Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Analysis of the Canadian Federal Government Response on Policies During COVID-19


Canada is viewed as having a far wider geographical area than it actually has. It has more defined authority divisions between administrative and common states, with regions overseeing the great majority of public administrations, including health care. Canada’s governance ranges from completely centralised rule over neighbouring nations such as France to broad provincial sovereignty exercised within the country. This also means that the Federal Government of Canada is dependent on the Federal parliamentary majority rules system, which is administered by a protected government. Its Regional Organization is divided into 13 distinct areas. Ten provinces are handled under sovereign authority in intrinsically contiguous territories, whereas three domains are directly dependent on the federal level.

The figures in the preceding part reveal that Canada has considerable exceptional degrees of medical care labour force, framework, and usefulness inside their respective medical service frameworks. Each country’s specific vision of its medical services scene is shaped by its own administration and population characteristics. These are key determinants that determine the accessible strategic activities and demands of their respective legislators, as the Covid-19 pandemic has made plainly clear. In compared to nations in “la Francophonie,” the global association for the French language, such as France and Belgium, which have promoted typically close financial and discretionary ties (Sonntag, 2003), Canada provides the most comprehensive medical care to its citizens. However, the administrations covered vary significantly, and Canada’s framework stands out among these nations as a result of the influence of the mid-2000s SARS outbreak and the subsequent redesign of some of its designs.

Health system, Data availability and transparency and Policies response

For a few unique nations, public health organisations have proactively began distributing profoundly specified weekly reports for each place and providing daily updates to the general public on critical measures such as case counts, hospitalizations, and deaths. Surprisingly, several nations, such as France, began to distinguish between deaths in long-term care homes and deaths in clinics, signalling the need for more grounded initiatives to keep up with and share correct information about the pandemic.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, accessibility and clarity of information were important in establishing the pandemic’s severity. To increase transparency, nations rely on institutional structures and legislation governing the exchange and absorption of health data. It enabled government scientists and hospitals to proceed rapidly and without legal stumbling obstacles toward publishing public information and regulatory reporting on COVID instances. For instance, the French government invoked public authority and implemented the “Open Data Policy” (Marian, 2013), which requires the public disclosure of medical clinic information beginning in late March, albeit within the context of the present situation of Health Emergency declared in March (Breton et al., 2021)

In stark contrast to France, data executives’ efforts in Canada were greatly hampered by the Federal Government’s overall healthcare structure being significantly inferior to that of their common partners. The Federal Government supplied the key web dashboard with fundamental measurements such as case numbers on a regular basis, but public level epidemiological data remained significantly harmed by delay, with no improvement until late June (McMahon et al., 2020). For instance, on May 25th, Canada had confirmed 85 679 instances of Covid-19, but the Federal Government had complete information on only 40 660 of those cases. 2021) (Beaulieu, Genesse, and St-Martin). The independence of their regional strategy structures can be attributed to a large portion of the public’s ineffectiveness in revealing information; where the federal government is directed to rely on common health specialists to report information and bureaucratic offices generally have limited general health capabilities.

Even though regional variances were large, provincial government information was significantly more reliable. While certain territories with moderately high case counts took predictable steps to improve information accessibility, the hardest-hit region of Québec began disseminating official data only in May, following pressure from academics who organised a mission to gather additional data to aid in directing public strategy (Adeel et al., 2020). This delay was worsened by the Institut de la Statistique du Québec’s (ISQ) long-standing practise of postponing official confirmation of mortality information until two years after a death, severely impairing the region’s ability to work with cutting-edge data.

In Canada, the policy response was considerably more evident, with the federal government in charge of monetary and fiscal policies and the provinces in charge of the vast bulk of general health initiatives. This drove localities to establish social constraints on a variety of timelines and implement a variety of measures, despite the fact that their activities generally tracked the rising curve of new contaminations and got more serious as case numbers climbed. Greater contrasts between common activities emerged as state-run administrations eased restrictions; Cololombie-Britannique (BC) had the option to begin financial re-opening due to their overall success in containing the infection, whereas Ontario and Québec regions struggled to implement unequivocal re-opening policies due to their ongoing battle against local episodes and new cases in long-haul care offices (Alami et al., 2021).

While provinces attempted to contain transmission within their borders, the federal government gradually increased the severity of line control measures, and the region of Québec implemented them exclusively between common line terminations, eventually resulting in severe restrictions on voyagers from all nations and a mandatory 14-day quarantine for all appearances. These moves first exonerated the United States, which proved to be an expensive choice given that the majority of Canadian Covid-19 cases acquired by explorers originated in the United States.

Economic Overview And Economic Policy Response 

Canada imposed severe strategy restrictions on daily life in order to contain the spread of the infection; these restrictions, of course, would have a negative impact on their respective economies. Concerns about their financial security compelled their states to enact extraordinary financial assistance packages to assist individuals and organisations. Financial considerations were also a significant factor in resuming procedures, as legislators were under increasing pressure to relax restrictions regardless of the epidemiological situation.

In Canada, the federal government found a way to carry out public financial arrangements, whereas the provinces reacted more ambiguously. The federal government’s primary objective with its guide bundle was to boost GDP by 5.5 percent through direct assistance to families and businesses, which included wage subsidies and expanded tax cuts (Desson et al., 2020). The most notable component of this package was the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), which provided a monthly cash payment of CAD $2000 to individuals who were unable to work due to the pandemic. Unlike France, the Canadian government chose to extend the CERB for a longer period than originally planned. June gradually shifted away from the date in order to aid in a faster financial recovery.

Reduced family consumption and contracting GDP were also likely to increase government obligations as duty pay decreased, especially given that low consumer confidence in the economy’s eventual fate is a feature of every country. According to McKinsey, 80% of Canadians surveyed were pessimistic or uncertain about the future prospects of the economy. Despite the fact that this figure is based on the highest household tax to gross domestic product ratio (Azad, Serletis and Xu, 2021). There is little evidence that the country’s GDP declines will be reversed by a customer-driven recovery. Financial policy in Europe offers policymakers almost nothing, because the key loan cost was zero at the time. In any case, Canada, where a significant portion of household taxes is supported by land, had the option of responding through Monetary Policy by lowering the key revenue rate (Azad, Serletis and Xu, 2021). However, levying a duty on land when macroeconomic factors cause prices to fall is unlikely to increase family certainty.

In accordance with Monetary Policy and in light of COVID-19’s monetary effects, monetary establishments significantly reduced their financing costs to 0.25 percent in order to facilitate financial action (Wei and Han, 2021). These actions benefit buyers and businesses throughout the economy by lowering interest rates on existing and new loans. Second, these organisations have been authorised to purchase securities and other obligations in order to assist in maintaining the operation of critical subsidising markets (Cavallino and De Fiore, 2020). In response to the pandemic, the Bank of Canada slashed its current target rate to its powerful lower bound and extended its monetary record at a record pace. Its resource purchases aided in the stabilisation of monetary business sectors by increasing liquidity and narrowing yield spreads. The disadvantage of its activities is that it has expanded beyond its traditional transmits of financial arrangement and loan specialist after all other options have been exhausted in order to participate in credit designation (Robertson, 2021). This includes purchasing public and private obligation of various types, assuming on praise and political wager, and debilitating business sector signs of relative peril. Nonetheless, the Bank’s adaptable expansion targeting system enables it to devote attention in the short run to auxiliary objectives such as adjusting the “yield gap” between actual and potential financial results.

To accommodate Canadians who may have been impacted by the COVID-19 episode, the Canada Revenue Agency devised a method that allowed residents to postpone the filing deadline for 2019 expense forms for individuals, including specific trusts. The Canada Revenue Agency granted all citizens the ability to defer payment of any annual assessment sums due on or after today and before September 2020 until August 2020. (2020, Pinshi). This relief would apply to burden debts that must be paid as well as certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code under Part I. No interest or penalties may be assessed on these sums during this time period (Hsu et al., 2020). To alleviate the need for citizens and duty preparers to meet face to face during this trying time, and to lighten managerial burdens, the Canada Revenue Agency has now permitted strategy exclusions for electronic marks that met the Income Tax Act’s mark prerequisites (Béland et al., 2021)

The Canada Revenue Agency modified an Outreach Program to assist individuals during COVID-19. The Canada Revenue Agency provided this assistance in order to assist individuals in meeting their tax obligations and claiming all available benefits and credits. Previously available only in person, this assistance is now available via phone and, in some cases, online. As a result, the Canada Revenue Agency fully anticipated that numerous neighbourhood associations would consider reducing or discontinuing administrations provided through the Community Volunteer Income Tax Program. Additional efforts will be made to encourage individuals to submit expense and benefit returns electronically or, where possible, via the File My Return administration.

In this instance, I believe that the issue is not so much with the policies and measures as it is with the implementation. As a result of the Canadian government’s similar behaviour during this interaction. However, being decentralised enabled a few areas to rapidly assemble their testing limits, despite the fact that this was done primarily to address a lack of public foundation, which may have contributed to the inconsistent epidemiological achievement across regions. The decentralised framework with sufficient overt repetition is impervious to point disappointments, as occurred during Canada’s administration. That is one of the reasons why arrangements regarding lockdown and medical services were largely appropriated by various neighbourhood pioneers. In general, disappointments will be few and far between. Disappointments of sufficient magnitude can disperse the difficulty over a larger area. Despite the fact that decentralisation is the optimal solution for resolving crises such as health crises and changes in government strategy. Centralization enables rapid decision-making by a single individual who is ultimately accountable for everything. Decentralization was a significant legislative construct that hampered the Federal Government’s asset circulation and strategy execution.


Adeel, A. B., Catalano, M., Catalano, O., Gibson, G., Muftuoglu, E., Riggs, T., … & Zhirnov, A. (2020). COVID-19 policy response and the rise of the sub-national governments. Canadian Public Policy46(4), 565-584.

Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Fleet, R., Fortin, J. P., Liu, J., Attieh, R., … & Ag Ahmed, M. A. (2021). How can health systems better prepare for the next pandemic? lessons learned from the management of COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada). Frontiers in Public Health9, 696.

Azad, N. F., Serletis, A., & Xu, L. (2021). Covid-19 and monetary–fiscal policy interactions in Canada. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance81, 376-384.

Beaulieu, M., Genesse, J. C., & St-Martin, K. (2021). High death rate of older persons from COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada) long-term care facilities: chronology and analysis. The Journal of Adult Protection.

Béland, D., Dinan, S., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2021). Social policy responses to COVID‐19 in Canada and the United States: Explaining policy variations between two liberal welfare state regimes. Social Policy & Administration55(2), 280-294.

Cavallino, P., & De Fiore, F. (2020). Central banks’ response to Covid-19 in advanced economies. BIS Bulletin21(June).

Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. Retreived March 15, 2022. publications/the-world-factbook/docs/one_page_summaries.html

Cheung, C., Lyons, J., Madsen, B., Miller, S., & Sheikh, S. (2021). The Bank of Canada COVID‑19 stringency index: measuring policy response across provinces (No. 2021-1). Bank of Canada.

Bignami, S. (2021). The Burden of COVID-19 in Canada. Canadian studies in population48(2), 123-129.

Breton, M., Sullivan, E. E., Deville-Stoetzel, N., McKinstry, D., DePuccio, M., Sriharan, A., … & McAlearney, A. S. (2021). Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts. BMC family practice22(1), 1-13.

Desson, Z., Weller, E., McMeekin, P., & Ammi, M. (2020). An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada. Health Policy and Technology9(4), 430-446.

Hsu, A. T., Lane, N., Sinha, S. K., Dunning, J., Dhuper, M., Kahiel, Z., & Sveistrup, H. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on residents of Canada’s long-term care homes–ongoing challenges and policy response. International Long-Term Care Policy Network17, 1-18.

Marian, M. (2013). Open access policy of France: Open access to scientific publications and research data:” The scientific information is a common good that must be available for all”(Geneviève Fioraso). 10442/13573, 00-18.

McMahon, M., Nadigel, J., Thompson, E., & Glazier, R. H. (2020). Informing Canada’s health system response to COVID-19: priorities for health services and policy research. Healthcare Policy16(1), 112.

Pinshi, C. P. (2020). Monetary policy, uncertainty and COVID-19. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences (JAES)15(69), 579-593.

Public Health Agency of Canada, Epidemiological summary of COVID19 cases in Canada.. AEM. (2020). Retrieved 15 March 2022, from epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html

Robertson, K. (2021). Public Debt–Balloon or Anchor? A Macroeconomic Case Study of Canada’s Fiscal and Monetary Policy Response to COVID-19. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting10(1), 1-7.

Sonntag, S. K. (2003). The local politics of global English: Case studies in linguistic globalization. Lexington Books.

Wei, X., & Han, L. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transmission of monetary policy to financial markets. International Review of Financial Analysis74, 101705.


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics