The payback period is when it will take the project to return the money invested. The shorter the payback period, the faster the money invested in a project( study smart). It can be calculated based on the average figures. The payback period measures the investment risk, judging the project’s absolute and relative profitability. Additionally, it involves cash flows and capital tied up. If the project has an expected liquidation value estimated with some certainty, it may be helpful to subtract it from the initial investment layout. According to Martina Rohrich,2022, p 20 paybacks calculate cumulative cash flows, summed up until they add to the initial capital investment.
Furthermore, paybacks aid in decision-making. In order to decide whether or not to accept a project, the decision maker has to select the cutoff point in time (Gotiz, 2015, p 42). All projects with a payback time equal to or less than the cutoff period are accepted. The average net cash flows are the significant critical Payback period used to evaluate capital projects and calculate the return per year (Lefley,1996, p 40-55). from the start of the project until the accumulated returns are equal to the cost of the investment, at which time the investment is paid back (Konstantin and Konstantin, 2018 pp 34-39). The method is mainly used in energy audits to evaluate the economic viability of cost-saving measures.
The average rate of return (ARR) is an investment’s annual return (profit), expressed as a percentage of the original sum invested. (Study smart). It combines a profit measure with a capital measure to focus on the return earned on the capital invested (Velnampy, 2005, pp 40-55). Additionally, the annual rate of return is a significant measure of investment worth because it relates the amount of savings or earnings to both the amount of capital employed and to the time this capital is employed/ It can be calculated by: ARR = Total Profit \100 Initial Investment 100 Additionally, the Average rate of payback measures the risk connected with an investment judging the absolute and the relative profitability of the investment project (Gotiz, 2015, p 40). The determination of the average target rate of return is the decision maker’s discretion, and it depends on investment and financing opportunities,
Initial investment. According to Uwe Gotiz, assessing absolute profitability based on total costs is not meaningful if the revenues generated by an investment differ from those generated without the investment. (Velnampy,2005, pp32-60) The initial investments include organizational expenses, the Purchasing cost of land, and equipment—wages and salaries of the workers. Factory maintenance costs Repairing cost of equipment. Such costs determine the level of investment Velnampy; additionally, according to Silvia Stamenova, 2018, pg. 20-64 Investment establishes the amount left after deducting the current liabilities from the current assets. With this, it is easy to ascertain whether the company is operating with losses or profits.
Furthermore, the initial investment determines the long-term economic and profitability of any investment Mostly, the long-run success of a firm depends on excellent investment decisions than on any other factors (Macrothink institute) Majority of firms’ investment decision involves the acquisition of fixed assets, for example, purchase of land, plant, equipment, and building. An effective investment decision is thus essential to help mold the firm’s future opportunities and to deserve a competitive advantage.
Equally important, the Net Present Value is the basic form of all investment appraisal methods, which consider the time value of money by applying to discount and compounding all payment series. (Konstantin & Konstantin 2018, 20-40)). The NPV of an investment is calculated by discounting the time values of all payments during the lifetime of an investment project and adding the cumulative present value of the invested capital. (Konstantin &Konstantin,2018, 21-25) Therefore NPV encourages working hard among staff members to recover the NPV. It implies that the NPV invested in capital must be recovered during the lifetime of the investment, including sufficient compound interest by appropriate returns. An NPV higher than zero means that the rate of return is even higher than the minimum acceptable rate of return. NPV facilitates wealth creation by using existing resources to produce goods and services. Capital budgeting practices as simple or naive capital budgeting practices (such as the payback and accounting rate of return) generally do not use cash flows, do not consider the time value of money, and do not incorporate risk systematically (Macrothink institute). Advanced capital budgeting practices (such as the internal rate of return and the net present value) consider cash flows, risk, and the time value of money. Capital budgeting decision-makers have used various techniques to evaluate the proposed capital investment projects and to determine the ones that benefit the firm the most. The individual determines the adoption of particular techniques rather than others.
An option should be chosen because the internal rate of return of c4 is 10.9% compared to C5, which has 9.5%. According to Investopedia and Fernando, 2022, the higher the internal rate of return, the more desirable an investment can be. The internal rate of return is uniform for investments of varying types and, as such, can be used to rank multiple prospective investments or projects on a relatively consistent basis. When comparing investment options with other similar characteristics, the investment with the highest IRR probably is considered the best. Additionally, it should be chosen because it equates the NPV to zero.
The finance director was confident that the percentage for both of them is at 8% because The Internal rate of return is the discount rate at which the net present value of future cash flows from an investment is equal to zero. ( Investopedia) If the estimated NPV1 is close to zero, the IRR equals R1. The entire equation is set up with the knowledge that NPV equals zero at the IRR. This relationship is critical to understanding the IRR. It links the present value of money and the future value of money for a given investment.
References
Adler, R.W., 2000. Strategic investment decision appraisal techniques: the old and the new. Business Horizons, 43(6), pp.15-15.
Andres W, (2003) Evaluating real options as a means for investment appraisal under uncertainty and its degree of Utilization by companies Amazon.com, 2003
Broyles, J. and Franks, J., 1976. Capital project appraisal: a modern approach. Managerial Finance, 2(2), pp.85-96.
Capital investment appraisal of advanced manufacturing technology. The International Journal of Production Research, 32(12), pp.2751-2776.
Collier, P. and Gregory, A., 1995. Investment appraisal in service industries: a field study analysis of the U.K. hotels sector. Management Accounting Research, 6(1), pp.33-57.
Damodaran, A., 2012. Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & Sons.
De Reyck, B., Degraeve, Z. and Vandenborre, R., 2008. Project options valuation with net present value and decision tree analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), pp.341-355.
Dessureault, S., 1999. Capital investment appraisal for advanced mining technology: case studies in GPS and information-based surface mining technology (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
Don, D, Richard, I, Harrison, S, Hebron, J & Rowland, P(2002) Capital Budgeting: Financial Appraisal of Investment Projects Cambridge University Press
Götze, U., Northcott, D. and Schuster, P., 2008. Investment appraisal. Methods and models, 2.
Grzeszczyk, T.A. and Waszkiewicz, M., 2020. Sustainable investment project evaluation. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 7(3), p.2363.
Haka, S.F., 2006. A review of the literature on capital budgeting and investment appraisal: Past, present, Savvides, S., 1994. Risk analysis in investment appraisal. Project Appraisal, 9(1), pp.3-18.and future musings. Handbooks of management accounting research, 2, pp.697-728.
Hallikainen, P., Hu, Q., Frisk, E., Päivärinta, T., Eikebrokk, T. and Nurmi, A., 2006. The use of formal I.T. investment evaluation methods in organizations: A survey of European countries. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj4rJCVwpj9AhWGR8AKHewoBacQFnoECDMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.macrothink.org%2Fjournal%2Findex.php%2Fajfa%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F12229%2F9813&usg=AOvVaw08_tRVfXK3eS-oExFs5BUm
Huikku, J., 2008. Managerial uses of post-completion auditing of capital investments. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 57(2), pp.139-164. Gilbert, E., 2005.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Rule: Definition and Example (investopedia.com)
Konstantin, P., Konstantin, M., Konstantin, P. and Konstantin, M., 2018. Investment appraisal methods. Power and Energy Systems Engineering Economics: Best Practice Manual, pp.39-64.
Laird, J.J. and Venables, A.J., 2017. Transport investment and economic performance: A framework for project appraisal. Transport policy, 56, pp.1-11.
Lefley, F., 1996. The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44(3), pp.207-224.
Longmore, D.R., 1989. The persistence of the Payback Method: a time-adjusted decision rule perspective. The Engineering Economist, 34(3), pp.185-194.
Martina, R,(2010)Fundamentals of Investment Appraisal: An Illustration based on a Case Study, Oldenbourg Verlag
Myers, S.C., 1974. Interactions of corporate financing and investment decisions-implications for capital budgeting. The Journal of Finance, 29(1), pp.1-25.
Sandeep Goel, S, (2015) capital Investment Business Expert Press
Shao, L.P., 1994. Capital investment evaluation procedures utilized by North and Latin American affiliates. Multinational business review, 2(1), p.11.
Shillinglaw, G., 1959. Managing capital expenditures: Appraisal of specific proposals. The Engineering Economist, 4(3), pp.1-21.
Stamenova, S (2018) Capital budgeting and alternative investment options. Working capital management GRIN VerlagAmazon.com
Turner, M.J. and Coote, L.V., 2018. Incentives and monitoring impact the financial and non-financial orientation of capital budgeting—Meditari accountancy research.
Uwe Götze, Northcott, D & Peter (2015) Investment Appraisal: Methods and Models 2nd Edition Spring shop
Velnampy, T., 2005. A study on investment appraisal and profitability. Journal of Business Studies, 2(1), pp.23-35.
Wright, M. and Robbie, K., 1996. Venture capitalists, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 26(2), pp.153-168. Chan, F.T.S., Chan, M.H., Lau, H. and Ip, R.W.L., 2001. Investment appraisal techniques for advanced manufacturing technology (AMT): a literature review. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(1), pp.35-47.
Wright, M. and Robbie, K., 1996. Venture capitalists, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 26(2), pp.153-168. www.studymart.com
Ye, S. and Tiong, R.L., 2000. NPV-at-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 126(3), pp.227-233.
write