Introduction
The issue of cybersecurity is quite pertinent in an educational environment, more so in an institution like Governors State University. These digital spaces are ripe and vast sources of vulnerabilities for a number of threats experienced day in and day out in institutions, higher learning institutions inclusive, which bring vulnerability to the instant loss of sensitive data and sustained disruption in standard operations (Kroeller et al., 2023). Sufficient sensitization and measures must be taken to ensure there is a need for stress on institutionalized cybersecurity, which would adequately save digital institutional assets and deliver continued educational services. This paper, therefore, redoes the different security architectures and, by analysis, recommends the most befitting according to the uniqueness of Governors State University and its challenges.
Security Architectures Overview
Different paradigms in safety architectures provide various ways to strengthen digital infrastructures. Traditional definition-based security is underlined by a strengthened perimeter for everything that goes through them; it tries to separate trusted internal networks from non-trusted external ones, boasting familiarity and ease in implementation. However, this results in a prime that always remains vulnerable to all threats via breakthrough only since it solely relies on perimeter defence (Hnamte et al., 2024). On the contrary, Zero Trust Architecture refers to a paradigm shift of not trusting the inside over the outside by strictly managing access. The segmented architecture breaks the network into domains with security policies. Thus, this then increases complexity and administrative overhead. The solution remains elastic and scalable, aids in the reduction of setup costs, gives less upfront investment, and supports centralized management. However, it increases suspicion in terms of information governance and dependence on third parties, as well as cloud-based security architectures that are highly dependent on cloud infrastructure.
Evaluating Needs of Governors State University
The Governor State University is a relatively large and complex organization; thus, it is bound to have a good number of its cybersecurity requirements treated and managed. In effect, the fact that they handle sensitive data calls for their security to be very robust; otherwise, student information combined with research data and financial records would all be at risk. As a university, they string along many devices connecting to online learning platforms for both students and staff.
Comparison and Analysis
Looking at some of the security architecture for Governors State University, a few tips come from that: First among them is the ability to adapt, with a view that the architecture is allowed to manage changes in size and other demands over time (Odorige et al., 2023). Another critical factor is manageability. Easy implementation and subsequent management actually translate to efficient operations. Cost is one-time and supposed to be in line with the budget of an organization, and it needs to be a much more cost-effective solution in the long run. Besides, the effectiveness of architecture designed to reduce specific threats like cyber threats or penetration of malware cannot be fully trusted and hence has to be assessed as well.
Recommendation
Before zeroing in, the following three architectures were considered in detail with respect to all related aspects and were decided as most befitting for Governors State University. The principal underpinning is that the least privileged access is easily linked with the practice that the university would have to put in place to ensure robust access control for their susceptible data. The very long-term residual security concerns and scaling issues outweigh the initial problems. While there are a few complexities along some points, these are absolutely justifiable following the reasoning mentioned above. Such Zero Trust Architecture will enable Governors State University to deploy a robust security mechanism that is capable of serving its broad spectrum of university cyber defence requirements.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the best way through which Governors State University can enhance its digital infrastructure and sideline cyber threats is by making the right choice of good security architecture. First, a good, properly designed Zero Trust Architecture can boost the security positioning of any university. Most significant to the security of digital assets within the university and ensuring the provision of educational services is the fact that there is a need for knowledge that the university leaders must stay alert and should always be ready for change in the wake of new cyber threats.
Reference
Hnamte, V., Najar, A. A., Nhung-Nguyen, H., Hussain, J., & Sugali, M. N. (2024). DDoS attack detection and mitigation using deep neural network in SDN environment. Computers & Security, 138, 103661.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404823005710
Kroeller, B. J. (2023). BEST PRACTICES TO CONSIDER WHEN BUILDING A NATIONAL CIVIL RESERVE CYBER FORCE (CRCF) FRAMEWORK.https://www.dmi-ida.org/download-pdf/pdf/23Dec_Kroeller_Brian.pdf
Odorige, F. O. (2023). SECURITY VOTES AS MISSING VAULTS IN NIGERIA CHECKERED SECURITY ARCHITECTURE. Journal of Political Discourse, 1(4), 169-184.
write