Part 1
One ethical problem or issue in the medical profession is the Practice of over-prescribing medications. Over-prescribing medications, also known as polypharmacy, is the Practice of prescribing multiple medications to a patient for the treatment of a single condition or multiple conditions. This can lead to negative consequences such as the increased risk of adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and decreased effectiveness of the medications. Additionally, it can also contribute to the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. This Practice can be influenced by factors such as a need for more communication between healthcare providers, financial incentives, and lack of education on prescribing guidelines. To address this issue, healthcare providers should prioritize communication and collaboration, use evidence-based prescribing guidelines, and regularly review and adjust a patient’s medication regimen.
The ethical issue of over-prescribing medications involves the potential harm caused by physicians prescribing excessive or unnecessary medications to patients. This can lead to negative side effects, addiction, and financial burdens for patients, and it also contributes to the larger issue of antibiotic resistance and the high cost of healthcare. One perspective is that over-prescribing is driven by financial incentives for physicians, such as bonuses for meeting prescription targets or pressure from pharmaceutical companies to promote their products(Bedene et al.,2022). Additionally, some argue that the culture of medicine prioritizes the treatment of symptoms rather than addressing underlying causes, leading to over-prescription. Another perspective is that over-prescribing results from defensive medicine, in which physicians prescribe medication to protect themselves from potential malpractice lawsuits.
Additionally, clearer guidelines for prescribing medication must be provided, leading to confusion and over-prescription. There are also differing opinions on the appropriate response to over-prescribing. Some propose stricter regulations on prescribing and financial incentives for physicians, while others argue for increased education and training for physicians and better access to alternative therapies. In summary, the ethical issue of over-prescribing medication is the potential harm caused by excessive or unnecessary prescription. This issue is driven by financial incentives, defensive medicine, a lack of clear guidelines, and a culture of treating symptoms. Different opinions on the appropriate response to this issue include stricter regulations, increased education, and better access to alternative therapies.
Part 2
One ethical position that could be applied in dealing with the issue of over-prescribing medications is the principle of beneficence. This principle holds that healthcare professionals should act in the best interest of their patients and do everything possible to promote their well-being (Thomas & Mathew, 2020). In the context of over-prescribing, healthcare professionals should be cautious in prescribing medications and only do so when it is clearly in the patient’s best interest. This could involve taking into account the potential risks and benefits of the medication, as well as considering alternative treatment options. The principle of beneficence is a fundamental ethical principle in healthcare that requires healthcare professionals to prioritize the well-being of their patients. In the context of over-prescribing medications, this principle would require healthcare professionals to be cautious when prescribing medications and only do so when it is clearly in the patient’s best interest. This means taking into account the potential risks and benefits of the medication, as well as considering alternative treatment options.
One way to apply the principle of beneficence in the context of over-prescribing is to ensure that medications are only prescribed for conditions for which they have been proven effective. This can be accomplished by adhering to evidence-based guidelines and staying up-to-date with the latest research on the safety and efficacy of different medications. Additionally, healthcare professionals should be transparent with their patients about the risks and benefits of their medications and consider the patient’s preferences and values when making treatment decisions (Greiwe et al., 2022). Therefore healthcare professionals need to be aware of the potential for addiction and dependence when prescribing medications. This can be done by avoiding over-prescribing, setting clear guidelines for how long a medication should be taken, and monitoring patients for signs of addiction or dependence. By being mindful of these potential risks, healthcare professionals can ensure that they act in their patient’s best interests. In summary, the principle of beneficence requires healthcare professionals to prioritize the well-being of their patients. Over-prescribing means being cautious when prescribing medications, adhering to evidence-based guidelines, considering alternative treatment options, being transparent with patients about risks and benefits, and being mindful of potential addiction and dependence.
A second ethical position that could be applied is the principle of non-maleficence. This principle holds that healthcare professionals should not harm their patients (John & Wu, 2022). In the context of over-prescribing, healthcare professionals should be careful not to prescribe medications that could cause harm to the patient. This could involve considering the potential side effects of the medication and weighing them against the potential benefits. The principle of non-maleficence is one of the foundational ethical principles in healthcare and is often considered alongside the principle of beneficence (the duty to do well). The principle of non-maleficence states that healthcare professionals should not cause harm to their patients and should always strive to minimize harm in their Practice. This principle is particularly relevant in prescribing medications, as there is always a risk that the medication could cause harm to the patient. The principle of non-maleficence is one of the foundational ethical principles in healthcare and is often considered alongside the principle of beneficence (the duty to do good). The principle of non-maleficence states that healthcare professionals should not cause harm to their patients and should always strive to minimize harm in their Practice. This principle is particularly relevant in prescribing medications, as there is always a risk that the medication could cause harm to the patient.
One way healthcare professionals can apply this principle is by carefully considering the potential side effects of the medication and weighing them against the potential benefits. For example, if a medication has severe side effects that outweigh the potential benefits, it may not be appropriate to prescribe it. Additionally, healthcare professionals should consider the individual patient’s unique situation, such as their medical history and any other medications they are taking, to determine if the medication is safe for them to take. In conclusion, non-maleficence is an essential ethical principle in healthcare, and healthcare professionals must minimize harm to their patients. This principle is particularly important when prescribing medications, as there is always a risk of harm associated with these treatments. By carefully considering the potential side effects of medications and monitoring patients closely, healthcare professionals can help ensure that they are not causing harm to their patients and are providing the best possible care.
A third ethical position that could be applied is the principle of autonomy. This principle holds that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their healthcare (Varkey, 2021).In the context of over-prescribing, healthcare professionals should respect the patient’s right to decide about their treatment and not pressure them into taking medications they do not want to take. This could involve providing patients with clear and accurate information about the medications prescribed and any potential risks or side effects. The principle of autonomy is an important ethical consideration in healthcare. It asserts that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their healthcare, free from coercion or manipulation. This means that healthcare professionals should respect the patient’s autonomy and not pressure them into taking medications or treatments they do not want. In the context of over-prescribing, this principle would require healthcare professionals to provide patients with clear and accurate information about the medications prescribed and any potential risks or side effects.
Additionally, it would require healthcare professionals to actively listen to the patient’s concerns and preferences and work with them to develop a treatment plan that aligns with their goals and values. This approach is essential for promoting trust and respect between patients and healthcare professionals and ensuring that patients receive safe and effective care. In summary, the ethical issue of over-prescribing medications in the medical profession can be approached from the ethical positions of beneficence, non-maleficence and autonomy. Healthcare professionals should act in the best interest of their patients, avoid causing harm and respect patients’ autonomy when prescribing medications.
Part 3
One potential solution to the Practice of over-prescribing medications is to implement stricter guidelines for prescribing medications and to increase education and training for healthcare providers on appropriate prescribing practices (Liau et al., 2021). This solution would address the root cause of over-prescribing by ensuring that healthcare providers have the knowledge and tools necessary to make informed prescribing decisions. Additionally, implementing systems for tracking prescriptions and monitoring prescribing patterns can help identify providers who may be engaging in over-prescribing and can also aid in detecting potential “pill mills”. Furthermore, incorporating patient education and shared decision-making processes in prescribing can empower patients to be active participants in their care and make informed decisions about their medication use. This solution is superior to others because it addresses the issue from multiple angles – by educating providers, monitoring prescribing patterns and involving patients in decision-making. This will not only help in reducing over-prescribing but also help in reducing the risks of medication errors, adverse drug reactions and drug dependency. By implementing stricter guidelines for prescribing medications and increasing education and training for healthcare providers, the solution addresses the root cause of over-prescribing by ensuring that healthcare providers have the knowledge and tools necessary to make informed prescribing decisions. This will also help reduce the risks of medication errors, adverse drug reactions and drug dependency. Additionally, implementing systems for tracking prescriptions and monitoring prescribing patterns can aid in identifying providers who may be engaging in over-prescribing and help detect potential “pill mills.”
Moreover, involving patients in the decision-making process and educating them about their medications can empower them to be active participants in their care, leading to better medication adherence and fewer adverse drug reactions (Jacob et al., 2022). This approach can also help reduce the risk of patients developing drug dependency, as they will be better informed about their medications’ potential risks and benefits. Therefore, this approach is comprehensive and holistic, addressing the issue of over-prescribing from multiple angles, which is more likely to be effective than a single-faceted approach. It empowers healthcare providers to make informed prescribing decisions, monitors prescribing patterns to detect potential issues, and involves patients in decision-making to promote better health outcomes.
The principle of beneficence and non-maleficence are two of the most important ethical principles in healthcare. These principles are closely related and often used to guide ethical decision-making and inform policy development. The principle of beneficence refers to the duty to do well and promote the well-being of others. This principle is closely aligned with providing quality healthcare, as it requires providers to take active steps to improve the health of their patients. This can include providing education and information about preventative care, administering appropriate treatments, and making referrals to specialists when necessary. The principle of non-maleficence, on the other hand, refers to the duty not to harm. This principle is closely aligned to minimize the risk of harm to patients. This can include minimizing the risk of adverse medication reactions, avoiding unnecessary treatments, and preventing infectious diseases.
In prescribing medications, these principles would call for stricter guidelines and increased education and training for healthcare providers to ensure that medications are prescribed appropriately and minimize the potential harm of medication use. For example, healthcare providers should be trained in the proper use of medications, including the appropriate dosage and duration of treatment, as well as the potential side effects and interactions of different medications. Additionally, healthcare providers should be educated about the potential harms of prescribing medications, such as the risk of addiction and overdose. They should be encouraged to take steps to minimize these risks. Many professional codes of conduct for healthcare providers also include guidance on appropriate prescribing practices, which can be used to inform the development of these stricter guidelines. For example, the American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics includes guidance on the appropriate use of medications, including the duty to prescribe medications by established guidelines and the duty to avoid prescribing medications that are not medically necessary.
In conclusion, beneficence and non-maleficence are two of the most important ethical principles guiding healthcare providers in prescribing medications. These principles call for stricter guidelines and increased education and training for healthcare providers to ensure that medications are prescribed appropriately and that the potential harms of medication use are minimized. Additionally, many professional codes of conduct for healthcare providers also include guidance on appropriate prescribing practices, which can be used to inform the development of these stricter guidelines. By following these principles and guidelines, healthcare providers can ensure that they are providing safe and effective care to their patients.
References
Bedene, A., Dahan, A., Rosendaal, F. R., & van Dorp, E. L. (2022). Opioid epidemic: lessons learned and updated recommendations for misuse involving prescription versus non-prescription opioids. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 15(9), 1081-1094.
Greiwe, J., Honsinger, R., Hvisdas, C., Chu, D. K., Lang, D. M., Nicklas, R., & Apter, A. J. (2022). Boxed warnings and off-label use of allergy medications: risks, benefits, and shared decision making. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 10(12), 3057-3063.
Jacob, C., Bourke, S., & Heuss, S. (2022). From Testers to Cocreators—the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study. JMIR Human Factors, 9(4), e41481.
John, S., & Wu, J. (2022). “First, Do No Harm”?: Non-Maleficence, Population Health, and the Ethics of Risk. Social Theory and Practice.
Liau, S. J., Lalic, S., Sluggett, J. K., Cesari, M., Onder, G., Vetrano, D. L., … & Bell, J. S. (2021). Medication management in frail older people: consensus principles for clinical Practice, research, and education. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(1), 43-49.
Thomas, V. M., & Mathew, A. (2020). Truth-telling: Apply the principle of beneficence. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment, 3(2), 359–360.
Varkey, B. (2021). Principles of clinical ethics and their application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28.
write