There are many ways through which the government and non-governmental organizations collaborate to serve people. Addressing community needs in Sydney involves a collaborative effort between governmental bodies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), especially concerning people experiencing homelessness and individuals facing physical challenges. The City of Sydney focuses on shelter needs, partnering with NGOs for immediate support and funding. Local policies aim to regulate shelters and encourage businesses to aid prevention programs (Deslatte et al., 2020).
The pressing needs include shelter, outreach programs, and resources for people experiencing homelessness. At the state level, New South Wales allocates funds for shelters, support services, and statewide policies. Collaboration with local initiatives ensures a comprehensive approach, addressing broader issues like affordable housing and mental health services. The federal government implements a national strategy to combat homelessness, working with local and state entities for data collection and evidence-based policymaking (Germishuys et al., 2022). A national approach fosters consistency and aids in identifying trends. Systemic issues like affordable housing and mental health support are pivotal at this level. Transitioning to individuals facing physical challenges, the City of Sydney emphasizes accessibility, inclusion, and tailored programs. Further, collaboration with NGOs ensures representation in decision-making and funding for these individuals’ needs.
At the state level, New South Wales contributes to health, accessibility, and employment opportunities for those with physical challenges. Collaboration with disability organizations focuses on understanding nuanced needs (Shaw et al., 2022). The federal government addresses broader issues through funding health, education, and employment programs. This collaboration is crucial for a holistic approach to disability issues. Challenges revolve around coordination, resource allocation, ensuring accessibility, and continuous effectiveness monitoring. Overall, understanding specific needs lays the groundwork for collaborative strategies, emphasizing both immediate concerns and systemic issues in community service provision in Sydney.
How Different Governments are Helping the Homeless People
The City of Sydney takes a leadership role in addressing homelessness, recognizing the immediate need for safe and accessible shelters (Doll et al., 2022). Collaboration with NGOs is paramount to providing immediate support, shelter funding, and assistance in outreach programs. Local policies are tailored, establishing shelter zoning regulations and incentivizing businesses to participate in prevention programs (Shaw et al., 2022). Immediate needs encompass shelter, outreach programs, and resources for those without homes.
At the state level, the State Government of New South Wales is pivotal in funding and supporting programs combating homelessness. According to Doll et al., 2022, addressing broader challenges like the unavailability of affordable housing, mental health, and other general health services, funds are allocated for shelters, support services, and the formulation of statewide policies. Coordination with local initiatives ensures a comprehensive approach, recognizing the diverse challenges the homeless population faces at the state level. To realize better results, broader issues, such as affordable housing and mental health services, are tackled strategically (Knapp & Wong, 2020).
On the other hand, the Australian Federal Government implements a national strategy to address systemic issues contributing to homelessness for most citizens (Doll et al., 2022). Most strategies are long-term, and their touch is across all the other lower and international governments. Beyond immediate needs, the federal government adopts a comprehensive approach, collaborating with local and state entities, as aforementioned, to develop a holistic strategy. Federal agencies conduct comprehensive data collection campaigns for evidence-based policies that are locally viable and internationally acceptable, thereby fostering consistency across regions (Wibowo, 2023). Systemic challenges like affordable housing and mental health support are addressed at the federal level, reflecting a commitment to a holistic and nationwide strategy.
Government Collaboration with Non-Governmental Organizations to Help People Living With Disabilities
To satisfactorily serve the constituents of the City of Sydney facing disability challenges and to offer the services they need, the City of Sydney collaborates with NGOs to address the primary concern of accessibility of the various services offered within the city’s jurisdiction. To sort the accessibility challenge, the immediate necessities include ensuring representation and inclusion in local decision-making processes. People with disabilities can better represent the people living with disabilities since they understand what other people living with disabilities need (Institute of Medicine (US), 2017). Due to that, positions are created for them to represent themselves on boards, management, and in parliament. The city recognizes the need for tailored programs and services fronted by the NGOs and the government, and therefore, it emphasizes funding for individuals facing physical challenges. Concurrently, an inclusive environment for those facing physical challenges is a priority since immediate needs require accessibility and inclusion. (Zallio & Clarkson, 2021)
More like the city government, the state government of New South Wales contributes to health and accessibility initiatives that are aimed at facilitating the livelihoods of people living with disabilities. Far beyond physical accessibility, the state government puts more effort towards creating opportunities for employment of people with disabilities by acknowledging the importance of their economic inclusion. Broader needs, such as health and employment opportunities, are addressed at the state level, highlighting the interconnected nature of the challenges these people face daily (Watson et al., 2020). Collaboration with disability non-governmental organizations is crucial to enable a comprehensive understanding of the needs and challenges facing this kind of group.
Further, the federal policies set up by the Australian federal government address broader issues faced by the physically challenged population nationwide. As much as the government may have funds collected from taxes and other avenues, collaboration with NGOs provides additional funding for health, education, and employment programs that are crucial for people living with disability challenges (AlHeresh & Cahn, 2020). The federal government can go further to create shelter modifications where necessary to cater to people experiencing homelessness (Doll et al., 2022). Federal collaboration with non-governmental organizations is essential for a broad approach to disability issues since the federal government recognizes the diverse needs of individuals with physical challenges and provides support at a national level; emphasizing a unified and inclusive approach is pivotal for the success of the efforts made by both organizations.
Challenges Being Addressed To Enhance Government and Non-Governmental Organizations Collaboration
Coordination Challenges
Part of the challenges currently being addressed include coordination challenges between the governmental and non-governmental organizations while aligning the efforts of different levels of government and NGOs to accomplish particular goals. Effective communication and synergy are ongoing priorities to enhance the interconnection required to flawlessly coordinate activities on various collaborations (Institute of Medicine (US), 2017). Ensuring immediate needs are satisfied through coordinated efforts remains challenging due to conflicts of interest that need to align with both organizations. This challenge indicates the necessity and calls for streamlined communication channels between governmental and non-governmental organizations (Wibowo, 2023).
Inadequate Resource Allocation
Resource allocation is also at the top of the list since financial constraints present a substantial challenge in initiating and accomplishing initiatives. Strategies to solve the resource allocation matrix involve seeking additional resources to solve scarcity and optimizing existing funds to meet community service needs as optimally as possible (Institute of Medicine (US), 2017). Strategic resource allocation is crucial to help address immediate needs such as shelter and accessibility. The challenge lies in finding innovative solutions to bridge the resource gap and ensure comprehensive support.
Inaccessibility of Physical Spaces
Furthermore, the challenge of enhancing accessibility regarding physical spaces and services remains very crucial (Masefield et al., 2020). Initiatives are ongoing at various levels to ensure universal accessibility to address the basic need for inclusivity and accessibility, which is crucial in improving the quality of life for individuals with physical challenges. Inclusive management, for instance, can be pivotal in implementing strategies and frameworks to address the challenges faced by people with disabilities. Complimentary, comprehensive strategies are essential to meet the diverse accessibility needs across different jurisdictions (Dineen-Griffin et al., 2019).
Monitoring and Evaluation
Most importantly, having a program that is not monitored renders it ineffective; therefore, continuous monitoring of the effectiveness of all plans and their execution is crucial for the plans’ success. Regular evaluation is required to facilitate monitoring to identify successful strategies and areas for improvement (Dineen-Griffin et al., 2019). Immediate and long-term needs are assessed to adapt community services to evolving societal needs. The challenge lies in developing robust monitoring mechanisms to ensure ongoing effectiveness and address the dynamic nature of community needs.
Conclusion
In summary, the collaborative efforts across different levels of governance in Sydney reflect a commitment to addressing the unique needs of people experiencing homelessness and individuals facing physical challenges. The collective understanding of these specific needs paves the way for comprehensive strategies. Balancing immediate concerns with long-term systemic issues showcases a proactive approach within the City of Sydney’s service delivery system. These coordinated efforts seek to ensure shelter, outreach programs, affordable housing, and tailored services for both groups. However, ongoing challenges persist, encompassing coordination difficulties, resource constraints, accessibility concerns, and the need for continuous effectiveness assessments. Despite these hurdles, the commitment to collaboration between governmental bodies, NGOs, and local initiatives underscores a collective determination to improve the quality of life for vulnerable populations. Future endeavors must address these challenges with innovative solutions while continually adapting to the evolving needs of these communities for sustainable and inclusive outcomes.
References
AlHeresh, R., & Cahn, P. S. (2020). Expanding Global Rehabilitation Services through International Academic-Community Partnerships. Annals of Global Health, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2876
Deslatte, A., Hatch, M. E., & Stokan, E. (2020). How Can Local Governments Address Pandemic Inequities? Public Administration Review, 80(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13257
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019). Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of primary health care practice self-management support strategies. PLOS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220116
Doll, K., Karabanow, J., Huges, J., Leviten-Reid, C., & Wu, H. (2022). Homelessness within the COVID-19 Pandemic in Two Nova Scotian Communities. International Journal on Homelessness, 2(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.5206/ijoh.2022.1.14227
Germishuys, P. S., Smith, S., Hugo, J., Madela-Mntla, E., & Botha, T. (2022). The demography and disease burden of the homeless shelter population of Tshwane during COVID-19. 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3692
Institute of Medicine (US). (2017). Health Care Services for Homeless People. Nih.gov; National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK218235/
Knapp, M., & Wong, G. (2020). Economics and Mental health: the Current Scenario. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692
Masefield, S. C., Msosa, A., & Grugel, J. (2020). Challenges to effective governance in a low-income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x
Shaw, J., Wickenden, M., Thompson, S., & Mader, P. (2022). Achieving disability-inclusive employment – Are the current approaches deep enough? Journal of International Development, 34(5), 942–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3692
Watson, M. F., Bacigalupe, G., Daneshpour, M., Han, W., & Parra‐Cardona, R. (2020). COVID‐19 Interconnectedness: Health Inequity, the Climate Crisis, and Collective Trauma. Family Process, 59(3), 832–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12572
Wibowo, A. (2023). Enhancing Economic Growth for the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals through Digital Era Fundraising Schemes for Sustainable Community Development: A Policy Analysis from the Islamic Economic Perspective. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Philanthropy, pp. 1, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.24090/icip.v1i1.301
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility in the built Environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, p. 206, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352
write