In the realm of management decision-making, three abstracts and three key articles are explored to show a rational approach. Luan, Reb, and Gemigenser’s (2019) work provides result-oriented insights about the use of fast-and-frugal heuristics, especially the D-inference heuristic, in unfavourable environments. Specific and adaptive strategies are stressed, which draws attention to various tactics for different environments and contexts that are the subjects of the article. Kurdoglu, Ates, and Lerner (2023) focus on complexity in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, considering how the misconduct of economic agents leads to different pathways of development, which, in turn, offer outcomes and challenges. Mousavi and Gigerenzer’s (2014) “The Journal of Business Research” discloses that risk has a complex metabolism between uncertainty and heuristics. Rhexposing natural thought through ecological trends, emotional factors, and the adaptive functions of intuitions leads us to come up with a new understanding of rationality in managerial decision-making.
Kurdoglu, R. S., Ates, N. Y., & Lerner, D. A. (2023). Decision-making under extreme uncertainty: eristic rather than heuristic. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior Research, 29(3), 763-782. https://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/9d3ecd74-f81d-4d31-8044-681a69a7917a/content
The authors of the article published in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, which is written by Kurdoglu, Ates, and Lerner (2023), present extreme uncertainty reasoning by proposing an eristic approach instead of a heuristic one. The authors distinguish between heuristics and eristics, stating the fact that rough estimates are very useful under moderate uncertainty; however, eristics is not only very effective but also very adaptive in cases of extreme uncertainty. They trick the concept of fast and frugal heuristics into a strategy, which is purposed to convey efficiency and signal transmission truth while demonstrating eristics – which is about a hedonic, non-calculative character. The authors, in their thorough analysis, uncover the unbiased desire of an entrepreneur to reason and make sound judgments. This, however, is often limited by eristic feelings, which can be equally laden with hate or romantic love, shaping an individual’s judgments and views of reality. The article participates by presenting a theoretical framework and actual cases to illustrate such an emotional factor of decision-making and provides guidelines for entrepreneurs.
When it comes to making managerial decisions, realizing the interrelationships between heuristics and eristics often becomes an instrumental aspect, especially when there is a great volume of doubt. It is the traditional managerial mode that emphasizes rationalism and scientific understanding, which is discussed in this paper. Still, the findings suggest the emergence of adaptiveness in eristic decision-making in highly uncertain conditions. The article monitors these invisible factors to help managers look deeper into how emotions and feelings play a role in shaping decisions, especially when the available facts or logic are not enough to do so. The eristic side of thinking is one of many deserving attention since heuristics should be as significant a component in management as it is in rational analysis if the goal is to make fact-based decisions in complex, uncertain scenarios. Ultimately, all disciplines of decision-making under such extreme uncertainty have to do with the suspension of either intellect or values and would offer other managerial practices to rethink the decision-making process and embrace innovation and creativity.
Although Kurdoglu, Ates, and Lerner (2023) are able to show some points in their article, it has some limited aspects. The implied theoretical character of the presented eristic approach might need more proof, with the result of the approach being limited and only working in a specific setting. By focusing solely on extreme situations, there could be a limitation in their applicability to other real cases of less severe uncertainty. In particular, over-emphasis on emotional components may bring up biased opinions. Therefore, it becomes impossible to form objective methods for making choices. Moreover, the essay does not offer an inclusive development of biases which may accompany eristic reasoning. Nevertheless, the study does give some valuable points concerning the emotional factors of the actions in the course when people are facing uncertain circumstances.
Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735-1759.https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7400&context=lkcsb_research
Luan, Reb, and Gigerenzer’s (2019) article, “Ecological Rationality: “Crisis Decision Making at Air Traffic Control Centres: The Use of fast-and-frugal Heuristics for Managerial decision-making under Uncertainty,” proposes a paradigm shift on the traditional management decision-making. The article proposes a substitute paradigm—ecological rationality—and says that the D-inference heuristics, one of the fast-and-frugal ones, that decrease error rates are applicable to decisions in uncertain contexts. It comprises three salient topics, the first one being the section addressing the concept of ecological rationality. In this regard, the authors suggest that heuristics do not always mask the underlying problem and put forward the adaptive approach, which is reliant on employing several management tools in diversified contexts. The subsequent research in this line 1 refers to experimental D-inference, in comparison to logistic regression, to reliably get the estimated job performance in a variety of situations, including real-world data, simulation, and experiments. The data contradicts the claims that heuristics are so biased or inflexible and rather allows for evidence that they play an important part in a variety of decision-making situations.
The descriptive study by Luan et al. covers the ways in which managers pick up the inclinations and signs in the selection of their personnel. According to the study, the human brain operates more flexibly than it is commonly thought through the use of adaptive heuristics that are significantly affected by the relevant task features. Furthermore, this provides an alternative to the long-standing split between intuitive and analytical approaches towards decision-making. The article, along with others, emerges as a pioneer as it discusses the adaptability and efficiency of ‘fast-and-frugal heuristics.’ The empirical studies backed the arguments in the article, and D- the inference heuristic introduced them to explore the uncertainty of decision-making. The article is recommended to scholars or practitioners in search of a deeper understanding of various matters related to management theories. Thus, the information can be accessed effectively by readers who are interested in decision science, personnel selection, or the practical applications of heuristics in management. Incorporating actual data from ecological systems and using examples of real-life designs heightens the reliability and relevance of the ecological rationality model.
One weakness of the article is it has an item-level analysis, which could have been beneficial in diagnosing the weaknesses of the articles on an individual level. It could have explored how the pieces of the research were intertwined, making the evidence even richer and providing a more sophisticated analysis. While briefly talking about the business implications, it needed to cover the applications in a more detailed way, thus not exploring how a practical approach could be used for decision-making in the real world. Much later, there were no given clues that helped us to integrate the concepts and link them to broader theories of management decision-making, which, in turn, limited a general understanding of the places that they might have within theories.
Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671-1678. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2096854/component/file_2096853/content
Mousavi and Gigerenzer forefront ecological rationality in their influential piece, exploding the perplexing cognition processes that guide heuristic decision-making. They emphasize that heuristics can be excellent tools for our capacity to navigate through very complicated and murky environments and situations where the brain processes information. The article introduces decision-making techniques such as recognition heuristics, fluency heuristics, and the consider-the-best approach, indicating that they are highly efficient in highly ambiguous situations. The heuristics also include the acknowledgement heuristics, which are paramount for the decision-maker in complex scenarios since they allow him to focus on the core elements, increasing the speed of his reactions and simplifying the decision-making process. The evolved bias for action depicts the mind as a strongly tuned, functionally highly developed storage of information, especially in business decision-making, when dealing with knowledge gaps and uncertainties. Managers, among all, seem to prefer heuristic thoughts because of their convenience and usefulness, according to the abovementioned.
The article explains the way that managers rapidly and automatically make decisions, thus characterizing the outcomes of the heuristic-dominated cognitive processes. As the divergence from the usual models of overly rational decision-making represents the multi-faceted and adaptive nature of heuristics in managers’ performance, this insight is critical to consider heuristics in managerial contexts. The application of the gut decision notion stresses the adaptive toolbox view, taking heuristics not as a troublesome and vast gamut of cognitive shortcuts but as the choice of sophisticated tactics formed by evolution to handle the vastness of problematic scenarios a decision maker might be subjected to. Throughout the story, the understanding and craft of effort-precision-ratchet work merge to exhibit a novel approach to decision-making. Mousavi and Gigerenzer warn against the danger of confusion. They argue for the application of simplicity as a paradigm that should guide judgment as well as govern behaviour in complex situations. This acknowledgement, an important message, is a major element relating heuristics and ecological rationality to efficient decision-making processes. It reconceptualizes decision-making frameworks by suggesting that heuristics are needed not only as a means of the brain being able to process information but also they offer themselves as a neurocognitive tool.
The article carefully demonstrates the creative role of heuristics in decision-making under uncertainty. The fact that the judging strategy, which comprises a heuristic element, comes forward to validate the cognitive shortcuts is a further aspect that captures attention. The adaptive toolbox demonstrates an advanced model structuring the minds of people, indicating that human brains have adapted and become effective. Hyper-rational models often lie at the heart of gut decisions that call into question strongly analyzed situations rather than representing the practical understanding of real management processes. In addition to that, the source must look into the possible limitations and biases that may occur during the methodological process as written. In addition to the practical applications, there is a need to explore the use and relevance of these streams of future knowledge to the efficient management and delivery of current business operations.
The article by Luan, Reb, and Gigerenzer (2019) is chosen because it offers a novel perspective on management decisions using ecological rationality and fast-flexible-and-frugal heuristics between the individual and the environment. It goes along with the constant situations in making management decisions. In pursuance of my explorative article on risk and heuristics by Mousavi and Gigerenzer (2014), these articles raise the holism belief with an inclination toward adaptability and heuristics, which function best in complex situations. In the choice of Kurdoglu, Ates, and Lerner’s (2023) article, the decision of this article also turns to an eristic approach with the theme of emotional bias as an adaptive tool. This aligns with my search article on risk, uncertainty, and heuristics by Mousavi and Gigerenzer (2014). Both articles enhance the comprehension of decision-making by exploring the interaction between cognitive processes, emotions, and adjustment techniques within uncertain situations.
In conclusion, drawn from both articles, the reasoned approach to making decisions and breaking away from traditional norms is highly relevant as the new world is about to emerge. According to Luan, Reb, and Gigerenzer (2019), in their Ecological Rationality and Fast-and-Frugal Heuristics pieces in the AOMJ, they recommend adopting the academic mindset. Kurdoglu et al. (2023) state forcible emotional reasoning in the face of extreme uncertainty and suggest flexibility in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.[ According to Mousavi and Gigerenzer (2014), it is precisely the interplay between risk, uncertainty, and heuristics that is the essence of keeping it simple. Their common premise is the necessity of a reappraisal of managerial decisions, providing an ecosystem-dependence, emotional adaptation, and heuristic-pragmatism methods should be used. An integral approach of this kind provides flexibility to consider complex trajectories when making decisions in uneven circumstances.
References
Kurdoglu, R. S., Ates, N. Y., & Lerner, D. A. (2023). Decision-making under extreme uncertainty: eristic rather than heuristic. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(3), 763-782. https://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/9d3ecd74-f81d-4d31-8044-681a69a7917a/content
Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735-1759.https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7400&context=lkcsb_research
Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671-1678. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2096854/component/file_2096853/content
write