Question one
One machining technology is CNC (Computer Numerical Control) milling. Manufacturing hollow 3D foam components is well-suited to it. CNC milling creates complicated forms and features in foam materials with versatility and precision. CNC milling ensures the constant fitting of foam pieces to established dimensions and standards due to its potential for achieving excellent precision. Hollow components requiring tight tolerances necessitate this level of precision. The foam components require accurate internal chambers. In addition, CNC milling demonstrates high versatility by utilizing diverse foam materials such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) and polyurethane (PU) foam. Manufacturing many types of foam components with varying densities and qualities is enabled by this versatility (Kautsar et al., 2020). CNC machining can easily produce the intricate geometry of hollow 3D foam components. The milling machine may systematically extract material to generate the required form, incorporating complicated internal emptiness structures by complying with a pre-programmed toolpath. Because of these capabilities, CNC milling is an excellent alternative for producing complicated foam structures.
Furthermore, CNC milling provides benefits in terms of customization and prototype. The foam component’s computer design may be turned into a CNC program, allowing for fast alterations and adjustments without the requirement for extensive machine modifications (Kautsar et al., 2020). This adaptability allows for swift prototype creation and customization based on unique requirements. CNC milling provides successful substance elimination in foam compositions in terms of efficiency. Because foam is comparatively soft, it may be effectively processed using milling cutters, resulting in low waste and maximum material usage. Furthermore, CNC milling is scalable, making it appropriate for both small-scale and large-scale manufacturing. Because of its scalability, it is a viable alternative for making hollow 3D foam items in various production volumes, offering the versatility required for various project sizes and specifications.
Question two
Whenever it comes to creating 30 thermoplastic elements weighing at least 40 kg apiece, injection molding is an acceptable primary method to consider. Injection molding, or injection molding, is a popular method of producing thermoplastic materials that has numerous benefits for mass manufacturing. Injection molding is a very efficient and cost-effective method for mass-producing complicated thermoplastic elements. It entails pumping molten thermoplastic material under high pressure into a mold cavity, where it solidifies and cools down, adopting the shape of the mold. Because it can accept an extensive selection of part sizes and geometric shapes, this method best suits components weighing at least 40 kg (Georgopoulou et al., 2021). One significant advantage of injection molding is its great consistency and dimensional accuracy. Injection molding molds are often manufactured to extremely tight tolerances, guaranteeing an exact duplication of the required component shape and dimensions across several manufacturing cycles. This is critical when producing big thermoplastic elements, as stability in dimension is required for optimum fit and performance. Injection molding also has quick production cycles, enabling efficient mass production (Georgopoulou et al., 2021). The injection molding machine can create elements at a high rate once the tool has been configured and the settings are tuned, contributing to higher productivity and reduced lead times. As a result, it is an excellent initial technique for creating 30 thermoplastic components.
Furthermore, injection molding offers a diverse range of material alternatives. Various thermoplastic resin types with diverse qualities like toughness, adaptability, chemical resistance, and heat resistance can be employed (Georgopoulou et al., 2021). This adaptability enables the choice of a substance that fulfills the individual needs of the elements, guaranteeing they have the appropriate properties. In addition, injection molding provides great part reproducibility. The highly mechanized procedure ensures constant quality while limiting variances between individual parts. This is particularly crucial when manufacturing many thermoplastic components since sustaining a consistent standard across the production run is critical for their effectiveness and dependability.
Question three
Thermal adhesives or thermal interface materials (TIMs) are one viable approach when producing a removable thermal conductive junction between glass components. Thermal solutions have been designed specifically to connect surfaces, allowing for effective heat transmission. Thermal adhesives are a good way to make a demountable thermally conductive junction amongst glass components. The aforementioned glues are designed to be highly thermally conductive, which permits effective temperature transmission through glass surfaces. They are frequently made up of thermally conductive filler materials like particles of ceramic or metallic flakes incorporated in a polymer matrix. Thermal adhesives are used by placing a small layer of a substance that sticks among the glass elements. The bonding agent is usually like a liquid or paste, making it simple to spread and manage the degree of thickness of the bond line. The glue is cured or hardened following assembly, resulting in a long-lasting and thermally conductive connection. According to Galvez et al. 2019, thermal adhesives offer mechanical durability and heat conductivity as a distinct advantage. Glass components that require a strong connection and effective heat dissipation depend on this. The glue repairs gaps or defects between the glass surfaces. It improves the contact and facilitates heat transfer across the junction. Thermal adhesives offer the advantage of easy removal. Unlike permanent binding technologies, thermal adhesives enable deconstruction and rework as required. Removing the connection without causing harm to the components is highly beneficial for maintaining, replacing, or adjusting glass components easily (Galvez et al., 2019). Note that determining the appropriate thermal adhesive involves considering parameters such as specific glass materials, operating temperatures, and expected degree of thermal conductivity. Diverse sealants enable tailoring for specific applications because they possess physical properties and thermal conductivity that differ. Galvez et al. 2019 state that thermal adhesives have the added advantage of easy removal because they are not permanent binding technologies. Thermal adhesives permit deconstruction and rework as required, unlike permanent binding technologies. This becomes particularly useful when maintaining, replacing, or adjusting glass components. One can easily remove the connection without causing harm to the components. Parameters like the specific glass materials, operating temperatures, and expected degree of thermal conductivity determine the proper thermal adhesive. Diverse sealants permit the tailoring of applications depending on their specific thermal conductivity and physical properties.
Question four
When improving the wear-resistant features of natural materials, it is essential to consider chemical vapor deposition (CVD) as a viable material treatment technology. The process of CVD deposits a thin protective covering onto the outermost portion of a material through chemical reactions that take place in a gaseous atmosphere. Improving the wear resistance of natural materials is advantageous with this method. The deposited coating can create a hard and robust surface that enhances abrasion, friction, and wear resistance. Moreover, CVD allows precise control of the thickness and arrangement of the coating. Syari’ati et al. 2019 state that utilizing CVD enables the personalization of the coating based on the natural material’s specific degradation characteristics. Applying a resistance to wear coating using CVD can greatly increase the durability and performance of organic compounds. Applying a resistant-to-wear coating using CVD benefits the surface treatment.
Question five
Thermoforming is the most suitable main technique to produce 15,000 pieces of thermoplastic dish sheet sections weighing less than 5 kg apiece. Thermoforming is a process that includes heating a thermoplastic sheet and molding it with a mold or form. This method has a number of advantages for high-volume manufacture of lightweight components. Softening the thermoplastic sheet with a vacuum and pressure makes it malleable and may be readily molded into the required shape. Thermoforming is a low-cost and efficient method that can produce vast amounts of elements with constant quality. It enables exact control over size, thickness, and surface finishes, guaranteeing that all standards are met (Erchiqui et al., 2020). Because of its ability to swiftly create intricate forms and appropriateness for production in large quantities, thermoforming is the best primary method for producing 15,000 pieces of thermoplastic dish sheet components weighing less than 5 kg each.
Question six
The laser welding procedure is excellent for manufacturing butt joints amongst ceramics because of its low labor intensity compared to equipment and tooling costs. Laser welding creates a concentrated heat source using a high-energy laser beam to fuse ceramic materials. For connecting ceramics, laser welding has different benefits, including low cost of ownership and minimal manufacturing requirements. The technique is highly automated and simple to integrate into production lines, eliminating the need for manual labor. Computer systems control the intensity of the laser beam, which enables exact control of welding settings and uniform quality. In laser welding, the process positions the ceramic surfaces into one another for connection. The laser beam targets the connecting interface. The high-energy laser rapidly heats the ceramic material. As a result, the ceramic material melts and solidifies upon cooling. The laser beam does not physically contact the ceramics during laser welding. Gomes et al. (2019) state that laser welding reduces the possibility of contamination or component damage by eliminating physical interaction between the welding instrument and ceramics.
Moreover, laser welding provides precise and focused heat input. Laser welding reduces the heat-affected zone and prevents ceramic materials from experiencing thermal stress or distortion. Sensitive ceramics that are prone to thermal shock or fracture benefit significantly from laser welding. Although laser welding instruments may be more expensive at first, the technique offers long-term cost savings due to its low amount of labor. While the apparatus is configured and the settings are tuned, the welding process can be completed with little human assistance, leading to improved productivity and lower labor costs over time (Gomes et al., 2019). It is important to note that the applicability of welding with a laser for specific ceramic substances is determined by criteria such as arrangement, thickness, and openness to the laser wavelengths. Laser welding, on the other hand, has been satisfactorily used for various ceramic components, including alumina, zirconia, and silicon carbide.
Question seven
Thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) are one type of recyclable elastomer. TPEs are a type of polymer with elastomeric and thermoplastic characteristics. TPEs may be melted and reconditioned numerous times without substantial deterioration in their qualities, unlike traditional elastomers, which are often crosslinked and difficult to recycle. Because TPEs lack permanent crosslinks, they can be remanufactured using a variety of thermoplastic methods, such as injection molding, extrusion, and blow molding, to name a few (Awasthi & Banerjee, 2021). TPEs are utilized in a variety of software, notably automobile parts, consumer goods, medical equipment, and packaging elements, and they provide an environmentally conscious choice because they can be recycled and reused.
Question eight
Ultrasonic welding is one excellent technology for generating light tee connections for thermoplastic structures that can bear stripping stress while keeping the production temperatures below 50 degrees Celsius. Ultrasonic welding is a popular joining process for thermoplastic components that has several benefits in the fabrication of lightweight joints. It produces high-frequency vibrations (ultrasonic waves) at the point of contact interface, which causes the thermoplastic polymers to melt and fuse altogether. The method is quick and ideal for lightweight applications that require relatively low processing temperatures (Bhudolia et al., 2020). Because of its solid-state fusion procedure, ultrasonic welding produces a strong and uniform bond that can bear peeling loading. It is extensively used in motor vehicles, electronics, and medical equipment that demand compact and dependable joints.
Question nine
Investment casting, called lost-wax casting, is possibly the best method for producing very large brass ship propellers. The process of investment casting is a versatile and precise technology for manufacturing complicated and large-scale metallic components. It entails casting a wax duplicate of the propeller design onto a ceramic shell. After that, the wax is melted or “lost” during the process, leaving an elongated mold. The mold is filled with molten brass, which freezes to make the propeller (Yang & Li, 2022). Because the investment casting process allows for fine details, accurate dimensions, and high surface finishes, the technique is ideal for producing huge brass ship propellers with sophisticated blade designs. Furthermore, investment casting has the advantage of material efficiency since it eliminates loss using the appropriate material.
Question ten
Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) is one of the best possibilities for a structural material made from composites that fits the parameters of exceptional tensile strength, moderate thermal conductivity, and fracture toughness of more than 15 MPam12. CFRP is a combination of materials made up of carbon fibers embedded in a polymer matrix, most commonly epoxy. It has a remarkable endurance-to-weight ratio, bursting strength, and corrosion resistance. CFRP has a low thermal conductivity, making it ideal for low-temperature systems that require heat insulation (Vinci et al., 2022). Carbon fibers have exceptional mechanical characteristics such as high strength at tensile stress, stiffness, and fracture resilience, rendering CFRP a trustworthy alternative for applications that require structural integrity and fracture resilience.
Question Eleven
A procedure known as chemical annealing or ion exchange is one method for increasing the hardness of glass. Chemical tempering is accomplished by submerging the glass in a molten salt bath comprising potassium or sodium ions. The high-temperature bath results in a regulated ion exchange in which larger sodium or potassium ions substitute the smaller ions on the glass surface. This method induces compressive stresses on the glass surface, increasing its resistance to scratching and hardness. As a result, the transparent material is reinforced and more resistant to surface damage (Dini et al., 2020). Chemical tempering is a typical technique for increasing the hardness of glass used in industries such as smartphone displays, car windows, and architectural glass, wherein scratch protection is critical.
References
Awasthi, P., & Banerjee, S. S. (2021). Fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic elastomeric materials: Challenges and opportunities. Additive Manufacturing, 46, 102177.
Bhudolia, S. K., Gohel, G., Leong, K. F., & Islam, A. (2020). Advances in ultrasonic welding of thermoplastic composites: a review. Materials, 13(6), 1284.
Erchiqui, F., Kaddami, H., Dituba-Ngoma, G., & Slaoui-Hasnaoui, F. (2020). Comparative study of using infrared and microwave heating modes to thermoform wood-plastic composite sheets. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 158, 119996.
Georgopoulou, A., Vanderborght, B., & Clemens, F. (2021). Multi-material 3D printing of thermoplastic elastomers for developing soft robotic structures with integrated sensor elements. In Industrializing Additive Manufacturing: Proceedings of AMPA2020 (pp. 67–81). Springer International Publishing.
Gomes, D. F., Galvão, I., & Loja, M. A. R. (2019). Overview of the evolution of laser welding of vascular and nervous tissues. Applied Sciences, 9(10), 2157.
Galvez, P., Abenojar, J., & Martinez, M. A. (2019). Effect of moisture and temperature on a ductile epoxy adhesive’s thermal and mechanical properties for use in steel structures reinforced with CFRP. Composites Part B: Engineering, 176, 107194.
Kautsar, S., Rosdiana, E., Widiawan, B., Setyohadi, D. P. S., Riskiawan, H. Y., & Firgiyanto, R. (2020). Farming Bot: Precision Agriculture System in Limited Land Based On Computer Numerical Control (CNC). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 411, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing.
Dini, Y., Rouchon, D., Faure-Vincent, J., & Dijon, J. (2020). Large CNT yarn electrical conductivity improvement by varying chemical doping and annealing treatment. Carbon, 156, 38-48.
Vinci, A., Silvestroni, L., Gilli, N., Zoli, L., & Sciti, D. (2022). Advancements in carbon fiber reinforced ultra-refractory ceramic composites: Effect of rare earth oxides addition. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 156, 106858.
Syari’ati, A., Kumar, S., Zahid, A., El Yumin, A. A., Ye, J., & Rudolf, P. (2019). Photoemission spectroscopy study of structural defects in molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2) grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Chemical Communications, 55(70), 10384–10387.
Yang, J., & Li, H. (2022). Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.