Victimology studies crime victims, their rights, services, and the criminal justice system. It addresses criminal victims’ psychological, social, and legal issues. Offender-centered and victim-centered attitudes dominate victimology. Victim-centered perspectives highlight victim needs and assistance. It examines how the crime affected victims, their rights and needs, their access to justice, their need for reparations, and the relevance of victim-centred criminal justice (Yılmaz, 2021). The offender-centered perspective stresses offender accountability, rehabilitation, and harsher sanctions.
I cannot entirely agree with the assertion that the Waynes made themselves more susceptible by running through a dangerous alley while wearing fine clothes. This worldview is built on the problematic notion of blaming the victim, explored in the academic field of victimology. The idea that the victim is to blame for the crime, even when the perpetrator is, is implied by the term “victim blaming.” This attitude has been connected to juries blaming the victim, which can result in harsher punishments for perpetrators and less concern for victims’ rights (Yilmaz, 2021). This disregards the reality that victims of crime might come from any socioeconomic level and can be located anywhere in the world.
Forensic assessment is a legal, psychological evaluation. It gives the court legal advice. Forensic examination usually involves clinical interviews, psychiatric evaluations, and record reviews (Ozkan et al., 2018). The evaluation’s primary goal is to objectively judge a legal issue like the capacity to stand trial or violence risk. Therapy assessment identifies and addresses mental health needs. Its main goal is to assess mental health and offer treatment. Therapeutic evaluation usually involves clinical interviews, psychological evaluations, and record reviews. The assessment’s primary goal is to understand the patient’s mental health and suggest treatments. Forensic and therapeutic assessment requires numerous data sources and psychological testing. Parties’ goals, ambitions, and connections differ. The therapeutic assessment aims to understand the patient’s mental health and offer treatment, while forensic evaluation gives the court a legal opinion. Therapeutic evaluation is with the patient, while forensic evaluation is with the court.
Joe Chill’s forensic evaluation may include clinician interviews, assessment tools, family or friend interviews, developmental history, criminal record, possible substance misuse history, and treatment suggestions. The clinical interview would assess Joe Chill’s mental condition and legal comprehension. The assessment instruments would determine Joe Chill’s risk of violence, ability to stand trial, and other legal matters. Interviews with Joe Chill’s relatives and friends would reveal his criminal history and other relevant facts (IResearchNet, 2018). A developmental history is needed to evaluate Joe Chill’s mental health and other facts. Joe Chill’s criminal record and other relevant facts will be assessed. Substance abuse disorders may be assessed using a possible history of substance abuse (Ozkan, 2018). The assessment results would determine treatment.
Bruce Wayne’s therapeutic evaluation may include clinical interviews, assessment instruments, developmental history, family and friend interviews, and therapy suggestions. The clinical interview would assess Bruce Wayne’s mental health and possible psychological trauma. The tools would assess Bruce Wayne’s mental health and trauma symptoms (Case et al., 2021). A developmental history would assess Bruce Wayne’s mental health and other factors. Interviews with Bruce Wayne’s family and friends would reveal his past, criminal history, and other information. Assessment results will guide therapy recommendations. Individual, group, family, and medication management may be included.
References
Case, S., Manlow, D., Johnson, P., Williams, K., & Smith, R. (2021). The Oxford Textbook on Criminology. In Google Books. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NbwyEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Victimology.+In+The+Oxford+handbook+of+criminology&ots=YcTXdVtxzy&sig=uXaCXhGKJReTv4wxAbgSd1A0GyU
Forensic Assessment (Forensic Psychology) – iResearchNet. (2018, October 1). Retrieved from Criminal Justice website: http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/forensic-psychology/forensic-assessment/
Ozkan, E., Belhan, S., Yaran, M., & Zarif, M. (2018). Occupational Therapy in Forensic Settings. In www.intechopen.com. IntechOpen. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/62493
Yılmaz, T. (2021). Victimology from clinical psychology perspective: psychological assessment of victims and professionals working with victims. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01433-z
write