Role in Quality Control
The general role of healthcare ethics relates to conceptualizing the moral responsibility that guides and governs the clinical care setting. This is achieved through advising on issues, educating staff and the general public on ethical issues surrounding healthcare, and structuring policies that delegate patient care (Hajibabaee et al., 2016). One of the mode-defined roles of the committee is to establish the patient rationale for quality improvement. They hold the staff liable for ensuring their provisions designate quality care through structured programs that link the functionality of the programs with the ethical committee (Anderson, 1996).
Inadequate Staffing Project
Critics of an Ethical Dilemma
My identification for the project considered the issue of inadequate staffing for a clinical setting. The dilemma’s approach references the evaluation that medical requirements are vital and cannot be delayed. Nursing staff, doctors, and healthcare practitioners should provide around-the-clock availability in emergencies, which occasionally happen. There needs to be more staff to rotate the roles. Describing the dilemma takes a perspective developed by Waterfield in assessing the risk of a case where the practitioners are asked to work overtime to stratify healthcare (Waterfield, 2022). The level of exhaustion leaves them incapacitated to performing more critical roles, thus the possibility of errors.
Barriers to Ethical Decision-Making
The conceptualization of the accrued solution to the issue is hiring more staff. However, the achievement is more challenging than it sounds. The workforce must define the quality of the clinical setting that the ethical committee defines. This serves as a barrier to adding the number of qualified workers. The consideration of the barrier to ethical decision-making has been related to the identifications by Erlen that point out the impact of the working environment (Erlen, 2004). The impact of the working environment serves as another barrier because the management has to structure their setting before considering the issue of staffing.
Key Stakeholders
The assessment of the issue of inadequate staffing questions the role of the ethical committee in addressing such issues and who is responsible for structuring a solution. The management is a significant stakeholder in a clinical setting for the ethical committee. If the clinical setting is private, shareholders are considered part of the ethical committee. For the case of a public corporation, the designation is under the federal government, making the individual secretaries or ministers part of the ethical committee. Other positions in the committee are designated to departmental managers and supervisors. A general public member is also included to represent the scope of the coverage as a public health worker.
Recommendations Framework on Ethical Decision-Making
The assessment settled on the consequential framework, which focuses on the future effects of the present decisions made in addressing the project on staff shortage (Larres & Kelly, 2023). Representing the scope of the framework for this case demonstrates a collaboration that can be achieved between stakeholders and the Ministry of Education in restructuring the curriculum on healthcare. The context to be included will focus on the individual requirements of different clinical settings. The future practitioner will be more qualified, providing more qualifying grounds for their inclusion in care for the future. The generative choice settles on the stakeholders initiating the change and representing the clinical designation of the ethics. The students will relate to the content until they can translate it to the clinical setting while adhering to the rules and regulations of the premises.
Summary of Project Choice
The settlement of the project, inadequate staffing, relates to the scope of the ethical committee in a healthcare setting. Its choice was based on determining the overall responsibility in handling such issues. It also demonstrated the stakeholders’ structure and ability to act on the recommendations made.
References
Anderson, C. A. (1996). Ethics Committees and Quality Improvement: A Necessary Link. J Nurs Care Qual., 11(1), 22–28. doi:10.1097/00001786-199610000-00009
Allen, J. A. (2004). Wanted-nurse. Ethical issues and the nursing shortage. Orthop Nurse, 23(4), 289–292. doi:10.1097/00006416-200407000-00017
Hajibabaee, F., Joolaee, S., Cheraghi, M, Salari, P. & Rodney, P. (2016). Hospital/clinical ethics committee’s notion: an overview. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 7(17), 112–117. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432947/#ref-list-a.h.atitle
Larres, P. & Kelly, M. (2023). A Framework for Authentic Ethical Decision Making in the Face of Grand Challenges: A Lonerganian Gradation. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 182, 521–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04974-2
Waterfield, D. (2022). Ethical Approaches to Address Nursing Workloads, Staffing Shortages. Chicago: Relias Media. Retrieved from www.reliasmdeia.com/articles/ethical-approaches-to-address-nursing-workloads-staffing-shortages
write