Introduction
Communications are now a critical component of many businesses’ ability to stay in business, yet the infrastructure and technologies that make this possible are often overlooked. An agile data transfer and an infrastructure that enables it are required by all service providers. For this reason, the company’s headquarters, regional offices, and data centre must be all linked since the company’s consumers must receive services that are always available. A new technology known as SDWAN is being used to connect all of the company’s locations, whereas private networks are typically established and managed by external service providers. As a result of this technology’s innovation, return on investment, and other perks, more organizations are willing to invest in it to reap the benefits (Badotra & Panda, 2020).
Corporations have relied on Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) for WAN connectivity across different locations, but this research intends to provide SDWAN as a new technical option (MPLS). The most widely used communication protocol in the technology industry is MPLS, and service providers utilize it to link numerous locations of their clients. A relatively new technology, SDWAN, has only been around for a few years and is now being utilized by many businesses.
The fact that many businesses are afraid to experiment with new technologies or renovate their facilities should be emphasized. As a result, this study focuses on the operational benefits of SDWAN technology, which are studied at the deployment level of software-defined network solutions. The software-defined networking system has many other advantages, such as increased scalability and reduced costs. The purpose of this article, then, is to examine the operational, technical, and economic advantages of SDWAN and compare it to existing technologies.
Review of the current technology MPLS
The MLPS was the traditional WAN before the SDWA was invented. There is a protocol known as MPLS, or Multi-Protocol Label Switching, which operates between OSI layers 2 and 3. The first IETF draft was released in 1997 (IETF Tools, 1997), and it immediately became popular in the years that followed. The name “multi-protocol” refers to the fact that this method may be used with various protocols and links (e.g. Ethernet, Frame Relay, ATM). Packets are labelled according to established pathways, allowing them to be routed swiftly and effectively over MPLS. MPLS’s quality of service (QoS) is largely responsible for its success. The Provider Edges of MPLS providers allow their customers to access a private network (PE). As a result, the latter are strategically located to cover all entry and exit points. The MPLS service provider owns and controls this network entirely on its own. Even though several customers may use this private network’s infrastructure simultaneously, the service provider can accurately monitor traffic and avoid oversubscription. In particular, the agreed-upon SLA shall be guaranteed.
Additionally, MPLS can prioritize VoIP traffic (Alwayn, 2001). The MPLS dependability was 99.81% in Nemertes worldwide research for 3Q18. An organization’s annual downtime is measured using this criterion for reliability: With a 99.81% uptime, that is 16h39min of downtime! (Luciani, 2019).
Because of this, MPLS is widely used in corporate networks and is preferred over the internet because of its high level of dependability. About 80% of firms utilize a private WAN (predominantly MPLS, but occasionally also Point-to-Point): 42% use only a private WAN, and 37% use both a private WAN and the internet at the same time (Nemertes, 2020).
MPLS technology has a number of drawbacks, including high costs, guest freedom, and a lack of control. In light of these disadvantages, the majority of businesses today make use of a hybrid wide area network (WAN) (WAN). The kind of data traffic and performance requirements, such as bandwidth, latency, and latency, guide the selection of the WAN connections for each branch. High expenses and difficulty in self-management persist despite the system’s increased flexibility. Additionally, new ideas have emerged in networks, such as SD-WAN: Software-Defined Wide Area Network. SDN (Software-Defined Network) and NFV (Network Function Virtualization) are the most important.
How SD-WAN Technology Works
In order to facilitate communication between locations, SDWAN establishes a logical infrastructure that operates on physical infrastructure and allows data to flow fluidly from the point of origin to the point of destination. The control plane manages the network’s device configurations, such as policies and routing information.
A cloud network, virtual services, orchestration, and analytics comprise the three main tiers of this system’s architecture. It is possible to create an overlay network that can communicate over private and public IP infrastructures using the cloud network layer. It is designed to facilitate communication between remote locations and cloud-based applications and services. The cloud network layer’s emphasis on security should not be underestimated (Uppal, Woo, & Pitt, 2015). Because SD-WAN relies on the public internet as a transport network, it must be secure to function. SD-WAN
The “overlay” in SD-WANs is an encrypted tunnel that connects locations. An SD-WAN device is installed at each location. Once the devices are linked to the local networks, custom-defined configuration and traffic regulations are downloaded, and tunnels are established, depending on the architecture.
The SD-WAN handles routing and traffic control. Application rules and current traffic circumstances guide the routing of outbound traffic. The SD-WAN device instantly switches to a backup connection when a last-mile connection breaks and manages traffic load according to pre-configured settings.
As a result, SD-policy-based WAN management is an essential part. Traffic will be steered by the priority level assigned to it, such as quality of service (QoS), under a dynamic path selection policy. VoIP and other interactive services may benefit from packet transmission priority policies tailored to meet unique business requirements.
The future of these technologies
Wide-area networks defined by software are also a newer concept in the networking world. As a result, many companies have yet to implement them. They are, nonetheless, a significant factor. About 75% of Indian corporate clients are interested in implementing these new tools. Even though software-defined wide area networks (SD-WANs) provide substantial advantages over traditional wide area networks (WLANs), only 5% of clients are prepared to make the move (SDWANs). It is expected that the number of information bottlenecks will be minimized as a result of this technology.
Applications may now be delivered more efficiently, and network connections across hybrid cloud networks can be brought together differently. As a result, the management of a company’s network may be improved and its agility and time-to-profit. Over the course of a year, Gartner estimates that SD-WAN systems may save up to 50% in capital expenditures and operating expenses (Riverbed Technology, 2022). According to the report’s authors, in June 2014, there were just a few paying customers for SD-WAN. By September 2016, that number had grown to more than 2,000. According to Gartner’s findings, branch offices could “pilot SD-WAN solutions to solve device complexity and/or high WAN transport or equipment costs” according to Gartner’s findings (Riverbed Technology, 2022). Ninety per cent of network administrators are planning to use a software-defined approach to their WAN, according to the Forrester Technology Adoption Profile.” In Brad Casemore’s opinion, “the demand for SD-WAN is not just prompted by the rising adoption of cloud services but also by the constant transfer of business data traffic from the enterprise branch straight to the Internet, and by the need to minimize the complexity and expense of WAN provisioning” (Riverbed Technology, 2022).
The Internet of Things is a logical fit for the SD-WAN architecture. Any device may be linked to the internet via the Internet of Things (IoT). The sensors in IoT would respond to the SD-WAN edge device since the IoT gateway is placed there. Cloud services may be included in the SD-WAN infrastructure. The Internet of Things sector has expanded from $16 billion in 2016 to $1.2 trillion by 2020. (Uppal, Woo, & Pitt, 2015). SD-WAN is the network architecture that links everything in the Internet of Things. Automated systems rely on it to provide them with the assistance they need to function successfully. SD-WAN solutions provide visibility and control for enterprise-to-Internet-of-Things technologies. Packet loss will not affect IoT devices or apps owing to SD-WAN technology.
Impact of SD-WAN technology
Internet and connection have been critical variables in deploying apps and meeting consumers’ expectations, as demand for firms’ services has grown over the past several years. An agile data transfer and an infrastructure to enable it are essential for any firm that delivers services. Increasingly, corporations are seeking more than just dependability, availability, and performance when it comes to providing connections across their sites. Because wide area networks (WAN) are necessary for transporting data or information, they are also seeking scalability. Connectivity between a company’s many locations is also critical to provide its clients with services that are both always available and of good quality. Most firms hire external service providers to deploy and operate their private networks. Software-defined wide area networks (SDWANs) are now being utilized to interact with a firm’s headquarters. The usage of conventional networks is changing because this technology gives innovation in how it runs, which adds a share of cost and value in the medium term and encourages more enterprises to invest in it (Mohmmad, Ramesh, Pasha, & Shankar, 2019). Finally, it diminishes the importance of service providers by empowering users to take control of their networks (Badotra & Panda, 2020).
One of the benefits of SDWAN in wide area networks is that it makes it simple and flexible to set up and maintain connections between branches of a firm, resulting in lower operational expenses over the long run (Yang, Cui, Li, Liu, & Xu, 2019). WAN networks benefit from this network because it makes bandwidth management and data traffic prioritization easier than in traditional networks (Mora-Huiracocha, et al., 2019). This can be done in traditional networks, but it takes more time and effort.
An additional benefit of SDWAN networks is the ability to centrally manage, operate, and configure all of the company’s networks using a web interface. Changes made to separate network connections can take effect instantly because of this feature. Data consumption, connection latency, IP traffic, bandwidth availability, and other metrics may be viewed unified in the centralized platform. This allows for better monitoring and control of the network’s state (Yang, Cui, Li, Liu, & Xu, 2019). Traditional wide-area networks need network administrators to configure each device by hand, which takes time and increases the risk of human error. SDWANs, on the other hand, perform all of the updating from a single, centralized platform. As a result, the platform allows users to distinguish between the types of traffic utilized by clients and the firms that run this platform. Among these are video and speech and, data and management, traffic. In order of importance, they are arranged as follows: video comes before voice, the voice comes before data, and data comes before the video.
Additionally, SDWAN technology may function with several lines of connection, which enables traffic to be routed across the WAN network using load-balancing (Rajagopalan, 2020), improving and managing the network’s traffic through the various connections (Rajagopalan, 2020). (Segec, Moravcik, Uratmova, Papan, & Yeremenko, 2020).
As an additional benefit of SDWANs, they allow for creating network policies and traffic management without the need for individual settings, making them far better than traditional networks (Yang, Cui, Li, Liu, & Xu, 2019). Additionally, network managers’ workloads would be made easier because of the increased efficiency achieved by grouping machines with similar configuration profiles together.
Finally, it is vital to remember that security is a fantastic feature of SDWAN since it is present throughout connectivity, traffic management, additional security services, deployment, visibility, and compliance with what is established in the SDWAN framework (Wood, 2017). Although there are a variety of architectures, designs, and brands to choose from, security is a vital necessity for any firm and for service providers, who must be allowed to carry out their projects (Wood, How to make sd-wan secure, 2017).
Conclusion
Based on the considerations outlined above, this article believes that software-defined WAN networks are a viable alternative to traditional wide area networks. By maximizing network resources, it improves network performance, availability, and security. Infrastructure and human resources are also decreased, since this technology is easy to administer and can be set up by staff with just basic network expertise. This shows us that the difficulties in maintaining networks has been much reduced, making this sort of technology the next-generation network.
There are several advantages to using SDWAN over traditional wide area networks (WANs) in capabilities and features. These advantages include increased automatization and programmability and the ability to connect with the WAN via a web interface. Using several characteristics, such as latency or jitter, SDWAN networks prioritize vital traffic for outlying offices, allowing them to communicate more readily with data centres. SDWAN provides several technological advantages that, in the end, maintain communications smart and save costs for businesses. We will now look at ROI and compare the various SDWAN brands on the market so that we can improve on the study we have already done.
References
Alwayn, V. (2001). Advanced MPLS Design and Implementation. Cisco Press.
Badotra, S., & Panda, S. (2020). A survey on software-defined wide area network. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 17(1), 59-73.
IETF Tools. (1997). Mpls Status Pages. Retrieved from https://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/
Luciani, C. (2019). From MPLS to SDWAN: Opportunities, Limitations and Best Practices. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Mohmmad, S., Ramesh, D., Pasha, S., & Shankar, K. (2019). Research on new network architecture through sd-wan. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering,, 8(6), 483-490.
Mora-Huiracocha, R. E., Gellegos-Segovia, P. L., Vintimilia-Tapia, P. E., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Cedillo-Ellias, E. J., & Larios-Rosillo, V. M. (2019). Implementation of a sd-wan for the interconnection of two software-defined data centers. 2019 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Nemertes. (2020). 2018-19 WAN Economics Research Study. Retrieved from https://nemertes.com/webinar-replay-wan-economics-the-business-of-disrupting-your-wan/
Rajagopalan, S. (2020). An overview of sd-wan load balancing for wan connections. 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Riverbed Technology. (2022). Why SD-WAN is the Future of the Network. Retrieved from https://www.riverbed.com/faq/why-sd-wan-is-the-future-of-the-network.html#:~:text=What%20Industry%20Analysts%20Say%20About,and%20reducing%20time%20to%20revenue.
Segec, P., Moravcik, M., Uratmova, J., Papan, J., & Yeremenko, O. (2020). Sdwan-architecture, functions and benefits. 2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 593-599). IEEE.
Sinha, S., Chowdhury, R., Das, A., & Gosh, A. (2021). Prospective sdwan shift: Newfangled indispensable industry driver. In Soft Computing Techniques and Applications (pp. 255-261). Springer.
Uppal, S., Woo, S., & Pitt, D. (2015). Software-Defined WAN for Dummies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wood, M. (2017). How to make sd-wan secure. Network Security, 12-14.
Wood, M. (2017). Top requirements on the sd-wan security checklist. Network Security, 9-11.
Wu, X., Lu, K., & Zhu, G. (2018). A survey on software-defined wide area networks. Journal of Communication, 13(5), 253-258.
Yang, Z., Cui, Y., Li, B., Liu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019). Software-defined wide area network (sd-wan): Architecture, advances and opportunities. 2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
write