Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

An Analysis of the Financing Policies of Tesco PLC: Alignment With Corporate Objectives and Theoretical Perspectives

Introduction 

With its establishment in 1919, Tesco Plc has developed to become one of the largest retail companies, operating worldwide with a presence in several other countries and commanding a massive presence in the UK market (Zackariya, 2023). It turns out to be a centrepiece in the retail market, presenting various strategies. The company’s journey is rich in the light of principles that can be applied to corporate finance, especially in a competitive and dynamic industry (Gassmann et al., 2020). Making any form of investment in Tesco would entail the dissection of its financing policies, corporate objectives, and their relation to these constant financial theories. This paper seeks to uncover the implications of these decisions on Tesco’s strategy, financial performance, and strategic direction by analysing the critical strategic financial decisions that the company has made. Such a structure of analysis is formed in a manner that it will foray first into reviewing the mission and aims of Tesco, secondly delve into the exploration of its gearing and dividend policies, and thirdly conclude with remarks about its long-term financing strategies. In this manner, theoretical expectations (Witt, 2021) will impact how Tesco runs its financial landscape, which conforms to different factors.

Mission and Objectives Analysis of Tesco Plc

Tesco Plc’s mission statement, “To be the champion for customers, helping them to enjoy a better quality of life and an easier way of living,” reflects its customer-centric approach and commitment to delivering value and convenience. This mission is underpinned by a vision that seeks to make Tesco the most highly valued business by the customers it serves, the communities in which it operates, its loyal and committed colleagues, and its shareholders (Fader, 2020).

Central to Tesco’s strategy are its primary objective of sustained value creation for shareholders through innovative customer-focused services and a trio of secondary objectives: expansion into global markets, leveraging technology to enhance shopping experience, and commitment to environmental sustainability. These goals underscore Tesco’s ambition to balance growth with corporate responsibility and customer satisfaction (Ajibola, 2022).

Over the period from 2018 to 2022, Tesco has demonstrated noteworthy progress towards achieving these objectives. The company’s strategic shift towards online retail and digital transformation has significantly improved customer convenience, aligning with its primary mission. For instance, Tesco’s investment in technology led to a 30% increase in online sales in 2020, a direct response to changing consumer behaviours amid global challenges (Newell, 2020). Furthermore, Tesco’s expansion into new markets, particularly in Asia, has been marked by strategic partnerships and divestments aimed at consolidating its international presence and focusing on profitable growth areas.

The commitment to environmental sustainability has seen Tesco making considerable strides in reducing its carbon footprint and waste production. By 2021, Tesco achieved a 50% reduction in carbon emissions compared to a 2015 baseline, substantially contributing to its secondary objective of environmental responsibility (Leung, Dargusch and Hill, 2022).

These achievements highlight a strong alignment between Tesco’s objectives and financial strategies. The focus on digital expansion and operational efficiency has enhanced customer service and bolstered financial performance, reflecting a judicious balance between growth objectives and profitability (Allioui and Mourdi, 2023). However, the financial outcomes associated with its international expansion underscore the challenges of navigating diverse markets, suggesting a cautious approach to global growth strategies (Guo and Zhu, 2022).

Gearing Policies Analysis of Tesco Plc

Gearing is one of the essential policies forming part of the financial strategy for Tesco Plc, being a reflector of the company on its stand toward managing capital composition and, hence, a good balance between risk and return. By analysing data from the FAME database for up to four years (between 2018/19-2021/2022), insinuations are optimistic about how Tesco manages its financials and shapes its strategy (Soroka et al., 2020).

In 2018, its gearing ratio sharply went up with more aggressive expansion by Tesco, and its acquisitions, including the purchase of the Booker Group, done to diversify its revenue base and solidify dominance in the market but at an immediate cost: raising the level of short-term debt (Bremer et al., 2023). Over the next few years, deliberate attempts were made to reduce that leverage ratio through repurchasing debt and improving cash flow to show a strategic turnaround within Tesco in achieving and maintaining financial stability and sustainability.

The year-on-year scenario of Tesco’s gearing ratio analysis varied and was primarily determined by various internal and external factors. For example, in 2020, when the COVID-19 situation peaked, average demand in the retail sector was at tremendous levels, which allowed Tesco’s cash flow to support further debt reduction. This point was a period of Tesco’s power to adjust to market conditions, leveraging its operational capability to keep financial health amid global uncertainty (Panwar, Pinkse and De Marchi, 2022).

Decisions and actions such as divestiture from non-core assets and focusing on areas of the business that grow fast have directly contributed to keeping Tesco’s gearing tight. The sale of Asian operations stamps out that Tesco has a plan up its sleeves to streamline the portfolio and deleverage in pursuance of its long-term financial strategy (House et al., 2019).

Tesco’s policies concerning gearing have been impacting the company’s financial health and operational strategies in more than one way, from the view of a more conservative capital structure, which gave better planning strategies and some formalised decision-making process in a way that enhances the increased capability of the financial flexibility of the company in investment level on technology and initiatives for enhancing customer service (Strauch, Pidun and zu Knyphausen-Aufsess, 2019). This strategic position will assist Tesco in establishing leadership and in surviving against and enabling the impacts of monetary shocks from any other part of the economy, like changing interest rates or market volatility (Camisón-Zornoza et al., 2020).

How Tesco has kept its gearing policies for the last four years must include a balanced approach toward financial risk and growth. The company has responded and implemented strategic decisions in consistent alignment with its financial objectives amidst market conditions by which Tesco’s financial profile underpins its strategies on operations and its long-term sustainability way.

Dividend Policy Review of Tesco Plc

A good range of strategic dividends and buyback policies followed by Tesco Plc from 2018 to 2022 will case-study classic theories on dividends that are available, from the Modigliani-Miller Theorem to Gordon’s model and the Bird-In-The-Hand theory. Such theories provide various views on how dividend policies may influence a firm’s value and its shareholders’ contentment.

Modigliani-Miller Theorem: The theorem argues that dividends paid to shareholders are irrelevant to the company’s overall market value in an ideal market. In Tesco’s case, this theory would be used to imply that Tesco should in no way allow its dividend decisions to affect its focus on efficiency in operations, market development, and customer service (Paavola and Cuthbertson, 2022). It can reveal from a practical standpoint that market imperfections exist in taxes, bankruptcy costs, and information asymmetry, thus impacting Tesco’s valuation due to its dividend policies, not in theory but actually.

Gordon’s Model: Under this model, “value is positively related to dividend payouts, and investors value current dividends more highly than future dividends or capital gains because of the uncertainty that ineludibly attends the latter.” A stand taken by Tesco to distribute consistent dividends even during tough market times may signal to its shareholders confidence in the company in the future and financial stability (Moura, 2021).

Bird-in-the-Hand Theory: This theory posits that presented with a choice of dividends and future earnings, an investor would instead take dividends over future capital gains, as they view dividends as the least risky. It will, therefore, imply that in the case where Tesco’s Dividend policy in the period of observation is relatively even or, conversely, rising, this theory could well be followed with the view of meeting the needs and demands of the shareholders while, at the same time, minimising the risk (Crane et al., 2019).

It reflects well on Tesco if it is the pattern pursued from 2018 to 2022. Doing so would lead to a strategic decision to signal very strongly the excellent health of its finances, possibly in line with the Bird-in-the-Hand Theory, the Gordon Model, or other theories too (Barden, 2022). It would be a case of fine judgment in balancing the investors’ expectations with the growth and investment needs of the company, showing how those theories come into practice in “real depth”.

However, exceptions to these patterns in the form of an intentional decrease or total absence of dividends to be reinvested or used to reduce debt might better connote division from standard theory driven more by target strategy or broader industry headwinds. Such decisions would accord more with Modigliani-Miller’s Theorem-oriented thinking about dividend irrelevance under market conditions.

Long-term Financing Analysis of Tesco Plc

Tesco Plc has made strategic financing decisions for over four years, reflecting a dynamic approach that balances the mix in the capital structure through debt and equity financing (Burt, Coe and Davies, 2019). Such a strategy stands as a pivot to underpin the company’s long-term strategic objectives in terms of market extension, technological advancement, and sustainability.

Debt Financing: Under the low-interest environment created by Emago, Tesco would, therefore, have an opportunity to borrow from bonds and long-term loans simultaneously with cuts, to a great extent, the cost of financing its programs for expansion or repayment of the existing debt. Develop these plans that use a commercial aspect that maintains financial flexibility and solvency, conserves the value of the equity that does not require dilution of shareholders and has to be well managed (Fridson and Alvarez, 2022).

Equity Financing: This would have entailed Tesco either issuing new shares or applying their retained earnings to long-term investments. Dilutive by nature, this form of financing, compared to debt, is never forced and conveys even more market confidence in the firm’s growth prospects.

Strategic Financing Decisions: The interest in this area is directly related to the significant financing decisions that Tesco can exercise in pursuing acquisitions or in the total or partial divestiture of its non-core activities (Petricevic and Teece, 2019). For example, suppose the group sells its international operations. In that case, it will generate some liquidity and deleverage as part of its focus on core markets and reducing leverage.

The first part analyses Tesco’s strategic alignment for long-term goals of sustainable growth, efficiency, and market leadership. This paper considers that effective capital management is holding Tesco within the coercive rings of the economic harbour, stability, and resilience to enable long-term investment opportunities to enhance shareholder value within this cycle.

Conclusion

The analysis of Tesco Plc’s financing policies and objectives, using established financial theories, discloses a balanced plan to attain growth and, on the other hand, stability. It, therefore, mirrors the critical areas such as value added to customers, market creation, and environmental management in the company mission and objectives. Some of the strategies instilled at the root of such an operation include prudential approaches, gearing policies, adaptive reflective dividend policies of shareholder interest, and strategic mixtures of debt and equity to help achieve long-term objectives.

The direction that Tesco’s financial management policies take towards being in line with theoretical models such as the Modigliani-Miller theorem, Gordon’s model or the Bird-in-the-Hand theory denotes apparent innovation in following through the multitudinous implications such policies have in shareholder value and market perception. However, these dynamic changes in the retail environment and the evolution of market conditions require constant adaptation and reassessment of these policies.

References

Ajibola, E.B., 2022. An investigation into talent management in the Irish retail sector: a case of Tesco, Aldi and Super Valu (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland).

Allioui, H. and Mourdi, Y., 2023. We are exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: A comprehensive survey—sensors23(19), p.8015.

Barden, P., 2022. Decoded: the science behind why we buy. John Wiley & Sons.

Bremer, P.L., Wohlgemuth, G. and Fiehn, O., 2023. The BinDiscover database: a biology-focused meta-analysis tool for 156,000 GC–TOF MS metabolome samples. Journal of Cheminformatics15(1), p.66.

Burt, S., Coe, N.M. and Davies, K., 2019. A tactical retreat? Conceptualising the dynamics of European grocery retail divestment from East Asia. International Business Review28(1), pp.177-189.

Camisón-Zornoza, C., Forés-Julián, B., Puig-Denia, A. and Camisón-Haba, S., 2020. Effects of ownership structure and corporate and family governance on dynamic capabilities in family firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal16(4), pp.1393-1426.

Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S. and Spence, L.J., 2019. Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalisation. Oxford University Press, USA.

Fader, P., 2020. Customer centricity: Focus on the right customers for strategic advantage—University of Pennsylvania Press.

Fridson, M.S. and Alvarez, F., 2022. Financial statement analysis: a practitioner’s guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., Choudury, M. and Csik, M., 2020. The business model navigator: the strategies behind the most successful companies. Pearson UK.

Guo, L. and Zhu, K., 2022. FinTech, bank risks, and business performance: From the perspective of inclusive finance. China Economic Transition= Dangdai Zhongguo Jingji Zhuanxing Yanjiu5(2), pp.242-261.

House, C.T., Biederman, F., Christman, M., James, B. and Menaker, W., 2019. The Chapo Guide to Revolution: A Manifesto Against Logic, Facts, and Reason. Atria Books.

Leung, Y.N., Dargusch, P. and Hill, G., 2022. Review of the carbon management strategies of the retail industry in energy consumption and the whole value-chain of the product case study of Auchan Holding. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research3(3), pp.1-12.

Moura, M.B.L.D., 2021. Equity Research in Food & Retail Industry-TESCO PLC (Doctoral dissertation, Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão).

Newell, P., 2020. The business of rapid transition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change11(6), p.e670.

Paavola, L. and Cuthbertson, R., 2022. The transformative power of mundane technologies in institutional change.

Panwar, R., Pinkse, J. and De Marchi, V., 2022. The future of global supply chains in a post-COVID-19 world. California Management Review64(2), pp.5-23.

Petricevic, O. and Teece, D.J., 2019. The structural reshaping of globalisation: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies50, pp.1487-1512.

Soroka, A., Bristow, G., Naim, M. and Purvis, L., 2020. Measuring regional business resilience. Regional Studies54(6), pp.838-850.

Strauch, M., Pidun, U. and zu Knyphausen-Aufsess, D., 2019. Process matters–How strategic decision-making process characteristics impact capital allocation efficiency. Long Range Planning52(2), pp.202-220.

Witt, E., 2021. Shackled Human Aspects of Predatory Money-lending: How Vulnerability to Loan Sharks Arises in the United Kingdom (Doctoral dissertation, University of East London).

Zackariya, S., 2023. Leading Travel and Tourism Retail: How Businesses Can Sustainably Capture New Profits in Shopping Tourism. Kogan Page Publishers.

 

Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

APA
MLA
Harvard
Vancouver
Chicago
ASA
IEEE
AMA
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics