Introduction
The trade, deal and donation of human organs are a hard phenomenon to deal with respectively as it implies ethical, social and health-related issues. This essay examines the causes and effects of human organ trade, ultimately with the aim of portraying that the trade is dynamic and that the audience will understand the dire implications. This topic can be viewed in immenseness along with the causes and effects of organ trade which can shed light upon the motivation behind organ trade and the impact on any individual and communities.
Causes of Human Organ Trade
Economic Disparities
The generous nature of human transplantation is marred by the deep economic inequalities which permeate the world, and, thus, creates a very sad confluence at the crossroads of poverty and disease. People who live in underprivileged circumstances often sell their bodies as organ donors as part of an effort to be one with their equals who are financially better. This choice is normally taken reluctantly; it is rather pushed by the necessity of people to sustain their own families and improve their living conditions even in impoverished regions, which represents a vulgar site of global injustices where human bodies are used as commodities to survive. According to Charisma & Ibrahim (2023), a bleak side of the organ-selling business it was laid bare how the franticness of despairing reliance propels people into this dangerous market. The very fact that it paints the individual misfortunes of those involved and then contrasts these to the socio-economic disparities that ensure the markets could exist in the first place trends attention beyond the incident to shine a stark light on the broader issue. From an economic perspective, the surrogacy of human organs as a tool for financial stability highlights the need for a fundamental social and economic reform which will ultimately aim at assuaging the reasons that lead to this injustice instead of just relying on the affected and dispossessed to make a tragic and desperate choice.
Shortage of Legally Available Organs
The main driver behind the progress of the illegal organ trade is the disparity of legally available organs for transplanting operations. These days, the number of patients who stand in need of an organ transplant is much higher than that of the available supply. As a result, the market turns black; otherwise, legal organ transplantation is replaced by illegal transactions, and both recipients and sellers take desperate measures. Diana (2023) explains the terrible consequences, which are the following: the lack of enough organs leads to patients waiting and often not surviving the waiting. Hence, the necessity of balance is an issue which is much needed now.
Moreover, this disparity creates a vicious circle of worsening problems for the disadvantaged and the incentivization of illegal business, which not only strips the organ donation and transplantation fields of their ethical foundation but also turns them into grey areas where unethical transactions take place. Subsequently, a murky response called the organ trade surfaces, which re-emerges as an equally contested shorter but ethically and medically coercive option for those with a more pressing need. While this problem can be solved through the use action Plan for more public awareness and different legal organ donations in society, this will help close the gap and lessen the alternative of the illegal organ trade.
Lack of Effective Legal Frameworks
As effective legal bodies are not enrolled, this absence or lack of appropriate control in the donation and transplantation of organs provides a strong impetus to the organ trade. Regions’ legislation often allows the elaboration of such loopholes in law that there is little to deter the organ trade associates, leading to the growth of this illegal market. Indriyanto et al. (2023) explain that the defects on both the demand and the supply sides are also obstacles to the enforcement of the laws and prosecuting their violators, so the black market is even easier to protect. Where there are no strict laws and enforcement, a cycle of exploitation and abuse is created, and most often, these are the victims of such criminal activities. The vulnerable in the community are most likely to bear the burden. Strict legal and regulatory instruments are views obligations to fight against organ trafficking successfully.
Effects of Human Organ Trade
Health Risks to Donors
While carrying out this illicit trade, the donors are usually exposed to different health risks, which, for the most part, leave them to be left in a vulnerable situation after the operation. Novyana (2023) explores the sad truth which lies in the depths from which the donors in developing countries are drawn and which further complicates the situation by persuading or forcing them into surrendering their organs when all the proper medical standards have been disregarded. The insufficient follow-up examination and care worsens the matter, as the donor is left behind to cope with the consequences of the surgery by herself. In the environment specially designed for such operations, most often, there are no facilities to tackle complications, thus immensely increasing the instances of donors’ morbidity and mortality. Long-term health effects of excessive noise exposure on these people are likely to be very serious conditions such as constant pain, organ malfunction, and psychological problems. Such undermining of donors’ safety and rights comes down to one plain fact: global health measures focusing on donor care and their protection are highly needed because organ suppliers, whether they do it out of altruism or financial issues, should do so safely and with understanding.
Ethical and Social Implications
Even when organ donation is the only option to save someone’s life, the organ trade, unfortunately, has shown both the donor significant health risks and broad ethical and social concerns. Yu & Zhai (2023) broach the moral dilemma of privatizing human body parts, and they are related to the ethos of equality, fairness and human dignity, which runs counter to the fundamental principles of equity, justice and human dignity. It mostly occurs at the expense of the weaker segments of the population and by taking advantage of their misery for private budgeting purposes. Besides, the ethical consequences of these types of exploitation yield much broader effects by forming a stigma towards assistance in organ donation and transplantation. At times, the donors can become psychology victims, fighting alongside a sense of loss, shame, depression, and regret that remains with them long after the exchange. Through the organ-trade ethical dilemma, the core values of society’s healthcare system and the way organs are sourced and distributed must be scrutinized critically, which can only be evaded by rethinking the means by which organs are donated for transplant.
Legal Systems for Organ Donation Systems
Where most established organ donation systems have cast a shadow over the illegal trade of organs, this is certainly an understatement. Indriyanto et al. (2023) reveal the negative impact of the organ trade on public trust towards the organs obtained through legal ways and explain that the possibility of exploitation and corruption in the system of organ transplantation may be the cause of why the number of donated organs may be lower because of the fear of this happening, which is an issue that already existed due to the fact that there is a shortage of legally available organs. The deterioration of the trust, which is needed to stimulate the donation, can result in a vicious circle where the lack of organs in the supply is being required by the illegal trade, which, in turn, does not assist in the establishment of public confidence in the system. Establishing trust in the legal system of organ donation is of utmost importance. For doing so, transparency, high ethical principles and strong legal protections are envisaged to be practised which in turn ensures that the donation process is fair and there’s no bias in a respectful way towards the individuals.
Alternative Hypotheses and Rejection
The position of the market-oriented structure for organ trade, explained by Sinaga (2023), suggests that the system can help cater for organ scarcity while reducingng exploitation through legislation and ethics. The main point of this view is building a model under which organ donors’ compensation is accepted as a reality, thus denying the existence of donor organ shortage. While this contention is compelling, it negates the core ethical dilemmas. The marketization of the human body anytime, regardless of the framework in place, creates a moral dilemma regarding both the cost of human life and control over the citizens. Instead of being given social sustainability, limited populations who are poor or socially disadvantaged might be coerced by others to sell their organs as their money source, transgressing discretion and leading to financial hysteria in a market-driven environment. Similarly, paying people for their organs could throw a spanner in the works because even though we will be in a state of addressing the shortage of organs, we could dig into the very essence of altruistic bone marrow donation, which potentially could be undermined by this payment being merely a feature of a transactional relationship. Through this transition, the gap in society may be enlarged, as the rich will find themselves having access to organs with more wealth.
Conclusion
The business of organ trading, organ transplantation and human organ donation are dilemmas which are clothed with ethical, social, and public health concerns. The basis of the organ trade is the economic disparity, difficulty in obtaining legal organs, and insufficient legal frameworks that focus on the conduct of organ transplantation, and this leads to the risks of donation, the gap between ethics and rights and undermining legal organ donation systems. We will get to comprehend the fundamental reasons and consequences of this perplexing issue in a way that values human dignity, rebukes inequity, and protects the well-being and the safety of all persons involved in organ donation and transplantation.
References
Aubert, O., Yoo, D., Zielinski, D., Cozzi, E., Cardillo, M., Dürr, M., … & Loupy, A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and worldwide organ transplantation: a population-based study. The Lancet Public Health, 6(10), e709-e719.
Sinaga, H. (2023). The Law On Human Trafficking For The Purpose Of Illegal Organ Trade. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(11), 2804-2810.
Indriyanto, D., Tedjosaputro, L., Tumangkar, T., & Noor, A. (2023). Understanding Human Organ Trading: Ethical Perspective and Indonesia’s Legal Framework. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(3), 22-29.
Yu, L., & Zhai, X. (2023). Ethical and policy considerations for organ trafficking and transplant tourism: Based on the UK’s first international case of human trafficking for the purpose of organ removal. Health Care Science, 2(5), 339-344.
Novyana, H. (2023). The Role of Law in Protecting Society from Human Organ Trafficking Cases in Indonesia. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 6(3), 1919-1927.
Charisma, R. A., & Ibrahim, A. L. (2023). Comparison of Criminal Law Related to the Trafficking of Human Body Organs in Indonesia and the Philippines. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(1), 1-21.
Diana, D., Sinaulan, R. L., & Chandra, T. Y. (2023). JURIDICAL REVIEW OF ORGAN TRAFFICKING IN INDONESIA. Novateur Publications, (1), 444-452.
write