Name three questions that surprised you regarding your answer. Why were you surprised?
One question that truly surprised me was about setting boundaries with friends and family seeking advice, especially in emergencies. Initially, I believed immediate support was ethical and natural. However, realizing the potential ethical conflicts in blurring personal and professional roles surprised me. I hadn’t fully considered the importance of maintaining objectivity and privacy, making me rethink my initial perspective.
Another question that caught me off guard was about accepting gifts from clients, even simple tokens. I hadn’t fully grasped the potential ethical implications initially. Recognizing that accepting gifts can create indebtedness and blur boundaries was surprising. It made me reevaluate my stance on this issue.
Additionally, the question regarding the practice of limiting therapy sessions under managed care plans surprised me. While I understood the challenges, I hadn’t fully explored the potential ethical conflicts this practice might entail. The realization that my commitment to prioritizing client well-being needed to extend beyond theoretical acknowledgment was a significant surprise.
In what ways did your answers change the second time? What made you change your thoughts? Be specific.
After reflecting, my answer about creating boundaries with friends and relatives seeking advice changed considerably. I initially thought immediate support was normal. My perspective changed as I considered ethical conflicts and professional boundaries.
I discovered that being the primary support for loved ones sometimes blends personal and professional duties, affecting objectivity and not always helping the person seeking aid. This made me reconsider urging loved ones to see professional therapists when appropriate to maintain the therapeutic relationship (Gunn III et al., 2021). As I considered the balance between client well-being and organizational constraints, my answer to managed care plan therapy session limits evolved. My initial statement acknowledged obstacles but didn’t consider ethical issues.
After more consideration, I recognized my dedication to client well-being needed to go beyond theory. It should involve advocating for proper care, even if that means challenging managers’ workloads or organizational policies (Bradley, 2023). A stronger appreciation of the ethical responsibility to protect clients’ interests and advocate for quality care in the organization drove this change.
What area of ethics do you struggle with? What is your plan to continue your growth in this area?
I struggle to balance personal and professional morals, especially while helping family members. I agree with helping friends and family, but maintaining critical barriers is hard. I want to progress in this area by seeking advice from mentors and coworkers who have had similar issues. Ethics workshops, peer debates, and self-mirrored images will be my activities. I attempt to set clear barriers, find respectful methods to deny counseling in informal settings and urge people seeking help to contact specialists.
Continuous self-attention, mastery, and prioritizing the person’s well-being while maintaining professional integrity are my goals.
What is one of the most valuable things you learned about yourself personally and professionally in this class?
One of the most valuable matters I learned in my opinion and professionally in this class is the significance of self-consciousness and ongoing reflection in ethical selection-making (Hopner & Liu, 2021). The elegance emphasized that ethical dilemmas are not meant to be tackled by myself; searching for help from peers, mentors, and expert businesses is important.
References
Bradley, L. J. (2023). Ethical Issues and Ethical Traps. The Family Journal, 31(2), 193-197.
Gunn III, J. F., Malo, P., & Soper, C. A. (2021). Evolutionary psychology and suicidology. The SAGE Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Applications of Evolutionary psychology, 51-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/coupsyc.2019.10
Hopner, V., & Liu, J. H. (2021). Relational ethics and epistemology: The case for complementary first principles in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 31(2), 179-198. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Youngs, D. Reviewing Crime Psychology.
Suzuki, L. A., O’Shaughnessy, T. A., Roysircar, G., Ponterotto, J. G., & Carter, R. T. (2019). Counseling psychology and the amelioration of oppression: Translating our knowledge into action. The Counseling Psychologist, 47(6), 826-872.
write