The country has witnessed the acceleration of censorship of literary resources over time, and most of such challenges have been related to religious justifications. By contrast, the prevalence of these values may be limited and thus may be violated as well, thus lowering intellectual freedom and religious liberty. Stringent laws of this kind, in turn, may prevent the passage of different thoughts and, what is more, even give an upper hand to some forces to spread their ideology to the detriment of others. Rather than suppressing them, we need to articulate the critical Constitutional issues of the right to freedom of speech and religion in the process of fighting against this issue. The role of establishing a society that would serve the social and cultural aspects at the same level should be one of the most critical tasks, and the analysis of every community’s silence to the censorship as well as the creation of a culture of intellectual and religious pluralism should be done.
The case of books being banned spread across states in the US over the last few years is a dazzling development to be examined since it is among the most astonishing things that have happened in our time. These bans and religious stands often hit the head very hard and are not rightly excluded from the context of intellectual freedom or religious freedom consideration. The system that forbids people to get their hands on books has much more negative side of things to offer than positive ones. Thus, it is essential to recognize these risks. However, it is equally significant to uphold the fundamental virtues of religious and intellectual l liberty that underpin our democratic principles.
The central issue of the matter relies on the balance between religious censorship and freedom. Even though the supporters of book bans argue that certain books are against their religion or tradition, it is essential to understand that the freedom of religion encompasses the right to use different points of view and meet the broad spectrum of thought. Persons who try to limit publications that do not belong to their own religious beliefs face the danger of restricting the rights of others to access all the information, regardless of their religion, instantly.
The Research Center for the Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association, indeed, has complained of an inflammatory increase in the requests to limit books and other library resources compared to all the previous records. The rise in commitments to censor non-information suppresses intellectual curiosity and diversity of ideas apart from making such a weak foundation of democracy and the freedom of expression, which the country relied on from its establishment. Through his writings, Thomas Jefferson stressed the importance of having a free mind and expressed his dislike for an individual to dominate the thinking or opinion of others. Hence, the freedom of the scientific community to probe, inquire, and contribute to different issues is the key to developing a democratic society.
Moreover, the rising frequency of book bans creates a specific fear in the community that with religion becoming a political issue and influencing the conversation in the community, it might one day be rejected outright. Generally, it is a case of the reinforced adherence to religious texts and doctrines, which consequently prompt limits on public access to books, leading to the imposition of specific beliefs on all society members. This eradication is not only a matter of silencing but also of maintaining a culture of hostility and isolation inside religious communities.
However, it is essential to emphasize that religious freedom does not mean proselytizing or imposing on others; the tolerance of followers of different beliefs should apply to a principle that states that everyone must have the liberty to practice their faith, always respecting the rights of others to do the same. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution gives Congress the power to pass laws that restrict actions that either establish one religion or prevent citizens from freely practising the religion of their choice. Thus, religious liberty guarantees that an individual’s conscience and religious plurality are protected in communities that embrace diverse opinions.
The kind of book ban imposition is the only time we should take a stand in defending intellectual freedom and the embrace of other religions. This includes resisting how the current information is destroyed, supporting media coverage that considers constructive examination, and pushing restrictive policies where freedom of speech and the region are free. Hence, there is a need to put in place a climate where all religions are respected, and there is an understanding between each celebrant of various religions while co-existing peacefully, which is created to allow them to be partners in the collective discourse.
In the same way, what should be paid attention to while standard political issues in which book bans are rooted are found are social problems that are the source of censorship. The iron at the core of this campaign is to prevent misleading/misinformation from being spread, make tools available that ease the process analysis and evaluation of the media outlets, and provide programs that aim to promote critical thinking and cultivate a deep comprehension of the issue of religious diversity. We give the tools to daily manoeuvre intricate facets of humanity through refined understanding into empathy. These ideals that appear during these collaborations become the factors that determine a tolerant and inclusive society, as reflected by the creation of the fundamental values of intellectual and religious freedom.
Therefore, the last and most severe challenge for qualified books across the USA is the First Amendment issue of free speech and intellectual diversity. Shutting down a religion only limits people’s freedom to be expressive democracy-wise. Moreover, other than this, censorship is the milk-shell for the culture of intolerance and menace to the existence of others. The problem is a grave one that must be tackled directly, a beginning by way of re-articulating our morals in promoting religious tolerance, tolerance of intellectual freedom, and democratic governance. Through joint efforts and strict following personal liberty as a prerequisite, we ensure that no opinions or ideas are manipulated only after this, as no one is forced to follow a particular dogma within a society.
In conclusion, in the binary of book bannings, the danger to democracy is only one of the threats to it. It has violated the two most fundamental ideals of the country: freedom of thought and worship. Not imposing the materials with the argument of democracy’s values on banning an object in this case, we are only increasing the deceitfulness between some social groups and others since exclusion is a norm in our contemporary society. For strong stewardship of these values, we should increase our part in bringing religious tolerance and teaching democratic ideas. By being united and facing these ideas of equal representation, a world can be developed where people take part and directions freely, and their views will always remain as their interests without being restrained and suppressed by any entity.
References
Bhuiyan, Md & Zoethout, Carla. (2023). Freedom of Religion and Religious Pluralism: An Introduction. 10.1163/9789004504967_002.
Macdonald, S. (2023). Intellectual freedom and social responsibility in library and information science: A reconciliation. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231160795
write