A Comprehensive Analysis of Unilever’s Global Operations and Competitive Landscape

Introduction

In 1929, when the Lever brothers and Unie Margarine, the diamond of the British soapmakers, and Holland went through a merger, respectively, a colossus in the fast-moving consumer goods industry (FMCG) trading Unilever was born. This habitat was not just about two companies merging; it was an amalgam of two visions intended to create a long-lasting imprint on the consumer market. Through many years, Unilever went from being a company that was confined to certain sectors to becoming a giant with a truly bewildering diverse range of products in such areas as nutrition, hygiene, and personal care. Now, Unilever is found by families in more than 190 countries, and it takes prime positions in the list of the largest soap producers worldwide, as well as ranges the list of owning famous brands such as Dove, Lipton, Ben & Jerry’s, and Axe. Unilever is indisputably represented on all continents due to its outstanding global presence, including all continents all over the world. The company is structured around three main divisions: Beauty & Personal Care, Foods & Refreshment, and Home Care, which represent three business divisions, guaranteeing a drawing-together of industry characteristics and consumer needs, hence a focused yet flexible model. This department embraces a wide range of products from the wide-ranging brand portfolio but is especially based on Unilever’s commitment to sustainability and ethical business practice, which focuses not only on profitability but the positive impact both environmentally and socially.

This report aims to thoroughly analyze Unilever’s strategic planning and operation activities, particularly in terms of the intricacies of the global market where the conglomerate manages to hold a leadership position. The analysis, in this case, would be aimed at disclosing the methods that have propelled Unilever to retain leadership in the market, as well as some of the areas where improvement could best work to keep the firm’s leadership even stronger. The report examines in depth Unilever’s financial status, its position in the market, its competitive strengths, and its alignment to the strategic planning models, and that is to equip it with recommendations that can lead the company to still higher heights of triumph.

Annual Financial Report (2023). Analysis

Accordingto Shaikh et al. (2022), the financial picture of Unilever in 2023 was varied and daunting; different key financial metrics demonstrate this. This firm accounted for an€59.604 revenue. Meanwhile, the business saw a slight revenue downfall in the previous year, which indicated an adverse market environment or new strategies being undertaken. The operating income tracked the trend, and it was also estimated to be €9.758, which shows the operational challenges Unilever faced due to the volatile market conditions all around the world. Given a cut was achieved in both net earnings, settling at €7.140 billion. Numerous reasons, such as production cost growth, different customer decisions, or high competition among customers, can explain this drop.

The year ended with Unilever’s value of total assets being 75.266 billion euros, marking a minor depreciation in spite of the preceding year, which might hint at some asset sales that could be a revaluation in response to the strategic restructuring process. However, on the same note, total equity realized a decrease to €20.764 million(Carvalho, 2020). This implies that the company deflated stockholder equity either through dividend income or share redemption. Subsequently, the business interest was lowered, and its investment capacity was affected due to the leverage margin. In-depth conversations about Unilever’s financial beauty, which happen every year, urge one to look into Unilever’s financial well-being. The economic downturns may have had an impact. However, the bigger picture also involves other global economic problems, like inflation and supply chain, which affect multinational corporations as well. Besides strategic investments in sustainability and digital transformation, which are still incurring short-term financial effects at the moment, these schemes build the ground for long-term stability and resilience in the future. The way the company has strived to be innovative, build its identity, and penetrate the market within emerging democracies has been a major pillar of its strategy, destined to recover the trend and give birth to certainty. Evaluation of the financial performance in the context of Unilever’s strategic vision will be essential for understanding the company’s capacity to remain dynamic and thread its way through the turbulent global market.

Market Share

Unilever’s financial landscape was both informative and enlightening as it provided invaluable insights into its business standing and strategic framework in 2023. The company posted a revenue of €59.604 billion year-over-year, which should be noted as a decline from the prior year’s figure. The smaller revenue, in this case, illustrates the difficult global market situation with unstable prices of raw materials and the market sector drift. Thanks to the revenues of €45.500 billion, the net income for the year amounted to €6.910 billion, beating the level of the previous year(Oluwatayo, 2022). Also, operational costs and competitive pressures increased, as is clear from the statement above. Nevertheless, Unilever’s asset base, as stated in their financial reports, was valued at € 75.266 billion, including € 20.764 billion in equity, which demonstrates the company’s strong fundamentals and ability to increase its financial capacity under conditions of economic insecurity steadily.

The fact that the financial problems Unilever faced are short-term ones is evident from the year-on-year comparison, which reveals that, in spite of them, the company’s overall financial health, which is quite strong, has not been affected negatively(Shaikh et al., 2022). The small dip in revenue and net income can be put down to a few determinants on the outside, including the increased competition rate, product saturation in one or more segments, and consumer behaviors that are still adjusting as per the post-pandemic era. Nevertheless, the firm’s existence of import assets and equity denotes a strong financial structure that can help it overcome the uncertainty of the market. Not only do these financial indicators evidence Unilever’s leading position in the international consumer goods market, but they also reveal its competitiveness in the environment of changing circumstances over the course of time. Looking forward, Unilever’s financial status, now secure, places it ideally to take advantage of growing markets and to continue building its legacy of long-term success.

Overview of Unilever and the Consumer Goods Sector

The consumer goods sector, like the great oceans, is a big and ever-changing sea of products that are used for everyday needs, and these products include such things as food and beverages, personal care products, and cleaning products(Suwadji et al., 2021). The nature of this and every other industry is determined by the combination of constantly inventing and opening new horizons, evolving customer preferences, and the relentless pursuit of the global market. Productivity and ethics have become competitive factors in the segment, thus affecting customers’ choices and companies’ strategies.

In a market where consumers are spoiled for choice, Unilever commands over 76 billion euros in annual sales and has the ability to offer almost 400 brands across the globe, which fulfill diverse consumer needs. The organization makes a statement not just of all the consumer goods that they produce but also as a champion of eco-friendly business operations. The plan to develop sustainable living in Unilever not only highlights the corporation’s dedication to cutting its ecological footprint and improving its social impact but also sets industry standards for corporate responsibility. On the one hand, Unilever aims to improve its products through innovation and adapt to the markets to boost its sales. It is spending a lot on R&D and constantly releases products that can satisfy the current consumers’ tendency to be more healthy and maintain wellness and sustainability. Furthermore, there is a targeted strategy that is used to gain consumers from expanding markets, especially in emerging economies where consumers exploiting the prosperous classes are targeted(Abubakari & Thuranira, 2021). These strategies not only bolster Unilever’s standing as a major player in consumer goods but also influence perceptions within and outside the sector about its future.

Analysis of Company Strategy

Unilever’s merit is its strategic planning, which is a testimony to the company’s foresight and agility as UV tries to react to the changing environment within and outside the international consumer goods market. Central to its strategy are three pillars: adoption of sustainability, fostering of innovation, and growth through market penetration, which are mutually intertwined for the successful strategic stance of the firm. Unilever has marked out its position in the sector by integrating its heritage of creating sustainable business value. Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan provides a framework for high targets to decrease by half the environmental impact of products, influence the health and well-being of more than 1000 million people, and bring benefits to millions in terms of livelihoods(Tsuraya et al., 2023). The fact that our commitment acknowledges this fact not only appeals to a growing consumer segment that is environmentally concerned and socially responsible but also provides the company with a sustainable supply chain that is resilient against global crises such as climate change.

Innovation is a fundamental aspect of Unilever’s strategy, and it is geared towards creating products that can generate consumer attention while satisfying their shifting needs. The firm invests a lot in its research and development operations, and this is to explore the market trends with a focus on natural ingredients, organic foods, and plastic-free packaging. Leading market tendencies, Unilever places it in the front line and makes sure that it creates something rather than simply copying. According toShaoping (2023), Unilever’s market expansion direction needs to be upgraded as a strategic point. Otherwise, Unilever will be far behind in its position, especially in emerging markets, because of its population growth and more income generated by the people. The company can discern subtleties of local tastes and distribution systems that grant the possibility of obtaining an expansion in the region. This is an approach that achieves a number of goals – it introduces local brands, it creates new brands, and it lowers the risk associated with rising economic turbulence in developed countries.

Environmental Analysis

Unilever’s strategic landscape is shaped by a detailed understanding of both its internal capabilities and the external market forces. This environmental analysis, incorporating SWOT, PESTEL, and Porter’s Five Forces frameworks, provides a comprehensive view of the challenges and opportunities facing Unilever.

Internal Environment (SWOT)

Strengths

• Brand Portfolio: The multinational span and the diversity of Unilever’s brand performance in various sectors are key strengths of the company.
• Sustainability Initiatives: Sustainability and ethical practices underline the company’s CSR events, which boosts brand trust among loyal customers and market presence(Cheng, 2021).
• Global Reach and Supply Chain: Unilever’s global presence and highly complex supply chain by which it manufactures and distributes goods make the production process and distribution of the products more effective.

Weaknesses

• Complexity of Operations: Not only directing a huge number of units but also day-to-day activities in every region the airline serves offers a substantial set of logistical and operational challenges.
• Product Pricing: High-quality and sustainable products’ uniqueness often results in premium prices, but it may be unfamiliar to customers with the lower price limit in diverse markets.

Opportunities

• Market Expansion: However, the step towards deepening the reach into emerging markets with tailored product development will accelerate the growth of the company.
• Innovation in Product Lines: Proceeding with innovation with a focus on current consumer concerns such as plant- foods and friendly eco-packaging will be the greatest opportunity(Cheng, 2021).

Threats

• Intense Market Competition: Consumer goods are a fierce area of competition, where immersing in the fight for the market is always on the go.
• Regulatory Risks: The possibility of tighter and tighter regulations regarding sustainability and health could affect new businesses and cost structures.

External Factors (PESTEL and Five Forces)

PESTEL Analysis

• Political: The different but similar trade policies and foreign regulations around the world may decrease the efficiency of the operations.
• Economic: Economic downturns are the worst nightmares for businesses that market non-essential goods, as this pattern of consumer behavior positively affects sales.
• Social: Consumers’ rising demand for ecological and socially responsible goods act in a way that is favorable for Unilever but necessitates ongoing innovation and deliverance of persuasive information(Hendrasetyawan & Yunus, 2022).
• Technological: On the other hand, developments in the field of manufacturing equipment and supply chains are seen as a basis for greater efficiency while, at the same time, direct communication channels with consumers create opportunities for closer engagement between the company and its customers.
• Environmental: Climatic factors with environmental damage positively impact the sustainability of operations and supply chains.
• Legal: One of the key aspects of outreach is actually going to the communities that might need assistance.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

• Threat of New Entrants: A well-established name in the market, diversified operations at a large scale, and integrated distribution systems allow Unilever to have these protections in place, but start-ups in niche markets will be at more risk(Wood et al., 2021).
• Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Due to the tremendous size of Unilever, there is some tactical edge, but it can become challenging to balance the responsibilities in order to obtain sustainable and ethically sourced materials for production.
• Bargaining Power of Buyers: In spite of the fact that shopping consumers are on a relatively low negotiating side, buyers have much power to go on terms, pricing, and placing of the products.
• The threat of Substitute Products: The widespread rise of competitors, either from national or international retailers (including names of famous brands here), will be under constant pressure.
• Rivalry among Existing Competitors: In the consumer goods market, intense competition, on a continuous basis, requires innovation and marketing efforts in order to remain competitive and relevant.

Stakeholders’ Analysis (CATWOE)

• Customers (C): Because consumer values are changing, the main stakeholders of Unilever are the main settling point of their products and the development of new ones.According to Paucar‐Caceres et al. (2021), meeting these customer requirements at sustainable pricing is now the biggest challenge in Unilever’s cost reduction without sacrificing quality.

• Actors (A): Such a group incorporates the workers, management team, and supply chain players. The other vital aspect of the organization would be its adherence to Unilever’s organizational values of sustainability and ethical practices. For a low-cost approach, these business models prioritize efficiency as well as production in operations. One of the key aspects is to think creatively and innovate at any level, including the development of products to their marketing.
• Transformation Process (T): Transformation of the material consists of manufacturing of products from raw materials. Unilever implements strategies that aim to make this process low-cost but at the same time acceptable in terms of quality for mass production and special brands. As a synonym for the company looking for greener practices and sustainable sourcing, we see the priorities of the company’s strategy.
• Worldview (W): As Unilever is changing its way of thinking to a way to sustainability in the social environment, the comprehensive change influences its corporate ethos. For the company, this role is much more than merely making a profit; it is setting the example for an environmentally friendly and socially positive life. Being a greenfield project, this worldview will strengthen this project’s differentiation as sustainability will be its key brand differentiator.
• Owners (O): Among shareholders and investors, the interest is to maintain and achieve consistent profit from investment(Paucar‐Caceres et al., 2021). Preparing Unilever for long-term efficient performance is based on the dual focus of cost efficiency that drives financial success and differentiated products that are, in turn, a strong positioning factor. Thus, the financial performance becomes sustainable.
• Environmental Constraints (E): There are also external variables, such as regulation requirements, environmental challenges, and competitive market tendencies, which are the factors that affect the business strategy applied by Unilever. Overcoming this situation necessitates the use of a versatile raging strategy that is set up to react to whatever shifts the market can throw at it and whatever can be expected of them as stakeholders.

Competitive Advantages Analysis (Bowman’s Strategy Clock)

Bowman’s Strategy Clock’s strategic positioning of Unilever’s company reveals competitive strategy, which, in turn, is a shrewd initiative to maintain competitive advantage. The main activity in which the firm is engaged is related to positions 4 and 5 (differentiation), and one is its brands (core strength), innovation, and sustainability.

• Differentiation (Positions 4 and 5): By entailing brands across a wide range of various product categories, Unilever succeeds in making customized brand contributions that actually click with consumers. Carrying and advertising high-quality and sustainably sourced main ingredients makes Unilever different from the competitors in terms of product innovation(Hoogers et al., 2023). Such an approach allows the selling of the product at a premium, as compared to similar products in the market, assuming that the consumers hold added value instead.
• Focused Differentiation (Position 6): Some parts of Unilever Company’s strategy, however, are aimed at the differentiation of its product portfolio by addressing specific customer segments’ needs and offering highly tailored products. Such as vegetarian and sustainable alternatives to The Vegetarian Butcher brand; their plant-based food lineup serves as a response to the consumers’ choice for eco-conscious and vegetarian consumption(Hoogers et al., 2023). In the same way, those premium beauty and personal care brands address consumers who prefer to purchase goods that reflect both luxury and environmental consciousness.

VRIO Analysis

• Value: Unilever’s brand portfolio is one of its most valuable resources. With over 400 brands, including household names like Dove, Ben & Jerry’s, and Lipton, Unilever has a significant presence in consumers’ lives worldwide(Theiner, 2021). These brands are not just recognized; they are trusted for quality and sustainability, aligning with consumer preferences for ethical and environmentally friendly products. This extensive brand equity enables Unilever to maintain a strong market position and premium pricing.
• Rarity: Unilever’s commitment to sustainability is a rare asset in the industry. The company’s Sustainable Living Plan aims to decouple growth from environmental impact while increasing social impact. This commitment is comprehensive, addressing the sustainability of raw materials, reducing environmental footprint, and improving health and well-being for millions. While competitors may engage in sustainability, the scale and depth of Unilever’s commitment are rare in the global consumer goods industry.
• Imitability: The combination of Unilever’s global supply chain, extensive R&D capabilities, and sustainability initiatives presents a complex system that is difficult for competitors to imitate. Its ability to innovate rapidly and scale up successful products across markets is underpinned by substantial investments in R&D and an agile, global supply chain. These capabilities are not easily replicated, providing Unilever with a durable edge.
• Organization: Unilever’s organizational structure and culture are finely tuned to leverage its resources and capabilities effectively(Galpin, 2023). The company’s decentralized approach allows it to respond quickly to market changes and consumer trends, while its focus on sustainability and innovation is ingrained across the organization, ensuring that Unilever not only identifies and develops valuable and rare resources but also fully capitalizes on them.

TOWS Analysis

The TOWS (Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths) matrix, a simple extension of SWOT analysis, enables Unilever to unite its strengths and weaknesses internally with external opportunities and threats. As a result, Unilever gets a well-founded strategic framework for further action.

SO Strategies (Leveraging Strengths to Seize Opportunities): SO Strategies (Leveraging Strengths to Seize Opportunities)

Unilever, whose powerfully notable brands and many green efforts can be used to take advantage of uptrend consumer interest in ethical and eco-friendly products. With more sustainability implementations in its product development and marketing strategies, Unilever will properly fortify its leadership dominance in the surrounding market and get more eco-conscious buyers.

ST Strategies (Using Strengths to Counteract Threats): ST Strategies (Using Strengths to Counteract Threats)

Having an extensive global footprint and product portfolio, the company will not only curb risks from economic downturns and intense competition in the market but also continue innovating effectively(Leeman, 2021). Suppose Unilever continues to innovate and tailor its products according to the changing tastes of market consumers. In that case, it can ensure its superiority over the competitors and sustain this status even during periods of unpredictability and uncertainty.

WO Strategies (Overcoming Weaknesses by Exploiting Opportunities): WO Strategies (Overcoming Weaknesses by Exploiting Opportunities)

Efficiency in operations and the supply chain delivers Unilever the capabilities to take greater advantage of emerging economies’ market expansion opportunities. Streamlining operations and allocating appropriately the amount for local production are important as they can help companies cut down on overall costs and gain a better response to the market, which further leads to gaining new markets or maintaining the old ones.

WT Strategies (Minimizing Weaknesses and Avoiding Threats): WT Strategies (Minimizing Weaknesses and Avoiding Threats)

The most effective response to the problem of relying on vendors and crossing off with product substitution is to mix the channels of distribution and to receive more of your positions at D2C. Enhancing online presence and utilization of digital platforms, lessening its dependency on traditional channels of buying, and customer interaction can be provided by more engagement with the company’s brands.

Conclusion

The evaluation of the strategic environment of Unilever through SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, VRIO, and Bowman’s Strategy Clock reveals that the company is a firm competitor yet faces certain challenges in the changing consumer product market. One of Unilever’s main assets is a brand portfolio that is wide and strong, committed to environmental friendliness, and reaches all big markets worldwide. All those things mentioned before, with the objective of innovation and market expansion, positively affect the competitive advantage and strategic plan of the company.

Nevertheless, these analyses also shine a light on vulnerabilities, such as fragility, complexity, and reliance on competing markets, that could weaken performance if not adjusted to the demands of this competitive environment. The competitiveness of the external environment, which has necessitated the organization’s adaptability and innovation, happens through changes in consumer preferences and the tightening of regulatory demand. VRIO scrutiny visualizes the role of brand equity in sustainability, the strength of efforts to deliver on sustainability promises, and the adequacy of the company’s resources as critical components in obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage.

Towards that end, Unilever’s strategic direction should further build on Unilever’s strengths and identify where it could work on its weaknesses. To be able to withstand the challenges of its global and local market dynamics, it should invest in supply chain resilience, increase agility in reactions to market changes, and deepen its environmental responsibility. The value of exploring underdeveloped markets and potential consumer segments lies in the expansion of markets and the consequential need for committed strategies that accommodate local tastes and become aligned with national priorities on environmental issues.

The main challenge that Unilever is facing is competing with strong players and putting more effort into communication in the regions where it remains inferior. No company in consumer goods is safe from this necessity to innovate within its products and business model, as the future highlights sustainability and consumer relationships as the key factors for companies’ authority in the market. Nevertheless, the fact that Unilever is capable of cutting with the times, innovating, and leading in sustainability not only places it in the group of companies that are here to stay but also sets an example for other players to follow.

Recommendations

• Enhance Supply Chain Resilience: Let Unilever develop supply channels that are more resilient and adaptable to any major global breaks. The development of local supply chains and alternative sources can reduce the threats connected with the emergence of geopolitical movements and diversification of trade restrictions. Also, the whole use of technology for improved supply chain visibility and forecasting must be part of all efforts toward enhancing the efficiency of operations.
• Accelerate Innovation in Sustainability: Perhaps Unilever already demonstrates the highest sustainability level globally, but there is still a place for improvement. The firm should invest in new technologies and business models that promote production efficiency and new market adventures that promote easy operability and energy saving. Efforts including zero-waste packaging, water conservation in factories, and continuing to lower carbon impacts are essential to reaching the desired environmental goals and meeting consumers’ expectations.
• Deepen Engagement in Emerging Markets: Unilever’s main immature markets consist of impressive prospects for the company’s development. Through localized products, brands can adjust to suit the source of local demand. A brand can sustain its standing in the market by putting its trust in the community and paying them back in terms of the investment they have made. Programs have to take into account the possibility of financing and inclusion in a broader consumer group.
• Leverage Data Analytics for Consumer Insights: Using cutting-edge data analytics tools to not only understand consumer behavior but also create new ideas can have a major impact on the marketing and development of new products. Personalizing and tailoring products can attract consumers to products and drive brand awareness, giving retailers an edge over common competitors.
• Expand Digital and E-commerce Capabilities: The fact that more and more customers are now shopping online and doing it with the ease and convenience of doing so online results in the need for the company to further improve its digital and e-commerce channels. The use of methods to increase the experience of online customers and digital marketing strategy optimization will be key contributors to the growth of this channel.
• Foster a Culture of Continuous Learning and Adaptability: Advancement of the culture among the employees will absolutely make the change, learning, and progress possible, and the employees will contribute positively to Unilever’s sustainability and growth objectives.

References

Abubakari, M., & Thuranira, B. (2021). The consumer goods sector and the sustainability agenda in Ghana: a review of sustainability commitments. Discover Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00037-8

Carvalho, A. M. A. (2020). The proposed acquisition of Danone by Unilever. Repositorio. Up. Pt. https://repositorio.ucp.pt/handle/10400.14/31319

Cheng, Y. (2021). Analysis of the Opportunities and Challenges of Unilever’s Differentiated Competition by Using SWOT and PEST. Www.atlantis-Press.com; Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210210.044

Galpin, T. (2023). The Strategist’s Handbook: Tools, Templates, and Best Practices Across the Strategy Process. In Google Books. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OwTOEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=VRIO+Analysis+in+Unilever+UK&ots=QZpLbMdxpK&sig=DZ8T6u7XMTogQV6Iyqd1Uu2cRkI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Hendrasetyawan, B. E., & Yunus, E. N. (2022). New Product Development Strategy for Sustainable Rigid Plastic Packaging at XYZ Company in 2022-2025. Business Review and Case Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.17358/brcs.3.3.193

Hoogers, H., Alessandro, M., Myers, J., Grimm, A., & Gates, H. (2023). Diageo Strategic Audit: A Deep Dive into the Management Strategies of Diageo. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses/622/

Leeman, J. (2021). Export Planning: A 10-step approach -2nd edition-. In Google Books. BoD – Books on Demand. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rvFsDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA11&dq=TOWS+Analysis+Unilever+UK&ots=zYcB72afpf&sig=ItGeGYfaMcawQiBZG8pz6a64Hl0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Oluwatayo, O. (2022). DEVELOPING THE INTERNATIONAL MARKETING PLAN (on the basis of UNILEVER PLC) Master’s student of Field of Study 07 -Management and Administration Speciality 073 -Management Specialization -Business Administration Research Instructor Kyiv -2022 Omolola, Oluwatayo. https://elib.uacu.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/113/OMOLOLA%20ESTHER%20OLUWATAYO.pdf?sequence=1

Paucar‐Caceres, A., Cavalcanti‐Bandos, M. F., Quispe‐Prieto, S. C., Huerta‐Tantalean, L. N., & Werner‐Masters, K. (2021). Using soft systems methodology to align community projects with sustainability development in higher education stakeholders’ networks in a Brazilian university. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2818

Shaikh, A. H., Solangi, A., & Raza, A. (2022). An In-Depth Comparative Analysis of Financial Statement Metrics: A Study of Unilever and P&G. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(3), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2022(3-III)57

Shaoping, L. (2023). Unilever Global Sourcing and Purchasing Strategies: A Case Study of Trade and Logistics between the EU and UK Post-Brexit. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management, 6(10), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2023.061016

Suwadji, S. A., Suryaningsum, S., & Pamungkas, N. (2021). Analysis of the Financial Performance of the Largest Consumer Goods Company in Indonesia Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Case Study at PT. Unilever Indonesia Tbk). Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP), 4(3), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i3.1357

Theiner, J. (2021, December 20). How are companies addressing supply chain transparency?: A Pedagogical case study of Rügenwalder Mühle. Repositorio.iscte-Iul.pt. https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/24826

Tsuraya, H. binti, Endayani, L., Zahda, F. M., Utami, I. S., & Jayadi, U. (2023). Unilever Company Work Model. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 1(1), 7–14. https://ij.lafadzpublishing.com/index.php/IJEMA/article/view/26

Wood, B., Williams, O., Nagarajan, V., & Sacks, G. (2021). Market strategies used by processed food manufacturers to increase and consolidate their power: a systematic review and document analysis. Globalization and Health, 17(1). https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12992-021-00667-7