Case Introduction
Analysis of the case study, “Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth,” shows that in 2012, Google faced formidable challenges in Russia’s internet search market. The local search engine giant Yandex enjoyed a commanding 60.7% market share compared to Google’s meek 26.4%[1]. Although Google was enjoying global success, it struggled to secure a prevailing position in Russia, predominantly stalled by a historical language barrier and the supposed lack of local significance. The struggle for market share propelled the company to appoint Dmitry Kuznetsov as the Country Marketing Director for Russia. The marketing director’s mission was to drive Google to the highest spot in the internet search market in Russia.[2]. Kuznetsov faced the overwhelming task of overpowering Yandex’s deep-rooted dominance and leveraging digital marketing tools and analytics to redefine Google’s market share in the Russian market.
The business background in 2012 replicated a unique dynamic in Russia’s internet scene, with the country boasting its largest online population in Europe of 61.4 million users.[3]. Notwithstanding Google’s global control, the Russian market presented discrete challenges, cemented by Yandex’s dominance and other local players that had successfully personalized their services to Russian users. Dmitry Kuznetsov emerged as an indispensable actor in this struggle, leading Google Russia’s determination to steer these challenges and restructure the company’s position in the Russian internet search industry.[4]. Overarching challenges that defied the struggle included the language barrier, user perception issues, and Yandex’s strong local presence. These challenges contributed to Google’s tussle to gain a competitive advantage in Russia. In this perspective, the case study explores the strategic initiatives and digital analytics utilized by Kuznetsov to propel sustainable growth for Google in the Russian internet search market.
Problem Opportunities / Challenge Identification / Dilemma
The case study analysis reveals that Google faces a meaningful challenge in the Russian internet search market. The company faces competition from the market leader Yandex, which is also a local company. Google holds an insignificant 25% market share compared to Yandex’s dominant 60% despite being a global leader in the market segment.[5]. This disproportion in market share in the Russian market directly impacts Google’s advertising revenues. Despite acquiring the Russian advertising market leader, Begun, in 2008, Google’s advertisement achievements still need to be improved in the Russian internet search market.
The percentages held by Google and Yandex in the Russian market reflect the quantitative nature of Google’s problem or challenge. The quantitative features of the problem are blatantly evident in the market share figures.[6]. Google’s 25% share is suggestively lower than Yandex’s impressive 60%, highlighting the magnitude of the competitive gap between the two competitors in the internet search market in Russia.[7]. The problem persisted after Google’s efforts to acquire Begun, a leading marketing firm in Russia, to strengthen advertising revenues. This is evidenced in the company’s performance in the market at the end of 2012, which could have been better. The quantitative data shows that Yandex was by far 4th most prevalent search engine in the world with 4.8% of the internet search market, after Google (65.2%), China’s Baidu (8.2%), and Yahoo (4.9%), suggesting the need for strategic interventions to improve market share and enhance revenue generation.
Apart from the quantitative signals of Google’s problems in the Russian market, qualitative dimensions of the problem reinforce the existence of the challenges. Qualitative evidence of the problems includes language barriers, the perceived absence of local applicability, and the strong Yandex brand perception by the local people. A study done by TNS brand in 2013 revealed that Yandex is professed as a more dependable, understandable, relevant, and user-friendly search engine compared to Google. Again, cultural variances and the complexities of the Russian language contribute to the problems Google faces in Russia. Therefore, google does not only need to rely on its analytical and marketing tools to capture the Russian market but should also mitigate the qualitative aspects that determine user preferences.
Language barriers and cultural differences are overarching issues hindering Google’s growth in the Russian market. The language barrier originally stalled Google’s establishment and development in Russia. Facts from the case study highlight that Google’s search technology had boundaries, including an inability to comprehend differences in word forms.[8]. Therefore, Google has to adopt a different strategy for developing its technology that will be used in the Russian market. The company can overcome the challenge by collaborating with Russian engineers to improve its search engine technology to align with the technicalities of the Russian language. Cultural variances in the Russian language, with its complicated structure, posed an exceptional challenge for Google in Russia compared to other global markets.
The qualitative aspect of Google’s problems in Russia goes beyond culture and language barriers to brand perception and its applicability to the local setting or market.[9]. The qualitative challenge spreads to company perception and relevance in the market. While Yandex is considered more user-friendly and trustworthy, google search technology is deemed irrelevant to Russian word searches. The TNS brand study accentuates that Yandex exemplifies qualities such as innovativeness, cheerfulness, and dependability, creating a notion of being the “guy next door.[10].” In contrast, Google is perceived as more detached, tech-savvy, and determined but lacking local significance. Mitigating this qualitative issue becomes critical for Google to increase market share and create a positive brand image that reverberates with the Russian audience.
Main Facts and Events of the Core Study
Analysis of the main facts and events of the main case study reveals a lot of issues and dynamics that may have contributed to the problems that Google has faced or is still facing in the Russian market.[11]. The challenges are reflected in the case through different signs. Several signs indicating the extent of the challenge mark Google’s journey in the Russian internet search market. One of the overarching facts is that Google’s market share stood at a meager 6% in 2006 the Russian market.[12]. The market share highlights its initial struggle to attain a grip despite entering the market 4 years earlier. Consequent improvements led to a significant increase, reaching 20% in 2008 after overcoming language barriers. However, by the end of 2012, Google’s market share had only slightly increased to 26.4%, falling short of the projected growth and signifying persistent challenges in challenging Yandex in the Russian market.
The magnitude of Google’s problem in the Russian market has been measured rather than quantified differently throughout the case study.[13]. The challenge is measured through an inclusive evaluation of market share percentages held by the firm, advertising revenue figures, and user feedback. Google’s incapability to attain considerable growth in market share is a direct indicator of the challenges it faces in the market. Despite acquisitions and efforts to improve its offerings, the advertising revenues at the end of 2012 could have been better. This occurred despite the company buying Begun, an advertising firm in Russia, hoping that it would help it raise its revenues. This measurement underlines the need for strategic interventions through technological means to rectify the market share discrepancy and optimize revenue performance.
Several factors can be attributed to Google’s struggle in the Russian internet search market. Language barriers are the leading factor, as it was the main hindrance to Google’s entry into the Russian market. Initially, Google’s progress in the market was restricted because of the language barrier, affecting its search technology and restraining its market share to 6% by 2006. Incapacitating the issue of the language barrier resulted in progress, bringing the market share to 20% in 2008 and 26.4 in 2012 when it appointed a Russian to head its marketing department[14]. However, the challenge persevered, with issues connected to local relevance and user view of the brand. Yandex’s supremacy because of its deeply rooted algorithm in Cyrillic script and robust partnerships with OEMs and Telcos further worsened Google’s difficulties.
Besides language and cultural issues, Google’s market share of 26.4% falls suggestively behind Yandex’s dominating 60.7%. Facts from the case study indicate that the significant gap in market share is made possible by Russians’ perceptions of the Google brand. As revealed by the TNS brand survey, user awareness highlights that users find Yandex more spontaneous and user-friendly than Google. This perceived aspect contributes to the problems Google experiences in the Russian market by influencing user inclinations favoring Yandex.[15]. Notwithstanding Google’s 2008 acquirement of Begun, a Russian advertising market leader, the advertising revenues at the end of 2012 did not change much. This financial metric is a critical pointer of the problem’s impact on Google’s entire performance in the Russian internet search market, highlighting the need for strategic initiatives to improve revenue generation.
Research and Analysis of the Situation
Google’s challenges and market dynamics in Russia can be explained using different market dynamics.[16]. External factors play a fundamental role in understanding Google’s challenges in the Russian market, primarily the dominance of local players.[17]. Evidence from market research shows that the Russian internet market is discrete, with the pervasiveness of local firms providing products and services customized precisely for Russian users. The case highlights the significance of recognizing these exclusive characteristics as contributing to Google’s scuffles. As a local actor deeply entrenched in Cyrillic script, Yandex demonstrates the local dominance that international companies such as Google must struggle to compete with in the Russian landscape. In this way, Google has to adapt to technologies that favor search customization to align with the local market demands.[18]. The company has to shift from its international standardization procedures when developing technology for the Russian market to compete effectively.
Internal factors contributing to Google’s situation in Russia comprise its historical struggles and problems with language barriers that do not favor its search technology. The case discloses that language barriers and an incapability to understand dissimilarities in word forms resulted in stagnation its market share stagnation at 6% from 2001 to 2006[19]. The language barrier among the employees hindered Google’s initial market share until 2006 when it got a breakthrough. The internal problem of overcoming these language barriers necessitated collaboration with Russian technicians and engineers to solve. The collaboration with local professionals led to an improvement in market share to 20% in 2008. However, the persistence of problems suggests continuing internal factors affecting Google’s performance in the Russian market that still need to be solved. Therefore, relying on analytics will help the company identify the overlaying issues contributing to the problem.
Analysis of the case study indicates that consumer segmentation and brand perceptions are commonly used to analyze the impacts of the challenges to the company. Tools for analysis utilized by Kuznetsov to understand the market trends and dynamics include an inclusive customer segmentation study that revealed four key client segments. These segments range from young people familiar with Google Search to older users mostly loyal to Yandex. The findings of the segmentation study helped the company develop a strategy that targeted a specific group of consumers. The brand perception research conducted by TNS in 2013 specifies an unambiguous contrast between Google and Yandex.[20]. Yandex is a local, dependable brand with potential such as modernity and trustworthiness. In contrast, consumers see Google as a foreign, less understandable, and more tech-savvy firm. This analysis provides a valuable understanding of the varied user base and the contests in fluctuating brand perception.
The case study focused on the potential of the mobile market in the Russian internet search market. The analysis highlights the possibility of the mobile market as a critical factor in the Yandex and Google market share wars. With mobile internet penetration increasing quickly and mobile consumers showing skepticism in their preferences, Kuznetsov grasps an opportunity to tap into this growing segment. The case discloses Google’s shift towards a “Mobile First” approach to capture more market share. This approach aligns with the changing internet use landscape not only in Russia but also all over the world. The potential of the mobile market grants a strategic opportunity for Google to display advanced technology and propel users across its product portfolio. Mobile first strategy demands more investment in technology to enhance internet search using mobile devices. Therefore, Google should invest in mobile first technologies, including Voice Search, hyper-local data, app integrations, and new certification forms.
Although consumers increasingly tend to shift to mobile internet use, Google’s Kuznetsov faces the dilemma of balancing a “Mobile First” or “Mobile Only” approach to market penetration in the Russian market.[21]. Data drawn from the case designates that 80% of Google RU’s revenue comes from desktops, requiring a delicate balance between desktop and mobile approaches.[22]. This decision-making process includes a detailed consideration of the revenue impact on Google RU’s mainly desktop-based income strategy.[23]. The strategic choice made by the company will expressively influence Google’s capability to contend in the developing Russian internet search internet. Therefore, relying on analytics will help the company unearth relevant data required to make informed or data-driven decisions about the dilemma.
Formulation of Solutions
Several solutions can be formulated from the case study based on the business perspective, insights from the case study, and resources for the company. Firstly, Goggle Company should enhance its product portfolio to align with the preferences and demands of Russian users. Evidence from the case study proposes that Google Maps, an essential product, needs customization for Moscow users.[24]. This is important because most users rely on subway stations other than streets and roads. Moreover, introducing innovative products, such as Voice Search, has revealed promising results in altering user perceptions. Customizing existing products to local tinges and introducing innovative products like Voice Search will distinguish Google from Yandex and attract a broader user base.[25]. The solution also aligns with Google’s “Mobile First” approach and mitigates the need for exclusive, user-friendly offerings in the Russian market.
Secondly, Google should focus on rebranding its product portfolio to overcome negative discernments and make it more locally pertinent and user-friendly. Data from the TNS brand research shows that Yandex is seen as the local, dependable brand, whereas Google is regarded as distant, less accessible, and more tech-savvy.[26]. This observation is a noteworthy barrier to Google’s growth and success in the Russian internet search market. To mitigate this perception, Google should invest in marketing campaigns highlighting its pledge to the local community, emphasizing user-friendly features, and displaying its relevance to Russian users. The company should customize its campaign message and image to local dynamics and trends. This will help Google build trust and resonate with the local audience, ultimately altering brand perceptions and preferences.
Evidence from the case study points to the rapid growth of the mobile market in Russia and globally. Google should deliberately concentrate on the mobile-first segment to attract new user behaviors and preferences. The case highlights the potential of the mobile market in Russia, with mobile internet diffusion projected to more than double by 2017[27]. Google’s change towards a “Mobile First” approach, including Voice Search and other mobile-centric features that align with the mobile first dynamics, will help it penetrate the market further. The company will capture a substantial market share by augmenting its product portfolio and services for mobile users and taking advantage of the growth in mobile internet usage. A successfully executed mobile strategy will address the changing subtleties of user behavior and position Google as an inventive and flexible player in the Russian market.
Discussion and Selection of Solutions
Based on the case study’s analysis and the challenges hindering Google’s success in Russia, the selected solution is a strategic focus on mobile first market. Google should deliberately concentrate on the mobile-first segment to attract new user behaviors and preferences.[28]. The case highlights the potential of the mobile market in Russia, with mobile internet diffusion projected to more than double by 2017. Google’s change towards a “Mobile First” approach, including Voice Search and other mobile-centric features that align with the mobile-first dynamics, will help it penetrate the market further[29]. The company will capture a substantial market share by augmenting its product portfolio and services for mobile users and taking advantage of the growth in mobile internet usage. A successfully executed mobile strategy will address the changing subtleties of user behavior and position Google as an inventive and flexible player in the Russian market.
It is expected that mobile market growth potential growth in Russia will grow more than double by 2017[30]. By deliberately concentrating on the mobile market, Google can tap into Russia’s rapidly growing mobile internet usage. Mobile internet usage is predicted to grow more than double. Therefore, by implementing a well-developed “Mobile First” strategy that includes features like Voice Search, Google can mitigate the growing user behaviors and preferences in the Russian internet search market. This strategy position will portray Google as an innovative and flexible player, capturing a substantial share of the increasingly mobile user base.
The benefits associated with the solution to adopt a strategic focus on mobile-first strategy are immense. Firstly, the solution will lead to market growth opportunities for Google Company.[31]. The mobile market in Russia presents a considerable growth opportunity for Google. By aligning with this new trend, Google can tap into a more extensive user base in this category. Secondly, focusing on mobile-centric landscapes like Voice Search shows an innovation and differentiation mindset. This will help differentiate Google from Yandex while catering to budding user expectations. Finally, a “Mobile First” strategy resonates with the fluctuating dynamics of user behavior, displaying Google’s adaptability and receptiveness to the local market.
The risks include significant resource allocation to enable the shift and competitive response from Yandex that may respond to Google’s mobile strategy.[32]. A competitive response will instigate constant innovation and strategic moves to sustain a competitive edge. Another risk involved in the solution is that the success of a mobile strategy hinges on user adoption.[33]. Google must ensure that mobile offerings align with Russian users and efficiently compete with Yandex. Generally, whereas improving the product portfolio and transposing the brand are valuable solutions, a strategic focus on the mobile market is a better solution for Google, given the business context. The strategy aligns with the projected growth in mobile internet habits in Russia. This solution mitigates the challenges while positioning Google for long-term success in the Russian market by acclimating to changing user behaviors.
Conclusion
The case of Google in Russia demonstrates the complex dynamics and contests that the tech giant Google faces in penetrating the Russian local internet search market subjugated by Yandex. As the Country Marketing Director for Google, Dmitry Kuznetsov must overcome brand perception issues, language barriers, and the stronghold of Yandex’s local significance to compete in the Russian market efficiently. The strategic emphasis on the mobile market emerges as a hopeful solution, resonating with the projected growth in mobile internet utilization and permitting Google to highlight innovation and tractability. As Google pursues sustainable growth in Russia, taking advantage of digital analytics and understanding to cater to sprouting user behaviors and preferences becomes imperious. The selected solution, together with continuing innovation and strategic positioning, places Google not only to compete with Yandex but also to create a stronger footing in the dynamic Russian internet search landscape.
Bibliography
Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
McGonigle, B. (2017). How the Russian search market looks now. [Online] Search Engine Land. Available at: https://searchengineland.com/how-russian-search-market-looks-283072 [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
Schwartz, E 2014b, 4 Reasons Google Loses to Yandex in Russia, www.linkedin.com.
Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[1] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[2] Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[3] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[4] Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[5] Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[6] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[7] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[8] Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[9] McGonigle, B. (2017). How the Russian search market looks now. [Online] Search Engine Land. Available at: https://searchengineland.com/how-russian-search-market-looks-283072 [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[10] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[11] Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[12] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[13] Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[14] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[15] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[16] Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[17] Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[18] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[19] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[20] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[21] McGonigle, B. (2017). How the Russian search market looks now. [Online] Search Engine Land. Available at: https://searchengineland.com/how-russian-search-market-looks-283072 [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[22] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[23] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[24] Schwartz, E. 2014a. Five Advantages of Yandex over Google in Russia. [Online] SEMrush Blog. Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/5-advantages-yandex-google-russia/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023]
[25] Schwartz, E 2014b, 4 Reasons Google Loses to Yandex in Russia, www.linkedin.com.
[26]Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[27] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[28] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[29] Schwartz, E 2014b, 4 Reasons Google Loses to Yandex in Russia, www.linkedin.com.
[30] Ibid
[31] Pfanner, E. 2006. New to Russia, Google Struggles to Find Its Footing. The New York Times. [Online] 18 Dec. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/technology/18google.html [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
[32] Niessing, J. and Balze, P. 2020. Google in Russia: Leveraging Digital Analytics and Intelligence for Sustainable Growth. [Online] publishing.insead.edu. Available at: https://publishing.insead.edu/case/google-russia-leveraging-digital-analytics-and-intelligence-sustainable-growth.
[33] Elharony, A. 2023. Yandex vs. Google: The Battle for Russia’s Internet Landscape. [Online] www.linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yandex-vs-google-battle-russias-internet-landscape-amr-elharony [Accessed 12 Nov. 2023].
write