Genetic and external factors influence bipolar disorder (BPD). Although the etiology of bipolar disorder is attributed to genetic factors, its manifestation and management are influenced by various external factors. Examples of external factors include the influence of healthcare policies, environmental factors, societal and cultural factors, and patient processes (Rodriguez et al., 2021). The paper gives an evaluation of how these factors influence bipolar disorder (BPD) while outlining the importance of understanding each of the factors in effectively managing BPDs.
How healthcare policies influence patients’ access to genetic testing
Healthcare policies play a significant role in matters of access to affordable genetic testing and subsequent screenings for bipolar disorders. These policies include insurance coverage, regulation policies, and reimbursement policies. Insurance policies associated with genetic screening vary with clinical experts; some cover the entire process, while others offer limited coverage for screening. These variations can provide access to or limit bipolar patients’ access to genetic testing. Similarly, reimbursement frameworks determine the availability of screening for bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists depend on the reimbursements provided by the patient’s insurance company to cover the testing costs; inadequate funds from the insurance company limit or restrict clinicians from delivering services to bipolar patients (Zhang et al., 2020).
Furthermore, regulation policies shape how genetic screening is done for bipolar disorder, for instance, policies that advocate for the approval of gene testing, oversight policies, and privacy regulations that govern how the patient’s information is used (Kroes et al., 2021). Despite these regulatory policies, there exist disparities in accessing genetic screening services, especially for underserved groups. People from underserved societies face this challenge, hence increasing the existing screening inequalities for bipolar disorder. To address this problem, policy experts must emphasize advocating for frameworks that promote affordable screening services for bipolar patients and conduct sensitization programs to ensure that patients are empowered to make good decisions in matters of mental health.
Societal, cultural, and environmental factors that cause bipolar disorders
According to Perich et al. (2022), stigmatization is the main challenge that limits the effective care of bipolar patients in society. Similarly, cultural beliefs that are associated with mental disorders promote policies of secrecy, hence discouraging the affected individuals from seeking medical help and support from psychometricians. Further, environmental factors contribute to bipolar disorders; for instance, trauma and stressful conditions influence the severity of bipolar disorders (Menculini et al., 2020). Persistence of these factors can exacerbate the symptoms of this disorder and create more problems, especially for those individuals fighting with mental health issues. In addressing these problems, it is necessary to understand both the social and cultural contexts that influence the health of bipolar patients. From a cultural perspective, caregivers should recognize and contrast the existing societal biases and engage in education programs to enhance their understanding of various cultural diversities. Through recognition of mental health intersectionality and varied cultures, psychiatrists find it easy to provide healthcare services according to the needs of patients. In addition, addressing the existing stigmatization can help society change perceptions of bipolar patients, thereby creating an inclusive environment for both community members without patients (Perich et al., 2022) and isolations. Counseling sessions can help minimize stress and self-rejection for bipolar patients and seek necessary support that will prompt complete mental recovery (Prabhakaran et al., 2021).
Patient Process and Nutritional Assessment
To manage bipolar disorder, patients go through various stages that are influenced by genetic, environmental, and mental factors. To address this disorder, it is essential to identify it in its early stages by conducting genetic screening. Fernanda et al. (2022) emphasize the importance of carrying out nutritional assessments and counseling; bipolar patients get mental health support from health providers while addressing the national and dietary patterns that can help foster mood stability. To enhance the process of patient treatment and recovery, health providers must adopt a healthcare system that addresses the relationship between external factors that empower bipolar patients with knowledge of how to take part in their treatment process.
In addition, the relationship between managing health, prevention, bipolar screening, diagnostics, prognostics, and treatment monitoring is significant in managing the fluctuating nature of bipolar disorder. Patient’s health is the state of individual well-being free from any disorders; on the other hand, prevention is the process of averting bipolar episodes by carrying out body and lifestyle exercises., and conducting psychoeducation programs to enlighten the community on the symptoms of bipolar. In line with bipolar. Instruments like MDQ help to detect bipolar disorder early; early detection helps to assemble diagnostic resources in order to evaluate the disorder and prevent other causes. Similarly, prognostic helps in predicting bipolar occurrence depending on the previous history, and treatment monitoring helps in regular assessment of the disorder in order to decide on the next treatment plan, including therapy.
Other Preventative Measures for Bipolar Disorder
Beyond clinical preventive measures for bipolar, other interventions, such as community-based practices and public health interventions, play a part in the overall management of bipolar disorder. For instance, mental health education programs help in creating awareness of bipolar, hence advocating for a reduction in stigma cases in society while promoting early genetic testing for identifying bipolar.Balanced diets and the management of stress are also important aspects. The two are potential ways to help manage manic or depressive episodes, and eating the right foods can make you feel well and help manage the condition better. Equally, targeted strategies for more vulnerable populations, like patients with a family history of bipolar disorder, can help make an early diagnosis and manage the condition. By rolling out the preventive intervention from individual to community levels, it is easier for clinical experts to ease the burden of bipolar disorder to enhance and improve the general mental well-being of bipolar patients.
Conclusion
In summary, bipolar disorder is influenced by a variety of external factors, such as healthcare policies, environmental factors, and social-cultural misconceptions. These factors call for the need for clinicians to embrace best practices to enhance the services provided to bipolar patients. By considering these factors, clinical experts, including psychiatrists, can tailor their treatment approaches to meet the diverse requirements of bipolar patients. Beyond clinical preventive measures for bipolar, other interventions, such as community-based practices and public health interventions, play a part in the overall management of bipolar disorder. By rolling out the preventive intervention from individual to community levels, it is easier for clinical experts to ease the bipolar disorder burden to enhance and improve the general mental well-being of bipolar patients. By integrating clinical measures and community-based interventions, health providers can provide proper methods of advancing health services for the management and treatment of bipolar disorders among patients. The efforts target the well-being of bipolar populations.
References
Fernanda C. Gabrie Icon,Manoela Oliveira. (2022). Nutrition and bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Nutritional Neuroscience, 26, 202(Issue 7), Pages 637-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2022.2077031
Kroes, S. K., Janssen, M. P., Groenwold, R. H., & Van Leeuwen, M. (2021). Evaluating privacy of individuals in medical data. Health Informatics Journal, 27(2), 146045822098339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220983398
Menculini, G., Balducci, P. M., Attademo, L., Bernardini, F., Moretti, P., & Tortorella, A. (2020). Environmental risk factors for bipolar disorders and high-risk states in adolescence: A systematic review. Medicina, 56(12), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120689
Perich, T., Mitchell, P. B., & Vilus, B. (2022). Stigma in bipolar disorder: A current review of the literature. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56(9), 1060–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221080708
Prabhakaran, S., Nagarajan, P., Varadharajan, N., & Menon, V. (2021). Relationship between quality of life and social support among patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 8(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-020-00211-7
Rodriguez, V., Alameda, L., Trotta, G., Spinazzola, E., Marino, P., Matheson, S. L., Laurens, K. R., Murray, R. M., & Vassos, E. (2021). Environmental risk factors in bipolar disorder and psychotic depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 47(4), 959-974. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa197
Zhang, Y., Wushouer, H., Han, S., Fu, M., Guan, X., Shi, L., & Wagner, A. K. (2020). Impacts of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted Anticancer medication price, volume, and spending in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3588529
write