Introduction
A business employing health and safety risk assessments must appraise its advantages to contribute to business advancement critically. This essay comprehensively looks at the strategic value of risk identification, which ranges from understanding potentially hazardous conditions to risk rating and appropriate measure application. By blending the ISO 45001 models and discussions and touching on the functional responsibilities of health and safety practitioners, this research employs the broader implications and concealed advantages of the risk evaluation process. A holistic investigation of its three main elements offers a basic foundation that other people may use to accomplish great things.
Main Discussion
Understanding the Health and Safety Risk Assessment Process
As cited by Sanni-Anibire et al. (2020), the health and safety risk assessment process includes primarily identifying hazards, evaluating the risks based on the hazards, and implementing control measures to help curb the associated risks. The working environment may differ depending on the industry. For example, in a manufacturing environment, such hazards could be machinery accidents, chemical exposure, and ergonomic issues (Sanni-Anibire et al. 2020). Risk assessment is aimed at evaluating the possibility that the hazards will exist, which the organization can measure and put more control measures into these which can occur.
The HSE from last year’s statistical data and risk assessment gives an idea of how the prevalence of workplace accidents is prevented. According to Health and Safety Executive (HSE) statistics for 2020/21, 693,000 non-fatal injuries to workers were reported by employers, resulting in a loss of 1.6 million working days due to occupation-related diseases and physical accidents (Health and Safety Executive, 2021). On the other hand, according to ILOSTAT (2024), among the employers who classify occupational health and safety as the top 3 most critical issues, the accident rate is lower, and so is absenteeism. For example, according to the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work research, firms that proved successful in risk assessment went through a 30% decrease in accidents (Dyreborg et al., 2022).
The Role of Health and Safety Practitioners in Risk Assessment
Unlike the role of risk assessment practitioners within the organization where their roles are paramount. They are accountable for discovering the resources of potential risks, evaluating the level of associated risks, and implementing the controlling measures to eliminate the identified risks. To illustrate, at a construction site, health and safety specialists may look into the functionality of the scaffolding constructions, machines’ functions, and electrical installations to determine the presence of hazards and estimate risks associated with every risky factor.
Health and safety workers’ appraisal data by the International Labour Organization (ILO) shows that safety practitioners are a key link for reducing workplace accidents (ILO, 2021). ILO (2021) reports that effective risk assessment techniques at factories, among other businesses, led to a 20% reduction in occupational accidents over the last 10 years. Additionally, workplaces with certified professionals within the health and wellbeing space are statistically confirmed to have lower rates of accidents and be in full compliance with occupational health and safety laws (Karanikas and Hasan, 2022).
The active engagement of health and safety specialists will be undertaken to implement continuous safety improvements by applying exact risk analysis methods, increasing the organizational safety culture.
Business Benefits of the Health and Safety Risk Assessment Process
Cost Reduction and Financial Benefits
The efficient risk evaluation tools could help reduce additional organizational expenses and benefit the company in the long run. By identifying and eliminating workplace risks, companies can minimize the chances of accidents, employees around the factory getting hurt, and the costs associated with many compensation claims (Health and Safety Executive, 2019). Moreover, preventative risk management can lead to low premiums on insurance and no need for a high degree of property damage repair or equipment repair expenses. This proves, for instance, that the HSE study brings to light that businesses that invest £1 in safety measures can get up to £2.20 returns on a reduction in cost and increase productivity (Health and Safety Executive, 2019). As for risk assessment, prioritized, it must certainly bring to savings a huge number of financial resources and preserve organizational longevity.
Legal Compliance and Reduced Liability
As cited by Bakar, Ramli, and Hassan (2019), using proper risk assessment monitoring, the company would be able to meet the best health and safety regulations, allowing it to be supported. It would play the role of the risk of paying regulatory penalties and fines. By identifying and eliminating potential threats, organizations display readiness and steadfastness to offer secure work sites to employees, contractors, and visitors alike. Also, risk management control puts in place practices that guard against employees’ endangering lawsuits or costly legal proceedings from accidents or injuries at the workplace (Jain et al. 2021). Through risk evaluation, companies reduce legal risks, and at the same time, their good names as reliable corporate citizens remain steadfast and well-established in the industry and the business community (Jain et al. 2021).
Improved Employee Morale and Productivity
Humanized employees, aware of the impact of their actions, play a vital role in the decision-making process. If staff take security and comfort in their work environment with the notion that they are valued and recognized, they are more interested, ambitious, and pleased. According to Shad et al. (2019), through risk assessment and control systems implementation, organizations express their willingness for their employee’s safety and allow them to work confidently and safely, which, in turn, helps create a positive corporate climate. Consequently, the workers’ efficiency rises as they are less absent from work, and the staff attrition rates hit their lowest. As cited by Landoll (2021), when the staff believes that they are sponsored and uncapped, they are likely to push harder for the organization’s vision, which is the backbone of the productivity and growth of the enterprise.
Enhanced Reputation and Stakeholder Confidence
As cited by Renn (2020), developing a sound risk assessment process will be a step that will advance an alliance’s image and increase the confidence of all the stakeholders. By ensuring the safety and welfare of their employees, customers, and the wider community, businesses not only show that their concern goes beyond their bottom line to meet the needs of our common society but also demonstrate in a real way their responsible corporate citizenship. This being said, risk management, which is a proactive approach, minimizes workplace accidents and incidents and, on the other hand, presents the organisation as a trusted and worthy corporate leader (Hubbard, 2020). In this case, shareholders, customers, and regulatory bodies shall develop the confidence that the entity’s everyday operations will remain consistent and sustainable in the long run.
Innovation and Continuous Improvement
As cited by de Araújo Lima, Crema and Verbano (2020), adhering to risk assessment models brings up a culture of innovation and constant evolution in the organizations. Through a persistent and constant search for hazards, companies are driven to incorporate and develop new safety products, procedures, and practices in the market. In that case, the feedback mechanism associated with risk assessment means that risk evaluation is a never-ending process that involves the constant improvement of safety practices, which leads to the overall development of the workplace safety benchmark. Companies that put risk assessment high on their agenda intend to lead the way in innovations and developments to move ahead with the upcoming risks and new regulatory requirements so that they can prove sustainable in their processes (Landoll, 2021).
Risk Mitigation and Future Preparedness
According to Ostrom and Wilhelmsen (2019), risk assessment processes play an exceptional role in allowing organizations to bring in effective current risk mitigation and future preparations. Through thorough screening and informed analysis of possible hazards, organizations are better positioned to set preventive strategies into motion to prevent an incident or an extensive accident from happening. In addition, risk assessment grants scenario planning and drills on contingency preparation, helping organizations to project into the future and deal with new risks (Godfrey et al. 2020). Through dedication to risk intelligence and site readiness, businesses create an umbrella for surviving uncertainties and rock against the turbulences in the dynamic business environment.
Hidden Benefits and Unforeseen Advantages
The most apparent benefits of the risk assessment processes are seen notwithstanding the additional gains such process reveals, which the organization neither knew nor considered (Shad et al. 2019). Some of how these changes can manifest in a safe workplace can be simplified by improved interdepartmental communication, greater team spirit, and a stronger sense of shared responsibility for safety (Shad et al. 2019). In addition, the risk assessment process creates a transparent and responsible culture in the workplace, contributing to the growing trust among the employees and stakeholders. Additionally, through brazenly weighing risks, organizations can spot new business options, ameliorate existing processes, and rationally shape strategies for future growth (Godfrey et al. 2020). They work quietly behind the scenes as part of the whole organizational safeguard program, which shapes the market competitiveness of the industry.
Incorporating Relevant Theories
The use of pertinent theories and approaches almost doubles the efficacy of risk assessment procedures inside organizations. For example, according to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory, meeting employees’ basic physiological needs and ensuring safety, which guarantees protection against hunger and danger, accomplishes higher needs, including self-esteem, self-actualization, and so on (Reyes, 2023). Factor two of Herzberg’s Positive and Negative Motivators is the hygiene factors; although they do not result in satisfaction, they prevent dissatisfaction; for example, workplace safety can be applied here (Thant and Chang, 2021). Take these theories into account to formulate a risk management strategy that can deal with not only the dangerousness of the physical environment around you but also the cognitive processes and health of employees. On the other hand, according to Lokman et al. (2022), vroom’s Expectancy Theory connects to the idea of employees being motivated through their perceived rewards and outcomes derived from the risk assessment activities. Thus, a feedback and engagement strategy is key in allowing employees to participate actively in risk assessment. One such theory refers to the individual’s perception and trust within the workplace (Lokman et al. 2022). This ratification process augments risk assessment inquiries and develops a desirable and work-compatible environment.
ISO 45001 and Its Implications
According to Neag, Ivascu, and Draghici (2020), the standard ISO-45001 provides a set of principles to be understood by occupational health and safety management systems. Its enactment underscores a duty to safeguard the employee’s and stakeholders’ physical and psychological wellnesses. The alignment of such organizations with ISO 45001 standards enables a systematic assessment of risks and their control. Consequently, the risks of occupational incidents and accidents are significantly reduced, contributing to workplace safety enhancement (Morgado, Silva and Fonseca, 2019). Also, under ISO 45001, commitment to constant improvement is manifested in the requirement for organisations to conduct regular risk assessment reviews to align with altered circumstances and those new risks (Morgado, Silva and Fonseca, 2019). Implementing ISO 45001 allows the organization to demonstrate its legal and regulatory compliance. It also improves its reputation with its stakeholders, gives the organization more credence, and opens a wider global trade market. ISO 45001 certification means compliance with the best practices, improvement goals, and lasting achievement at the organizational level (Morgado, Silva and Fonseca, 2019).
Conclusions
In essence, this risk assessment procedure provides businesses with a multi-dimensional solution, from reducing costs to following the rules and regulations to boosting employee morale and innovation. Applying the theories relevant to your organization and adopting specific standards like ISO 45001 will strengthen your risk management procedures and develop a set of safety and health principles for your company. Conversely, the intuitive fact can only be noticed if the risk assessment strategies are revised persistently and approved. From the risk evaluation processes themselves, organizations can improve the safety of the workforce, handle business risks, and ensure successful long-term business development in the ever-evolving market.
References
Bakar, N.A.A., Ramli, W.M.W. and Hassan, N.H., (2019). The internet of things in healthcare: an overview, challenges and model plan for security risks management process. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (IJEECS), 15(1), pp.414-420. http://eprints.utm.my/88841/1/NurAzaliahBakar2019_TheInternetofThingsinHealthcare.pdf
de Araújo Lima, P.F., Crema, M. and Verbano, C., (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European management journal, 38(1), pp.78-94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237319300751
Dyreborg, J., Lipscomb, H.J., Nielsen, K., Törner, M., Rasmussen, K., Frydendall, K.B., Bay, H., Gensby, U., Bengtsen, E., Guldenmund, F. and Kines, P. (2022). Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, [online] 18(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1234.
Godfrey, P.C., Lauria, E., Bugalla, J. and Narvaez, K., (2020). Strategic risk management: New tools for competitive advantage in an uncertain age. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Health and Safety Executive (2019). Benefits and costs: Leading health and safety at work. [online] Hse.gov.uk. Available at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/leadership/benefits.htm [Accessed 16 Mar. 2024].
Health and Safety Executive (2021). Health and safety statistics. [online] Hse.gov.uk. Available at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/ [Accessed 16 Mar. 2024].
Hubbard, D.W., (2020). The failure of risk management: Why it’s broken and how to fix it. John Wiley & Sons.
ILO (2021). WHO/ILO: Almost 2 million people die from work-related causes each year. [online] www.ilo.org. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_819705/lang–en/index.htm [Accessed 16 Mar. 2024].
ILOSTAT (2024). Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH). [online] ILOSTAT. Available at: https://ilostat.ilo.org/resources/concepts-and-definitions/description-occupational-safety-and-health-statistics/ [Accessed 16 Mar. 2024].
Jain, A., Hassard, J., Leka, S., Di Tecco, C. and Iavicoli, S., (2021). The role of occupational health services in psychosocial risk management and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing at work. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(7), p.3632. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3632
Karanikas, N. and Hasan, S.M.T., (2022). Occupational Health & Safety and other worker wellbeing areas: Results from labour inspections in the Bangladesh textile industry. Safety Science, 146, p.105533. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753521003763
Landoll, D., (2021). The security risk assessment handbook: A complete guide for performing security risk assessments. CRC press.
Landoll, D., (2021). The security risk assessment handbook: A complete guide for performing security risk assessments. CRC press.
Lokman, A., Hassan, F., Ustadi, Y.A., Rahman, F.A.A., Zain, Z.M. and Rahmat, N.H., (2022). Investigating motivation for learning via Vroom’s Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), pp.504-530. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noor-Rahmat-2/publication/357826859_Investigating_Motivation_for_Learning_Via_Vroom’s_Theory/links/61e14a2f5779d35951a8466d/Investigating-Motivation-for-Learning-Via-Vrooms-Theory.pdf
Morgado, L., Silva, F.J.G. and Fonseca, L.M., (2019). Mapping occupational health and safety management systems in Portugal: outlook for ISO 45001: 2018 adoption. Procedia manufacturing, 38, pp.755-764. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978920301049
Neag, P.N., Ivascu, L. and Draghici, A., (2020). A debate on issues regarding the new ISO 45001: 2018 standard adoption. In MATEC web of conferences (Vol. 305, p. 00002). EDP Sciences. https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2020/01/matecconf_sesam20_00002/matecconf_sesam20_00002.html
Ostrom, L.T. and Wilhelmsen, C.A., (2019). Risk assessment: tools, techniques, and their applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Renn, O., (2020). Risk communication: Insights and requirements for designing successful communication programs on health and environmental hazards. In Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 80-98). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003070726-5/risk-communication-insights-requirements-designing-successful-communication-programs-health-environmental-hazards-ortwin-renn
Reyes, T.J., (2023). Meeting Students’ Needs to Improve Motivation and Higher Academic Achievement in Rio Grande Valley Schools.
Sanni-Anibire, M.O., Mahmoud, A.S., Hassanain, M.A. and Salami, B.A., (2020). A risk assessment approach for enhancing construction safety performance. Safety science, 121, pp.15-29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575351731559X
Shad, M.K., Lai, F.W., Fatt, C.L., Klemeš, J.J. and Bokhari, A., (2019). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner production, 208, pp.415-425. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618331366
Thant, Z.M. and Chang, Y., (2021). Determinants of public employee job satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s two factor theory. Public Organization Review, 21(1), pp.157-175. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11115-020-00481-6
write