Introduction
In the years after the Civil War, during the Era of Reconstruction, important events happened that changed the course of American history. This time was marked by important choices, big changes, and urgent problems that will never be forgotten (Prior et al., 2017). This essay argues that among the many aspects of Reconstruction, three stand out as being the most important in shaping the country’s post-war environment. First, ratifying constitutional changes like the 13th, 14th, and 15th changes showed a dedication to ending slavery, making sure everyone had equal rights under the law, and giving everyone the right to vote, no matter what race they were (Foner, 2024). Second, the creation of public schools became a key part of pulling African Americans up, giving them access to information and laying the groundwork for future social and economic progress (Byman, 2021). In the end, the controversial creation of the Freedmen’s Bureau, which was meant to help newly freed slaves with their immediate problems, shows how difficult it is to rebuild society. But the opening also stresses how important it is to consider different points of view, whether they are about political changes or economic policies, to fully understand the complex layers of meaning that were part of the Reconstruction era.
Ratification of Constitutional Amendments
The approval of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments during Reconstruction is a turning point in American history. It shows how deeply the country wants to end slavery and advance the ideas of equality and voting rights (Foner, 2024). When the 13th Amendment was officially passed in 1865, it ended slavery. This was a big step towards the country’s democratic goals. After that, the 14th Amendment, which was passed into law in 1868, gave all citizens similar protection under the law. This protected the basic rights of people who had just become free. When it was passed in 1870, the 15th Amendment gave African American men the right to vote. This was a huge step towards universal suffrage that went against the norms of exclusion at the time.
Some people do not agree with this story of growth. Some people are skeptical about the constitutional changes, saying that even though they were important, they did not fully protect the rights of African Americans. Jim Crow rules in the late 1800s and the unfair treatment of African Americans throughout the 1900s show that the African American community still has a lot of problems. Critics say that the promise of equal rights under the law and the right to vote without limits was weakened by racism that was built into many institutions (Prior et al., 2017). Some people also say that these changes did not do enough to fix larger social and economic problems, leaving African Americans open to economic abuse, segregation, and social injustice.
The criticism of the constitutional changes shows a variety of views on how they work and what effects they have. Even though these changes were a huge step towards civil rights, discrimination and unfair treatment still happen today (Steinhauer, 2015). This shows how hard it is to get justice and equal rights in the United States. When we acknowledge these criticisms, we need to look more closely at the historical background and keep working to fix systemic problems. This is to make sure that the goals spelt out in the constitutional amendments lead to real and all-encompassing changes in society. Basically, the argument over ratifying the constitutional amendments during Reconstruction shows how complicated the relationship is between laws and everyday life in shaping the history of human rights in the United States.
Establishment of Public Education
Setting up public schools during Reconstruction was a key step towards empowering and uplifting African Americans. The main goal was to give them access to education, improve literacy, and build a strong base for future social and economic mobility. People thought that this strategic move was very important for making up for past wrongs because they believed that education was the key to ending systemic oppression and giving the freshly freed population equal opportunities.
In this case, some people did not like the idea of public schools during Reconstruction due to the change it brought. People who were against this focus on education said that it took attention and resources away from more important problems like rebuilding the economy and reforming the land system (Simpson, 2020). People said that the few resources that were available during this troubled time could have been better used to help the former slaves and poor white people with their immediate economic problems. Critics also said that the focus on education might have accidentally slowed down the recovery of the economy and the stabilization of society.
In addition, putting educational plans into place was hard and met with resistance in some areas. Some people said that deep-seated biases and reluctance to change made it hard for educational programmes to be widely adopted and consistently used (Simpson, 2020). This was especially true in Southern states where the effects of slavery were still felt today. In these places, resistance showed up as both open opposition to integrating schools and the creation of barriers like inadequate funding, broken infrastructure, and unfair practices, which made it harder for African Americans to get the benefits of public education that were meant to be there.
During Reconstruction, people who supported public schools said that the long-term rewards were much greater than the short-term problems. They said that putting money into education was both the right thing to do and the most practical way to make society more fair and successful (Byman, 2021). Giving African Americans the chance to go to school could break the circle of poverty that runs through generations, encourage them to get involved in their communities, and improve the health of the country as a whole.
Freedmen’s Bureau
During the Reconstruction Era, the Freedmen’s Bureau was created as an important and caring way to help newly freed African Americans deal with the problems they were facing right after the war. The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands is the official name of this agency. It was set up by the federal government in 1865 to provide a wide range of important services, such as schooling, health care, and job assistance (Gates, 2019). Its main goal was to help people who had just been freed from slavery make the change from being slaves to citizens by giving them important help in areas that were important for their health and integration into society.
Even though the Freedmen’s Bureau was created with good goals, its critics have good points about how well it works and the problems it ran into while it was being put into place. There were not enough resources for the Bureau to meet the needs of the huge number of newly freed people, which was one of their biggest problems (Caplan, 2019). The huge amount of work that needed to be done and the lack of money made it hard for the Bureau to fully meet the needs of the freed people. This lack of resources made it harder for the Bureau to reach its lofty goals of making it easy for African Americans to go from being slaves to full citizens.
Also, the Freedmen’s Bureau faced strong resistance from white supremacist groups and people who didn’t want the changes that Reconstruction brought about (Foner, 2024). These opponents wanted to stop the Bureau’s work and keep the harsh systems in place in the South before the Civil War. There were many kinds of resistance, from violent attacks on Bureau officers to trying to stop services from getting to the freed people. This resistance not only made it harder for the Bureau to do its job, but it also made it harder for it to make long-lasting changes in South Carolina society.\Some critics go beyond the problems that actually happened and say that the Freedmen’s Bureau, despite doing great work, was not able to change society in the long run like Reconstruction was supposed to. They say that while the Bureau’s programmes did provide important short-term help, they did not do enough to fix the underlying structural and systemic problems that kept racial inequality going (Byman, 2021). From this point of view, the Bureau’s effects were more temporary than permanent, and they did not really change the core problems.
Even though the Freedmen’s Bureau had problems and wasn’t perfect, it’s important to understand how important it was in the past when trying to meet the immediate needs of recently freed African Americans (Gates, 2019). Initiations by the Bureau in areas like education, health care, and jobs paved the way for future progress in civil rights, adding to the story of African American success after the Civil War (Caplan, 2019). As more information is gathered about the Freedmen’s Bureau, it becomes clear that its history is shaped by a complicated mix of admirable efforts, outside problems, and the limitations of the Reconstruction era.
Conclusion
The Era of Reconstruction is remembered as a time of change and growth in American history that had a lasting effect on the whole country. Ratification of constitutional amendments, especially the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, was a major step towards ending slavery, making sure everyone gets the same treatment under the law, and giving everyone the right to vote, no matter what race they were (Gates, 2019). At the same time, public schools were created to help African Americans get ahead by giving them access to information, encouraging reading, and setting the stage for future social and economic growth. People were freed from slavery and faced instant problems. The controversial creation of the Freedmen’s Bureau was meant to help them, but it shows how difficult it is to rebuild society (Caplan, 2019). But it’s important to see things from different points of view, including criticisms that show how hard it is for constitutional changes, public schools, and the Freedmen’s Bureau. This more nuanced understanding shows how complicated the changes were during Reconstruction. It also shows how important it is to look at things from different points of view to fully understand the deep and long-lasting effects of this transformative era on the United States.
References
Byman, D. (2021, July 19). White Supremacy, Terrorism, and the Failure of Reconstruction in the United States. International Security, 46(1), 53–103. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00410
Caplan, L. (2019, September 18). What Reconstruction-Era Laws Can Teach Our Democracy. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/books/review/the-second-founding-eric-foner.html
Foner, E. (2024, February 2). Reconstruction. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Reconstruction-United-States-history
Gates, H. L. Jr. (2019, April 2). How Reconstruction Still Shapes American Racism. Time. https://time.com/5562869/reconstruction-history/
Prior, D.M., Bercaw, N., Bond, B., Brown, T.J., Foner, E., Taylor, J., Tillet, S. (2017). Reconstruction in Public History and Memory Sesquicentennial. The Journal of the Civil War Era 7(1), 96-122. https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2017.0014.
Simpson, T. (2020, May 11). “Reconstruction Never Ended”: A Review of Eric Foner’s Second Founding. Facing Today. Retrieved from https://facingtoday.facinghistory.org/reconstruction-never-ended-a-review-of-eric-foners-second-founding
Steinhauer, J. (2015, November 17). The Civil War, Reconstruction and the Transformation of African American Life in the 19th Century. In Kluge Center at the Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://blogs.loc.gov/kluge/2015/11/the-civil-war-reconstruction-and-the-transformation-of-african-american-life-in-the-19th-century/