Written Policy on Cutting Participants in a Team
There is always controversy on the issue of picking the best players in the team because many players are involved; hence, it’s hard to allocate equal time and playful opportunities to each. Amidst the dilemmas surrounding player cuts, we present a meticulously crafted player selection policy that not only adheres to established best practices but also integrates insights from Hammond et al. (2019) study, “Sports coaches as policy actors.” This Policy strikes a harmonious balance between skills, commitment, and objectivity, seeking to foster a constructive and inclusive environment for young athletes while upholding the program’s commitment to fairness and skill development. By doing so, we aim to address the sensitive issue of player cuts with professionalism and precision, ensuring that all participants have a fair chance to develop their skills and relish their experience in the recreation baseball program.
Team Size and Selection Criteria
Team Size
Based on the research findings and the goal of having equal playtime, we will recommend a team consisting of eleven to fourteen players, which is the league average. It balances the need for competitiveness with that of participation.
Player Selection Criteria
Skills and Abilities: Player selection relies on skills and abilities as the primary basis. Technical assessment of a player’s performance should be evaluated. Evaluation of these skills includes batting, pitching, fielding, base running, and other skills explicitly related to baseball (Hammond et al. 2019). During tryouts, coaches, evaluators, and administrators will assess each player relatively about their proficiency in these areas.
Commitment and Attitude: Furthermore, these factors, such as the player’s commitment, attitude, and teamwork, are indispensable. These character traits affect both the performance and the spirit of teams.
Objective Evaluation: Objective evaluation free from bias and merit is vital to our selection policy.
Selection Procedure and Appeal Process
Tryouts: All those interested will undergo tryouts. As suggested by our study, coaches and other independent evaluators should be involved in the selection process we have adopted.
Selection Committee: The selection committee, which shall include coaches, independent evaluators, and program administrators, will have to review the results and select candidates for the travel team (Hammond et al. 2019). This is consistent with the study’s suggestion that different stakeholders should be incorporated into the process.
Roster Size: If, however, the number of players chosen is more than the prescribed team size, the selection committee will resort to the criteria stated above in a fair way.
Transparent Communication: As recommended in the study, communication of decisions to selected and non-selected players has to be practical and straightforward. We want to highlight that skill enhancement and involvement in other activities in the program are essential.
Appeals Process
An appeals process is necessary to alleviate the concerns and maintain fairness, as described below.
Submission of Appeal: The recreation baseball team’s Appeals Committee must receive a written appeal within specified days of the team roster announcement.
Appeals Committee Composition: As per the study’s recommendation on neutrality, individuals who were not directly involved in the process will constitute the Appeals Committee.
Appeal Review: Finally, the Appeals Committee will examine the appeal and may consider other data provided by an appealing party.
Decision: It will also mean that within specified days, the Appeals Committee will issue a decision concerning the appeal that conforms with the study’s focus on a practical and transparent procedure.
Final Decision: This ensures an ordered way of resolving disputes, and the decision taken by the Appeals Committee is final and binding.
Why choose this Policy
Skills and Abilities: The selection of players is based on their performances observed during tryouts. This means that those who are selected for the travel team have the right abilities and can help the section towards winning (Hammond et al. 2019). Consistent with this study’s orientation towards objective measures for selecting players, only the most skilled players are chosen to participate.
Commitment and Attitude: Besides skills, the player’s dedication to the team, positive spirit, and capacity to collaborate with other teammates’ are considered. However, these attributes go beyond the performance aspect and deeply influence team chemistry and morale (Hammond et al. 2019). The Policy addresses commitment and attitude, which promote a collaborative team environment consistent with the study’s focus on inclusion and fairness.
Objective Evaluation: It follows a strict evaluation on a factual basis so that all players are selected. This assessment of the players is according to the study’s suggestion of a fair and neutral player selection process.
In conclusion, we have considered research and best practices, especially from Hammond et al. (2019), which emphasize all stakeholders’ participation and equality and equity in the company’s policies on objective evaluations, clear communication, and fair appeals process to resolve conflicts. The organization aims to develop a favorable and beneficial ambiance for all the youth athletes participating in our program. This will enable us to deal with the controversial issue of player cuts professionally.
Reference
Hammond, A. M., Penney, D., & Jeanes, R. (2019). Sports coaches as policy actors: An investigation of the interpretation and enactment of disability and inclusion policy in swimming in Victoria, Australia. Sport, education, and society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1628013
write