Introduction
The aspect of data collection is pertinent in all research studies, for that provides the basis of analysis and interpretation. As Taherdoost (2021) explains, appropriate selections for the methods and tools to use in data collection go a long way in verifying reliability in arriving at findings in a research study. The section is highlighted by outlining criteria for the study’s data collection plan, instruments, and organizational strategies to inform adaptive leadership theory and successful data technology project execution.
Data Collection Plan
Sample Data Collection Plan: Primary and Secondary Data
Consequently, the involvement will include primary and secondary data about the study. In this regard, primary data usage will represent, at best, the data from an in-depth, semi-structured interview with leaders and employees seriously involved in nurturing data technologies in the finance industry. In these interviews, the exercise will be held to examine the discussion surrounding the leadership challenges in bridging the strategy formulation and execution, behaviors of the employees that lead to failure or success, and elements positioning the organizations for failure or success in financial performance. Secondary data collection will be done through a survey administered to a larger sample of participants to triangulate findings from the interviews. On the other hand, the secondary data will include the project documentation and the financial reports retrieved from archival data to supplement the primary data. Assume also on point is the fact that a multi-method approach to data collection is appropriate, as observed by Taherdoost (2021) and Mishra & Alok (2022), since, among other things, it enables the researchers to gain an in-depth understanding of complex phenomena observable through their study.
Instruments
The Implementation of Data Collection Tool. Implementing an in-depth, semi-structured interview schedule with research questions is the major tool for data collection. This will further encourage providing honest and valuable information to the respondents about their experiences and perceptions of the public transport service by allowing them to be free in their disclosure. To what extent do they cover the difficulties of bridging theory with practice in strategy formulation and execution? Their works elicit such issues as building employee behaviors that yield success or failure and those factors that position organizations for success or failure in financial performance. The interview guide will be contained in the manuscript appendix.
Secondary Data Collection: Secondary data will be supplemented by a survey that will be administered in the course of the research design. The survey questionnaire will consist of a balanced set of open and closed-ended questions regarding the listed research questions and themes. This way, I will get a unique opportunity to collect data from a bigger portion of the population under study, thus hoping to term the expected outcome closer to being termed ‘generalizable.’ The survey instrument link is attached in the appendix section. The obtained data will be used for triangulation (Bans-Akutey & Tiimub, 2021).
Archival Data: These will include documents relevant to the project at hand, complemented by organizational financial reports, which are directed to give concrete and elaborate background information and validation on the primary data. This data will determine how adaptive leadership is related to the success of their project execution and organizational financial performances. The use of archival data will be within the triangulation of the research under study and not for primary research.
Data Organization
The data gathered from interviews, surveys, and archival sources will be systemized and managed through a systematized procedure. The interview data will be transcribed verbatim and filed electronically for personalized security. The survey will be displayed with statistical precision on a sheet or software program. The archival data shall be digitized and filed securely. All the information shall appropriately be labeled and categorized according to the nature of its source, the timeline of the collection, and the themes or variables at the point.
Validation of the data collected from the interview participants is done through member checking. It involves summarizing what the interviewer said during the interview and then giving it back to them so that they can check whether that is what they could represent. This may also be followed up to further shed light on any existing ambiguities or newly emerging themes that require deeper exploration (Nassaji, 2020; Kiger and Varpio, 2020).
This is also undertaken through multi-measure strategies of data collection involving interviews, research surveys, and data on various archived data technology projects. Therefore, it is a multi-measure data collection method to research adaptive leadership theory on initial and research questions about data technology projects concerning the final execution. The designs of the instruments, including the interview guides and the surveys according to the research questions, are also included. The data should be in a position of systematic organization with member checking and even follow-up interviews to assure its trustworthiness. Such comprehensive data collection yields a solid ground for analysis and interpretation.
Data Analysis
Introduction
This was also combined with in-depth research to be undertaken where raw data translated into significant insights could address the research questions. According to Mishra and Alok (2022), “The nature of the data must guide the selection of appropriate techniques for data analysis and the aims towards which such research is geared. The methods described were quality analysis techniques of the manner of coding, theme development interpretations, and the way the data is represented. Besides these, the triangulation methods and translated data analysis—that is, cutoff and adaptation rule—all set up the rigors of data science.
Qualitative Analysis
Quality research will enable the making of patterns and tools to develop themes that may occur regarding the data collected from the in-depth reflection of in-depth interviews. The first step in data analysis is the review to check for the accuracy of transcriptions from the audio files. A qualitative device is a means by which a reader can re-read the transcripts, take a close look, and build on the overall patterns of the experiences and perspectives of the participant (Kiger & Varpio, 2020).
The coding and theme development process will involve a systematic approach to identifying and categorizing relevant data segments. Initial coding will be conducted by assigning descriptive labels to chunks of data that capture the essence of the participant’s responses. As the coding progresses, similar codes will be grouped to form categories, and relationships between categories will be examined to identify emergent themes. The constant comparative method will refine the themes and ensure they are grounded in the data (Kiger & Varpio, 2020).
Interpretations will be developed with the identified themes, and a supporting feature will be provided that includes direct quotes from the participants. The researcher provides a richly descriptive account of the experiences and perspectives of the participants embedded in a broader context consisting of adaptive leadership theory, specifically with data technology project execution success. It will improve the credibility of the interpretations’ potential cultural range adaptation (transferability). (Nassaji, 2020; H.).
The data will be represented using visual aids such as tables and figures in such a manner as to convey the findings clearly and straightforwardly. The themes will be used further to elaborate with excerpts from the interview transcripts and an example from the participant’s voice. As Halkias and Neubert (2020) and Nassaji (2020) noted, further discussion is imperative for research to include a narrative account of the findings and how the themes connect to bring out relevance to the answer.
Analysis for Triangulation
Triangulation is a strategy that involves looking at the same phenomenon under study from other people’s perspectives. This study will triangulate the data to help compare and contrast the information derived from the interviews, surveys, and archival data sources. This approach is meant to underscore how much better and more thorough a handle is on emergent and complex cases and phenomena under investigation, hence strongly bringing out the areas of convergence and divergence in the data.
The choice of triangulation methods will be based on the nature of the data collected and the research questions. For example, the survey data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared to the themes identified in the interview data to assess how consistent the findings are across different data sources. Archival data, such as project documentation and financial reports, will be examined to provide context and support for the primary data sources (Halkias & Neubert, 2020).
It will draw towards the patterns and relationships that the interrelationships of the different data sources produce or bring out in-depth points of agreement and disagreement. The study will critically sift the strengths and limitations of the various data sources and establish their contribution to better comprehending the matter under study. There will also be further triangulation, including critical reflection, where the researcher returns to their assumptions and biases, considering if it might have tainted data interpretation (Bans-Akutey & Tiimub, 2021).
Generally, the data from the study will be analyzed depending on the likelihood of specific themes together with patterns from the interview data with the support of the survey and archival data in triangulation. The themes’ coding and development will be systematically grounded along the data. The interpretations will mimic the identified themes by using direct quotes from the given participants. Data representation uses all justified visual aids and narrative accounts to clarify and brief the findings. It is worth the details of what to note that apart from that, there will be an analysis of triangulation that shall be put in place to increase the credibility and truthfulness of the findings, discussion in the plot patterns and relationships that will be at last between the varied sources of data. A comprehensive data analytical strategy will be formed to provide a strong foundation, meaningfully drawing inferences for the contribution of knowledge from cases conducted in the new arenas of adaptive leadership theory and data technology project execution successes.
Reliability and Validity
Introduction
Reliability and validity are essential components of any research study, as they demonstrate the trustworthiness and credibility of the findings. In qualitative research, reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the research process. In contrast, validity refers to the accuracy and truthfulness of the findings (Validity and Reliability within Qualitative Research for the Caring Sciences, 2020). This section will discuss the strategies employed in this study to ensure reliability and validity, including using case study method authorities and bracketing techniques to address researcher bias.
Reliability
Reliability: Qualitative research relies on stability and the predictability of the research process. There shall be several approaches the research shall use to ensure the study is reliable. First, it remains the researcher’s perception to create a comprehensive research protocol to guide the whole work regarding data collection and analysis procedures, ensuring openness and reproducibility of the entire research process (Halkias & Neubert, 2020).
Secondly, the participant audit trail will involve making decisions and taking action. Data collection, process records, and any changes to the research design in the study are included. In an audit trial, evidence of consistency and dependability will be available about the diverse activities carried out throughout the research process (Mishra & Alok, 2022).
Thirdly, peer debriefing will be carried out by having a forum to discuss the procedures and findings of the research with another colleague and mentor who is conversant with the topic being worked on and the research method. Such opportunities will ensure that the researcher’s ideas are challenged and critically reviewed, making them very credible (Halkias & Neubert, 2020).
Last but not least, triangulation and a mixed approach with the availability of different data sources, including interviews, questionnaires, and archival information, will lend more weight to the study’s dependability. Triangulation allows the researcher to view the phenomenon from several aspects and get both convergence and divergence.
Validity
In qualitative research, validity is used to explain the ascent to accuracy and truth of the findings. Therefore, validity will be assured by prolonged exposure to reality and maintaining contact between the researcher and the people for whom the research has implications. As such, actions toward research participants are likely to gather authentic data that portrays the real experiences and views of the research participants (Halkias & Neubert, 2020).
The current study will maintain member checking, where the research findings are brought back to the participants to be informed and confirmed by them. The independent participants might ensure the exactness of the researcher’s interpretations by giving added insights or thorough clarifications (Mishra and Alok, 2022).
Thirdly, there is peer review, where the research findings are shared with other workmates or researchers to look into them and critically give the necessary responses. This, in return, will enable the researcher to receive some external validation of results and identify any weaknesses or biases that cropped up during the entire process of research (Halkias and Neubert 2020).
Finally, the researcher will use a thick description, providing a detailed and contextualized account of the research findings. This will allow readers to evaluate the transferability of the findings to other contexts and populations, enhancing the study’s validity (Mishra & Alok, 2022).
Bracketing
Qualitative research uses the bracketing technique to advance the credibility of its claim. “The researcher will adopt some of the bracketing techniques to reduce the influence of his/her assumptions and preconceptions in the research process and its findings” (Nassaji, 2020).
First, reflexive research will be carried out to make a critical definition by examining the researchers’ predispositions and assumptions that impact the research. This will be fed to a reflexive journal, which documents feelings, thought processes, and reactions throughout the study to help them note the decisions and actions made in response to potential biases (Kiger & Varpio, 2020).
The second is the peer debrief, where the discussion is made with the biases and assumptions between the researcher and the external colleague or mentor to challenge the researcher’s thoughts. Such debate may eventually point out possible blind spots or preconceived notions that might have taken over the research process (Nassaji, 2020).
Finally, it involves member checking where the research findings are shared with the participants for more views about their accuracy and interpretations. With clarified views ahead, other methods of data triangulation open up to the participants in acquiring more information regarding the subject under inquiry.
In summary, this study will employ many strategies to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings realized in the research. In this respect, a case study method authorities and bracketing techniques will ensure researcher bias is not imposed in the research. Developing a research protocol, keeping an audit trail, peer debriefing, and data source triangulation will ensure reliability. Therefore, this research will attain validity through the long engagement period with the participants, member checking, peer review, and thick descriptions of the research findings. Mechanisms that can be used to assist in minimizing the influence the research exerts include reflexivity, peer debriefing, and member checking. By accepting these methodologies, the study will convey reliable and creditable findings, making possible the realization of further knowledge in the science of adaptive leadership theory in executing projects for data technology success.
References
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2020). Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator. International Labour Review, 159(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12160
Apenko, S., & Chernobaeva, G. (2021, April). The influence of complex adaptive leadership on the efficiency of business management. In International Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance (p. 17). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9kDQCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA17&dq=+Apenko,+S.,+%26+Chernobaeva,+G.+(2016,+April).+The+influence+of+complex+adaptive+leadership+on+the+efficiency+of+business+management.+In+International+Conference+on+Management,+Leadership+%26+Governance+(p.+17).+Academic+Conferences+International+Limited.&ots=vB5w5S63aO&sig=LDbSNQkqZ2UogeGF334xH-M2HZU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Bennett, Nathan and Lemoine, James, What VUCA Means for You. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92, No. 1/2, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389563
Cheah, S., Bellavitis, C., & Muscio, A. (2021). The impact of technology complexity on the financial performance of R&D projects: Evidence from Singapore. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 431-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09777-7
Dunn, R. (2020). Adaptive leadership: Leading through complexity. International studies in educational administration, 48(1), 31-38. https://edu.thecommonwealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ISEA-2020-481.pdf#page=37
Validity and Reliability within Qualitative Research for the Caring Sciences http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.or.
Niu, Y., Ying, L., Yang, J., Bao, M., & Sivaparthipan, C. B. (2021). Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics. Information Processing & Management, 58(6), 102725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102725
Niemand, T., Rigtering, J. C., Kallmünzer, A., Kraus, S., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Digitalization in the financial industry: A contingency approach of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic vision on digitalization. European management journal, 39(3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.008
Huang, J. Y., Jiang, R., & Chang, J. Y. (2023). The Effects of Transformational and Adaptive Leadership on Dynamic Capabilities: Digital Transformation Projects. Project Management Journal, 87569728231165896. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231165896
Rosenfeld, S. J. (2020). Institutional Review Board Assessment—Balancing Efficiency and Quality. Ochsner journal, 20(1), 50-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0075
Sherwood, G., & Parsons, S. (2021). Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: Learning from social science researchers. Research ethics, 17(4), 448-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211014941
Morgan, T., & Anokhin, S. (2020). Strategy Formulation and Execution in the Digital Age: Challenges and New Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 582-606.
Halkias, Daphne and Neubert, Michael, Extension of Theory in Leadership and Management Studies Using the Multiple Case Study Design (April 27, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3586256 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3586256
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, 2, 1-6. https://www.academia.edu/51125516/Triangulation_in_Research
Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research; a step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1), 10-38. https://hal.science/Hal-03741847/
Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319207471_HANDBOOK_OF_RESEARCH_METHODOLOGY
de Lavoisier, A. L. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGNS IN SOCIAL WORK, 298. https://doi.org/10.7312/thye20116
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S.E. (2020). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106007
write