Justice has evolved through the multiple disciplinary manifestations and descriptions into the present field of study and technique of inquiry. From humanities to social sciences, history, and natural science, they have played an integral role in developing the present descriptive facets of justice. The generation of a comprehensive overview of the human dimension in assessing justice has become apparent through the open and broad spectrum of enriching the justice perspective. Therefore, developing a unique disciplinary background that centers on examining justice has become the focal point for analyzing justice and determining its influence on the people. The multiple lenses play an integral role in gaining acknowledgment within the interdisciplinary areas of justice examination. Thus, developing a comprehensive analysis of justice from various lenses and a concerted focus on social science and humanities should highlight their influence on the contemporary setting.
Justice across the different lenses of social science, natural science, history, and humanities
Key characteristics
The four lenses provide an enabling platform to ask questions and gain information from a different perspective on the description of justice. Rethinking justice from the view of social science, natural science, history, and humanist can provide the framework for comprehending the characteristics that influence decision-making (Norder & Rijsdijk, 2016). Looking at the cultural artifacts presents an enabling platform to construct a thematic evaluation of justice.
Social science denotes the assessment of society and its interplay with people. Hence, generating insight into human behavior and its interactive process translates into the manifestation of justice. Tauginienė et al. (2020) recognize that an integrated relationship between social science and justice emerges due to studying how people interact with each other and the need for the codes of practice that influence decision-making.
Natural science denotes the evaluation of the physical world from the basis of biology, physics, and chemistry. In line with the related disciplines is the emphasis on the natural world as descriptive and intertwined with justice (Norder & Rijsdijk, 2016). Questions that center on description, prediction, and observation of the natural world play a direct part in the assessment of the way we develop indicative elements of value, morals, and ethics.
History, on the other hand, entails the awareness of the events that occur in the past and their interplay in the determination of the interactive process. Firsthand accounts and experiences can influence behavioral dimensions (Fassin & Steinmetz, 2023). People living in specific times can be determinant in the evaluation of the knowledge and the influential factors that lead to the development of principles of justice.
Equally, humanities center on examining cultures across the globe and provide an opportunity to evaluate the socialization process. Humanities should be recognized as a broad perspective that can lead to comprehending multiple experiences, cultures, and values (Fassin & Steinmetz, 2023). The diverse mediums of human expression play a central role in assessing humanities.
Similarities and differences
Humanities and social science are interrelated due to their potential to examine the values, connections, and cultural artifacts that define the human experience. The development of the hallmarks for assessing objectivity and subjectivity for evaluating justice emanates from the two lenses. Central to the examination is the platforms for studying ways of cultural expression and determination of human experience (Fassin & Steinmetz, 2023). On the other hand, natural science is extensively factual-centric and depends on assessing the physical setting as the basis for understanding justice. Additionally, history borrows from the natural world to collect evidence on the parameters that define justice (Norder & Rijsdijk, 2016). However, humanities, social sciences, and history differ from natural since due to their emphasis on qualitative data in the assessment of immediate issues.
Justice across the four lenses
The four lenses highlight a unique insight into justice and its influence in developing diverse areas of inquiry. Humanities, as an avenue of cultural study, can be influential based on literature, art, philosophy, and photography in determining justice (Markusson et al., 2020). On the other hand, social science denotes situational awareness of how we interact with our world. Developing a wide lens on personalization should be the framework for interactive outcomes (Haeffner et al., 2022). On the other hand, the humanities provide a unique insight into how civilization has grown and the role of justice. Understanding what represents the human experience should give insight into the dimensions of interaction that can influence growth and development (Fassin & Steinmetz, 2023). Hence, from the research, the critical questions to assess from the two lenses are:
- Can humanities play an integral role in reflecting on the impact of science on human culture?
- Is social science the basis for examining the causes and effects of interpersonal relationships and justice?
Justice across the two lenses: Learned aspect
Justice and Social Sciences
From the question raised, it is clear that social science is comprehensively human-centric. Generating insight into human behavior denotes evaluating interactive dimensions and the framework for developing mutually beneficial outcomes (Norder & Rijsdijk, 2016). A wide variety of assessments represents the intersection of human values and the determination of the tenets of relationships that lead to the determination of justice. For example, in a classroom setting, justice is expressed in the daily interactive process (Haeffner et al., 2022). The way that a teacher assigns grades is a manifestation of justice, especially from a personal perspective when a fellow student plagiarized his work, and the teacher opted to rank me higher than him. The experience showed high human interaction as a facet of social science can lead to the development of principles of justice (Norder & Rijsdijk, 2016). Consideration of the social lens denotes the promotion of better living and interactions that can be beneficial to the determination of principles of inclusivity and socialization.
Justice and Humanities
Tauginienė et al. (2020) emphasize that humanities often overlap with science, and it is crucial to develop situational awareness of the interactions based on the creative approaches of expression. For example, assessing literature, fine art, dance, and photography promotes an enabling platform for examining humanity. Central to the assessment process is the comparative process of societies and primary sources (Markusson et al., 2020). Acknowledgment of one’s values is through authentic expressions that can provide an opportunity for scientific study. Central to the assessment is the generation of insight into how the existent artifacts lead to learning about ourselves (Haeffner et al., 2022). Thus, the brief evaluation can offer a framework for cultural aspects and the scientific dimension that shapes people. Correlating the humanities with human experience can highlight the scientific description of culture, values, and their interplay with the development of facets of justice. For example, assessing literature such as Plato’s philosophy plays an integral role in the scientific comprehension of humanity and the progress made in determining justice.
Conclusion
Justice plays a progressive and integrated dimension in assessing humanities, social sciences, the natural world, and history. A comprehensive assessment of its influential part is vital in discerning how the lenses can be compared. However, evaluating humanities and social sciences highlights the considerable part of understanding justice from the purview of interaction and human experience. Emphasis on the interpersonal approaches that influence people can be beneficial in determining justice and the facets that led to its emergence.
References
Fassin, D., & Steinmetz, G. (Eds.). (2023). The Social Sciences in the Looking Glass: Studies in the Production of Knowledge. Duke University Press.
Haeffner, M., Hames, F., Barbour, M. M., Reeves, J. M., Platell, G., & Grover, S. (2022). Expanding collaborative autoethnography into the world of natural science for transdisciplinary teams. One Earth, 5(2), 157-167.
Markusson, N., Balta-Ozkan, N., Chilvers, J., Healey, P., Reiner, D., & McLaren, D. (2020). Social science sequestered. Frontiers in Climate, 2, 2.
Norder, S. J., & Rijsdijk, K. F. (2016). Interdisciplinary island studies: connecting the social sciences, natural sciences and humanities. Island Studies Journal, 11(2), 673-686.
Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., Heinisch, B., Daskolia, M., Suškevičs, M., … & Prūse, B. (2020). Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-11.
write