Introduction
Communities have some mutability concerning the handling of older subjects in highlighting cultural beliefs, various levels of health care systems, and social frameworks. This paper strives to identify and compare how the elderly are provided with equal treatment in the United States, Japan, and China. Although each country is accompanied by various specific elements of culture and socio-economic aspects, unearthing the overlaps and dissimilarities regarding the elders’ treatment sheds light on cross-border issues as well as opportunities related to an ageing population.
United States: If to speak about the USA, old people’s care is somehow shaped by all these backgrounds – individualism, cultural differences, and an assortment of healthcare systems. The ageing old people in America have a huge respect for them because they provide great insight and analysis toward their lives as well as challenges such as ageism and allegations of social isolation. In the U.S., there is well-developed medicine, which has advanced approaches and several types of treatment displayed that no revolutionary therapies have been introduced by medical practitioners across the world to deal with ageing. Though these differences in ageing may be overlooked, there are factors like economic inequality lack of social safety nets, and the variance in healthcare quality that can lead to different experiences for people growing old.
Japan: It is in the treatment of its old population that Japan stands out with a method to is different from what other countries practice because of the high regard for parents and elderly people. The elderly from same in Japan are commonly adopted into family setups and there is a certain culture that entails taking care of their older relatives by younger generations (van Willigen, & Lewis, 2018). These are all supportive both within the family and the advanced healthcare system which promotes mostly a positive attitude towards ageing. The Japanese Government also has policies that it uses to encourage people to engage in active ageing to maintain ties within societies as well as economic activities.
China: China is a country with strong Confucian beliefs, and most of the ordinary population believes that older people are important because they bring good luck. It is difficult to decide without the consent of elders because this culture does not make parents neglect their children as they grow into adults. Nevertheless, economic growth and the development of cities saw to it that there emerged diversiform forms of families leaving a gap in their elders. These factors pose significant challenges for the Chinese government which has put into place measures such as nursing homes and community care options treating an uncomplicated effort of modern values that influence society (Feng, et al., 2014).
Comparative Analysis:
During a comparative analysis of the treatment that most invalid patients are given in these countries above common issues emanate. First of all, cultural background provides a major source for diverse attitudes towards ageing. The next difference that can be observed when comparing family in the US, China, and Japan is that China as well as Japan tends to have a more emotionally intricate connection between older people and their families whereas such practice is not quite common for Americans. Besides, healthcare systems are vital aspects as access to treatment and the quality of such services directly influence the welfare of senior citizens.
Economic agents also act as a source of different life choices. Differences in economic level may determine unequal resource allocation among ageing groups with the US being an example of how differences in socioeconomic status affect older people while Japan and China are cultures whereby social safety nets play a bigger role, but the economy may not influence the situation equal distributions.
Conclusion:
In closing, the older population is far more treated along cultural backgrounds that have been highly affected by conditions of health care systems and structures in societies. Although each country has its distinct style, several issues can be highlighted in this article including the changed perception of conventional families’ role along with balancing cultural integrity together with modernization. By comprehending such dynamics it becomes possible for policy-makers and societies to act on creating environments that respect the life, age wellness, and dignity of eldership while promoting a global sense of geriatric care where age wisdom counts.
References
Feng, Z., Guan, X., Feng, X., Liu, C., ZHAN, H. J., & Mor, V. (2014). 15 Long-term care in China: reining in market forces through regulatory oversight. Regulating long-term care quality: an international comparison, 409. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163720303093
van Willigen, J., & Lewis, D. C. (2018). Culture as the context of ageing. In Handbook of Asian aging (pp. 117-144). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315224503-5/culture-context-aging-john-van-willigen-denise-lewis
write