The assistance of qualified professionals, such as clinical medical attendants and specialists who administer therapy, is provided when someone’s health begins to deteriorate. Medical practitioners who adopt evidence-based approaches to guarantee patient satisfaction following the provision of treatment are more likely to be successful. New professionals in nursing need to comprehend the relevance of integrating cutting-edge research into their profession as a justification for relevant practices aimed at improving patient health (Horntvedt, et al., 2018). In addition, they have to understand the importance of gaining knowledge about the various nursing problems from reputable study results and sources. Health professionals need trustworthy data and tools to successfully manage and lead varied care assignments to the greatest level of excellence. The aim of this paper is to establish the trustworthiness of information and data sources that will be utilized in the search for gestational diabetes in pregnant patients.
Contrary to popular belief of two existing types of diabetes, several forms of diabetes impact different populations in varying ways. High glucose levels exacerbate gestational diabetes in the bloodstream. Poor diet consuming high sugary foods, high-stress levels, lack of exercise, inadequate rests are among the factors that herald gestational diabetes in women with this condition (McIntyre, et al., 2019). Other factors such as a family history of diabetes and senile maternal age also facilitate the development of this type of diabetes. Notably, this kind of diabetes is controlled effectively if it is treated correctly during pregnancy, provided she is diagnosed, and care intervention is administered early.
Determining the Credibility of Resources
The credibility of resources is important to ensure professionals integrate the best evidence-based intervention. Using primary and credible sources while doing research is critical to maintaining the safety of patients. Despite the fact that the internet has a wealth of beneficial information, it can also be a hub of misleading knowledge. Examining the relevance and credibility of nursing informative sources, the CRAAP test is used to underpin this objective. CRAAP test is an abbreviation for “Currency, Relevance, the Authority, the Accuracy, and the Purpose” (Berg, 2017). When these concepts are examined, it is identified if the source meets the criteria to be integrated as an accurate sources. The date of publication, review and update should be assessed to inform the currency of the source.
Resources to be used need to be published within the past five years of the current year, ensuring that the knowledge included inside represents the most recent developments in the nursing profession. When deciding whether or not the information source offered fits the needs of the researcher, it is vital to take into account the relevancy of the literature review that was incorporated to develop the content (Horntvedt, et al., 2018). The qualifications of the authors and their contribution to professional nursing knowledge will also be significant in assessing the strength of the articles. Accuracy and precision of the source to the subject of inquiry should be attained by having it confirmed by other scholars through review and supported by reality, rather than relying just on one’s ideas and assumptions to obtain it. When it comes to motivating an informational gathering, it is important to understand why data is made accessible to the general public in the first place. It is also necessary to analyze the article to decide whether it is of sufficient significance to be declared public knowledge.
Analyzing the Credibility and Relevance of Evidence
Using reliable sources to gain informative insights on gestational diabetes is essential. It is important to first turn to the school library, Capella’s Summon, which has diverse useful resources on the subject of inquiry. Using the school library will allow students to complement their investigative activities with numerous articles, diaries, books, and other educational resources that are relevant to their interests. Ensuring that the key data obtained over the most recent five years is shown will be feasible to exhibit current sources and data, making adjustment filters on the search engine. On the search engine, researchers are advised to use keywords and use peer-reviewed studies or journals from the selection presented.
Every step is taken to determine the trustworthiness, relevance, and authority of the sources, as well as the legitimacy of each source. Aiming to educate uninformed professionals about gestational diabetes from beginning to end, the materials selected have been carefully selected with accuracy by skimming through abstracts to get an overview of what is contained in the sources. As a result, a thorough reading of the material will pique the reader’s interest in general learning more about gestational diabetes. The picked articles should be within a range of the past five years (2022-2017), peer-reviewed, published with well-renowned authors, and reflect the relevance of the information contained with the needs of intervening for gestational diabetes patients.
Incorporating Credible Evidence into an EBP Model
A significant part of our ability to make well-informed decisions is ensuring that we are acting in accordance with the moral norms of medical services practice while also paying close attention to the needs and desires of our patients and their families. Choosing practices and the overall style of care to improve them continuously is crucial in ensuring that our patients get the best possible care. A similar approach should be used to ensure that our dynamic involvement remains successful by including credible evidence into the mix. Using a system that is based on evidence is critical in the treatment of gestational diabetes, and this approach should be followed on a continuous basis. In integrating evidence-based research, choosing a model to underpin the incorporation of credible evidence is significant. John Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) proved an effective model in aiding address the gestational diabetes condition.
The examination, practice, and teaching components are the three components of the JHEBP paradigm that supports gestational diabetes intervention. Gestational diabetes requires an in-depth examination of the commotion through extensive research and diagnosis. This presents information through finding high guide the application of care practices tic curb escalation of the condition to uncontrollable levels (Dang et al., 2021). Each of these elements contributes to the achievement of a certain objective. When faced with difficulty or under stress, it is frequently necessary to obtain knowledge about the issue, demonstrating the interaction’s exploration component. After care practices, teaching patients on self-administered care practice enhances better recovery and control of diabetes.
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau.
Berg, C. (2017). Teaching website evaluation: The CRAAP test and the evolution of an approach.
Horntvedt, M. E. T., Nordsteien, A., Fermann, T., & Severinsson, E. (2018). Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: a thematic literature review. BMC medical education, 18(1), 1-11.
McIntyre, H. D., Catalano, P., Zhang, C., Desoye, G., Mathiesen, E. R., & Damm, P. (2019). Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nature reviews Disease primers, 5(1), 1-19.