The complex correlation between income levels and obesity is a complicated phenomenon characterized by many contributing elements. One salient factor pertains to the financial implications of food, whereby more nutritious alternatives, such as fruits and vegetables, sometimes incur higher costs than energy-dense processed foods, hence giving rise to the phenomenon commonly referred to as the “food price gap.” Economic inequality might cause persons with lower incomes to place higher importance on consuming foods that are rich in calories, which subsequently leads to the adoption of unhealthy dietary patterns. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as the “obesity income paradox.” Furthermore, the presence of obstacles in obtaining facilities for engaging in physical exercise exacerbates the matter, highlighting the intricate nature of the relationship between obesity and poverty.
The connection, between obesity and income levels, is complex
One important factor is the cost of food. Healthier options like fruits and vegetables tend to be more expensive compared to processed foods in calories. This price difference is called the “food price gap” (Sizer & Whitney, 2008). People with incomes may prioritize high-calorie foods to meet their energy needs, which can lead to overconsumption of unhealthy choices. This phenomenon is often referred to as the “obesity income paradox.” Moreover, individuals with resources may need help accessing facilities and safe spaces for physical activity. The lack of opportunities for activity can contribute to a lifestyle and further increase the risk of obesity.
Growing world population threat to the food supply
As population numbers increase, food demand increases, resulting in intensified practices. Unfortunately, this intensification can lead to deforestation, soil degradation and overexploitation of resources. The conversion of farmland into areas for agriculture frequently results in the loss of habitats, which negatively affects biodiversity and causes disturbances in ecosystems. Moreover, population increase puts pressure on water resources. The demand for crops that require much water rises as the population rises, making agriculture a major user of fresh water. Because of this, water scarcity and environmental degradation can result from over-drawing from rivers and aquifers.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Aquaculture
Aquaculture, sometimes known as fish farming, encompasses a wide range of practices aimed at raising fish species for various purposes, offering numerous advantages and applications to the human population. Firstly, aquaculture alleviates the strain on wild fish populations by offering a sustainable protein source, hence meeting the demand for seafood. Additionally, aquaculture has the potential to contribute to the economic growth of coastal communities by offering alternative livelihood opportunities and generating income (Sizer & Whitney, 2008). Nevertheless, aquaculture is not devoid of its ecological consequences. The introduction of nitrogen and phosphorus into the aquatic ecosystem is a contributing factor to the occurrence of eutrophication and the subsequent proliferation of harmful algal blooms. An additional concern about the environment involves the possibility of farmed fish being released into natural habitats, resulting in genetic contamination and ecological competition with indigenous species.
Environmental dangers
Furthermore, aquaculture presents environmental dangers in the following manners: a. Disease transmission: The implementation of intensive aquaculture techniques has been found to facilitate the dissemination of diseases among farmed fish, hence requiring the utilization of antibiotics and other chemical agents. Certain substances can potentially infiltrate water sources, posing a risk to non-target wildlife species. The accumulation of surplus feed and fish waste originating from aquaculture activities has the potential to accumulate on the bottom, leading to habitat degradation and adverse impacts on marine ecosystems (Sizer & Whitney, 2008). The Dissemination of Non-native Species: The introduction of non-native species for aquaculture purposes can disturb the ecological equilibrium of local ecosystems since these species may exhibit competitive advantages over native species or prey upon them.
The fifth topic of discussion pertains to Marasmus and Kwashiorkor. Children diagnosed with marasmus and kwashiorkor exhibit discernible physical manifestations that can be directly attributed to the varied levels of their dietary deficiencies. The primary cause of marasmus is a lack of calories and essential nutrients, in the diet leading to malnutrition. Children with marasmus experience weight loss and significant muscle shrinkage. Conversely, kwashiorkor is characterized by protein intake despite consuming enough calories. When infants have kwashiorkor, they may develop swelling, known as edema, in their area due to fluid retention in body tissues. This happens when the body lacks proteins for maintaining balance.
In summary, the relationship between obesity and income levels is complex and influenced by social and environmental factors. The concept of the “food price gap” highlights the challenges consumers face when making food choices due to constraints. Additionally, limited access to spaces for activity further increases vulnerability to obesity. To address this issue effectively, it is crucial to adopt an approach that considers not only individual decision-making but also systemic factors affecting food availability and physical activity opportunities. To tackle the obesity income paradox, we need everyone on board: policymakers, healthcare professionals and communities. We must create an environment that promotes access to choices and encourages physical activity for people from all income groups.
References
Sizer, F., & Whitney, E. (2008). Nutrition: Concepts and Controversies (16th Edition)
write