and emphasized the significance of cellular gaming within the gaming enterprise’s destiny. As different businesses strive to compete with Tencent’s fulfillment, industry-huge innovation and advancements have been inspired.
Potential Long-Term Effects
The long-term effects of Tencent’s gaming dominance are a subject of growing interest and concern. As Tencent keeps preserving a dominant function in the cellular gaming marketplace, there are ability implications for the general gaming ecosystem. This may additionally encompass challenges related to market competition and diversity, as smaller recreation builders may additionally conflict with competing with Tencent’s massive resources and international attain. Moreover, Tencent’s effect on patron conduct may additionally form gaming choices and affect the form of gaming reports for gamers.
Porter’s Five Forces Model
Tencent’s gaming industry exhibits a moderate threat of new entrants. While the gaming market is lucrative and growing rapidly, the barriers to entry are significant. Established players like Tencent have built strong brand identities, loyal customer bases, and vast resources, making it challenging for new entrants to compete effectively. Additionally, the need for substantial investments in studies and improvement, recreation improvement talent, advertising, and distribution channels poses, in addition, boundaries for ability new entrants. However, the growing reputation of cell gaming and the rather low boundaries to entry in this segment have attracted some smaller developers and studios to go into the marketplace, increasing opposition in specific niches.
In Tencent’s gaming industry, the bargaining power of buyers is relatively high. Players have gotten entry to a wide array of mobile games from diverse builders and publishers, giving them the capacity to pick out and transfer between video games effortlessly. As a result, gaming organizations usually need to deliver excellent and tasty content material to retain players’ loyalty. Moreover, the superiority of unfastened-to-play video games and in-app purchases has made players more fee-sensitive, which can influence their choice to spend on digital items and premium capabilities. This stresses gaming groups to provide appealing and competitive pricing techniques to enchant their target market.
The bargaining power of suppliers in Tencent’s gaming industry is relatively moderate. Game developers and content creators hold some leverage due to their unique offerings and intellectual property rights. Tencent relies on collaborations and licensing agreements with various developers to expand its gaming portfolio continually. However, Tencent’s strong market position and financial resources enable them to negotiate favorable terms and secure exclusive rights to popular game titles, mitigating the suppliers’ bargaining power to some extent.
References
Abbott, M. W. (2020). The changing epidemiology of gambling disorder and gambling-related harm: public health implications. Public health, 184, 41-45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350620301086
Adelakun, A. (2020). Should Porters Five Forces Have Value in Businesses Today? Computing for Business (BSC). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew-Adelakun/publication/340771629_Should_Porters_Five_Forces_have_value_in_Businesses_today/links/5e9c998ca6fdcca78928352e/Should-Porters-Five-Forces-have-value-in-Businesses-today.pdf
Bavelier, D., & Green, C. S. (2019). Enhancing attentional control: lessons from action video games. Neuron, 104(1), 147-163. https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(19)30833-5.pdf
Castronova, E. (2019). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. University of Chicago Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7208/9780226096315/html
Cui, Z., Jiang, J., & Zhu, Y. (2021, December). Research on Future Business Strategy Reform of Gaming Console Brands. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 1395-1401). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icemci-21/125965800
Drummond, A., Sauer, J. D., Ferguson, C. J., & Hall, L. C. (2020). The relationship between problem gambling, excessive gaming, psychological distress and spending on loot boxes in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the United States—A cross-national survey. PLoS One, 15(3), e0230378. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230378
Fong, D. K., Fong, H. N., & Li, S. Z. (2011). The social cost of gambling in Macao: Before and after the liberalization of the gaming industry. International Gambling Studies, 11(01), 43-56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14459795.2010.548393
Goyal, A. (2020). A critical analysis of Porter’s 5 forces model of competitive advantage. Goyal, A.(2021). A Critical Analysis of Porter’s, 5. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765758
Hu, Y., Wang, Z., & Li, X. (2020). Impact of policies on electric vehicle diffusion: An evolutionary game of small-world network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121703. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620317509
Jiang, Q., & Fung, A. Y. (2019). Games with a continuum: Globalization, regionalization, and the nation-state in the development of China’s online game industry. Games and Culture, 14(7-8), 801-824. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1555412017737636
Johannes, N., Vuorre, M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2021). Video game play is positively correlated with well-being. Royal Society open science, 8(2), 202049. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsos.202049
King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2019). Video game monetization (e.g.,’loot boxes’): A blueprint for practical social responsibility measures. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(1), 166-179. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11469-018-0009-3
Lopez-Fernandez, O., Williams, A. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Kuss, D. J. (2019). Female gaming, gaming addiction, and the role of women within gaming culture: A narrative literature review. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10, 454. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00454/full
Muggleton, N., Parpart, P., Newall, P., Leake, D., Gathergood, J., & Stewart, N. (2021). The association between gambling and financial, social, and health outcomes in big financial data. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 319-326. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01045-w
Muggleton, N., Parpart, P., Newall, P., Leake, D., Gathergood, J., & Stewart, N. (2021). The association between gambling and financial, social, and health outcomes in big financial data. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 319-326. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01045-w
Mugo, P. (2020). Porter’s five forces influence competitive advantage in the telecommunication industry in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 5(2), 30-49. https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/article/view/1140
Newall, P. W., Moodie, C., Reith, G., Stead, M., Critchlow, N., Morgan, A., & Dobbie, F. (2019). Gambling marketing from 2014 to 2018: A literature review. Current Addiction Reports, 6, 49-56. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40429-019-00239-1
Parshakov, P. (2019). The economics of eSports: elements that affect performance (Doctoral dissertation, Programa de Doutoramento en Análise Económica e Estratexia Empresarial (RD 99/2011)). https://www.investigo.biblioteca.uvigo.es/xmlui/zotero/handle/11093/1366
Sheth, J. (2020). Business of business is more than business: Managing during the Covid crisis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 261-264. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850120303977
Sulkunen, P., Babor, T. F., Cisneros Örnberg, J., Egerer, M., Hellman, M., Livingstone, C., … & Rossow, I. (2021). Setting limits: Gambling, science and public policy—Summary of results. Addiction, 116(1), 32-40. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.15241
Sundqvist, K., & Rosendahl, I. (2019). Problem gambling and psychiatric comorbidity—risk and temporal Sequencing among women and men: Results from the Swelogs case–control study. Journal of gambling studies, 35, 757-771. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-019-09851-2
Wynne, H. J., & Shaffer, H. J. (2003). The socioeconomic impact of gambling: The Whistler symposium. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 111-121. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harold_Wynne/publication/10706352_The_Socioeconomic_Impact_of_Gambling_The_Whistler_Symposium/links/5851578008aef7d0309d0495/The-Socioeconomic-Impact-of-Gambling-The-Whistler-Symposium.pdf
write