In the digital age, social media is increasingly becoming a dominant shaper of our perceptions of cosmic relations and, most significantly, self-perception. This virtual world creates an opportunity for people to form, develop, and create their identities in ways others will see them and how they will view themselves. This essay addresses the complex dynamics of self-identity formation via social media and explores the multifaceted opportunities and risks of this contemporary phenomenon. On the road through the hallways of Instagram, Facebook or Twitter, one continues to get involved in a network of challenges and opportunities. Social identity theory, the Proteus effect, and Goffman’s dramaturgical perspective are some concepts and ideas that will be examined critically in this investigation of the many facets of identity construction in the digital era. To better grasp the topic, this essay draws on various resources, including empirical studies, psychological theories, and real-life examples, to uncover the complex relationships between social media communication and the process of self-identity construction.
Comparison and Envy
There are countless social media sites in today’s digital world, and users meticulously curate the elements of their lives that they share with the world (Buckingham, 2007). While this pervasiveness allows us to peek into the lives and struggles of others, it also triggers a complex psychological mechanism known as social comparison. This idea is based on Social Comparison Theory, which asserts that people’s self-esteem is affected by how they perceive the success, valuable assets, and lifestyles shown on social media (Crusius et al., 2022). Users curate highlights of their lives on social media platforms, which function as virtual display windows. Frequently, these pictures show romanticized depictions of life, a sanitized story. Visitors to these well-planned exhibits often find themselves caught in a self-defeating cycle of comparing their experiences and achievements to those of the virtual residents. The highly regulated nature of social media material might amplify this comparing process and evoke emotions of inadequacy or jealousy.
The Social Comparison Theory, introduced by Leon Festinger in the 1950s, postulates that humans have an inherent need to judge themselves based on comparing what they can do or say with their social standing towards others. First, as individuals compare themselves on social media with other people, they perceive themselves to be more successful or accomplished than them. Much work has been done regarding the complex connection between high social media use and its effects on mental health, especially among young people, according to studies like Fardouly et al. (2020). The constant view of carefully selected highlight reels can lead to an unrealistic self-concept (Fardouly et al., 2020). As people are exposed to a constant flow of seemingly perfect lives, they adopt unrealistic standards, making them feel inadequate and ultimately reducing their confidence.
A huge psychological cost is connected with constantly comparing oneself to others and feeling jealous. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the utilization of social media platforms and elevated levels of anxiety, symptoms of depression, and other negative emotions such as feelings of isolation. A person’s sense of self-worth can be lowered, and a cycle of negative emotions can begin when they are driven on social media to adhere to a particular ideal about themselves. This can be a vicious cycle.
Identity Distortion and Performativity
In virtual social media, people are not just users but actors in a big arena; dancers participate intricately and simultaneously, maintaining an image while creating their identity. This phenomenon reflects Goffman’s dramaturgical perspective, wherein individuals are compared to actors dressing up in different masks and representing distinct roles in the social play (Kivisto & Pittmann, 2007). First, the Proteus Effect further enhances this inherent theatricality, a psychological phenomenon when avatars or online personas that people adopt affect user behavior. Social media platforms foster impression management where users selectively craft and display specific aspects of their lives, often showcasing a version that can be far removed from the truth about who they truly are. Goffman’s Dramaturgical Perspective helps us look at this process in a new light – individuals strategically choose what to disclose and what not to tell each other, just like great actors on the stage carefully build their performances from scratch.
A study conducted in 2007 by Yee and Bailelson discovered that the use of numerous online personas or pictures might have a substantial impact on people’s behavior and their image of themselves. The Proteus Effect is the name given to this phenomenon. During their interactions with the virtual world, individuals adopt a variety of personas in order to maintain a sense of coherence between their online persona and their identity in the actual world. People can better cope with the concept of authenticity in contrast to the pressure to conform to accepted cultural norms, which, according to Yee and Bailenson (2007), forms an identity deformity. This distortion helps people work through this conflict. Toma (2010) conducted research that contributed to a better understanding of this activity by examining the tendency of individuals to display their ideal selves on the Internet. Even though it gives the individual a feeling of control and agency, the meticulously built identity may also result in a disconnected and superficial view of who they truly are.
According to Toma (2010), the impacts of performativity and identity distortion have extended beyond the realm of the Internet. The levels of self-esteem that individuals possess and how they interact with one another have been influenced as a result of these consequences. Cognitive dissonance may occur due to the pressure to behave in a manner compatible with this online identity. Individuals cannot properly manage the virtual person and the real person in this scenario because the virtual person is unlike the real person. As a result of this dissonance, an individual may have feelings of isolation, imposter syndrome, and a separation from their true self within themselves.
Cyberbullying and Online Harassment
In a society of social media interconnectedness where, anonymity has often hidden users, allowing them to participate in that digital world as though they have no repercussions from things done there. However, this sense of liberation also introduces a dangerous idea called the Online Disinhibition Effect (Suler, 2004). So, the dark side of this phenomenon develops as individuals become empowered enough to neglect societal norms and resort to behavior they would otherwise not display face-to-face, such as reacting to cyberbullying or online harassment. Online Disinhibition Effect is a psychological state whereby individuals become less aware of social constraints and act more freely in cyberspace. This phenomenon can be a breeding ground for cyberbullying because, behind the virtual mask of anonymity, people engage in nasty behavior that includes harassment, intimidation, or even spreading malicious content.
The investigation that Hinduja and Patchin (2010) conducted has concentrated on the occurrence. Individuals are regularly allowed to conduct acts of cruelty that might cause them to have second thoughts about engaging in the real world because of the virtual universe’s separation from the practical implications of their actions. The hostile environment that is fostered by cyberbullying not only hurts the mental health of those who are bullied but also forces them to question their authenticity and their capacity to endure as human beings.
According to Hinduja and Patchin (2010), victims of cyberbullying experience both short-term and long-term repercussions on their self-esteem, mental health, and overall well-being. Individuals who are subjected to online harassment experience psychological anguish, which can result in a sense of helplessness. This makes it challenging for individuals to define themselves within the digital environment. Victims may be forced to withdraw or develop a defensive persona as a result of this poisonous atmosphere, which will further change their genuine selves.
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) and Social Isolation
As we live in social media, FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) has become an all-pervasive psychological effect that sheds shade on finding one’s self-identity.’ Every day, scanning through an endlessly long list of social events, get-togethers, and experiences on their screens, the concern of being left out or omitted fills one with dread. Such FOMO, stemming from the deep human desire to connect and establish a social identity, can take individuals into a whirlpool of societal comparisons for them to conform. The term FOMO, first used by a marketing strategist, Dan Herman, has found great relevance in the digital era, perhaps more so within social media (Marek, 2023). This feeling of constantly missing out on rewarding experiences due to constant exposure to social activities by others with vivid imagery and enthusiastic captions is pervasive. Social Identity Theory offers a perspective on how people define themselves regarding their importance to social groups and seek affirmation and a sense of belonging (Ellemers, 2023).
As a consequence, FOMO can affect people’s mental health and self-perception (Alabri, 2022). The fear of being left out of online social circles becomes an imperative stress provider that instigates his quest to remain in constant engagement and validation mode. In order to avoid the perception of social isolation, people may be motivated to adopt one or more norms that they find disagreeable simply because conformity with these standards makes it necessary for them to alter their true personalities. The consequences of FOMO on the self are deep and psychological because those who participate in it tend to participate continually in comparison that involves trying their best, like aligning their lives with what appears as very colorful experiences in other people’s online lives. Although relieving the pain of exclusion, this conformity could lead to a lower sense of individualism. This pressure to copy the lives and actions of other online community members may turn one’s identity into something superficial, with more similarities to codified demands presented by an abstract virtual reality than a personal, realistic self.
Privacy Concerns and Digital Footprint
In the interconnected digital environment, sharing personal information over social media platforms becomes akin to leaving tracks or footprints in an enormous place known as the Internet (Lutkevich & Wigmore, 2023). This digital footprint, although inherently fleeting, brings deep privacy challenges for individuals who struggle to come feet with the permanence of their online identities. The digital footstep is related to posts, comments, likes, and every small detail like location data or search history. When people participate in the seemingly simple activity of sharing their lives online, they may need to recognize how lasting and powerful this digital trail can be. The digital footprint principle puts individuals face-to-face with the concept that their online activities contribute to a permanent record, determining how others view and think of them.
The analogy is similar to a tattoo in that anything shared online becomes integral to one’s self-image – something visible, present and difficult to remove (Boyd, 2010). This metaphor highlights the importance of people being careful about their online activities because the cyber trails they leave can influence current opinions and determine future chances at job interviews and socializing. Employers, schools and even friends act through online platforms to collect information about individuals. Indiscreet or compromising content in a digital footprint can affect professional opportunities, educational prospects and social contact. Online privacy is also a consideration with the accessibility of personal information; individuals may be susceptible to data breaches, identity theft, or unwarranted invasion of their individual lives.
Opportunities for Forging Self-Identity Through social media
Social Connection and Support: Building Bonds in the Digital Realm
In social media, social connection entails more than just digital interactions; it entails developing virtual communities that imitate real-world connections (Buckingham, 2007). As a result, social connectedness extends beyond this. Social media platforms serve as meeting points for people with similar interests, experiences, and ambitions. This is accomplished through the use of social capital and affinity concepts. Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu introduced the concept of social capital. According to this theory, social networks and interactions provide resources, support, and a range of perspectives (Claridge, 2021). Bourdieu developed this notion. Social media platforms assist users in developing community social capital and using social media. Connecting with others with similar interests or challenges helps build an online ecosystem. This ecosystem connects people to rich shared knowledge, emotional support, and experiences.
Many online communities on various platforms show how this approach might be applied. Parenting, mental health, and life challenges support groups give a secure area for people to share and get help. Support groups span photography, gaming, and DIY hobbies to specific life concerns. Online groups can provide a strong sense of belonging for lonely people and those seeking deeper relationships. This is because these communities span borders.
Relationships have a significant impact on an individual’s self-identity. Within the confines of online communities, individuals can authentically express their interests and struggles, receiving validation and understanding from peers who share similar values (Claridge, 2021). The shared experiences affirmed within these virtual spaces contribute to a robust self-identity by reinforcing a sense of community and belonging. Moreover, the support networks formed in these online communities play a vital role in navigating life’s challenges. Whether it is advice on a particular hobby, coping strategies for mental health issues, or shared narratives of overcoming adversity, these digital communities’ collective wisdom and empathy become integral components in the ongoing construction and affirmation of one’s self-identity.
Self-Expression and Creativity: Crafting Identity on the Digital Canvas
In the dynamic landscape of social media, symbolic interactionism and creative agency converge to empower individuals to explore and express their identities (Buckingham, 2007). Social media platforms serve as expansive canvases where users, armed with creative agency, can paint vivid portraits of themselves through visual arts, written content, or multimedia presentations. Most people believe that George Herbert Mead created symbolic interactionism. According to Fink (2015), humans generate meaning through social interactions, symbols, and experiences. This theory highlights the platform’s significance as a symbolic arena where users actively construct and interpret their digital identities when applied to social media. This means that each post, image, and video becomes a symbolic representation with personal meaning that each audience can perceive differently.
Humans’ “creative agency” permits them to modify their surroundings and express their opinions. This is the “creative agency” principle. Users can freely express themselves on social media, providing unprecedented creative freedom. According to symbolic interactionism, every social media post becomes a symbolic act, a creative expression contributing to the self-narrative. When examined via the lens of symbolic interactionism, the content alters.
These themes are used in Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok content. Individuals can use these venues to exhibit their creativity, abilities, and unique perspectives. According to Melnick and Plann (2023), visual artists can utilize Instagram as digital galleries, authors can blog, and videographers can make YouTube videos. This multiplicity of creative activity results in a diverse and authentic self-representation. This is accomplished by allowing people to develop and communicate their identities actively.
Furthermore, participatory social media platforms enhance this form of self-expression, which makes the situation even more dire. A variety of activities, including chatting, commenting, and the formation of creative groups, are carried out by users. As a result of this cyclical production and engagement process, individuals are motivated to refine and develop their expressions over time, ultimately resulting in a dynamic flow of ideas.
Personal Branding: Crafting Distinctive Identities on the Digital Stage
According to Appel et al. (2019), social media has become a platform for people to promote themselves by showcasing their lives and engaging in personal branding. Social media users must present a public image representing their values, hobbies, and career goals. This is done after self-branding and impression management. According to Nickerson (2023), sociology was the first to pioneer impression management. According to the idea, people actively alter their public image to influence others. This is known as deliberate self-presentation on social media. Users make deliberate decisions about what they post, how they present themselves visually, and what they write to impact their audience and positively form their perceptions of others.
According to Gorbatov et al. (2018), self-branding converts people into brands with diverse identities. Self-branding occurs when individuals become brands. Individuals can use social media platforms to cultivate and protect their brands actively. Content delivery, aesthetics, messaging, and online presence are all part of this. Personal branding is demonstrated by Instagram and YouTube influencers. Individuals provide this example. The individuals in question can develop a coherent narrative that portrays their personalities and interests by actively spreading content that connects with their audience. Influencers can distinguish themselves digitally by developing a distinct and distinctive self-identity. This is accomplished by cultivating a self-centered brand through consistent and deliberate self-presentation.
Personal branding, beyond influencers, is becoming more popular among people of various backgrounds and financial levels. People who use dating apps to meet new people meticulously craft their profiles to present a certain picture to potential mates. Professionals use LinkedIn to create their brands; entrepreneurs use Twitter to demonstrate their competence, and even singles utilize dating apps to find new friends. Purposeful personal brand design results in a consistent and carefully managed self-identity. This is true in all of the indicated instances. Personal branding has far-reaching implications. People can impact their digital interactions and online opportunities by developing their image. This is because people shape their online image. When properly built, a personal brand can facilitate professional relationships, networking, and social contacts matching their values and interests because a person’s identity is reflected in their brand.
Identity Exploration and Discovery: Navigating the Digital Landscape of Self-Discovery
In the digital age, social media is a powerful catalyst for the intricate identity exploration and discovery process, particularly among younger individuals traversing key developmental stages (Buckingham, 2007). When studied through Erikson’s Identity Theory and digital nomadism, social media becomes a means for self-discovery. According to Erikson’s Identity Theory, people experience identity crises. According to Schwartz (2001), adolescence is critical for identity development since people construct identities. People can experiment with many aspects of their identity on social media, aiding self-discovery. Social media platforms provide a broad virtual arena with diverse communities and information.
Smercina (2012) defines “digital nomadism” as the ability to navigate diverse digital environments and interact with other ideas, cultures, and lifestyles. Also included in this definition is the ability to travel. Exploring one’s identity involves doing things like this. Users can follow content providers on social media platforms, participate in online discussions, and completely submerge themselves in online communities. A person’s understanding of themselves and the world is expanded when they are exposed to various perspectives, which creates an environment conducive to the process of identity discovery.
Given the dynamic interaction between clients across platforms, implementing these notions is a straightforward process. By following a variety of content creators who offer their experiences, attitudes, and points of view, individuals can investigate numerous facets of their identities. Users have the opportunity to taste and adopt pieces that are suitable for their changing selves through the usage of social media, which provides a digital smorgasbord of vacation vlogs, instructional content, and lifestyle blogs. One can find this buffet on several social media platforms.
People can experiment with expressing their opinions, values, and interests through online communication and virtual communities. This allows children to explore different ways of expressing themselves. Interactive social media creates community and belonging by offering a supportive atmosphere for people to express and enhance their identities. The enormous variety of virtual communities, each with its subculture, expands the opportunities for developing one’s identity. This process corresponds to Erikson’s identity formation hypothesis, which claims that people struggle with “Who am I?” and “What do I want?” Erikson’s theory is used perfectly in this process. People can experiment with different aspects of their identity, discover new hobbies, and construct an ever-changing sense of self by connecting with social media’s numerous materials and communities.
Community Activism and Social Advocacy: Empowering Voices in the Digital Sphere
According to Buckingham (2007), social activism and social media have combined to produce a potent force for change in the digital era. On social media, users may now actively participate in community activism and advocate for social issues, which has increased purpose and social responsibility. These platforms are based on social interaction and group identity. “Social activism” is defined by Brenman and Sanchez (2014) as “deliberate actions to influence social, political, economic, or environmental problems.” According to this concept, social activity is called “social activism.” People can connect across boundaries and rally around causes thanks to social media. These efforts are amplified and democratized via social media platforms. Remember that when many people work together, they may accomplish incredible things.
Gerbaudo and Treré (2015) found that social media usage increases group identification. In order to build online communities, users can connect with others who share their values and worldviews. Above and beyond personal opinions, this shared identity can foster a sense of community and belonging, which are crucial for social activity. Developing this persona could prove to be beneficial. Using the hashtags #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo, Kann et al. (2023) demonstrate the possible implementation of these concepts. Even the most marginalized people’s opinions have the potential to be heard through social media. Social media’s multiplicative power is a contributing factor. Users’ involvement in these movements facilitates the dissemination of information, the arousal of awareness, and the mobilization of support. Beyond the domain of internet platforms, these movements impact societal discourse due to their broad nature. Not only that, but these changes can bring about real changes.
Going beyond basic posting and hashtagging, a person’s participation in the social media community becomes an essential aspect of their identity (Goswami, 2018). Users align themselves with social movements that uphold their values to solidify their sense of self. This is known as “alignment.” This sense of belonging and responsibility to one another keeps an individual’s friends, both online and off. One way to accomplish this is to cultivate a diverse, authentic, activist identity. The democratization of knowledge through social media also makes it possible for anyone to become an educated advocate and teach others about critical social concerns. We can fortify our shared identity by exploring intricate social issues in greater depth; doing so may inspire the open exchange of different perspectives.
Conclusion
Finally, creating a unique identity in this day of continual social media connection is challenging. There are advantages and disadvantages to using digital technology when trying to express and discover one’s personality. Social media users deal with issues such as the dynamic nature of online networks, privacy concerns, self-presentation, comparison, and similar problems. Many social media problems necessitate our immediate and vigorous response, including cyberbullying, social comparison, identity distortion, and digital footprints. To address these issues, we must first study psychology and then collaborate to promote empathy, respect, and ethics online. However, social media networks provide numerous methods for verifying identities. Users can find, empower, and participate in relevant activities through social connection and support, self-expression, creativity, personal branding, identity development, and community involvement. While it is critical to recognize the potential benefits of these opportunities, they must also be utilized. It will motivate people to organize their online experiences around their values and goals, benefiting everyone. Our investigation of the complicated interaction between social media and self-identity revealed that the digital world is a dynamic environment in which people negotiate their identities in response to possibilities and difficulties. Our investigation revealed this. The social media ecosystem is continually changing, and numerous critical components are involved. These are examples of digital literacy, online ethics, inclusion, and empathy. If users are intentional, resilient, and honest, social media can aid in self-discovery and identity formation.
References
Alabri, A. (2022). Fear of missing out (FOMO): the effects of the need to belong, perceived centrality, and fear of social exclusion. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4824256
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2019). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In A networked self (pp. 47–66). Routledge. https://www.danah.org/papers/2010/SNSasNetworkedPublics.pdf
Brenman, M., & Sanchez, T. W. (2014). Social activism. In Springer eBooks (pp. 6012–6017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2729
Buckingham, D. (2007). Youth, identity, and digital media (p. 216). the MIT Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/26085/1/1004001.pdf
Claridge, T. (2021). Bourdieu on social capital – theory of capital. Institute for Social Capital. https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/bourdieu-on-social-capital-theory-of-capital/
Crusius, J., Corcoran, K., & Mussweiler, T. (2022). Social comparison: Theory, research, and applications. Theories in social psychology, 165. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=y8Z6EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA165&dq=Social+Comparison+Theory&ots=weQ_9sgjhO&sig=3yNPxeoMFrSboj7QdVIFoH_uhtU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Social%20Comparison%20Theory&f=false
Ellemers, N. (2023, December 4). Social identity theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-identity-theory
Fardouly, J., Magson, N. R., Rapee, R. M., Johnson, C., & Oar, E. L. (2020). The use of social media by Australian preadolescents and its links with mental health. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(7), 1304–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22936
Fink, E. L. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication,1-13.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Edward-Fink/publication/314629859_Symbolic_Interactionism/links/5ccda855299bf14d9578196c/Symbolic-Interactionism.pdf
Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1043319
Gorbatov, S., Khapova, S. N., & Lysova, E. I. (2018). Personal Branding: Interdisciplinary systematic review and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02238
Goswami, M. P. (2018). Social media and hashtag activism. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326655352_Social_Media_and_Hashtag_Activism
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of suicide research, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
Kann, C., Hashash, S., Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., & Alvarez, R. M. (2023). Collective identity in collective action: evidence from the 2020 summer BLM protests. Frontiers in Political Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1185633
Kivisto, P., & Pittman, D. (2007). Goffman’s Dramaturgical Sociology. Illuminating social life: Classical and contemporary theory revisited, 271-290. https://study.com/academy/lesson/dramaturgical-analysis-in-sociology-definition-examplesquiz.html#:~:text=Dramaturgical%20analysis%20is%20simply%20another,Goffman%20called%20the%20front%20stage.
Lorena. (2023, November 1). The impact of social media on Mental health: Navigating the Digital Age. Anew Era TMS & Psychiatry. https://aneweratms.com/the-impact-of-social-media-on-mental-health/
Lutkevich, B., & Wigmore, I. (2023, February 9). digital footprint. WhatIs. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/digital-footprint
Marek, A., (2023). FOMO: a contemporary problem affecting many young people | European Youth Portal. (n.d.). European Youth Portal. https://youth.europa.eu/year-of-youth/young-journalists/fomo-contemporary-problem-affecting-many-young-people_en
Melnick, L., & Plann. (2023, February 23). How to promote yourself on Instagram as an artist. Plann. https://www.plannthat.com/how-to-promote-yourself-on-instagram-as-an-artist/
Nickerson, C. (2023, September 29). Impression Management & Self Presentation (Goffman). Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/impression-management.html
Nortje, A., Ph.D. (2020, April 29). Social Comparison Theory & 12 Real-Life Examples. PositivePsychology.com.https://positivepsychology.com/socialcomparison/#:~:text=The%20concept%20of%20social%20comparison%20was%20first%20termed%20and%20fully,people%20to%20form%20an%20evaluation.
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(1),7-58.https://cmapspublic3.ihmc.us/rid=1NFRF279X-GJGL70-15HW/Identity_Review_Paper.pdf
Smercina, R. V. (2012). Living on the Move: The Digital Nomad Mobile Phenomenon Identity and Practice ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c02587d1d3dc91ec122eb8173d06db9d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Toma, C. (2010). Affirming the self-online: Motives, benefits, and costs of Facebook use. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/092d8c0b-3fbe-498e-b362-f5f37b75da0f/content
Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human communication research, 33(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
write