Texas Roadhouse is a renowned business that dominates America’s restaurant and food industry. It is known for its continued quality services of good food and other exclusive services like accommodation and meat distribution. Texas Roadhouse, located in Clarksville, Indiana, was established in 1993 and remains the giant steakhouse producer and distributor. Having more than 600 branches in the United States and other parts of the world, the company has built its brand as the favorite dining destination for couples, families, and steak lovers. This has been possible because of the unique selling proposition that has made it deliver a more Westernized, serene atmosphere for dining and having deliciously hand-cut meat steaks.
Texas Roadhouse has a mission statement that focuses on providing quality food and services to its guests and customers. Focusing on quality and a serene and welcoming environment, the company aims to maintain its customers through brand loyalty with memorable dining experiences. Even with the best services and quality dishes, the food industry is under increased scrutiny regarding sustainability practices and environmental impacts. Texas Roadhouse, a business within the food industry, is not an exception, as it is also facing the challenge of fully operating within the principles of environmental responsibility and Community engagement or adequate social responsibility.
From quizzes presented earlier on the sustainability of Texas Roadhouse operations, various issues arose concerning strategies the company uses to manage waste, its sourcing practices, and its environmental impact and effects. The specific issues were how organic or sustainable the ingredients used in their dishes were and how they managed their food waste. The company’s efforts are to minimize its carbon emissions and promote practices that are environmentally friendly.
With the increasing consumer expectations and awareness, the significance of sustainability in the food industry must be considered. Consumers now demand organic ingredients and food packaging that are environmentally friendly and sustainable practices in businesses (Chiu and Chia 540). Because of these consumer demands, restaurants like Texas Roadhouse are forced to re-strategize and improvise to be at par with the evolving market demands on sustainability. To remain competitive and relevant in the food industry, businesses must strategically handle environmental concerns because key stakeholders prioritize sustainability when making critical decisions. Therefore, this essay comprehensively analyses current sustainability practices that Texas Roadhouse uses, examines the company’s environmental impact, and recommends strategies the company can use to improve its sustainability. Also, having analyzed the mission of the company, sustainability concerns, and evolving trends in the industry. The essay will also give important details of how Texas Roadhouse can manoeuvre the dynamic landscape of sustainability in the food industry and become a giant in championing environmental and social responsibility.
Sustainability Practices in the Food Industry
Because of the wider supply chain, waste generation, and substance consumption, the food industry remains a crucial element in the drive toward environmental sustainability (Pullman et al. 56). I will explain specific sustainability practices like sourcing, food preparation, waste management, and environmental impact in the food industry. The challenges faced, and opportunities Texas Roadhouse can use to improve its sustainability practices in the areas explained will also form part of my discussion.
Sourcing Practices
In the food industry, getting sustainable ingredients is vital to demonstrating environmental responsibility (Beske et al. 136). For environmentally friendly practices, Texas Roadhouse can prioritize getting locally grown produce. They should go for grass-fed cattle for beef and organic ingredients, which will economically support local farmers. The company should minimize carbon emissions due to transportation and sparingly use pesticides and chemicals to be socially responsible and environmentally friendly. For the quality and sustainability of the company’s dishes, it needs to establish partnerships with sustainable suppliers and strictly observe ethical sourcing practices.
Food Preparation
Incorporating techniques to prepare food efficiently can help reduce high energy consumption and food waste (Forster and Alexandra 5). Installing energy-conserving kitchen appliances, conserving resources through optimized cooking processes, and staff training on sustainable practices for handling food are some of the techniques Texas Roadhouse can use. The company is able to bring down its environmental impact and operational costs while promoting sustainability through minimizing water usage, energy consumption, and food wastage during food preparation.
Waste Management
For restaurants to reduce environmental degradation, they need to do proper waste management (Høgevold et al. et al., 358). For a revolving economy, Texas Roadhouse can venture into programs like recycling, composting organic waste, and reducing one-time use of plastics to divert waste from landfills. To show commitment towards environmental conservation and proper waste management practices, Texas Roadhouse can apply waste reduction strategies such as portion control, food donation programs, and optimized packaging.
Environmental Impact
Food production and consumption go beyond the restaurant’s operations in affecting the environment to include elements like biodiversity conservation, greenhouse gas emissions, and water use. For Texas Roadhouse, the company can carry out a detailed assessment of environmental impacts to find out areas for improvement. This will also help the company set measurable, sustainable goals. The company is able to mitigate change impacts and conserve natural resources for generations to come when it reduces the activities that pollute the environment.
Insights from Chouinard’s “Let My People Go Surfing”
According to Chouinard (2016) he emphasizes the importance of environmental control, welfare of employees, and ethical management as crucial aspects of sustainable business practices. This section consists of the philosophical analysis as presented in Chouinard’s book. I will then elaborate on how their application to Texas Roadhouse’s sustainability efforts, particularly in the areas of management, human resources, and environmental practices, can improve the sustainability of the company’s business.
Management Philosophy
Chouinard argues that it is imperative to have a management philosophy that puts forward environmental sustainability and social responsibility. For adequate sustainability, Texas Roadhouse can opt for a similar approach and implement sustainability principles into its strategic decision-making processes. This philosophy is important for setting clear sustainability goals in a business and enforcing relevant initiatives by the business management.
Human Resources Philosophy
According to Chouinard, workers’ empowerment is essential for having a conducive work environment and allowing employees to also live a life outside work. Coming up with programs like employee training and better welfare for employees will help Texas Roadhouse improve its human resources practices. Effecting Chouinard’s human-centric approach to business management will allow the company to improve the productivity of its employees and retain them because they will experience satisfaction by being supported and valued at their workplace.
Environmental Philosophy
This philosophy outlines how the incorporation of sustainable activities like environmental conservation reduces degradation, which is necessary for sustainability. Texas Roadhouse can apply this philosophy by implementing environmentally friendly activities like waste minimization and investing in renewable energy solutions.
Application to Texas Roadhouse
Applying Chouinard’s philosophies in its operations, Texas Roadhouse will be able to assess its management practices to ascertain sustainability through transparency and ethical leadership. The company must involve its employees in sustainable activities and build a culture of environmental responsibility by incorporating sustainability into its core values and operations so as to comply with Chouinard’s principles of responsible business management.
Focusing on employees’ welfare, diversity, and career development opportunities will be key for upscaling the human resources practices of Texas Roadhouse Company. To comply with Chouinard’s emphasis on valuing and investing in human capital, the company needs to promote a conducive work environment and empower employees to contribute to sustainability efforts in and out of the workplace. All these will help Texas Roadhouse become the leader in sustainable dining practices in the food industry.
Elkington’s Framework for Sustainability
The sustainability framework by John Elkington, as explained in chapters 4-7 of his book, gives a detailed guide for businesses to integrate more sustainable and responsible models. I will explain further the stages of rejection to regeneration Elkington and deliberate on how Texas Roadhouse can achieve a realistic, sustainable business model by having practices that comply with these stages.
Stages of Rejection-to-Regeneration:
Rejection
Being thefirst stage of the framework, it recognizes the existence of unsustainable practices and the negative impacts of traditional business models. According to Elkington, a company is able to establish a strong foundation for transformative sustainability when it realizes and drops practices that are unsustainable, for example, excessive waste generation and energy inefficiency. This stage is, therefore, significant for Texas Roadhouse to determine its areas of operations that highly fuel environmental degradation, depletion of resources, and social inequalities.
Non-Compliance
At this stage, businesses start to embrace standards and set laws, but they may fail to go past the minimum requirements (Elkington 130). Striving to meet all the environmental regulations, food safety standards, and labor laws will make Texas Roadhouse more outstanding in the food industry. Furthermore, it is important to look for available opportunities to surpass compliance and implement best sustainable practices. Adhering to all the measures to minimize its negative environmental impacts, improve working conditions, and ensure superb community engagement, the company will show its determination to have responsible business practices.
Efficiency
The efficiency stage is all about better operational performance, reduction in wastage, and optimized resource utilization (Elkington, 132). Texas Roadhouse, therefore, needs to strategically invest in energy-conservation technologies, water conservation measures, and waste reduction strategies. This practice will improve its operational efficiency and minimize environmental degradation. When moving towards sustainability, the company is able to realize critical economic and environmental benefits when it strategically increases its resource productivity and minimizes its production cost.
Sustainability
It is here that businesses implement sustainability in their key strategies, products, and services. Texas Roadhouse, not being an exception, can incorporate principles of sustainability into its business model. The principles can also positively influence its supply chain management and customer engagement. Initiatives like Promoting sustainable sourcing, menu options, and proper waste management can help the company continue stamping its authority and have a more substantial, unique selling proposition. Making use of this stage will allow Texas Roadhouse to attract environmentally conscious consumers and champion for a more sustainable food industry.
Regeneration
Regeneration stage is about establishing long-term sustainability practices like regenerating natural and social capital and creating positive impacts (Elkington, 140). With strong partnerships and sustainable practices, Texas Roadhouse can regenerate ecosystems, offer local community support, and advocate for social equity. The company is able to lead the path of a more regenerative, resilient, and sustainable future and inspire fundamental changes in the food industry through investing in biodiversity conservation and community development projects.
Alignment with Texas Roadhouse:
Therefore with proper application of Elkington’s stages of rejection-to-regeneration in its business operation, Texas Roadhouse will be able to examine its sustainability efforts and determine areas to improve on. Additionally, it will also help the company set ambitious goals for a realistic and achievable sustainable business model. Moving from the rejection of unsustainable practices to the regeneration of natural and social capital will aid the company in improving its environmental and social responsibility to become competitive and viable in the evolving food industry. I would also say that by adhering to Elkington’s framework for sustainability and implementing the stages of rejection-to-regeneration, Texas Roadhouse is able to speed up its journey toward sustainability and positive change within the industry, for all these will make it a top-ranked business in sustainable dining practices.
Challenges and Opportunities for Texas Roadhouse in Implementing Sustainable Practices
Like many companies in the food industry, Texas Roadhouse also experiences unique challenges and opportunities when implementing sustainable practices. I will focus on specific barriers and potential routes for improving sustainability in the operations company. I will also factor in the areas it needs to improve on, as well as its current initiatives and techniques to overcome these challenges.
Challenges
Supply Chain Sustainability
From my quizzes and conversations with some of the staff, I can see thatTexas Roadhouse experiences difficulties in ensuring sustainability throughout its supply chain. It was also evident that the company experienced challenges in acquiring sustainable ingredients, managing supplier relationships, and measuring the impacts of its products environmentally and socially (Beske et al. 140). To combat these challenges of supply chain sustainability, one needs to engage suppliers closely, be transparent in sourcing practices, and comply with the existing ethical standards on sourcing.
Waste Management
Texas Roadhouse has found it challenging when it comes to proper waste management, especially when it comes to managing food and packaging waste alongside energy consumption. For the company to reduce its environmental impact, it must start incorporating measures like strategies for effective waste reduction and energy conservation and focus on recycling programs (Arcese et al. 8070). To mitigate these challenges, one needs to invest heavily in sustainable technologies, train employees, and improve the company’s operational efficiency.
Consumer Awareness and Demand
In my analysis, it could be challenging for Texas Roadhouse to enlighten consumers about sustainable dining activities and meet the rapidly growing need for environmentally friendly alternatives. It is, therefore, necessary for the company to effectively package and communicate its sustainability initiatives (Chiu and Chia 537). To achieve this, they need to come up with sustainable menu choices and better customer engagement activities (Shim, Jimin, et al., 2131). To efficiently tackle the challenge of consumer awareness and demand, the company must carry out marketing campaigns, innovate its menus, and implement functioning customer feedback mechanisms.
Opportunities
Operational Efficiency
There is room for Texas Roadhouse to improve its operational efficiency through optimized resource use, minimized waste, and lower costs. Techniques like having energy and conserving water conservation measures with waste reduction programs will also improve its cost savings and operational performance and not just environmental impact (Larson et al. 8).
Menu Innovation
The company, through bringing sustainable menu options and ingredients produced locally and organic-based alternatives, gives Texas Roadhouse an opportunity to stay unique in the market and also consider consumers who hold dearly to environmental conservation. With sustainable and healthy choices in place, the company can establish a broader customer base and increase its revenue growth.
Community Engagement
Having strength in the corporate social responsibility segment by engaging local communities in carrying out charitable activities is able to propel Texas Roadhouse’s brand reputation and the loyalty of its customers. Partnering with community-based organizations, giving back to society, and sponsoring events will help the company build strong relationships with stakeholders and have a more significant social impact. (Maloni et al.,42)
Strategies for Enhancement
In the analysis of concepts from (Chouinard, 47) and (Elkington, 98), there is a need for strategic recommendations to manage the sustainability challenges in Texas Roadhouse’s business operations. Develop a robust sustainability strategy for Texas Roadhouse that highlights its goals, targets, and action plans for incorporating sustainability into its operations for better and higher quality services and products. Conducting a detailed and efficient SWOT and PESTLE analysis while engaging various stakeholders smoothens the company’s way towards sustainability.
Company- Supplier collaboration is an excellent strategy to solve supply chain problems. Collaborating with the suppliers is also effective in improving transparency and sustainability practices within the dynamic supply chain in which Texas Roadhouse operates (Chiu and Chia 532). The application of sustainability criteria for suppliers, regular auditing, and strategic partnerships established based on shared values are critical drivers of supply chain sustainability.
Employee training and engagement practices, such as engaging staff in sustainability activities, bring a culture of environmental responsibility to Texas Roadhouse. Especially when the employees’ sustainability efforts are recognized and rewarded, proper empowerment and engagement of employees in sustainable initiatives can propel the company to its aim of internal engagement and innovation.
Ethical and Sustainable Decision-Making
In this part, I will look into how Texas Roadhouse is able to manoeuvre the ethical and sustainable decision-making processes. I will focus on various factors like the interest of shareholders, labour practices, and impacts on the environment. I will also assess the company’s mode of balancing profit incentives with equity concerns and then give recommendations to help the company’s decisions to effectively comply with the existing ethical values.
Ethical Considerations
Shareholder Interests
Striking a balance between the interests of shareholders and diverse societal concerns is an ethical challenge to Texas Roadhouse, as portrayed in my quizzes and conversations with some of the company’s staff. Even with prioritizing shareholder values as a primary focus, the company also needs to factor in the effects of its decisions on employees, customers, and the community. According to (Sebastiani et al. 475), ethical decision-making entails weighing short-term financial gains against long-term sustainability. It also emphasizes the need for a more robust social responsibility of the business.
Labor Practices
Fair labor practices, the welfare of employees, their diversity, and incorporation in the workforce are some of the critical ethical issues that Texas Roadhouse should consider. Hiring employees, training them, providing compensation, and creating a secure and inclusive work environment for all are some of the ethical standards that Texas Roadhouse should adhere to. This is an essential area of ethical concern, just as (Kibert et al. et al. 250) argue that ethical decision-making in labor practices covers prioritizing workers’ welfare and creating a culture of respect and equality where the company is required to address any issues of discrimination and harassment.
Environmental Impact
Taking complete control of a company’s environmental impact resulting from its operations, like reducing its carbon emissions to promote sustainability, remains an essential ethical consideration for Texas Roadhouse Company in the food industry. The company must drastically reduce its environmental harm and increase conservation efforts. These can be realized by examining its resource consumption, rate of waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions (Forster and Alexandra 6). For better ethical decision-making regarding environmental impact, practices that are environmentally friendly must be employed, primarily investing in renewable sources of energy.
Sustainable Decision-Making
Profit Incentives vs. Equity Concerns
Adhering to profit incentives and equity concerns to balance financial performance with social and environmental responsibility are among the challenges that Texas Roadhouse experiences in its restaurant businesses. Realizing sustainable decision-making is all about exercising the aspect of people, planet, and profit and incorporating economic, social, and environmental factors into business strategies (Wu et al. 580). The company is able to provide long-term value for stakeholders and advocate for a more sustainable future in the food industry. This is feasible especially by having sustainability in its decision-making processes.
Stakeholder Engagement
Sustainable decision-making is majorly about factoring in the interests of all stakeholders and putting in place outcomes that mutually benefit the business and society (Aripin et al. 33). To achieve sustainable decision-making, Texas Roadhouse must effectively engage all its stakeholders from employees, suppliers, and customers to the community. For the company to meet stakeholder expectations and values, it must seek feedback and address the concerns raised effectively. This is key because it will demonstrate the involvement of the stakeholders in the company’s decision-making processes.
Recommendations for Alignment
On the Integration of Ethical Guidelines, I recommend that Texas Roadhouse come up with very concise ethical principles to steer its decision-making across all of its organizational levels. To build a culture of integrity, transparency, and accountability, the company must fuse ethical considerations with its corporate identity, policies, and operations.
It is better to apply sustainability metrics, such as coming up with key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics for the assessment of its progress towards set sustainability goals. Through monitoring and evaluation, Texas Roadhouse can evaluate its performance and the impact of its practices on the environment and society. Monitoring sustainability initiatives also helps in making data-oriented decisions to enhance sustainable performance.
Lastly, on the promotion of ethical leadership Texas Roadhouse must sensitize the practice of ethical leadership at all levels of the business. The company must also mobilize its managers and employees to make ethical decisions in their daily work. Encouragement alone may not be enough, as training and support are still needed in the recognition of ethical behavior to promote a culture of integrity and ethical decision-making.
Worker Empowerment and Community Engagement for Sustainability
This part outlines the importance of empowering workers and effectively engaging community members around the business so that Texas Roadhouse can easily succeed in its sustainability programs.
Worker Empowerment
According to (Estes and Jonathan 78), Worker empowerment is about offering employees the power and support with the necessary resources to be part of the decision-making processes. With this, the employees are able to bring positive change to the organization. Having proper worker empowerment at Texas Roadhouse and allowing the employees to take part in sustainability initiatives will result in innovative ideas and a sense of belonging in building a more sustainable workplace.
When the employees are encouraged and allowed to freely participate in the planning and implementation of sustainable practices, then Texas Roadhouse is able to fully utilize the collective intelligence of its entire workforce to achieve sustainability. This will make the employees feel that their skills, perspectives, and knowledge are valued, which will motivate them to continue being productive in their work.
With goodtraining and technological opportunities geared towards sustainability, employees are motivated to embrace leadership roles willingly and propel environmental and social initiatives (Aripin et al. 38). For better success, Texas Roadhouse can inculcate a culture of sustainability by empowering its manpower to advocate for practices in their teams and departments. This is possible through providing the employees with the requisite skills and knowledge.
Community Engagement
To achieve effective community engagement, there must be a strong relationship with local communities (Ramachandra et al. 590). The needs, demands, and priorities must be met, supplemented by a more robust corporate social responsibility. To strengthen its community engagement, Texas Roadhouse must venture into charitable initiatives, partner with community-based organizations, and engage in activities that mitigate social and environmental threats.
Community engagement is beneficial to both employees and local communities as it gives them a sense of pride and belonging (Ramachandra et al. 595). Proper engagement also brings out a receptive work environment and boosts the morale of employees. By aligning sustainability efforts with community needs, Texas Roadhouse can create shared value for both employees and local residents, contributing to social cohesion and sustainable development.
For Sustainable Practices, Texas Roadhouse should carry out practices like waste reduction and resource conservation that benefit both employees and communities (Magdalena et al. 358). Having sustainable operations in its larger supply chain, the company is able to reduce the impacts of environmental degradation and come up with economic opportunities for local stakeholders, resulting in the overall well-being of the local community around its steak restaurants.
Stance
The debate is about whether we should effect radical changes in socio-political and economic structures to achieve sustainability or if changing business models can drive us to sustainability in the world without strict regulations. I take a position by arguing that transforming capitalism is very significant for sustainable development rather than doing away with it. Chouinard and Elkington are all against banning capitalism as they stress the need for a newly thought-out and more sustainable form of capitalism. A new capitalism that puts forward environmental and social responsibility accompanied by economic growth. My position goes with the notion that though sustainable business practices lead to positive change, there is still a need for changes in the systems to handle the root causes of unsustainability.
I support the position I hold regarding Chouinard and Elkington’s call for a more sustainable form of capitalism involving the triple bottom line of people, planet, and profit. The two scholars outline the need for various businesses to implement sustainability in their operations, combat environmental challenges, and promote social responsibility.
Elkington argues that despite businesses performing a key role in promoting sustainability activities, there must be changes in the system to handle the more immense socio-political and economic challenges that hinder sustainable development (Elkington 98). This is because solely depending on voluntary corporate responsibility practices is not enough to help realize the long-term sustainability goals.
I also advocate for strict adherence to the existing regulations. This is because even if businesses decide to voluntarily take action to spearhead this change, regulatory frameworks are still vital for accountability and proper enforcement of sustainability standards in various industries (Ostrom and Elinor, 355). In the absence of regulations, many businesses will focus on short-term profits over long-term sustainability, and this can result in severe environmental degradation and social inequalities.
I fully agree with the study by (Ostrom, 645) that shows the need to have a mixture of regulatory mechanisms. This mixture, which consists of market-based incentives and government interventions to deal with complex sustainability challenges, can be more effective because it establishes a safer environment for sustainable business practices.
There must also be a balance between social and environmental goals with the intention of achieving huge profits. Currently, capitalism is majorly about maximizing profit at the expense of environmental conservation and social justice (Roszkowska-Menkes and Maria, 87). I contend that there is a need to redefine the purpose of capitalism so that businesses can fully achieve sustainability by balancing economic interests with social and environmental goals.
The emphasis for businesses to create value for society as they generate profits, as outlined in the concept of “shared value” proposed by (Porter and Kramer 123), is really crucial in the journey toward sustainability. With this concept, it is true to say that creating a shared value for society as businesses make a profit complies with the urge to transform capitalism to serve the interests of all stakeholders and not just shareholders.
Conclusion
For the full realization of sustainability at Texas Roadhouse, there must be a complete technique for transparency, goal setting, worker empowerment, and collaboration in the entire company’s businesses. To achieve positive change, the company needs to instill a culture of sustainability through accountability, innovation, and ethical conduct among its employees and the public. Doing this will help Texas Roadhouse further its sustainability agenda and motivate its employees and the communities it serves to join hands in the drive. The company should also engage in practices like collaboration and display consistent progress, which are critical pillars for having a more sustainable and ethical business model.
I also emphasize my stance that even when a change of business models and adherence to the existing labor laws is able to propel us to sustainability, there is still a need for a transformed capitalism. It is through transformed capitalism that we will be able to solve the systemic problems that deter us from realizing a fully sustainable world. This transformation of capitalism will also help businesses move towards having a more sustainable world through the concept of shared value. The analysis has also found that proper regulations and better corporate responsibility are vital for making the desire to have a balance between economic prosperity and sustainable practices become a reality.
Works Cited
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), (2011). 62–77.
Chouinard, Yvon. Let my people go surfing: The education of a reluctant businessman–Including ten more years of business unusual. Penguin, 2016.
Elkington, John. Green swans: the coming boom in regenerative capitalism. Greenleaf Book Group, 2020.
Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria, and C. S. R. Strategic. “Porter and Kramer’s (2006)“Shared Value”.” Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer Cham, Switzerland, 2021.
Ostrom, Elinor. “Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems.” Shaping Entrepreneurship Research. Routledge, 2020. 353–392.
Ostrom, Elinor. “Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems.” American Economic Review 100.3 2010: 641-672
Ramachandra, Anubama, and Nur Naha Abu Mansor. “Sustainability of community engagement–in the hands of stakeholders?.” Education+ Training 56.7 (2014): 588-598.
Magdalena, Magdalena, Eko Ganis Suharsono, and Roekhudin Roekhudin. “Reflection of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation: Community Engagement In Sustainability Aspects.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 5.5 (2019): 357-365.
Aripin, Zaenal, Sri Rochani Mulyani, and Adang Haryaman. “MARKETING STRATEGY IN PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT EFFORTS IN EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES: BUILDING A RECIPROCITY FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.” KRIEZ ACADEMY: Journal of development and community service 1.1 (2023): 25-38.
Sebastiani, Roberta, Francesca Montagnini, and Daniele Dalli. “Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry. Evidence from the Eataly case.” Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2013): 473-488.
Maloni, Michael J., and Michael E. Brown. “Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry.” Journal of Business Ethics 68 2006: 35–52.
Wu, Zhaohui, and Mark Pagell. “Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management.” Journal of Operations Management 29.6 2011: 577–590.
Kibert, Charles J., et al. Working toward sustainability: Ethical decision-making in a technological world. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Chiu, Chia-Ning. “Leveraging competitiveness to develop optimal strategies: evidence from the restaurant industry.” Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 32.4 2022: 525–545.
Shim, Jimin, et al. “The impact of CSR on the corporate value of restaurant businesses using triple bottom line theory.” Sustainability 13.4 2021: 2131.
Høgevold, Nils M., et al. “Sustainable business models: Corporate reasons, economic effects, social boundaries, environmental actions and organizational challenges in sustainable business practices.” Baltic Journal of Management 9.3 2014: 357–380.
Larson, Andrea L., Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg, and Richard R. Johnson. “Sustainable business: opportunity and value creation.” Interfaces 30.3 (2000): 1-12.
Estes, Jonathan. Brilliant Green: How to implement sustainable business practices in any industry and make money. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Beske, Philip, Anna Land, and Stefan Seuring. “Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature.” International journal of production economics 152 2014: 131-143
Forster, Alexandra. “Sustainability: Best practices in the food industry.” UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research 16 2013: 1–9.
Pullman, Madeleine E., Michael J. Maloni, and Jesse Dillard. “Sustainability practices in food supply chains: how is wine different?.” Journal of Wine Research 21.1 (2010): 35-56.
Arcese, Gabriella, et al. “Evidence and experience of open sustainability innovation practices in the food sector.” Sustainability 7.7 2015: 8067–8090.
write