Introduction
COVID-19 has had an uneven impact on numerous places throughout the world (Brown, 2022). Many studies have indicated that black individuals, settlers, and persons with low income probable to have the virus, be hospitalized, and die as a result. These effects have spread to the disabled communities, who have been affected extremely (Wong, 2020). There are factors such as: a higher risk of poor disease outcomes, limited access to normal health care and rehabilitation, and the negative social repercussions of pandemic response activities, which as has led to excessively harmful impact on individuals with disabilities. These disabled kin are part of the disability community segregated and isolated in the name of care and safety. Therefore, this paper will discuss the connection between disability history and disability history and institutionalization and the present day ableism faced by the disabled people in the society after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Connecting Disability History to Our Present Day
Social integrity and the civil privileges activities will remain imperfect and deficient as long as they continue to allow discrimination practices and the ideas to the disabled people (Brown, 2022). This is because their policies fail to acknowledge and understand the matters that concern disabled people across different experiences. For instance, there has been a lack of response to people trapped in the institutions and congregate places who face high risks with minimal protection. It has been discovered that most of the individuals living in these places are at high transmission rates. Many of the outbreaks worldwide have happened at nursing homes, group homes and psychiatric hospitals that have led to the death of many disabled people. This has continued to worsen because of the tech policies that do not cater to disabled people; hence, continuing to endanger their lives, safety, and freedom.
Disasters and calamities disproportionately affect people with disabilities globally, and this pandemic is no exception (Brown, 2022). The presence of individuals with disabilities in the COVID-19 retort has been harmed and excluded due to lockdown efforts during the disease. Persons with disabilities who require to access health care are fined if lockdown and restriction are enforced by officers using coercive tactics. Those special needs will be impacted differently if ordinary health care or rehabilitation is cancelled or postponed.
Inadequate planning for the effects of the COVID-19 epidemic on people with disabilities has been common (Brown, 2022). For instance, in education for children with exceptional educational wants, the provision of individual defensive tools in social care, and the use of sign language in official announcements, people with disabilities have been ignored or treated as an afterthought. School closures have resulted in the exclusion of many young people with disabilities since instructional resources are not in accessible formats and access to assistive technology, particularly the internet, has been problematic.
In a public health disaster like the COVID-19 outbreak, clear information is more important than ever (Brown, 2022). Messages in the United Kingdom have been confusing, making it harder for people with intellectual disabilities to understand them. Increased isolation and uncertainty or fear about the epidemic has damaged the mental health of people with disabilities. Isolation and dread can be especially harmful to persons who suffer from mental diseases. People who have physical limitations are also more likely to suffer mental problems. Many people’s mental health has been impacted as a result of this epidemic.
Shortage of equipment, many nations and hospital policies fails to support the people with disabilities as they fail to receive life-saving treatment (Brown, 2022). The procedures are discriminative and have devastating consequences. For instance, they have occasionally resulted in the death of certain people.
Disabled individuals already have to reveal their confidentiality to access essential facilities and housings (Brown, 2022). They are subjected to handle matters such as the beliefs about fraud and dishonesty that result in enacting policies. Because of the discrimination community is frequently resisting to develop resources for persons with disability.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the disabled individuals have indeed endured health testing; eugenics grounded strategies and the joined impacts of financial abuse and denial (Wong, 2020). Being aware of situation aids legislators to pass rules that are truly open to the both requirements of the moment and the current heritages of the past injustice of these disabled people. Politicians should recognize that significant access and engagement for disabled people is a must. Disabled users must have access to information about programs aimed to alleviate the terrible economic effects of COVID-19. There has to be checks and balances in hospitals and nursing home. Otherwise, the disabled people, mostly the people of color, are left alone in a system that already doesn’t care about them.
References
Brown, L. (2022). How to centre disability in the tech response to COVID-19. Brookings. Retrieved March 7 2022, from https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-to-center-disability-in-the-tech-response-to-covid-19/.
Wong, A. (2020, June 7). Freedom for some is not freedom for all. Disability Visibility Project. https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/2020/06/07/freedom-for-some-is-not-freedom-for-all/
write