Theory or Conceptual Model
Upon presenting a comprehensive approach to understanding health-related behaviour in communities, HBM flows into influencing factors (Zhao et al., 2022). It assumes that the cues to action for people deciding whether to engage in health-promoting behaviours stem from their perceptions about severity, susceptibility, and perceived desirability/permissiveness following barriers. In this community intervention, HBM will help develop approaches to improve people’s participation in health screening by participating in aspects of such significance. Through communication of individuals’ perceptions or beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screenings, HBM will lead to developing interventions to increase awareness and motivation among access to such services.
The health belief model will be implied in this initiative by aligning interventions to focus on use-specific factors that influence individual’s choices towards colorectal cancer screening. It tries to increase perceptions of gravity and vulnerability for colorectal cancer, emphasizing the importance of early detection and losing therapeutic compromise potential obstacles towards screening. This initiative on positive behaviour becomes good through the coordination of intervention strategies with earlier HBM; this will improve the screening rate among members and result in early detection, thereby reducing morbidity and improving health status.
Population Screening Purpose
On the other hand, colorectal cancer emerges as a leading health risk in Clark County, Washington, that brings forth profound cases and mortality rates. On average, about 52 new cases of colon cancer per lakh individuals are detected every year, and the mortality rate is estimated at around $. According to the USPSTF, colorectal cancer falls in grade A; its development combined with early diagnosis facilitates recommending it. This directive points out the importance of screening that is effective to such an extent as it can be sufficient for reducing mortality and improving health Outcomes 3 Economics Do not Downgrade? The target population of this screening initiative is anyone from 50 to 74 years old, which matches the recommendations given by USPSTF in people who are very likely to develop colorectal cancer.
Among the findings that point to racial diversity in Clark County is about 30 per cent who describe themselves as black. In this population, 5% are female, and the rest are male, which leaves about 47 % male. Thus, according to the given age pattern count, a significant number of people are in the 50 years-75 years category, which comes to about 35 per cent. Though the need for colorectal cancer screening is obvious, present county-wide SPS rates are far from ideal – approximately only 60% of eligible people receive it. Such a dissimilarity reflects that barriers restrict individuals’ effective utilization or interaction with screening services. Inadequate awareness and physical and culturally located inaccessibility of the healthcare facilities due to far distances from home followed by local beliefs related to cancer screening resultantly contributed to the wrong usage.
These essential barriers should be overcome to increase screening rates. In this scenario, an intentional intervention is required to address these identified factors and augment the capacity for initiating related educational programs emphasizing the importance of early recognition of colorectal cancer and the need for screening modalities (Smith et al., 2021). Concerning demographics in terms of diverse cultural tastes and preferences for language, these programs will be tailor-made depending on all segments considered vital stakeholders. In addition, efforts focused on improving access to screening services will be brought into focus; this can achieved by setting up alternative and culturally appropriate screening centers. This intervention will target removing these barriers and provide awareness to members regarding colorectal screening to increase colonoscopies, likely to reduce the burden from CRCs due to Clark County.
Intervention Strategies
A comprehensive strategy will address barriers and establish acceptance of a colorectal cancer screening initiative. Afterwards, the information campaign of significant magnitude will be done through broadcasting via community fairs and local media properties, along with disseminating materials in centres or clinic outlets. Such campaigns will try to popularize colorectal cancer screening recognition and stress potential outcomes and hazards connected with this disorder, keeping in mind that dialling services ought to be known likewise (Gandhi et al., 2021). By involving in a variety of community settings and using multiple communication channels, these campaigns will touch the lives of many individuals taught how to divert their attention from partaking.
Second, interventions will be focused on enabling access to screening services by providing mechanisms, including programs that can fit them within their busy schedules for people with different lifestyles. It will involve establishing taste sites in inaccessible areas, offering times flexible hours, including opening to serve patients on weekends and evenings, as well as language plus cultural barriers addressed by partnerships with local health care providers. These programs will overcome logistical hurdles and provide culturally sensitive care, though more people in disadvantaged communities might be willing to undergo colorectal cancer screening. Also, introducing promotional incentives such as branded gift cards or raffle tickets will reinforce preventive health behaviour, stimulating following even more. These intervention processes help address the barriers people face, improving their awareness and subsequently increasing colorectal cancer screening rates among the service population.
Evaluation and Sustainability
A pre-and post-intervention survey will be systematically randomized, deploying the standard quantitative variables that could be used to capture changes in knowledge about colorectal cancer, attitude towards screening practices, and the actual behaviour of this target population (Elliott et al., 2021). Administration of these surveys will inform about intervention influence and help in adjustment, if necessary, to determine the efficiency achieved by this. Simultaneously, preventive monitoring of the screening rate will be made to determine if there is progress towards achieving a specific goal focused on expanding uptake related to breast cancer in certain regions. By continuously monitoring the above indicators, strategies could be adjusted to changes taking place in reality, which should achieve maximum effectiveness towards attaining desired objectives.
The aspects of sustainability considered the intervention being plugged into existing community health infrastructure took advantage of preexisting platforms and resource networks for continuity. Along with the continuous collaboration of local stakeholders, like medical facilities and advocacy groups, state agencies prioritizing maintaining itself will be necessary. Notably, investments will be sought from indefinite funding sources that the provision can subsidize through grants or partnerships with other organizations and raise funds within a community. This initiative seeks to tear down obstacles and engage community resources that facilitate change indefinitely, preventing the burden of colorectal cancer for Clark County while fostering health population-wide.
References
Elliott, T. E., O’Connor, P. J., Asche, S. E., Saman, D. M., Dehmer, S. P., Ekstrom, H. L., Allen, C. I., Bianco, J. A., Chrenka, E. A., Freitag, L. A., Harry, M. L., Truitt, A. R., & Sperl-Hillen, J. M. (2021). Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 102, 106271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271
Gandhi, R., Cook, C. L., LaMastra, N., Uttarapong, J., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). An Exploration of Mental Health Discussions in Live Streaming Gaming Communities. Frontiers in Psychology, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.575653
Smith, R. A., Fedewa, S., & Siegel, R. (2021, January 1). Chapter Three – Early colorectal cancer detection—Current and evolving challenges in evidence, guidelines, policy, and practices (F. et al. Boland, Eds.). ScienceDirect; Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065230X21000294
Zhao, Y. C., Zhao, M., & Song, S. (2022). Online Health Information Seeking Among Patients With Chronic Conditions: Integrating the Health Belief Model and Social Support Theory. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(11), e42447. https://doi.org/10.2196/42447
write