Introduction
The social presentation of a defined society views the concept of order as adhering to the set rules. The terming of the crime interprets it as a shift of the social order that can lead to lawlessness. Social norm identifies an organized presentation that defines how people are supposed to conduct themselves, which upon violation is considered a violation subject to report to the authorities. Deviance crime incorporates major identifications encompassing a violation with clarified social norms and increased conformity. Defining its generative ideas takes a look at the ideas of the connection created in the social concept to a collaborative reaction against the crime. Social control interprets the structured approach as an attempt to control crime. Social control is often viewed as a collective responsibility facilitated by representatives within the community who are defined with the recognition of the social norms and possible reaction to an act of defiance.
The theoretical interpretation views the general functionality of society in social organization, control, and strain. This can be evaluated in the ability of the specific facts of the society that initiate the needed campaign against the deviants. Since the crimes are performed within the society’s scope, the community members question their relevance in breaching the deviance concept (Inderbitzin et al. 12). Interpretation of the theoretical perspective views social control as an administrative regime that designated the roles of classification of behaviors within the demographical stipulations and mandated with disciplining the deviants within the identifications of the law. Since ancient civilizations, society has designated the role of making decisions regarding deviants on their guilt and deciding on the level of punishment to be accorded (Anleu 1). This risk management policy makes the deviants refrain from criminal behavior based on the severity of the punishment. This relinquished crime from the generated social concept of collective responsibility. Although most of the roles have been designated to a structured system, the courts the society have been allowed some control over the management of deviant policies and how to handle the assessment and discipline. Some of the cases are minor and are complex to the justice system. This essay demonstrates the relationship between deviance, crime, and the accorded social control. A research topic has been selected and settled on, which will act as a guide in the arguments that have been considered following the ideas of the topic.
Research Topic
The initial concept of Marijuana use in the United States has always been considered a crime until 2012 when some states legalized its use. There were profound issues following the actions as it was considered to possess medical value. Some states allowed the use of marijuana on the concept of medical purposes only. The division of the idea of administration was that some states decriminalize the general use. Recreational use had not been termed, and Washington initiated the process, allowing members of its state the use of marijuana without being considered as violating any law against drugs and substance use.
The legalization has remained controversial as a larger portion of the population believes the action was hasty and works to appeal the decision. Organizations such as Citizens Against Legalization of Marijuana (CALM) believe the original consideration of the drug as illegal should remain, considering its impact on generations that use it. This builds the concept of regard for the use of the drug as criminal and deviant. The actions against the legalization are the social control concepts that work against the established system to work and examine the facets of the society and prevent the use. The significance of the research topic will be demonstrated in the structuring of the thesis as it tries to identify facets within the community scope and the controversy that has been generated on the use of marijuana. The purpose will be achieved by contemplating the political and social divide that has resulted from the legalization of marijuana.
Thesis Organization
It is easy to classify extreme crimes, such as murder, based on the concept of social norms. The use of marijuana is, however, referenced as controversial due to the divided scope of the government systems and social control. This can be further interpreted based on the organization of the societies. Parents are the major structure used to identify social control due to their moral background and the need to protect their children. Social control may seek intervention from the local governments to limit the use of marijuana in the community concept. They are limited to the identification that the federal consideration of the drug as legal and may not limit its use. Therefore, the thesis statement encompasses the society identifications and cultures that limit social control’s efficiency and defined scope.
Discussion
The concept of the legalization of marijuana can be considered to redefine the social construct and the identification of the people of the United States. Before the legalization, the drug was considered harmful to the health of the user. Since then, there have been reports of chronic usage since the passing of the marijuana medical law. The law was then restructured to include recreational usage (Moss et al. 680). The definition and argumentation of the ideas of deviance, crime, and social control follow the generated idea of the resulting risk preference and deviant behavior. The legalization for this case is considered authentic, but the after-effects consider the indulgence of risky and deviant behaviors as a result. Can the use then be classified as deviant? What will be the social control’s scope in disciplining those caught violating the social norm following the use? These questions will guide the argument in handling the controversy as the individual user can make their case for being under the influence. The state recognizes such statements and can be allowed to conceptualize a case where a defendant can argue their level of intoxication. In this case, the point is assessing the cultural structuring of the system, such as the government undermining the roles of social control in handling deviants.
The social control concept has stayed the same, only the need and utilization of the drugs. In the cases of over-intoxication, a user will perform deviant activities and commit crimes in the cases of extremity. The presentation of the case is the settlement of the influence of a substance considered legal. The system officiates the use as the culture has been determined to be focused on societal well-being (Kaplan et al. 44). Under the identification, social control should structure serious measures and discipline those who commit crimes and result of deviant behavior as a result of the intoxication. The social integration control should revise their modifications to identify loss of control over the administration of the social norms. The mentioned changing structure of society references relativity to the idea that the use of such drugs is against social normality. The accorded individuality has been determined to be the majority of factors limiting social control’s role. The punishment and discipline process should be instilled the same way and argued that the actions are independent of the utilization and use of the drug.
Evidence Review
The review of the evidence is based on the scope of recognizing the damage done to the social presentation. Deviant behaviors and crime cannot be evaluated and disciplined effectively as such legalization is associated with a defined scope that erodes the basis of the argument. The specific example is considered a case where teenagers used the drug and were involved in multiple counts of crime and deviant behaviors in Copenhagen in 2017. During the prosecution, the defendant argued that the crimes were a result of the influence of the drug. The argument was later developed into stipulations based on Becker’s model to demonstrate individualized use (Jarvinen and Ravn 137). the settlement of the ideas from the evidence is the subcultural association between the users and the social presentation later assigned to the rehabilitation. The assessment termed deviance as a result of social interaction and socialization.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the essay has defined the undertakings under the argument of the generated controversy of the social control of crimes and deviant behavior due to the legalization of marijuana. The arguments are generated following the normal social presentation and the restructuring needed to refine the issues to conform to the refusal of the state to control the use of drugs. The need for control has been demonstrated due to the resulting actions of the users and how they make social control invalid. Society is changing rapidly; hence, social control should be updated to consider individual crimes and behavior as the user’s actions and not related to intoxication.
Works Cited
Anleu, S. R. Deviance, crime, and social control. Ed. Routledge. 4th. Chicago: Tyler Francis Group, 2019. <www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003116974-19/deviance-crime-social-control-sharyn-roach-anleu>.
Inderbitzin, M., Bates, K. and Gainey, R. Deviance and Social Control. California: Sage, 2020. Book. <us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/deviance-and-social-control/book259228>.
Jarvinen, M. and Ravn, S. “Cannabis careers revisited: Applying Howard S. Becker’s theory to present-day cannabis use.” Social Science and Medicine 100 2014: 133–140. Article.
Kaplan, H., Martin, S., Johnson, R. J., and Robbins, C. A. “Escalation of Marijuana Use: Application of A General Theory of Deviant Behaviour.” Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 27.1 1986: 44–61. Article.
Moss, S. L., Santaella-Tenorio, J., Mauro, P. M., Keyes, K. M., and Martins, S. S. “Changes over time in marijuana use, deviant behavior and preference for risky behavior among U. S. adolescents from 2002-2014: Testing the moderating effect of gender and age.” Addiction 114.4 2019: 674–686. Article.
write