Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) is a major brand that has experienced gradual growth since it was launched in 1961. YSL has become a high-end fashion store with iconic designs like female tuxedoes, ballerina-inspired dresses, boots, coats, and pants. However, YSL has experienced some uncertainties based on its leadership, competitors, and other market dynamics that inspired the company to transform. Using Porter’s Five Forces model may impact YSL’s capacity to cater to its clientele and generate profits. According to Rice (2010), modifying any of the five factors necessitates a business unit reevaluating the market changes due to the overall shift in industry information and dynamics. YSL should strategically align its abilities, action plans, and business strategies to achieve profitability beyond expectations. Yves Saint Laurent can be asses using Porter’s 5 Forces model to assess its market and analyze the effectiveness of the leadership model it uses to make recommendations.
Threat of New Entrants
It is in the interest of established businesses to erect obstacles in their path to keep new competitors out of the market. The groups may include recently established companies or those looking to expand into new markets. The new entrants in a sector present opportunities for growth and the ability to grow market share. The fashion business presents a notable entrance hurdle owing to the requisite establishment of brand awareness, creative skills, and distribution networks. YSL has a robust brand image and well-established distribution networks, presenting a moderate difficulty for potential new entrants seeking to compete in the market (Baxter-Wright, 2021). As new players enter the primary business, they may capitalize on their current resources, such as abilities and financial flows, to disrupt the existing competition. Low profitability is caused by high substitute threats, which put an economic limit on industry earnings out of concern that other products would replace them. In addition, it lowers profitability margins, impacting the industry’s overall growth potential.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Strong suppliers give YSL a more remarkable ability to extract substantial revenue by imposing high prices while restricting the amount and standard of the products or services offered or by shifting the costs to the industry participants. Supplier power is a concept that pertains to the influence wielded by suppliers in determining the prices of raw materials and inputs used by a firm. YSL depends on suppliers to procure materials and textiles, yet it has a distinguished reputation within the industry, which grants it significant leverage in bargaining power (Baxter-Wright, 2021). Increasing the price while sacrificing quantity and quality is one of the many requirements suppliers typically set. The company has moderate bargaining power due to establishing supplier relationships and cultivating a brand reputation. Therefore, the assessment of YSL’s total bargaining power of suppliers is reasonable.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
By enforcing conditions that are not particularly advantageous for the suppliers in terms of price, quality, or service, buyers with significant bargaining power can substantially impact the profitability of the providers functioning in the market. Consequently, frequently selecting customers becomes essential for businesses to prevent dependence on them. YSL has a high bargaining power based on the variety of products it offers. The fashion sector is characterized by significant buyer power attributed to the extensive range of options accessible to consumers. YSL is not expected to incur any switching expenses while transitioning between buyers. To foster client loyalty, it is essential for YSL to consistently engage in innovation and uphold the standards of product quality. YSL’s strength is primarily determined by the degree of interest and customer focus on the product. Customers are seen as powerful when they are adept at negotiating, especially in price-sensitive industries where they can exert pressure on suppliers to lower prices even further.
Threat of Substitute Products
In the fashion industry, the threat of new substitutes is high. There are alternative or replacement goods consistently emerge as viable options. These substitutes are produced by different players, which can replace the products offered by YSL. The fashion sector is distinguished by its dynamic nature, marked by frequent shifts in trends, posing a substantial risk from replacement items. Consumers can readily transition their preferences towards alternative high-end or rapid fashion companies.
Rivalry among Existing Competitors
The intense rivalry between businesses is a valuable indicator of an industry’s profitability since it drives companies to put tremendous effort into vying for market share. Furthermore, YSL rivalry is based on variety, industry development, and entrance barrier obstacles. YSL faces intense rivalry from significant brands based on the constantly changing fashion trends that require the company to adapt quickly to these dynamics. The market has a high degree of fragmentation, intensifying industry competition. The market needs more concentration, accommodating players of diverse operational scales, ranging from small-scale enterprises to large-scale entities. The fashion sector is characterized by intense competition, whereby several well-established companies operate. YSL encounters significant competition from prominent luxury labels like Chanel, Gucci, and Prada. Hence, YSL can be successful by prioritizing competitive prices, innovation, and marketing. Examining the brands and products, their strengths and weaknesses, rivals’ strategy, and popularity, all contribute to the competitive rivalry of YSL.
The effectiveness of YSL’s leadership model
YSL uses a combination of transformative, visionary, and collaborative leadership approaches. These models often provide advantages in the innovative and ever-evolving fashion sector. According to Rogelberg (2019), leaders who believe their meetings are progressing well are less inclined to request input and pursue avenues for improvement actively. Evaluating leadership styles’ efficacy should depend on YSL’s capacity to adapt to prevailing industry trends, cultivate innovation, oversee teams of creative individuals, and attain predetermined financial objectives. Despite the leadership models used by YSL being effective, some issues have forced the company to change its leadership. Therefore, using alternative leadership models, such as servant leadership, may facilitate a deeper understanding and fulfillment of employee needs by YSL leaders, resulting in heightened creativity, work happiness, and overall productivity. Moreover, implementing agile leadership in YSL may effectively facilitate the company’s ability to adjust to evolving trends and market situations promptly.
Recommendations
YSL needs to engage in ongoing market research to get insights into developing fashion trends and customer preferences. Another recommendation is the improvement of supply chain efficiency as a means to decrease lead times and mitigate manufacturing expenses. This enables YSL to address market needs and sustain its competitive edge promptly. Lastly, YSL should consider allocating resources towards e-commerce and digital marketing strategies to enhance the brand’s online visibility and reach. Technology is changing the fashion industry, where designs are generated through 3D models to create unique products, which YSL must consider to remain dominant. Also, the analysis of the environment needs to feed all planning aspects, as it should be continuous. The effect of the particular external factors or forces might have extreme consequences for the specific department or divisions. Also, the analysis better helps companies clarify the needed or required changes, thus identifying the potential options.
References
Baxter-Wright, E. (2021). Little Book of Yves Saint Laurent: The Story of the Iconic Fashion House (Vol. 8). Welbeck Publishing Group.
Rice, J. F. (2010). Adaptation of Porter’s five forces model to risk management. Defense AR Journal, 17(3), 375-388.
Rogelberg, S. G. (2019). Why your meetings stink and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 140-143.
write