The maturation from youth to formative years marks a significant shift in a person’s social and character development. This literature evaluation synthesizes insights from Durbin et al. (2016), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS, 2021), Soto and Tackett (2015), and Thompson (2016) to light up this complex transformation. Durbin et al. (2016) explored personality trait changes from late childhood to young maturity. The researchers pointed to nonlinearity and sex variations in change, demonstrating that personality traits no longer expand along a singular trajectory but alternatively vary dynamically, with differences observable between women and men. Girls, for instance, had been seen to show off a sharper decrease in negative emotionality than boys. This finding underscores the full-size position of gender in personality improvement.
Meanwhile, Soto and Tackett (2015) provided additional illumination on the shape and outcomes of character trends in youth and formative years. They emphasized the stability and predictability of positive trends while also acknowledging substantial transitions for the duration of these early lives. Crucially, they argued that the size of youth persona tendencies predicts significant consequences in adulthood, including intellectual fitness, indicating the long-lasting effect on these early developmental degrees.
Research by the united states department of Health and Human Services wrote a report on how personality changes from childhood to adulthood. According to Durbin al., 2016 in their view, these personality changes are brought about by social developments in the social change experience. They argue that unlike in childhood, where children spend most of their time with family, they expand their social circle as they approach adolescence and are most likely to form strong bonds with people outside of family who become their role models (Durbin et al., 2016). According to Durbin et al. (2016), children’s personalities are also influenced by taking in new social roles as they leave their childhood behind. In an article by Health and Human Services (2021), adolescents assume new roles, such as leadership roles, being responsible elder siblings, and having a romantic partner.
The above factors determine a child’s personality in adolescence (Health and Human Services (2021). Given that this is a government report from a well-funded organization, its research is credible and will help add more insights as I write my essay. Both these studies resonate with the attitude shared by the HHS (2021), which outlines the social modifications that adolescents enjoy. As youngsters transition into youth, their social circles extend beyond their own family’s confines, encompassing friends and mentors. This dynamic social ecosystem contributes significantly to a character’s developing personality, fostering an accelerated sense of independence, shifting priorities, and forming private ideals and values. Complementing these understandings, Thompson (2016) elucidated the elaborate courting among social and personality improvement in formative years. He exacts how different factors and relationships with caregivers and friends contribute to forming an infant’s character. Thompson also emphasized that children’s comprehension of social roles and rules extensively informs their evolving self-standards, self-esteem, and usual persona.
In summary, the reviewed literature underscores that persona and social development from early life to adolescence is a multifaceted, nonlinear manner formed using several interconnected factors. These encompass, however, are not restricted to a man or woman’s intercourse, the converting breadth and nature in their social interactions, and their growing hold close to societal norms. Furthermore, the works together highlight the enduring impact of these early developmental stages, establishing their significance now not handiest in a man or woman’s youth but also in their grownup existence. The reviewed studies encourage persistent inquiry into this complicated topic to take advantage of more specific knowledge of ways those dynamics shape long-term outcomes.
References
Durbin, C. E., Hicks, B. M., Blonigen, D. M., Johnson, W., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2016). Personality trait change across late childhood to young adulthood: Evidence for nonlinearity and sex differences in change. European Journal of Personality, 30(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2013
Health and Human Services (2021) Social Development, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-development-explained/social-development#:~:text=General%20Social%20Changes%20Adolescents%20Experience&text=As%20their%20social%20circles%20expand,who%20may%20function%20as%20mentors
Soto, C. & Tackett, J. (2015). Personality Traits in Childhood and Adolescence: Structure, Development, and Outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 24. 358–362. . https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345
Thompson, R. (2016). Social and Personality Development in Childhood. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. http://www.nobaproject.com.
write