The main feature of project management methodologies is the systematic structuring or grouping of units, elements, or components into a consistent whole. They can be seen as the set of policies and procedures governing how projects are handled or as guidelines. Methodologies offer an established method and are meant to maintain uniformity among different projects (Kerzner, 2022). On the contrary, the frameworks comprise individual blocks, principles, pieces, or elements required to ensure that a project is done. Instead of a full framework, frameworks provide a looser but more mobile scaffolding for the construction of project deliverables.
Usually, methodologies are quite restrictive and may hamper projects when they need adaptions or experience changes with the demands in requirements. They primarily use already defined metrics that do not vary much between projects and might not allow for adjustment to meet clients’ specific needs. However, frameworks promote flexibility and adaptability. These permit project managers to select and use aspects of the framework, like forms and templates, in such a way that it follows the needs of a given project or client.
Methodologies are understood as procedures, activities, and techniques directed to a particular discipline, for example, project management. They develop and can be modified to suit a corporation’s changed focus or trajectory. On the contrary, frameworks are conceptual tools applied to solve project-related problems. They can adjust to changes in the project’s needs and evolve less formally. Frameworks promote applying more flexible principles, providing a greater opportunity to respond to client requirements and environmental changes (Cristaldo et al., 2021).
In governance, various project management methodologies are used as a structured approach to project execution. They are usually composed of different processes, activities, and tools corresponding to this field’s most important practices. Frameworks provide managers with a conceptual structure that offers a flexible approach to viewing and handling project requirements. Governance is the implementation of aspects of the framework that work well for the project, such as forms, guidelines, checklists, and templates.
In this case, I would suggest conducting a health check instead of a full audit for the July 4th parade and picnic project. Health checks are more basic and informal evaluations focusing on a project’s general health to ensure it stays on course and meets the original goals. Due to the scale and type of the event, a health check represents a good choice for an early evaluation, offering useful information without a lot of red tape.
The reason for selecting a health check is associated with the context of the project and the scope of its implementation. This is the initial tentative approval of the parade and picnic from the town council; $1,500 of the budget has been allocated to it. The project seems in the infant stages and a health check would have a minor impact while giving an overview of the project at a glance.
The health check would consist of a brief screening of essential factors, including milestone progress, budget alignment, and adherence to technical specifications and constraints. It helps to quickly assess whether the project is likely to achieve its goals and what issues and red flags may require immediate action (Kerzner, 2022). Taking into consideration the timeframes and resources available, a health check provides the brother-in-law with timely feedback with minimum administrative burden.
More specifically, the areas of focus for the health check might include validating the permit status, evaluating the advancement of venue selection, re-assessing sponsorship organization, and lastly ensuring conformity to technical requirements and limitations. This method enables a realistic and proactive evaluation of the health of the project to take place in such a way that any required modifications can be made during the planning stage to improve the chances of a July 4 parade and picnic taking place in Anytown, USA. The emphasis is on confirming the key components to ensure that the project will progress in the right direction to achieve a positive outcome of the celebration on Independence Day.
The selection of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a project should encompass a well-considered approach to project objectives, the designed expectations of the stakeholders, and the intended results. KPIs can be selected correctly by project participants if the first step is to determine the factors necessary for successful implementation that support the objectives of the project. These success factors form the basis of KPI selection for relevance and measurability. Moreover, the key stakeholders need to be involved in the KPI selection process so that the organization’s priorities and expectations are met. The proposed KPIs must be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) so that the rate of success and progress can easily be determined.
Based on my personal experience participating in a renovation project, KPIs would have been used to improve the project management and results. For example, a KPI that included the percentage of achieved milestones on schedule would have helped in terms of schedule adherence. The financial-related KPIs including precision of the cost estimates and budget deviations would have been a great help in managing the financial issues efficiently (Kerzner, 2017). Moreover, customer satisfaction surveys could have been used as qualitative KPIs to measure the client’s attitude towards the refurbishment process and the result. Since these KPIs would also be regularly reviewed and analyzed throughout the project, early detection of possible issues would have been possible, thus, timely and effective adjustments could be made to ensure the overall success of the project. Through continuous tracking of these KPIs in the project life cycle, the project participants can detect zones of problems or deviations from the initial plan and intervene promptly. By using carefully selected KPIs, this structured approach to guiding, measuring, and finally improving the performance of house renovation projects contributes to their success.
References
Cristaldo, P., De Luise, D. L., La Pietra, L., De Battista, A., & Hemanth, J. (2021). Metrics for the Systematic Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET).
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.
write