Introduction
Trends in hospitalization and emergency department visit rates point toward an increasingly grave public health problem of alcohol abuse in Minnesota. In fact, according to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH, 2023a), the rates of alcohol consumption and disorders are continuing to be exceedingly high in this state. In 2021, 59.5% of adults in Minnesota consumed alcohol, and the intensity of drinking went very high at 17.9% (MDH, 2023a). From individual to family and community levels, alcohol has posed one long-standing and severe outstanding problem in America. A community-based assessment for these dangerous alcohol consumption influences becomes very imminent in Minnesota. The variations in alcohol abuse across Minnesota, public health interventions that work best and are optimally effective will be those developed irrespective of the epidemiological fact that such interventions have to be adapted to community assets to reduce the impact of, in this case, alcohol abuse, given the patterns of increasing hospitalizations and insights derived from professionals.
Overview
The high levels of alcohol abuse in Minnesota, defined by its behavioral character, such as binge and heavy drinking, have manifested into a substantial public health concern. The study by the MDH in 2023 reports that about 62.5% of men and 56.6% of women aged over 18 reported the consumption of alcohol, where the rate of its consumption was one of the highest across the country at 17.9% (MDH, 2023a). The apparent stability of the prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence from 2011 suggests that the mitigation of alcohol abuse still has considerable challenges. The social cost of excessive drinking in Minnesota is enormous. For instance, one of the studies established that in 2019, the cost for Minnesotans engaging in excessive drinking was approximately $8 billion. These costs come through lost productivity, health care, criminal justice, and motor vehicle crashes. Notably, lost productivity was 72% of these costs, thus showing how it represents the broader impact that extends to the workforce and economy. Inpatient hospital treatments attributed to alcohol make up about 35% of the alcohol-attributable costs for all inpatient treatments in Minnesota, estimated at 3% of the total number (MDH, 2022c).
The effects of alcohol abuse go further to impact youths and pregnant women, not only being centered around adults. In 2022, 12% of 9th and 11th-grade students reported past-30-day use of alcohol, compared to 21% in 2013. This finding may, therefore, indicate changes in youth behavior. This is, however, more worrying, with 22.6% of expectant women reporting alcohol consumption, whereas 14.8% had had heavy drinking within the past 30 days (MDH, 2023a). The state has, therefore, to rise against this alarming rate of alcohol-related mortality. Between 2015 and 2019, alcohol-attributable causes of death averaged 2,151 persons annually. This also represents a dramatic increase over the 2001-2005 average of 1,127 persons. In most cases, alcohol resulted in deaths among males (68% in 2019). Direct death from alcohol has grown most rapidly during the previous two decades (MDH, 2023a). This goes on to indicate that the number of alcohol-related illnesses requiring hospital treatment underscores the workload in the healthcare system. In 2022, alcohol caused 26,082 inpatient hospitalizations and 32,879 emergency room visits for conditions fully attributable to alcohol in Minnesota (MDH, 2023a). This translates into about 9% of all inpatient hospitalizations within the state, quite a significant burden on health resources brought about by alcohol abuse (MDH, 2023a).
Incidence and Prevalence Data
According to the 2022 Minnesota Student Survey, a significant yet varying proportion of students across grades reported alcohol consumption. To be more specific, 5% of 8th graders had had any alcohol to drink on 1 to 2 of the past 30 days, and this percentage only goes up as grade increases (Minnesota, 2022). These rates describe a disturbing trend among the state’s youth regarding early alcohol exposure. The increase in the frequency of alcohol consumption from the 8th grade up to the 11th grade may suggest the importance of intervention strategies that are early and well-sustained (Minnesota, 2022).
Access to alcohol emerges as a critical factor in underage drinking. The survey data indicate that large numbers of students reported getting alcohol from friends and family, while the number ranged from 14% to 43%, depending on the respective grade levels (Minnesota, 2022). This finding underlines the community and family influence that avails minors’ access; hence, effective interventions must go beyond individual mechanisms of change to include community education and family interventions. Moreover, the factor of age also influences the perceptions of the students about alcohol use. It has turned out that according to the research, most students are aware of the harmful consequences for health, but the conviction decreases from 8th to 11th grades (Minnesota, 2022). This is likely an emerging signal for the development of social dynamics and peer influence, heralding the need for focused educational programs that will fill this void.
Economic Impact and Societal Cost
The cost that is considered to be the most hurtful, however, and which casts a stark light on the substantial economic impact of alcohol abuse, is that which yields from this problem. In 2019, the social cost related to the use of alcohol in the state was over $8 billion, or approximately $1383 per Minnesota resident (Gloppen et al., 2022). This represents an intimidating financial burden in health costs and sizeable losses from productivity, crime-related costs, and expenses from motor vehicle incidents. From these, the lost productivity placed a significant financial burden on the scale, contributing to some $5.59 billion (Gloppen et al., 2022). This very aspect of economic impact emphasizes the issue pervasively, indicative of exceptionally high trends of alcohol abuse among working-age adults in Minnesota. These statistics underline the dire need for definite intervention and policies that target control of far-reaching economic outcomes.
Cost-wise, alcohol abuse is also known to be very expensive in health care, with annual costs of over $915 million. That cost has quite a significant impact on the healthcare system of Minnesota (Gloppen et al., 2022). Such costs are for hospitalization, outpatient care, and specialized alcohol abuse and dependence treatment services. The implications of such costs, in effect, are felt far and wide since they bestow a substantial financial responsibility not only on the health care system but also on state and local governments. These agencies account for approximately 41.1% of these costs, indicating the seriousness with which alcoholic abuse spills over from personal health problems to become a considerable public and fiscal issue within the state (Gloppen et al., 2022). This situation highlights the need for comprehensive strategies that should not only be limited to health aspects arising from alcohol abuse but should also take into consideration the broader economic and social impacts.
State-Specific Challenges
Minnesota is one of those states presenting quite a challenge in dealing with the problem of alcohol abuse compared with national figures when state data are used. The per capita economic burden of alcohol abuse in Minnesota is above related national averages by a significant extent. This is something that remains plausible primarily due to the unique demographic composition of the state and some particular patterns of drinking. Prevalence in the issue of binge drinking, forming a more significant percentage of the behaviors in Minnesota, has been a major issue. Remarkably, from this percentage, binge drinking alone contributes to an overwhelming 72.9% of the total societal cost related to alcohol abuse (Gloppen et al., 2022). This pattern sheds light not only on a more significant economic burden but also amplifies the health-related consequences of alcohol abuse, indicating the target of an urgent need for state-based intervention strategies.
High-Risk Populations
Within Minnesota, this speaks most prominently to the at-risk, highest population of identified adolescents in the Student Survey and working-aged adults projected from economic data (Gloppen et al., 2022). Moreover, this supports why they need to undertake public health interventions. For the prevention strategies for teenagers, the strategies should also include access to alcohol and perception changes. The adult interventions, perhaps the workplace programs, may have mass awareness campaigns about the health and economic cost of excessive drinking.
Epidemiologic Triangle Model or Web of Causation Application
The alcohol abuse problem in Minnesota could effectively utilize the Epidemiologic Triangle Model. The model considers both the characteristics of the host and agent and environmental factors in developing the specific condition that affects public health. In the context of alcohol abuse, the hosts are the members of the community who are prone to misuse. These hosts manifest due to several factors, some being inherent, e.g., genetic, age, and gender, while others manifest through acquired characteristics such as lifestyle and social habits.
The agent in the case of alcohol abuse is alcohol itself, categorized as a chemical agent. This has solely to do with the properties that accompany its effects on the human body, including addiction and physical dependence, which take a critical role in perpetuation. In this epidemiologic triangle, alcohol stands out as an agent that is easily made available and supported by the community in terms of cultural or social acceptance. Environmental risk factors span the range of factors that may be physical, social, or economic (Issa et al., 2020). For example, environmental factors such as social norms, peer pressure, and the availability of alcohol, including socio-economic status, have been highly associated with the prevalence of alcohol abuse. Some of the conditions include economic pressure, cultural attitudes toward drinking, and even weather conditions (long winters leading to more inside activities and alcohol) that combine to produce a high prevalence of alcohol abuse.
This can further be appreciated through the complexity and the interrelation of the roles played by the different factors in causing the public health problems in this epidemiological approach to the Web of Causation model. Alcohol abuse could not be called an outcome of individual choice but rather an outcome of very complex web causes, biological, psychological, social, and environmental (Juergens, 2019). For instance, the family history of alcoholism, social tolerance for the consumption of alcohol, economic struggles, and psychosocial problems of depression and anxiety all combine to form a network of causes leading to alcohol abuse.
This web-like structure of causation presents challenges in prioritizing intervention strategies. This multi-dimensionality of the problem merits a multi-dimensional response. In other words, effective interventions for the problem of alcohol abuse in Minnesota would be public health efforts aimed not only at the host and his behaviors but at social and environmental factors. This may include policy changes, community education, increased access to health care and mental health services, and addressing socio-economic injustices. In this way, with ecosocial framework, the whole comprehension of the complex problem of alcohol abuse can be realized if the role is acknowledged and played by the biological and social components that bear on health and well-being.
Windshield Survey
The windshield survey was carried out for alcohol consumption tendencies in high school students, mainly concentrating on the 9th and 11th-grade students from Minnesota. The data from the Minnesota Student Survey Report (2007) on the same category of grade 9 and 11 students give a comprehensive picture of alcohol use and its effects. 82.8% of the students in grade 11 have reported abstaining from alcohol for the last 30 days and 70.9% for the last 12 months (Windshield Survey, 2022). This clearly indicates that many high school juniors are going for sober options. A small percentage but a matter of concern from the sample are those who drink regularly; amongst them, 0.3% of the respondents say they drink on all 30 days (Windshield Survey, 2022). This large majority does signal responsible behavior with the use of alcohol but signals for a small majority for which the use is quite regular. Binge drinking presents diverse patterns based on whether the people in a region excessively drink alcohol or not.
Additionally, even though 92.4% of the 11th-grade students did not engage in binge drinking, this still points to a considerable minority who did. (Windshield Survey, 2022) Gender differences emerge, with women more likely to report having drunk at a binge level of four or more drinks than men, who report five or more. This is a similar pattern of alcohol intake, but in Grade 9, a more significant percentage of them are done in sobriety. Only 2.4% of the students used to binge drink here, and most of these had not taken alcohol in the past 30 days (Windshield Survey, 2022). The overall use of alcohol was pretty low, with most of the students either reporting no use of alcohol or use on one or two occasions. The other area of concern was the quantity of alcohol taken at a go. Though most of the students take one glass, can or drink, there is a portion of the drinking students who take five or more glasses, cans or drinks, indicative of the potential to take excessive alcohol.
Community Protective and Risk Factors
Community Protective Factors
The protective factors that feature from the community play a contributory role in reducing the strength of the risks related to alcohol abuse. A variety of strengths and resources, if present in a community, contribute to a great extent to the reduction of risks related to alcohol abuse. What emerges from the 2022 Minnesota Student Survey Report is one of the essential protective factors: robust educational infrastructure in Minnesota. The abstinence from alcohol, which was reported at high levels, is 82.8% for Grade 11 and 97.6% for Grade 9. This hints at the crux of the school-based educational programs and awareness campaigns in developing healthy conduct (Windshield Survey, 2022). Other community-based programs that continue the efforts of the Interdisciplinary Policy Board include the Bloomington Alcohol Abuse Awareness Program, which involves interdisciplinary teams of mediators, social workers, and educators.
Another significant protective factor is the presence of robust healthcare and mental health services in the state. Treatment of abuse and help necessary in the matter of alcohol can be availed from community clinics and through the Minnesota Department of Human Services (MDH, 2023b). It provides services that include not just medical and psychological support, but it is involved in outreach and community education, which includes an essential part of prevention and early interference. The efforts—such as Place of Last Drink (POLD), adopted in more than a dozen Minnesota communities are hyper-reactive in trying to curtail alcohol abuse (MDH, 2022c). This assists in finding out and alerting potentially dangerous drinking outlets in the area by getting information on where the subjects last drank prior to having had these alcohol-related incidents.
Community Risk Factors
However, several risk factors counter these protective factors from allowing optimum health outcomes and access to other resources. For example, one of the leading risk factors is the prevailing social and cultural norms that encourage or tolerate alcohol use. This is evidenced by the high rates of binge drinking by the state, whereby 17.9% of the adults had practiced the behavior (Gloppen et al., 2022).
These norms can subvert all the efforts made in education and prevention, like, in some cases, influencing attitudes and changes in behavior toward alcohol consumption, which may be very difficult. Economic factors are also prominently included in the risk of abuse of alcohol. The cost to society of alcohol use of almost $8 billion for Minnesota in 2019 can point toward an intolerable burden on the people and state. Further economic strain among the people causes more increased use of alcohol as a form of coping mechanism, hence increasing the problem. Another challenge is the limited availability of resources, mostly in rural areas. Scarce health care and limited access to mental health services in these areas may thus deter these people from seeking their much-needed help or intervention against alcohol abuse (MDH, 2023b). In other words, this problem of access would then yield untreated alcohol-related problems with higher incidents of hospitalization and other health-related problems. Also contributed to by this difference is the variation in the educational efforts and preventive measures that exist regarding alcohol across other communities and schools. However, one cannot deny that while some schools and communities have robust programs, others will want resources or even commitment leading to effective intervention, as evidenced by the differences in the Minnesota Student Survey (2022).
Healthy People 2030 Goal and Objective
The framework Healthy People 2030 contains, in one place, the complete set of goals and objectives that target better health and well-being of communities. This is in line with the relevant goal as it relates to alcohol abuse in Minnesota: “Reduce substance abuse to protect health, safety, and quality of life for all, especially children.” One of the specific objectives includes reducing the proportion of adolescents and adults who report binge drinking in this community (Healthy People 2030, 2020). This goal is directed at the alarming statistics that emerged from the Minnesota Student Survey (2022), revealing that 17.9% of adults and some students in high schools are binge drinkers.
Public Health Intervention
A comprehensive public health intervention is proposed to address alcohol abuse in Minnesota, targeting both adolescents (grades 8-12) and adults, particularly those identified with higher rates of alcohol consumption and binge drinking. The prime approaches of the intervention are twofold: primary prevention to stop the onset of alcohol abuse and secondary prevention targeted at those who have already started experimenting with it.
In the advocacy aspect, the intervention focuses on promoting policies that restrict underage access to alcohol, an essential step in curtailing the early initiation of alcohol use among adolescents. The part of advocacy is essential in that it focuses on the promotion of policies that curtail access to alcohol by the underage, which, in the real sense, is one of the significant aspects of efforts aimed at reducing early alcohol initiation among teenagers. The other key area is policy development, such as collaboration with local businesses and schools to bring about stricter control measures regarding alcohol and a severe and constructive educational program across the board (OESE, 2020). An educational component is proposed with the intent to focus on community or population-based education that will improve the level of general public awareness about the risks associated with the abuse of alcohol and good choices regarding healthy lifestyles. These efforts aim to create a community that is more aware of health and, in turn, to reduce the prevalence and impact of alcohol abuse in the state of Minnesota.
Implementation
The implementation of this public health intervention is multi-dimensional and summarizes aspects related to the development of partnerships, educational programming, policy advocacy, and even public awareness campaigns. The development of strong partnerships is the key ingredient to any strategy. This may be done in partnership with schools, local business owners, entrepreneurs, healthcare providers, and other community-based organizations (Mushi et al., 2023). Such partnership arrangements will allow the sharing of resources, expertise, and outreach so that access to many more children is gained, thus strengthening the impact of the intervention. These are of great importance in spreading the message and, at the same time, in implementing practical measures to reduce alcohol abuse. School-based educational programs are also significant. The target of these programs was to draw the student’s attention to the problems related to alcohol abuse and a healthy lifestyle. These programs are articulating the school curriculum at the same time that they reach a critical mass of youth who need knowledge and the tools to decide on consuming alcohol.
Policy advocacy plays a critical role in this intervention. Devise and enforce policies to cap minor access to alcohol and control the promotion and advertisement of alcohol with the help of local administration (World Health Organization, 2019). Such policies are crucial in developing an environment that will favor healthy behaviors and lower the temptation and access to alcohol by susceptible populations while simultaneously carrying out effective policies in favor of the populace. It will also involve public enlightenment campaigns to sensitize other members of the community to the dangers binge drinking poses to the community and their need to undertake alcohol-free activities. The campaigns change the public perception through media and community events by developing a more health-conscious community environment.
The strategies will be supported through funding from state and local governments, a health foundation, and private donations. The project must use the material and human resources from educational institutions, healthcare agencies, and community organizations to facilitate the intervention. However, some of the challenges expected to be faced by the intervention include cultural norms that view alcohol as a regular thing, insufficient rural resources, and probable resistance from stakeholders. Some of the strategies against these barriers involve focusing on changing the attitude of the community through targeted awareness campaigns and education, applying for grants and state funding for resource-limited areas, and including all the stakeholders in the planning that shall reflect the benefits to be accrued in the long run due to the decline in alcohol abuse. These measures are essential for overcoming obstacles and ensuring the successful implementation of the intervention.
Evaluation
Evaluation of Public Health Intervention
The significant measure of success will be for the public health intervention that targets reducing alcohol abuse within the state of Minnesota. Furthermore, a reduced rate of incidences of binge drinking among adolescents and adults. These will be evaluated through annual surveys, similar to the Minnesota Student Survey, measuring changes in alcohol consumption patterns concerning frequency and quantity of binge drinking episodes. Tracking cases reported within health facilities and those reported to law enforcement will also be necessary. Its success would be recorded in a significant reduction of the cases over the intervention period, say 1-3 years. Information about the reach and effectiveness of awareness generation and education programs will also be sought through referred educational institutions and community-based organizations.
Healthy People 2030 Health Indicator
The percentage reduction of binge drinking in the target population will be the measurable health indicator for the Healthy People 2030 objective: reduce the proportion of adolescents and adults who report binge drinking. Baseline data will be obtained from sources like the Minnesota Student Survey (2022) and health department records. Such would be, for example, a reduction of 10 percent in five years, which would lower numbers of these rates by a set percentage. This is a way in which it could be possible to reach the Healthy People 2030 goal. It will be backed by following relevant indicators, such as hospital admissions related to alcohol and incidents related to DUI, which are bound to decrease with the fall in the rate of binge drinking. These indicators should be updated regularly to capture the changing public health impacts of intervention in all aspects related to the abuse of alcohol.
Conclusion
The comprehensive assessment of alcohol abuses in Minnesota underscores that this is a huge problem with significant effects on adolescents and adults. Such are thoroughly reviewed sources, including the Minnesota Student Survey and public health reports, among others, which in sum do give evidence of the fact that most, but certainly not all, are abstaining from alcoholic drinks, a worrying minority does exist that consumes these beverages in a risky way. The proposed public health intervention includes the design of a package that would entail an educational program, policy advocacy, the development of partnerships in community settings, and public awareness campaigns. The said intervention is bound to be successful by measuring through specific, quantifiable outcomes, such as rates of binge drinking and the number of related incidents. If successful in implementation and evaluation, these efforts would be of immense value in the helpful reduction of alcohol abuse within the state of Minnesota among its citizens, forwarding a healthier, safer community, part and parcel to large-scale public health goals.
References
Gloppen, K. M., Roesler, J. S., & Farley, D. M. (2022). Assessing the Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Minnesota. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 63(4), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.031
Healthy People 2030. (2020). Healthy people 2030 framework. Health.gov. https://health.gov/healthypeople/about/healthy-people-2030-framework
Issa, Y. Y., Amro, A., & Rajabi, R. K. (2020). Environmental and Social Determinants of Health in Palestine. Springer EBooks, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74365-3_22-1
Juergens, J. (2019). Genetics of Alcoholism: Hereditary Factors of Alcohol Use – Addiction Center. Addiction Center. https://www.addictioncenter.com/alcohol/genetics-of-alcoholism/
MDH. (2022a). About the MIDAS Alcohol Data – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/injury/midas/aboutalcoholdata.html
MDH. (2022b). AUD: Alcohol Use Disorder – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/alcohol/basics/aud.html
MDH. (2022c). New study shows economic and social impact of excessive drinking in Minnesota – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/news/pressrel/2022/alcohol081122.html#:~:text=About%203%25%20of%20inpatient%20hospital
MDH. (2023a). Alcohol Quick Facts – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/alcohol/data/quickfacts.html#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20alcohol%2Drelated
MDH. (2023b). Costs of Excessive Alcohol Use in Minnesota – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/alcohol/data/costs.html
MDH. (2024). Alcohol Data and Reports – MN Dept. of Health. Www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/alcohol/data/index.html
Mushi, D., Hanlon, C., Francis, J. M., Moshiro Candida, Demissie, M., & Teferra, S. (2023). Adaptation of a model for integration of interventions for alcohol use disorders in primary health care in Tanzania. BMC Primary Care, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02061-1
OESE. (2020). Title, I Improving the Academic Achievement of The Disadvantaged. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-formula-grants/school-support-and-accountability/essa-legislation-table-contents/title-i-part-a/
World Health Organization. (2019, July 10). 10 areas governments could work with to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Who.int; World Health Organization: WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/10-areas-for-national-action-on-alcohol
Windshield Survey. (2022). Alcohol Use. Statewide.
write