Change and Leadership

1.0 Part 1

1.1 Introduction

The capacity to adapt and successfully manage change are two of the most powerful tools at an organization’s disposal for boosting its bottom line (Srivastava and Agrawal, 2020). An analysis of the changes recently implemented by Coca-Cola occupies most of the study. This will help to understand how the company’s strategic moves have improved its performance and given it an advantage in the market. The report will often focus, as is customary, on the many ways the organization might facilitate positive change. In the article, we present the company, admit that change is necessary, and use a SWOT analysis to pinpoint the driving factors. Taking Kotter’s model as its starting point, this report will examine the effects of change management on an organization and provide recommendations for maximizing its effectiveness.

1.2 Importance of Change

Organizational transformation is the transition of a business from one state to another (Sindhuja, 2017). Adaptation may assume many forms. This often necessitates modifying how a business operates or utilizing particular technologies and methods (Hanelt, Bohnsack, Marz, and Antunes Marante, 2021). This may be planned before the launch, or several external factors may mandate it. The rate at which a company changes can be either rapid or gradual. According to the University of Minnesota (2017), the primary challenge for any business, regardless of the magnitude of the change, is adapting to the new methods (University of Minnesota, 2017). According to Carnevale and Hatak (2020), adapting to new methods is fundamentally a management process that includes human resources.

An organization must recognize the need for change, especially in today’s society (Hanelt, Bohnsack, Marz, and Antunes Marante, 2021). Businesses that hope for a respite from “today’s fast-moving environment” may be in for a rude awakening. There have been notable technological advancements, changing consumer preferences, and ongoing changes in economic conditions (Chattopadhyay, 2019). In light of this, businesses reluctant to respond to changing market conditions risk being left behind. As said by Sindhuja (2017), companies need well-thought-out strategies for adjusting to new circumstances so they can exploit opportunities as they emerge and counteract dangers successfully.

1.3 Company Background

The Coca-Cola Company, founded in 1892, dominates the global beverage industry (Guo and Wen, 2021). In addition to Coca-Cola and Diet Coke, it offers additional profitable brands such as Minute Maid and Dasani water. With the largest distribution network in the world, the company can serve consumers in nearly every country (Knežević, Koprivica, and Kriste, 2021). Before the middle of the 20th century, Coca-Cola focused primarily on increasing its domestic market share. In the waning years of the 20th century, Coca-Cola continued its global expansion, capitalizing on overseas profit potential and overcoming intense competition in the soft drink industry to establish a global monopoly. In the late 1990s, Coca-Cola owned more than fifty percent of the world’s soft drink market, while PepsiCo, Coke’s primary competitor, owned only fifteen to twenty percent. Coca-Cola’s primary industry remains beverages.

Over the years, the company has encountered various change management challenges (Sulistiani, Wardani, and Sulistyawati, 2019). However, the company’s demonstrated ability to adapt effectively to change has enabled it to ascend to the echelons of the most well-known and prosperous businesses in the modern world (ALC Training, 2018). To save costs and push the firm forward, most of the changes made by the corporation are geared towards constricting costs and securing a competitive edge. It is essential to keep in mind that, despite the organization’s best efforts, not everyone has been pleased with the modifications that have been made. Through critical reflection utilizing change theories, the need for change at Coca-Cola can be identified, and suggestions for re-inventing changes that have created tension can be developed.

1.4 Coca-Cola Change Management and elements impacting Change Processes

Coca-Cola has implemented several changes to its business strategy to differentiate itself from rivals and boost revenue. Throughout the years, as previously described, several difficulties have arisen. In 1980, for instance, Pepsi actively assaulted the corporation, prompting the introduction of New Coke, a sweetened variant of the beverage (Schroeder, 2010). However, the public did not embrace the novel beverage. The company rapidly adjusted, reverting to an earlier formulation of the beverage. Typically, the company responded quickly to changing consumer preferences, ensuring its products remained popular.

Similarly, the corporation maintained the proactive character of its operations during World War II (ALC Training, 2018). Coca-Cola promoted itself internationally and increased its brand recognition by supplying complimentary beverages to Gls (ALC Training, 2018). During this period, the business established its global dominance by establishing numerous facilities in various nations. Coca-Cola’s proactive strategy to change management has evolved. Diet Coke, Enviga, and Coca-Cola Zero are a few of the products the company has introduced in response to expanding health consciousness.

In addition, the firm adopted an acquisition approach to responding successfully to changing consumer preferences amid the Asian financial crisis. Coca-Cola’s ability to rapidly adapt to and even predict fluctuations in consumer preferences and trends directly results from the company’s commitment to effective change management. When faced with adversity, the corporation also implements a cost-cutting modification. For instance, during the first quarter of 2017, the company’s revenue decreased significantly due to corporate restructuring. To further reduce costs, the company laid off approximately 1,200 employees (Retail Asia, 2017). The corporation estimated that reducing its personnel could save $800 million.

Supplemental change processes recently featured include product offering expansion, organizational structure changes, process automation, and increased R&D funding. According to Abbas (2023), Coca-Cola now offers various beverages, from sugar-free and low-sugar sodas to flavored waters, juices, and teas, to respond to shifting consumer preferences and maintain its competitive edge.

Figure 1: Coca-Cola additional product varieties

(DJ, 2019)

Regarding organizational structure changes, Coca-Cola 2007 developed a global business unit framework to assist with these issues. After restructuring, the organization responded more quickly to changing market conditions and client needs.

Coca-Cola has also automated production processes, employed digital marketing strategies, and utilized data analytics to guide business decisions to increase productivity and facilitate operations through technology (Abbas, 2023). The firm has also invested substantial money into research and development to develop new products, improve existing ones, and stay competitive. The funding was used for research into novel forms of sweeteners, packaging enhancements, and eco-friendly initiatives. According to the Lancet (2015), Coca-Cola disclosed spending approximately US$ 118.6 million on research and development (health and well being0 in the previous 5 years.

1.5 SWOT Analysis

Despite the corporation being renowned globally, its ongoing transformation has been extremely difficult. The problems began in the 1990s when the chief executive officer exhibited incapacity to handle significant financial developments (Auburn University, 2015). During his tenure at Coca-Cola, the price of the company’s shares has seen significant shifts. On the day Mr. Doug Ivester was appointed chairman, the stock closed at $57.6875. Since then, it steadily increased to a record high of over $89 in July 1998. When Coke’s profits began to decline, its share price followed suit, plummeting to $47.31 at the beginning of October 1999. It has been trending upward for the past few months. According to McKay and Deogun (1999), on Mr. Ivester’s last day as CEO, the stock concluded at $68.1875 at 4:00 p.m., representing an 18% increase during his 25-month tenure. The Dow Jones Industrial Average grew by 44% (McKay and Deogun, 1999). Investors sold Coke stock. It was trading down $4.125, or 6.4%, at $64.0625 on the NYSE at 4 p.m.

He needed to be more adequate to cope with Pepsi’s established competition. The inability to keep expenses under control and successfully compete with other businesses is evidence of a change management strategy that needs to be revised and is cause for concern. In recent history, there have been several ethical disasters. Profit manipulation, breaking long-term contracts with distributors, racial discrimination, and exaggerating the findings of several market tests are only some of the allegations against the corporation (Auburn University, 2015). Such variables affect the change implementation process (Auburn University, 2015). When the intended change turns out to be unethical, people typically resist even more vigorously.

1.6 Kotter’s Model of Change and Change Process Challenges

According to Kotter, over 70% of an organization’s main projects fail because of a lack of a thorough plan for bringing change (Kotter, 1995). The eight-step change model stresses how a business’s change contributes to its market viability. Lewin’s method begins with four steps devoted to the “unfreezing” phase, followed by three phases of “moving,” and finally, one final phase of “refreezing,” in which the freshly implemented change is solidified.

1.6.1 Committee coordination

According to Kotter, it is crucial to involve employees who are on board with the change (Kotter,1995). Regarding the change topic, we observe that Coca-Cola needs to precisely involve its employees in the process. Particularly, change initiatives are delegated to leaders such as the CEO. As mentioned, the chief executive officer experienced financial challenges in the 1990s. This indicates that the CEO needs a decision-making committee comprised of essential employees.

1.6.2 Communication of the Vision

Coca-Cola always acts with a strategy. But to avoid conflicts of interest as much as possible, leaders should always tell everyone about the goal (Khoo, 2013). This is one of the primary reasons the company encountered artificial sweeteners controversies in 2017 when it laid off employees to cut costs. According to La Monica (2017), Coke endured consumer preferences change that featured a shift from sweetened beverages. Even Coke’s diet products were impacted by the hazards of artificial sweeteners. The proposal to lay off 1,200 employees was part of an effort to save $800 million and return the company to profitability (La Monica, 2017). The company had over 100,000 employees worldwide, so the number of people let go is negligible.

1.6.3 Creating a Sense of urgency

Coca-Cola needs to embrace a sense of urgency effectively. Despite being adaptable in the face of unpredictability, the corporation is not putting its workers’ and customers’ happiness first. The optimal action would have been resolving employee concerns after listening to them. Before implementing any cost-cutting measures, for instance, employees should have been consulted. In light of societal demands, ethical considerations, and biases should be considered. According to research cited by Lunenburg, employee dissatisfaction is likely to increase if unmet needs are unmet.

1.6.4 Empowering People

Leaders should delegate authority by minimizing potential obstacles to change (Khoo, 2013). The laid-off Coca-Cola employees did not support the company’s aim of reducing expenses through organizational transformation.

1.6.5 Planning for Rapid Achievement

A successful strategy is devised when employees are highly motivated. According to research, a flexible and enthusiastic workforce is more profitable because it adapts to change more readily (Lunenburg, 2013). Coca-Cola is an organization with highly motivated employees. The firm’s equitable compensation structure encourages employees. This will make transformation possible to sustain.

1.6.6 Consolidating Gains

All potential benefits must be discussed. Coca-Cola is an excellent example of this practice, as the executives frequently meet to discuss proposed changes before implementation. The CEOs describe the benefits of this, which include cost savings and competitive advantage.

1.6.7 Distributing Changes to the Organization Culture

According to Lunenburg (2013), leaders can influence cultural transformations by delegating authority, fostering collaboration, and setting an exemplary example for subordinates (Lunenburg, 2013). Coca-Cola has fully embraced a culture of change, as evidenced by its numerous cost-cutting and competitiveness-enhancing initiatives.

1.7 Conclusion and Recommendations

Change is inevitable and must be managed effectively within every organization. This highlights the importance of enhancing deliberate decision-making. Coca-Cola is an excellent company that can respond quickly to market changes. However, the organization has been sluggish in ensuring everyone’s satisfaction. The failure of the company’s management to rally the workforce behind previous organizational changes resulted in pervasive resistance. To keep up with the competition, it should not hasten the potentially lengthy change process. However, change requires careful consideration before implementation.

There were unquestionably obstacles throughout the transitional processes. Coca-Cola’s prompt responses to the majority of customer complaints, despite these setbacks, illustrate why the company has been so successful. However, the company should consider incorporating new groups into the decision-making process. Not surprisingly, there was considerable opposition to the beverage created to compete with Pepsi. Consumer contentment would have been higher if the company had solicited feedback from a broader spectrum of individuals, including its employees. The following SMART objectives will help the Coca-Cola team adapt more effectively to the change.

Enhancing Collaboration throughout Organizational Change

2.0 Part 2

2.1 Skill Sets Possessed

The following are some of the skill sets I possess;

2.1.1 Relationship building

Some leaders may contend they are successful regardless of how their coworkers perceive them (Koka, 2023). Although this may be true, effective managers must also possess the leadership qualities necessary to establish strong working relationships with their employees to create a cohesive and more engaged team. I like to think of myself as someone who can facilitate connections between individuals. Leaders who have established mutual trust and open communication with their teams recognize that the time spent on this endeavor is worthwhile and sets the foundation for future accomplishments.

Gallup’s meta-analysis of employee engagement demonstrates that companies with high levels of employee engagement experience fewer quality defects (41%) and higher attendance (37%) (International Institute for Management Development, 2022). It has been shown that employee participation increases productivity by 21%. Even though I do not believe I need to be liked at work, I know that I will need to be skilled at cultivating positive relationships to achieve leadership success. If you are a leader in a company where employees are passionate about their work, the close relationships you develop with them should inspire them to give their all. My professional career has followed this pattern (working as an intern and manager at our local neighborhood store).

2.1.2 Agility and Adaptability

My adaptability and agility are also essential abilities. In 2008, Development Dimensions International discovered that the most effective leaders could support change. In the year 2022, one of the most featured valuable characteristics of a leader is the ability to adapt (International Institute for Management Development, 2022). The COVID-19 pandemic, a hypercompetitive corporate environment, and climate change are just a few conditions that necessitate leaders’ adaptability and agility.

To be an effective leader, you must adapt to new circumstances, whether they originate from within or without. As a leader, I have prioritized cultivating an appetite for knowledge to keep up with the ever-changing business environment and provide my company with a competitive advantage. I’ve increased my leadership agility and adaptability by accepting responsibility for my actions and developing a plan for coping with unforeseen events. So that I can monitor my progress in adapting to the change and serve as an example to my coworkers, my plan includes a realistic schedule.

2.1.3 Innovation and Creativity

I have many original concepts and thoughts. Every organization must prioritize executives who can contribute novel ideas. During the earliest phases of the pandemic, I had the idea to implement the hybrid system to facilitate greater adaptability and a safer working environment. This is the phase of creativity, wherein remarkable ideas are generated and form the foundation of innovation success. Some employees will work from home, while others will work fewer hours in the office. This not only helped the company comply with the pandemic limitation directives, but as a result of the enhanced performance, profits increased by 10%.

2.2 Areas for Development

Improving my ability to motivate my team members is my top leadership priority. If you offer them a compelling reason to remain with your organization, they will. Therefore, it would be advantageous to implement an incentive program to maintain staff motivation. I’m considering rewarding employees with a quarterly incentive, access to private health care, funds to assist them in becoming certified, and a portion of the company’s profits. People are more likely to perform their finest work and stay around to see a project through if they believe they will be fairly compensated. When individuals are contented and motivated at work, according to Herzberg, they are joyful, and when they are not, it is because of the work environment. (Alshmemri, Shahwan-Akl and Maude, 2017).According to Herzberg, there are two kinds of requirements in the workplace: sanitation needs and motivator needs. Hygiene refers to a person’s working conditions, salary, and workplace relationships, whereas Motivators are factors such as job recognition, advancement, and accomplishment that inspire individuals to work harder.

In addition, I must practice recognizing the endeavors of others. People are frequently content with merely being acknowledged for their efforts. I will not hesitate to recognize an employee who has contributed extra effort to a project or gone above and beyond to assist a colleague. It’s not just about the token of appreciation; it’s also about the philosophy behind it: if individuals believe their efforts are valued, they will be more motivated to continue performing well. In organizations with a formal recognition and incentive system, employee engagement, output, and satisfaction all increase by 14%, while employee turnover falls by 31% (Block Inc, 2023). It is essential to express gratitude for devoted personnel, either publicly in a meeting or via correspondence to the staff, or in a more personal manner. It’s great to have loyal employees who have been with your organization for a while. It is essential for the success of your business that your employees remain motivated, even in difficult circumstances. Not only do long-term employees make your workdays simpler because they know the procedures, but they also enrich your personal life.

3.0 Bibliography

Abbas, T., 2023. Coca Cola change management case study. CMI. https://changemanagementinsight.com/coca-cola-change-management-case-study/

ALC Training., 2018. What you can learn about change management from Coca Cola and Nokia. Available at: https://www.alctraining.com.au/can-learn-change-management-coca-cola-nokia

Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. and Maude, P., 2017. Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), pp.12-16.

Auburn University., 2015. The Coca-Cola Company Struggles with Ethical Crises. [online] Available at: https://harbert.auburn.edu/binaries/documents/center-for-ethical-organizational-cultures/cases/coca-cola.pdf

Block Inc., 2023. 10 Scientifically Proven Ways to Motivate Employees. Square.

Carnevale, J.B. and Hatak, I., 2020. Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of business research, 116, pp.183-187.

Chattopadhyay, P., 2019. A Comprehensive Study on Organized Retailing with Reference to Customer Preferences and Customer Loyalty in Indian Context. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3, pp.410-414.

Chron., 2020. Why is change important in an organization? [online] Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/change-important-organization-728.html

DJ, M., 2019. Coca-Cola: Closing the gap. Seeking Alpha. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4033096-coca-cola-closing-gap

Free, K., 2016. SWOT analysis of Coca Cola. [online] Available at: https://pestleanalysis.com/swot-analysis-coca-cola/

Guo, X. and Wen, M., 2021, December. Research on Competitive Strategy of Coca-Cola Company. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 2879-2885). Atlantis Press.

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D. and Antunes Marante, C., 2021. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), pp.1159-1197.

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D. and Antunes Marante, C., 2021. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), pp.1159-1197.

International Institute for Management Development., 2022. The 8 greatest leadership skills you need to know in 2022. IMD business school for management and leadership courses. https://www.imd.org/reflections/leadership-skills/

Jurevicius, O., 2020. Coca Cola SWOT analysis (6 key strengths in 2020). [online] Available at: https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/swot-analyses/coca-cola-swot-analysis.html

Khoo, E.W., 2013. The Role of Leadership in Organizational Transformation [online] available at:https://www.cscollege.gov.sg/Knowledge/Pages/The-Role-of-Leadership-in-Organisational-Transformation.aspx&gt

Knežević, A.G., Koprivica, I. and Kriste, L.M., 2021. THE CASE STUDY OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY. COMPANY ANALYSIS, p.71.

Koka, S., 2023. Leadership and love: Part 1. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 67(1), pp.x-xi.

Kotter, J.P., 1995. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail [online] Available at: https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/resources/marketing/docs/95204f2.pdf&gt

La Monica, P. R., 2017. Coca-Cola to cut 1,200 jobs as sales slump. CNNMoney. https://money.cnn.com/2017/04/25/investing/coca-cola-job-cuts-earnings/index.html

Lunenburg, F.C., 2013. ‘Approaches to Managing Organizational Change’ International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity [online] Available at: http://www.nationalforum.com/

McKay, B., and Deogun, N., 1999. After short tenure, Ivester quits as the chairman of Coca-Cola. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB944496345264477011

Retail Asia., 2017. Coca-Cola to restructure company and cut costs. [online] Available at: https://www.retailnews.asia/coca-cola-restructure-company-cut-costs/

Schroeder, J.E., 2010. The artist in brand culture. MARKETING THE ARTS: A FRESH APPROACH, Daragh O’Reilly, Finola Kerrigan, eds., Routledge.

Sindhuja, S., 2017. Organisational change: Meaning, Causes and its process. [online] Available at: https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/notes/management-notes/organisational-change/organisational-change-meaning-causes-and-its-process/9178

Srivastava, S. and Agrawal, S., 2020. Resistance to change and turnover intention: a moderated mediation model of burnout and perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), pp.1431-1447.

Sulistiani, H., Wardani, F. and Sulistyawati, A., 2019, October. Application of Best First Search Method to Search Nearest Business Partner Location (Case Study: PT Coca Cola Amatil Indonesia, Bandar Lampung). In 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE) (pp. 102-106). IEEE.

The Lancet., 2015. Coca-Cola’s funding of health research and partnerships. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)00397-9/fulltext#

University of Minnesota., 2017. 14.3 organizational change – Organizational behavior. [online] Available at: https://open.lib.umn.edu/organizationalbehavior/chapter/14-3-organizational-change/#