A Literature Review: The Current Use of Telehealth in Postoperative Patient Quality of Care, a Case of Post-cardiac Surgery Care

Introduction

Telehealth has become an alternative mode of providing healthcare services over long distances through telecommunications devices. It helps eradicate the geographical barrier, ensures access to care, and boosts patient monitoring. Telehealth technology is a transformative tool in post-op care, particularly in heart surgery aftercare, since it can improve patient outcomes, reduce readmissions, and strengthen adherence to medication and wound care. The literature review will investigate telehealth treatment’s role in improving patients’ care process after open heart surgery. The review will examine the influence of telehealth on (1) wound monitoring and surgical site infection prevention, (2) medication adherence and patient education, (3) remote monitoring of patients and early intervention, (4) reduction of hospital readmissions and medical costs as well as (5) the limitations and problems of

Wound Monitoring and Surgical Site Infection Prevention

Surgical site infections (SSI), significant in post-cardiac surgery, mandate a strict examination of wounds. Teleservices have become an attractive option because they enable remote wound assessment and detect infection at the early stage. Atilgan et al. (2021) created a novel telemedicine system for follow-up after cardiovascular surgery, which was associated with increased patient satisfaction and reduced admission rates. Similarly, Abraham et al. (2024) stressed the significance of telenursing and remote monitoring, which is expected to improve cardiovascular health outcomes. Battineni et al. (2021) showed that through a well-conducted systematic review, telemedicine has been found to have advantages in customizing cardiovascular disease prevention. As Cartledge et al. (2022) and Woo & Dowding (2020) highlighted, other factors hindered telehealth adoption, including technological barriers and clinician acceptance, which recommends a comprehensive implementation strategy. Chen et al. (2020) also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of telemedicine in chronic wound management, which showed its possible use in accelerating wound healing. As the limitations exist, the literature endorses the integration of telemedicine for postoperative wound monitoring and SSI prevention, offering chances for earlier interventions, individualized care, and improved patient outcomes in post-cardiac surgery settings.

Medication Adherence and Patient Education

Medication adherence and patient education are a must-have in post-cardiac surgery care, and telehealth interventions have shown significant success in overcoming these obstacles in clinical practice. Escobar-Curbelo and Franco-Moreno (2019) showed the use of telemedicine for chronic and acute heart disease control, which could contribute to better medication adherence. Frederix et al. (2023) further showed that a six-month telemedicine care program caused improvement in medication adherence as well as a reduction in readmission rates for chronic heart failure patients. In a related study, Cho et al. (2021) explored the elements that affect patient satisfaction with cardiology telehealth care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with information on patient involvement strongly considered. Ferrick et al. (2023),

Stühlinger et al (2022). Ajibade (2020) also established a professional consensus on managing remote device clinics. They emphasized the role of telehealth in screening patients and, at the same time, educating them. The comprehensive review by Groom and colleagues (2021) on telehealth in nursing homes highlighted the role of telehealth in performing medication management correctly. Nonetheless, according to Gruska and colleagues (2020), telehealth implementation in cardiology should focus on recommendations to provide the best patient outcomes. Nevertheless, the literature indicates that telemedicine for medication adherence and patient education is a suitable means of post-cardiac surgery care, putting on personalized interventions, remote monitoring, and improved patient engagement at a whole new level.

Remote Patient Monitoring and Early Intervention

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) and early intervention are critical areas during post-surgical care, and telehealth technologies have played a significant role in these fields. As Medoff, Cooper et al. demonstrated in their 2020 research, home monitoring with telehealth was proven to be feasible and accepted for post-cardiac surgery patients with congenital heart disease. The researchers of Jin et al. (2019) obtained conclusions from a systematic review and meta-analysis that telecare interventions are efficient enough to provide secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. According to Lu (2019), a public healthcare center model is more successful in preventing the rise in blood pressure through telehealthcare at home than before. Though Malanchini et al. (2021) highlighted the problem of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices, they stressed that the need for effective solutions exists. Karadag and Sengul (2021) looked into the issues that healthcare providers confronted in managing wounds during the COVID-19 pandemic. They proposed using telehealth technology to overcome these challenges, including the chances of digital cardiovascular care being a substitute during the pandemic. The articles cumulatively emphasize the advantages of RPM and early intervention through telehealth, which enables timely diagnosis, personalized care, and improved patient results in post-cardiac surgery settings. However, there are also issues to tackle, such as technological and implementation issues.

Reduction in Readmissions and Healthcare Costs

One of the critical considerations in post-cardiac surgery care is bringing down the readmission rate to hospitals and the overall healthcare costs. Studies have found that telehealth initiatives are essential in achieving this objective. Mousa et al. (2019) and Ferrick et al. (2023) have shown that the telehealth platform with electronic patient monitoring after discharge helps reduce post-discharge complications and surgical site infections following arterial revascularization. Neubeck and his colleagues (2020) performed a rapid review to gather evidence about the possible role of remote healthcare delivery to cardiovascular patients during the pandemic, while Russo et al. (2021) designed nursing teleconsultations for outpatient cardiovascular management as an adjunct that demonstrated the feasibility and favorability of these service models. Slotwiner and others (2019) highlighted the role of data interoperability from cardiac implantable electronic devices. Interoperability can assist in remote monitoring and may even decrease potential readmissions. A thorough review of the literature by Stergiopoulos and his fellow researchers has shown that telemedicine can help to reduce readmissions among heart failure and COPD patients (Stergiopoulos et al., 2024). Although difficulties are still out there, the literature shows the value of integrating telehealth solutions into post-cardiac surgery patients’ caregiving to improve follow-up and early treatment, eventually reducing the hospital readmission rate and related healthcare costs.

Limitations and Challenges

Although telehealth provides a significant advantage in postcardiac surgery and other post-surgical care, its use has limitations and difficulties. Some research papers have drawn attention to technical barriers, such as insufficient availability of stable internet connection for some patients and low level of digital literacy among specific populations, which can inhibit the growth of telehealth services (Woo & Dowding, 2020; Takahashi et al., 2022). Apart from other challenges, data privacy, security, and reimbursement policies are also why this technology is not widely used.

Besides, the efficacy of care provision through telehealth modalities may be affected by other aspects, such as the type of technology used, the medical setting, and the patient’s familiarity with the technology (Cartledge et al., 2022). Stühlinger et al. (2022) emphasized the importance of agreement on detecting and treating interference that may occur during medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, which will allow effective remote monitoring. On the one hand, Téot et al. (2020) thus concluded that telehealth-assisted wound care improves healing outcomes. On the other hand, Turan Kavradim et al. (2020) emphasize the need for more studies on the effectiveness of telehealth secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. The research team of Varma et al. (2021) gave valuable suggestions on using mobile health (mHealth) technologies in arrhythmia management, with an understanding that there are challenges and they need standardization. The literature may accentuate the benefits of post-cardiac surgery care of telehealth. Nevertheless, it is necessary to develop a technique with the whole approach that could be used to solve the technological, privacy, and security issues, reimbursement policies, and standardization of care delivery to embrace its potential and fully overcome the limitations.

Conclusion

The literature review centers around the growing utilization of telehealth in post-cardiovascular medical procedure care, with empowering discoveries in injury checking, medicine adherence, far-off persistent observing, and readmission and medical services cost decrease. Issues like mechanical constraints, information protection and security, and payment rules should be overcome before telehealth can completely satisfy its commitment in this climate. As innovation advances and medical care frameworks conform to the evolving scene, telehealth will play an undeniably significant role in understanding the results and nature of therapy in the postoperative period after a heart medical procedure.

References

Ajibade, A., Younas, H., Pullan, M., & Harky, A. (2020). Telemedicine in cardiovascular surgery during COVID‐19 pandemic: a systematic review and our experience. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(10), 2773-2784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14933

Atilgan, K., Onuk, B. E., Köksal Coşkun, P., Yeşi̇l, F. G., Aslan, C., Çolak, A., … & Bozbaş, H. (2021). Remote patient monitoring after cardiac surgery: the utility of a novel telemedicine system. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 36(11), 4226-4234.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15962

Abraham, C., Jensen, C., Rossiter, L., & Dittman Hale, D. (2024). Telenursing and Remote Patient Monitoring in Cardiovascular Health. Telemedicine and e-Health, 30(3), 771-779. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0187

Battineni, G., Sagaro, G. G., Chintalapudi, N., & Amenta, F. (2021). The benefits of telemedicine in personalized prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD): A systematic review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(7), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11070658

Cartledge, S., Rawstorn, J. C., Tran, M., Ryan, P., Howden, E. J., & Jackson, A. (2022). Telehealth is here to stay but not without challenges: a consultation of cardiac rehabilitation clinicians during COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia. European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 21(6), 548–558.https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab118

Chen, L., Cheng, L., Gao, W., Chen, D., Wang, C., & Ran, X. (2020). Telemedicine in chronic wound management: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(6), e15574. doi:10.2196/15574

Cho, D., Khalil, S., Kamath, M., Wilhelm, H., Lewis, A., Moore, M., & Nsair, A. (2021). Evaluating factors of greater patient satisfaction with outpatient cardiology telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, 2(6), 312–322.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.10.005

Escobar-Curbelo, L., & Franco-Moreno, A. I. (2019). Application of telemedicine for the control of patients with acute and chronic heart diseases. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(11), 1033-1039.https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0199

Ferrick, A. M., Raj, S. R., Deneke, T., Kojodjojo, P., Lopez-Cabanillas, N., Abe, H., … & Varosy, P. D. (2023). 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on practical management of the remote device clinic. Europace, 25(5), euad123.https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad123

Frederix, I., Vanderlinden, L., Verboven, A. S., Welten, M., Wouters, D., De Keulenaer, G., … & Dendale, P. (2019). The long-term impact of a six-month telemedical care program on mortality, heart failure readmissions and healthcare costs in patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 25(5), 286-293.https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18774632

Groom, L. L., McCarthy, M. M., Stimpfel, A. W., & Brody, A. A. (2021). Telemedicine and telehealth in nursing homes: an integrative review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(9), 1784-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.02.037

Gruska, M., Aigner, G., Altenberger, J., Burkart-Küttner, D., Fiedler, L., Gwechenberger, M., … & Working Group Rhythmology of the Austrian Cardiological Society. (2020). Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology. Wiener Klinische

Wochenschrift, 132, 782-800.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00508-020-01762-2

Jin, K., Khonsari, S., Gallagher, R., Gallagher, P., Clark, A. M., Freedman, B., … & Neubeck, L. (2019). Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 18(4), 260–271.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515119826510

Karadag, A., & Sengul, T. (2021). Challenges faced by doctors and nurses in wound care management during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey and their views on telehealth. Journal of Tissue Viability, 30(4), 484-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2021.09.001

Kaushik, A., Patel, S., & Dubey, K. (2020). Digital cardiovascular care in COVID‐19 pandemic: A potential alternative? Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(12), 3545-3550.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15094

Lu, J. F., Chen, C. M., & Hsu, C. Y. (2019). Effect of home telehealth care on blood pressure control: A public healthcare center model. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 25(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17734258

Malanchini, G., Ferrari, G., Leidi, C., Ferrari, P., Senni, M., & De Filippo, P. (2021). Challenges in the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in 2021. Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal), 79(4), 380-385. DOI: 10.33963/KP.15899

Medoff Cooper, B., Marino, B. S., Fleck, D. A., Lisanti, A. J., Golfenshtein, N., Ravishankar, C., … & Curley, M. A. (2020). Telehealth home monitoring and postcardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatrics, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0531

Mousa, A. Y., Broce, M., Monnett, S., Davis, E., McKee, B., & Lucas, B. D. (2019). Results of telehealth electronic monitoring for post-discharge complications and surgical site infections following arterial revascularization with groin incision. Annals of vascular surgery, pp. 57, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.023

Neubeck, L., Hansen, T., Jaarsma, T., Klompstra, L., & Gallagher, R. (2020). Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19: a rapid review of the evidence. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(6), 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515120924530

Russo, V., Cassini, R., Caso, V., Donno, C., Laezza, A., Naddei, M., … & Nigro, G. (2021). Nursing teleconsultation for the outpatient management of patients with cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 2087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042087

Slotwiner, D. J., Abraham, R. L., Al-Khatib, S. M., Anderson, H. V., Bunch, T. J., Ferrara, M. G., … & Wilkoff, B. L. (2019). HRS white paper on data interoperability from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Heart Rhythm, 16(9), e107-e127.https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(19)30433-3/fulltext

Stergiopoulos, G. M., Elayadi, A. N., Chen, E. S., & Galiatsatos, P. (2024). The Effect of Telemedicine on Readmissions of Patients with Heart Failure and COPD: A Systematic Review.https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3885370/v1

Stühlinger, M., Burri, H., Vernooy, K., Garcia, R., Lenarczyk, R., Sultan, A., … & Nitta, T. (2022). EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: For the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Europace, 24(9), 1512-1537.https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac040

Takahashi, E. A., Schwamm, L. H., Adeoye, O. M., Alabi, O., Jahangir, E., Misra, S., … & American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Hypertension, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Stroke Council. (2022). An overview of telehealth in managing cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 146(25), e558-e568. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001107

Téot, L., Geri, C., Lano, J., Cabrol, M., Linet, C., & Mercier, G. (2020). Complex wound healing outcomes for outpatients receiving care via telemedicine, home health, or wound clinic: a randomized controlled trial. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 19(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734619894485

Turan Kavradim, S., Özer, Z., & Boz, I. (2020). Effectiveness of telehealth interventions as a part of secondary prevention in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 34(3), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12785

Varma, N., Cygankiewicz, I., Turakhia, M. P., Heidbuchel, H., Hu, Y. F., Chen, L. Y., … & Svennberg, E. (2021). 2021 ISHNE/HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert collaborative statement on mHealth in arrhythmia management: digital medical tools for heart rhythm professionals: from the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology/Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 14(2), e009204.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009204

Woo, K., & Dowding, D. W. (2020). Decision-making factors associated with telehealth adoption by patients with heart failure at home: a qualitative study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 38(4), 204–214. https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/abstract/2020/04000/decision_making_factors_associated_with_telehealth.7.aspx

Xu, H., Granger, B. B., Drake, C. D., Peterson, E. D., & Dupre, M. E. (2022). Effectiveness of telemedicine visits in reducing 30‐day readmissions among patients with heart failure during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(7), e023935.https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023935