Among the most well-known Christian nonprofits in the country is the American Family Association (AFA). Originally known as the National Federation for Decency, the AFA was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon and had a major rebranding in 1988. Its mission was expanded to “enlighten, educate, motivate, and equip people, especially parents, in changing the American culture” due to this revolutionary change. The AFA is well-known for its firm opinions on matters like COVID-19 guidelines, gay rights, and abortion. This compelling essay aims to investigate the AFA comprehensively by following its history, probing its ideology, analyzing its workings, and assessing its influence on multiple fronts. The document additionally seeks to delineate the organization’s present legislative agenda and offer helpful recommendations for bettering it.
Donald E. Wildmon established the American Family Association (AFA) in 1977 under the National Federation for Decency (Cheah et al.,2020). The organization has a long and illustrious history. Originally, the emphasis was on dealing with alleged media immorality, which was in line with traditional Christian ideals. The organization changed its name to the American Family Association in 1988 after realizing it needed a more comprehensive strategy.
The main goal of the AFA is to “enlighten, educate, motivate, and equip people, especially parents, in changing the American culture.” This is the foundation of the organization’s mission (Churchwell et al.,2020). This mission statement highlights the organization’s commitment to changing society’s norms and values, especially through the prism of conservative Christian beliefs. The AFA has continuously opposed causes like homosexual rights, abortion, and certain medical procedures.
The American Family Association (AFA) concept is firmly based on traditional Christian ideals. The organization’s mission, guiding principles, and core beliefs are all shaped by its fundamental view of God as its supreme leader. The AFA’s steadfast adherence to the sanctity of life, which forms the cornerstone of its anti-abortion campaign, is a reflection of these core values (Lioness et al.,2019). Operationally, the AFA uses a range of strategies to achieve its goals. Notably, the group is well-known for using boycotts strategically. Through consumer power and supporter mobilization, the AFA aims at businesses and organizations that behave in a way inconsistent with its principles. By influencing the actions of organizations that are thought to conflict with the Christian values of the AFA, this strategy seeks to effect societal change.
The AFA has also embraced the potential of digital media to spread its message. The organization mobilizes its base, fosters support among followers, and effectively reaches its target audience through active interaction on social media channels (Medlin et al.,2023). The AFA’s use of traditional and digital media shows its flexibility when implementing various tactics to further its goals. Comprehending the ideology and operational procedures of the AFA is essential for assessing its influence at various levels, as the following sections shall go into. The group’s deliberate use of media appearances and boycotts demonstrates its dedication to changing public opinion and societal norms.
The American Family Association (AFA) maintains several fundamental ideas derived from biblical teachings and draws primary inspiration from the gospel. Its core beliefs that God is the ultimate leader impact all facets of the organization’s mission, core values, and guiding principles. An important aspect of the AFA’s biblical roots is its unwavering defense of the right to life (Ommen et al.,2020). This conviction serves as the organization’s moral compass and justification for its active involvement in the anti-abortion struggle. Based on its interpretation of biblical teachings, the AFA views the protection of life as an unassailable ideal.
In addition, the AFA affirms marriage as a union of two genders—male and female—by traditional biblical conceptions of marriage. This viewpoint shapes the organization’s position on LGBTQ issues. The AFA promotes a particular view of marriage and family by standing in line with traditional biblical teachings, which adds to the larger cultural and political conversation (Prelutsky et al.,2020). The AFA’s advocacy efforts are motivated by its adherence to these biblical roots. Comprehending these tenets is crucial for assessing the organization’s stances and the consequences of its actions, both of which will be discussed in the following sections. Its biblical basis closely links the AFA’s religious convictions and principles.
In order to achieve its goals, the American Family Association (AFA) participates in various activities and operates at several levels. These initiatives demonstrate the organization’s dedication to changing society standards widely and take place at the local, state, and federal levels. Initiatives aligned with the AFA’s objective of reforming America are carried out nationally. Utilizing its robust media presence, the organization spreads its message and builds support. The AFA has been particularly influential in influencing national dialogues about topics like religious freedom, LGBTQ rights, and abortion.
The AFA customizes its initiatives at the state level to consider local quirks and issues. This focused strategy supports the organization’s grassroots initiatives by enabling it to affect communities directly. Activities at the state level could involve planning events, working with nearby religious organizations, and promoting laws that reflect the ideals of the AFA. The AFA takes part in community-focused projects locally. This could entail planning educational initiatives, working with nearby churches, or attending neighborhood gatherings. The AFA builds support throughout communities and expands its influence by interacting with people locally.
Encouraging campaigns against specific health procedures, the organization’s support of religious freedom, and its attempts to influence municipal legislation consistent with its principles are a few successful projects at every level. Knowing the AFA’s multi-level strategy can help one better understand how flexible the organization is and how well it can adjust its operations to fit various situations. The next part will entail AFA’s present legislative agenda, emphasizing its continuous efforts to impact policy at several levels.
The American Family Association (AFA) is committed to influencing policies that align with its principles, as evidenced by its active involvement in several legislative issues at the federal and state levels. Opposing the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) confirmation of Gigi Sohn is a major emphasis at the national level. According to the AFA, this affirmation could harm the freedom of religion in the media. The group is committed to defending religious liberty, as evidenced by its active participation in advocacy campaigns to stop this confirmation.
The AFA uses its legislative power to promote laws and policies that support its principles at the state level. The group regularly engages in state-level policy debates and legislative proceedings to enact legislation consistent with its conservative Christian beliefs. The AFA’s involvement in legislative agendas demonstrates its dedication to swaying politics in favor of its principles (Thompson et al.,2022). The next section will evaluate the AFA’s overall efficacy, considering its achievements and obstacles at the federal, state, and municipal levels.
The American Family Association (AFA) has shown effectiveness on several fronts, most notably in swaying laws and policies that support its principles. The organization’s influence on the confirmation process of people like Gigi Sohn at the federal level demonstrates its capacity to influence conversations about religious freedom. Notable successes have been attained at the state level due to the AFA’s active involvement in policy discussions and legislative procedures. The group has done a good job of promoting legislation that aligns with its strict Christian beliefs.
The AFA’s grassroots support has been bolstered locally via community-specific activities. The organization’s capacity to establish personal connections with people has made it easier for the community to get behind its efforts and mobilize support. However, the AFA has problems, just like any other organization (Witkowski et al.,2020). There are still issues with public opinion and conflicting support, especially when it comes to recruitment. Recognizing these obstacles, the part that follows will offer suggestions for development, taking into account methods to increase efficacy.
The AFA should concentrate on expanding its base of support by means of focused recruitment campaigns in order to augment its influence. By expanding its appeal, the group may infuse its efforts with fresh ideas and energy, creating a more inclusive and diverse network of supporters (Umaña‐Taylor et al.,2020). Resolving the stigma associated with a “hate group” is essential to enhancing public perception and promoting greater acceptance. In an effort to close gaps and clear up misunderstandings, the AFA may take into account proactive communication techniques that place an emphasis on comprehension and discussion. A deeper comprehension requires better idea expression. To ensure that its message is effectively communicated without ambiguity, the AFA could invest in accessible and unambiguous communication tactics.
To sum up, the American Family Association’s influence on the country’s social and political discourse stems from its traditional Christian foundation. The organization has been successful in changing laws, but there are still issues with public support and perception. It is possible to strengthen the AFA’s influence in the political and cultural arenas by addressing these issues, especially with regard to hiring practices, public image management, and communication tactics.
References
Cheah, C. S., Wang, C., Ren, H., Zong, X., Cho, H. S., & Xue, X. (2020). COVID-19 racism and mental health in Chinese American families. Pediatrics, 146(5).
Churchwell, K., Elkind, M. S., Benjamin, R. M., Carson, A. P., Chang, E. K., Lawrence, W., … & American Heart Association. (2020). Call to action: structural racism as a fundamental driver of health disparities: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 142(24), e454-e468.
Lienesch, M. (2019). “In God We Trust:” The US National Motto and the Contested Concept of Civil Religion. Religions, 10(5), 340.
Medlin, Z. (n.d.). Medlin: One Million Moms, American Family Association stain Mississippi’s legacy. The Vision. Retrieved November 15, 2023, from https://thevisionmsms.org/24491/opinion/medlin-one-million-moms-american-family-
Ommen, S. R., Mital, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A., Elliott, P., … & Sorajja, P. (2020). 2020 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 76(25), e159-e240.
Prilleltensky, I. (2020). Mattering at the intersection of psychology, philosophy, and politics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1-2), 16-34.
Prominent shadow network Christian Nationalist group rocked by sexual harassment charges. (2023, September 11). Americans United.
Thompson, K. N., Kimber, T., Williams, D. J., Matthews, D., Grossmann, M., & Bräutigam, (2022). A Scoping Review of Psychological Assessment in Mission and Ministry Candidates. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 51(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00916471221122074
Umaña‐Taylor, A. J., & Hill, N. E. (2020). Ethnic–Racial Socialization in the Family: A Decade’s Advance on Precursors and Outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 244–271.
Witkowski, T. H. (2020). Broadening Anti-Consumption Research: A History of Right-Wing Prohibitions, Boycotts, and Resistance to Sustainability. Journal of Macromarketing, 36(2), 027614672098342.